BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU

Birol Gülnar; Mete Kazaz

EN TR

INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION IN SPORT CLUBS AS AN ORGANIZATION

Öz

Although there have been many studies on interpersonal and organizational communication satisfaction in western countries, this is a new concept in Turkey. In this study, interpersonal communication satisfactions of soccer players who are trained by foreign and domestic coaches (technical directors) were comparatively investigated. The data of this study was collected by a questionnaire that was applied to 50 soccer players that play in two different teams. These teams were Ankaraspor which has foreign coach and Konyaspor which has domestic coach. The questionnaire was prepared by using the Interpersonal Communication Inventory developed by Hecht (1978a). Nonparametric analysis indicated that both of the teams’ soccer players’ interpersonal communication satisfaction levels are medium. On the other hand interpersonal communication satisfaction levels of soccer players of Konyaspor Team were significantly higher than soccer players of Ankaraspor Team. Also a negative meaningful relation has been found between interpersonal communication satisfaction and duration of being professional soccer player and the age of soccer players of Konyaspor Team. Finally, soccer players that have university and high school degrees have significantly higher interpersonal communication satisfaction levels than soccer players that have primary school degrees.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Interpersonal communication satisfaction,football,foreign and domestic technique directors

BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU

Öz

Bireylerarası ve örgütsel iletişim doyumu ile ilgili Batı’da pek çok çalışma olmasına rağmen kavram Türkiye için yenidir. Bu çalışmada yabancı ve yerli çalıştırıcı (teknik direktörler)larla çalışan futbolcuların teknik direktörleriyle kurdukları iletişimden kaynaklanan bireylerarası iletişim doyumları karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Futbolcuların bireylerarası iletişim doyum düzeyleri teknik direktörleriyle kurdukları iletişim sonucunda ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri iki farklı takımda oynayan 50 futbolcuya uygulanan anketle elde edilmiştir. Bu takımlar yabancı teknik direktörle çalışan Ankaraspor ve yerli teknik direktörle çalışan Konyaspordur. Anket, Hecht (1978a) tarafından geliştirilen Bireylerarası İletişim Ölçeği’nden faydanılarak hazırlanmıştır. Nonparametrik analizler, her iki takım futbolcularının iletişim doyum düzeylerinin orta düzeyde olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Diğer yandan Konyasporlu futbolcuların bireylerarası iletişim doyum düzeyleri anlamlı şekilde Ankarasporlu futbolculardan daha yüksektir. Ayrıca Konyasporlu futbolcuların bireylerarası iletişim doyumları ile profesyonel futbolcu olma süreleri ve yaşları arasında negatif yönlü, anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Son olarak, üniversite ve lise mezunu futbolcular ilköğretim mezunu olanlara göre anlamlı şekilde daha yüksek bireylerarası iletişim doyum düzeyine sahiptir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bireylerarası iletişim doyumu,futbol,yabancı ve yerli teknik direktörler

Kaynakça

Ahmad, Azhar H. (2006). “Auditing Communication Satisfaction among Academic Staff: An Approach to Managing Academic Excellence.” The Business Review Cambridge. 5 (1): 330-333.
Area, Ronald G. (1978). Organizational Communication and Faculty Satisfaction in Institutions of Higher Education. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University.
Athanasios, Laios (2001). “Communication in Greek Sports Sciences.” Corporate Communications. 6 (2): 102-106
Athanasios, Laios (2005). “Communication Problems in Professional Sports: The Case of Greece.” Corporate Communications. 10 (3): 252-256
Bakan, İsmail ve Büyükbeşe, Tuba (2004). “Örgütsel İletişim İle İş Tatmini Unsurları Arasındaki İlişkiler: Akademik Örgütler İçin Bir Alan Araştırması.” Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi. 7: 1-30
Bambacas, Mary ve Patrickson, Maraget (2008). “Interpersonal Communication Skills That Enhance Organisational Commitment.” Journal of Communication Management. 12 (1): 51-72 Beauchamp, Mark., Maclachlan, Alan ve Lothian, Andrew (2005). “Communication Within Sport Teams: Jungian References And Group Dynamics.” The Sport Psychologist. 19 (2): 203 Berman, Stuart J. ve Hellweg, Susan A. (1989). “Perceived Supervisor Communication Competence And Supervisor Satisfaction as a Function of Quality Circle Participation.” The Journal of Business Communication. 26 (2): 104-119 Biggers, Thompson ve Masterson, John T. (1984). “Communication Apprehension as a Personality Trait: An Emotional Defense of a Concept.” Communication Monographs. 51 (4): 381-390 Bush, John B. ve Frohman, Alan L. (1991). “Communication in a “Network” Organization”. Organizational Dynamics. 20: 23-35 Byrne, Zinta S. ve LeMay, Elaine (2006). “Different Media for Organizational Communication: Perceptions of Quality and Satisfaction.” Journal of Business and Psychology. 21 (2): 149-173 Clampitt, Phillip G. (1983). Communication and Productivity. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Kansas.
Decker, Frederic H. (1997). “Occupational and Nonoccupational Factors in Job Satisfaction and Psychological Distress Among Nurses.” Research in Nursing and Health. 20: 453-464.
Downs, Cal W. ve Hazen, Michael D. (1977). “A Factor Analytic Study of Communication Satisfaction.” Journal of Business Communication. 14 (3): 63- 73
Eroğlu, Erhan ve Özkan, Gülden (2009). “Örgüt Kültürü Ve İletişim Doyumu İle Bireysel Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Uygulama Örneği.” Selçuk İletişim, 5 (4): 50-61.
Ehlers, Lindsay N. (2003). The Relationship of Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Self-Reported Absenteeism. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ohio: Miami University.

