Sanat ve Zanaat Olarak Kamu Politikası Analizi

Öz

Kamu politikası analizi, kamu politikası çalışmalarının ilgilendiği temel konulardan biridir. Toplumun ve siyasetin giderek karmaşıklaşması, karşılaşılan sorunların daha karmaşık hale gelmesine neden olmaktadır. Bunun sonucunda, sorunların çözümüne yönelik karar verme süreçlerinin daha güçlü şekilde desteklenmesi gerekmektedir. Kamu politikası analizi, kamu politikalarına karar verme aşamasında başvurulan önemli bir yöntemdir. Anketler, istatistikler, veri setleri, diğer sayısal gereçler ve düzenleyici etki analizi gibi teknikler politika analizinin zanaat boyutunu meydana getirirken içe bakış, sezgisel unsurlar, öngörü ve çeşitli informal süreçler ise sanat boyutunu meydana getirir. Bu karmaşık olgu, hem üstlendiği işlevler, hem de karar vericilere sağladığı çok yönlü içebakışla daha sağlıklı karar vermeye yardımcı olmaktadır.    

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu Politikası,Siyasa Analizi,Karar Verme

Public Policy Analysis as Art and Craft

Öz

Public policy analysis is one of the basic areas of interest of public policy studies. The increasingly complicated structure of society and politics leads to the complexity of problems encountered. As a result, decision-making processes aiming at the solution of problems have to be supported more robustly. Public policy analysis is an essential method used in decision-making stage of public policy processes. Surveys, statistics, datasets, other numerical instruments and techniques such as regulatory impact analysis create the craft aspect of policy analysis whereas insight, intuitive elements, foresight and various informal processes represent its art aspect. This complicated phenomenon helps more robust decision-making with the functions it offers and the multi-dimensional insight it provides to decision-makers.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Policy,Policy Analysis,Decision-Making

Kaynakça

1. Andrew, C. J. 2007. Rationality in Policy Decision Making, (Ed.) Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller ve Mara S., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Sidney. Londra, New York: CRC Press. 161-171.
2. Bardach, E. 2012. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Sorun Solving, 4. Baskı, ABD: CQ Press.
3. Cabinet Office. 1999. Modernising Government. Londra.
4. Carl, P. ve Sawicki, D. (1986). Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning, Prentice-Hall. N.J.: Englewood Cliffs.
5. deLeon, P. 1988. Advice and Consent: The Development of the Policy Sciences, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6. Duncan Jr., M. ve Whittington, D. 1997. Expert Advice for Policy Choice: Analysis and Discourse. Washington DC.: Georgetown University Press.
7. Duncan, M. ve Wilde, J. A. 1979. Policy Analysis for Public Decisions. North Scituate, Massachusetts: The Duxbury Press.
8. Dunn, N. 2004. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

9. Fischer, F. 2007. Deliberative Policy Analysis as Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical and Normative Arguments”. (Ed.) Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller ve Mara S., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Sidney. Londra, New York: CRC Press. 223-236.
10. Foster, C. D. ve Plowden, F. J. (1996). The State Under Stress: Can The Hollow State Be Good Government? Open University Press.
11. Hajer, M. 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void, Policy Sciences, (36),175-195.
12. Hajer, M. ve Laws, D. 2006. Policy in Practice, (Ed), Michael Moran, Martin Reinve Robert E. Goodin., The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. 409-424.
13. Hillgartner, S. 2001. Science on Stage. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14. Jann, W. ve Wegrich, K. 2007. Theories of the Policy Cycle, (Ed.) Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller ve Mara S., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Sidney. Londra, New York: CRC Press. 43-62.
15. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Köseoğlu, Ö. 2013. Meslek, Sanat ve Disiplin Olarak Kamu Politikası: Türkiye’ye İzdüşümleri, Bilgi, (26): 4-36.
17. Lasswell, H. 1971. A Pre-View of the Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
18. Lindblom, C. E. ve Cohen, D. K. 1979. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Sorun Solving. New Haven ve Londra: Yale University Press.
19. Sapru, R. K. 2011. Public Policy: Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.
20. Shulock, N. 1999. The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much of It?, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, (18): 226-244.
21. Smith, K. B. 2005. Data Don’t Matter? Academic Research and School Choice. Perspectives on Politics (3): 285–299.
22. Smith, K. B. ve W. Larimer, C. 2009. The Public Policy Theory Primer. ABD: Westview Press.
23. Stone, D. 2001. Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making. Revised Edition. New York: Norton.
24. Torgerson, D. 2007. Promoting the Policy Orientation: Lasswell in Context. (Ed.) Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller ve Mara S., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, Sidney. Londra, New York: CRC Press. 15-28.
25. Vickers, G. 1980. The Assumptions of Policy Analysis, Policy Studies Journal (9): 552-558.
26. Wagner, P. 2007. Public Policy, Social Science and the State: An Historical Perspective. (Ed.) Frank Fischer, Gerald J.
27. Miller ve Mara S., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, Sidney. Londra, New York: CRC Press. 29-40.
28. Weinter, D. L. 1992. The Craft of Policy Design: Can It Be More Than Art? Review of Policy Research (11): 370–388.
29. Weiss, C. H. 1977. Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
30. Wildavsky, A. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, Massachusetts: Little Brown.
31. Wilson, R. 2006, Policy Analysis as Policy Advice, (Ed.) Michael Moran, Martin Rein ve Robert E. Goodin, The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. 152–168.