Francisca, Ovadje O. (1996). Employee Organizational Commitment: Its Relationship with Communication Satisfaction and Performance. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Spain: Universidad de Navara.
Glatfelter, Angela (2000). The Influence of Supervisor’s Interpersonal Communication Competence on Worker Satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fullerton: California State University.
Glauser, Michael J. ve Tullar, William L. (1985). “Citizen Satisfaction with Police/Officer Interaction: Implications for the Changing Role of Police Organizations.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 70 (3): 514-527.
Goris, José R. (2007). “Effects of Satisfaction with Communication on the Relationship Between Individual-Job Congruence and Job Performance/Satisfaction.” Journal of Management Development. 26 (8): 737-752.
Goris, José R., Vaught, Bobby C. ve Pettit, John D. Jr. (2000). “Effects of Communication Direction on Job Performance and Satisfaction: A Moderated Regression Analysis.” The Journal of Business Communication. 37 (4): 348- 364
Gross, Lena G. (2004). E-Mail: Its Effects on Relational Maintenance and Communication Satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Missouri: Central Missouri State University.
Gülnar, Birol (2007a). Örgütlerde İletişim ve İş Doyumu. İstanbul: Literatürk Yayınları. Gülnar, Birol (2007b). “The Relationship Between Communication Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction: A Survey among Selcuk University Research Assistants.” Fifth International Symposium Communication in The Millenium, May 16-18 2007, (Edited by: Erkan Yüksel), 190-205 Bloomington-United States of America: Indiana University School of Journalism.
Gülnar, Birol (2009). “İletişim Doyumu Boyutları ve Örgütlenme Yapısı İlişkisi.” Selçuk İletişim. 5 (4): 62-82
Hecht, Michael L. (1978a). “Measures of Communication Satisfaction.” Human Communication Research. 4 (4): 350-368.
Hecht, Michael L. (1978b). “Toward a Conceptualization of Communication Satisfaction.” Quarterly Journal of Speech. 64 (1): 47-62.
Hecht, Michael L. (1978c). “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Satisfaction.” Human Communication Research. 4 (3): 253- 264.
Hilgermann, Hans R. (1998). Communication Satisfacton, Goal Setting, Job Satisfaction, Concertive Control, and Effectiveness in Self-Managing Teams. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of Maine.
Hsu, Shu-hua (2002). Internal Marketing in the Hospitality Industry: Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Michigan: Eastern Michigan University.
Hunt, Gary T. ve Ebeling, Rudy E. (1983). “The Impact of a Communication Intervention on Work Unit Productivity and Employee Satisfaction.” Journal of Applied Communication Research. 11 (1): 57-68.
Infante, Dominick A. ve Gorden, William I. (1981). “Similarities and Differences in the Communication Styles of Superiors and Subordinates: Relations to Subordinate Satisfaction.” Communication Quarterly. 30 (1): 67-71.
Infante, Dominick A. ve Gorden, William I. (1989). “Argumantativeness and Affirming Communicator Style as Predictors of Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction With Subordinates.” Communication Quarterly. 37 (2): 81-90.
Infante, Dominick A. ve Gorden, William I. (1991). “How Employees See The Boss: Test of an Argumentative and Affirming Model of Supervisors’ Communicative Behavior.” Western Journal of Speech Communication. 55 (3): 294-304
Jain, Harish C. (1973). “Supervisory Communication and Performance in Urban Hospitals.” Journal of Communication. 23 (1): 103-117
Johlke, Mark C. (1997). The Influence of Sales Manager-Salesperson Communication Characteristics Upon Salesperson Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction, and Performance. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Texas Tech University.
Kirtley, Michelle D. (1999). The Influence of Interpersonal Communication Variables on Group Attraction and Group Communication Satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Louisiana State University.
Kongchan, Ananchai (1985). Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, And Organizational Commitment of Business College Faculty. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Arizona State University.
Lausic, Domagoj; Tennebaum, Gershon; Eccles, David; Jeong, Allan ve Johnson, Tristan (2009). “Intrateam Communication And Performance In Doubles Tenis.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 80 (2): 281-290
Mahoe, Stacie (2007). “Five Ways to Improve Communication with Your Players.” Coach and Athletic Director. 76 (7): 44.
Peltokorpi, Vesa (2006). “The Impact of Relational Diversity and Socio-Cultural Context on Interpersonal Communication: Nordic Subsidiaries in Japan.” Asian Business and Management. 5 (3): 333-356.
Pincus, David J. (1986). “Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance.” Human Communication Research. 12 (3): 395-419.
Purvis, Richard G. (1997). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship among School Superintendent Communicator Style, Communicator Image, and Channels of Communication on Board President Satisfaction. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Texas Tech University.
Rodwell, John J., Kienzle, René ve Shadur, Mark A. (1998). “The Relationships among Work-Related Perceptions Employee Attitudes, and Employee Performance: The Integral Role of Communication.” Human Resource Management. 37 (3&4): 277-293.
Rubin, Rebecca B. ve Rubin, Alan M. (1989). “Communication Apprehension and Satisfaction in Interpersonel Relationships.” Communication Research Reports. 6 (1): 13-20.
Shapiro, Irving S. (1984). “Executive Forum: Managerial Communication the View from the Inside.” California Management Review. 27 (1): 157-172.
Snyder, Robert A. ve Morris, James H. (1984). “Organizational Communication and Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 69: 461-465.
Spitzberg, Brian H. ve Hecht, Michael L. (1984). “A Component Model of Relational Competence.” Human Communication Research. 10 (4): 575-599.
Stiller, J.L., Gould, D.R. ve Ostrowski, J.A. (2007). “Strategies for Improving Communication and Motivational Skills of Athletic Trainers.” Journal of Athletic Training. 42 (2): 73.
Townsley, Jennifer M. (2004). University Persistence: A Study Linking Communication Satisfaction To Student Retention. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Arizona State University
Tsai, Ming-Ten ve Chuang, Shuang-Shii (2009). “An Integrated Process Model of Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Outcomes.” Social Behavior And Personality. 37 (6): 825-834
Ulloa-Heath ve Julie M. (2003). Leadership Behaviors And Communication Satisfaction: Community Colleges in Micronesia. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. University of San Diego.
Vuuren, Mark V., Jong, Menno D. T. ve Seydel, Erwin R. (2007). “Direct and Indirect Effects of Supervisor Communication on Organizational Commitment.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 12 (2): 116-128
Wheeless, Lawrence R., Wheeless, Virginia, E. ve Howard, Richard D. (1984). “The Relationships of Communication with Supervisor and Decision-Participation to Employee Job Satisfaction.” Communication Quarterly. 32 (3): 222-232
Yüksel, İhsan (2005). “İletişimin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir İşletmede Yapılan Görgül Çalışma.” Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 6 (2): 291-306.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Birol Gülnar Bu kişi benim

Mete Kazaz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Haziran 2010

Gönderilme Tarihi

-

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2010 Sayı: 13

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL

APA

Gülnar, B., & Kazaz, M. (2010). BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 45-66. https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL

AMA

1.Gülnar B, Kazaz M. BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU. Akdeniz İletişim. 2010;(13):45-66. https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL

Chicago

Gülnar, Birol, ve Mete Kazaz. 2010. “BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 13: 45-66. https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL.

EndNote

Gülnar B, Kazaz M (01 Haziran 2010) BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi 13 45–66.

IEEE

[1]B. Gülnar ve M. Kazaz, “BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU”, Akdeniz İletişim, sy 13, ss. 45–66, Haz. 2010, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL

ISNAD

Gülnar, Birol - Kazaz, Mete. “BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi. 13 (01 Haziran 2010): 45-66. https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL.

JAMA

1.Gülnar B, Kazaz M. BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU. Akdeniz İletişim. 2010;:45–66.

MLA

Gülnar, Birol, ve Mete Kazaz. “BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU”. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 13, Haziran 2010, ss. 45-66, https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL.

Vancouver

1.Birol Gülnar, Mete Kazaz. BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU. Akdeniz İletişim [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2010;(13):45-66. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44MJ96JL

Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION IN SPORT CLUBS AS AN ORGANIZATION

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

BİR ÖRGÜT OLARAK SPOR KULÜPLERİNDE BİREYLERARASI İLETİŞİM DOYUMU

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster