A CONCEPTUAL EXAMINATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE SECURITY APPROACH AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Yıl 2018, , 37 - 50, 28.12.2018

Ahmet Barbak

https://doi.org/10.33707/akuiibfd.444409

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study examines conceptually the
relationship between sustainable security approach and public administration.
Sustainable security represents the latest approach to security understanding
within sustainable development policy which establishes a causality
relationship between security and development. According to sustainable
security approach, the focus should be on developmental and environmental root
causes that undermine security conditions of individuals and communities,
rather than on merely security issues and the state. In this respect,
sustainable security approach contends that national security paradigm and
pertinent security organization should change accordingly. The study first
examines sustainable security approach drawing upon pertinent literature and
policy documents. Then it discusses its implications for public administration.
In this context, as an emerging security approach, sustainable security points
to a long-reaching security organization in public administration, which relies
on strategic management and foresight, and where coordination and policy
coherence come to forefront. It can be asserted that sustainable security
organization will be shaped by a public policy process which is
multidisciplinary and integrated, in addition to the balances between effectiveness
and accountability as well as between short-term and long-term. It is likely
that a relevant security ethics will emerge and the relationships of both
“economics-security” and “urbanization-security” as well as urban security
policies will come to the fore.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Security, Public Administration

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR GÜVENLİK YAKLAŞIMI VE KAMU YÖNETİMİ İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE KAVRAMSAL BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Bu çalışma,
sürdürülebilir güvenlik yaklaşımı ve kamu yönetimi arasındaki ilişkiyi
kavramsal olarak incelemektedir. Sürdürülebilir güvenlik, kalkınma ile güvenlik
arasında nedensellik ilişkisi kuran sürdürülebilir kalkınma politikası
içerisindeki en son güvenlik anlayışını temsil etmektedir. Sürdürülebilir
güvenlik yaklaşımına göre, sadece güvenlik sorunlarına ve devlete odaklanmak
yerine bireylerin ve toplulukların güvenlik koşullarını olumsuz etkileyen,
kalkınma ve çevre sorunlarına ilişkin kök nedenlere odaklanılmalıdır. Bu
yönüyle, sürdürülebilir güvenlik ulusal güvenlik anlayışının ve buna ait ulusal
güvenlik örgütlenmesinin değişimini talep etmektedir. Çalışma öncelikle
sürdürülebilir güvenlik yaklaşımını ilgili literatür ve politika belgelerinden
incelemekte; daha sonra bu yaklaşımın kamu yönetimi bağlamında sonuçlarını
tartışmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, sürdürülebilir güvenlik henüz gelişmekte olan bir
yaklaşım olarak kamu yönetiminde uzun vadeli, stratejik yönetim ve uzgörüye
dayanan, eşgüdüm ve politika uyumunun öne çıktığı bir güvenlik örgütlenmesine
işaret etmektedir. Sürdürülebilir güvenlik öğütlenmesini ise,
etkililik-hesapverebilirlik ve kısa vade-uzun vade dengeleri yanında çok
disiplinli ve bütünleşik bir kamu politikası sürecinin biçimlendireceği ileri
sürülebilir. Bu güvenlik yaklaşımı çerçevesinde güvenlik etiğinin gelişmesi;
yönetimde “ekonomi-güvenlik” ve “kentleşme-güvenlik” ilişkileri ile kentsel
güvenlik politikalarının öne çıkması olası görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Sürdürülebilir Güvenlik, Kamu Yönetimi

Kaynakça

• Abbott, C., Phipps, T. (2009), Beyond Dependence and Legacy: Sustainable Security in Sub-Saharan Africa, UK: Oxford Research Group.
• Abbott, C., Rogers, P., Sloboda, J. (2006), Global Responses to Global Threats: Sustainable Security for the 21st Century, UK: Oxford Research Group.
• Amer, R., Swain, A., Öjendal, J. (2012), The Security-Development Nexus: Peace, Conflict and Development, UK: Anthem Press.
• Butts, K. H., Bankus, B. C. (2012), “Sustainability: A Lens for National Security”, (Ed.) J. Hartman, K. Butts, B. Bankus ve S. Carney, Sustainability and National Security, USA: United States Army War College.
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., de Wilde, J. (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Crawford, A. (2014), “Thinking about Sustainable Security: Metaphors, Paradoxes and Ironies”, (Ed.) M. Schuilenburg, R. Van Steden ve B. Oude Breuil, Positive Criminology: Reflections on Care, Belonging and Security, The Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing.
• Christiensen, T., Lægreid, P. (2006), The Whole-of-Government Approach-Regulation, Performance, and Public-Sector Reform, Norway: Stein Rokkan Centre For Social Studies.
• Dalby, S. (1992), “Security, Modernity, Ecology: The Dilemmas of Post-Cold War Security Discourse”, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 17(1), 95-134.
• Dernbach, J. C. (2003), “Achieving Sustainable Development: The Centrality and Multiple Facets of Integrated Decisionmaking”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 247-285.
• Drexhage J., Murphy, D. (2010), Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012, Background Paper for the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability, New York: United Nations.
• Floyd, R. (2011), “Can Securitization Theory Be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards A Just Securitization Theory”, Security Dialogue, 42(4-5), 427-439.
• Gallopín, G. (2003), A Systems Approach to Sustainability and Sustainable Development, Santiago de Chile: United Nations Publications.
• Gänzle, S. (2000), Coping with the “Security-Development Nexus”: The European Community’s Instrument for Stability-Rationale and Potential, Germany: German Development Institute.
• Giddens, A. (1987), Social Theory and Modern Sociology, USA: Stanford University Press.
• Giovannoni, E., Fabietti G. (2014), “What is Sustainability? A Review of the Concept and its Applications”, (Ed.) C. Busco, M. L. Frigo, A. Riccaboni ve P. Quattrone, Integrated Reporting: Concepts and Cases That Redefine Corporate Accountability, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
• Gray, R. (2010), “Is Accounting for Sustainability Actually Accounting for Sustainability and How Would We Know? An Exploration of Narratives of Organisations and the Planet”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47-62.
• Hartman, J. (2012), “Sustainability and National Security”, (Ed.) J. Hartman, K. Butts, B. Bankus ve S. Carney, Sustainability and National Security, USA: United States Army War College.
• Hearne, S., Alcorn, J., Goran, W. (2012), “Sustainable Security and Fragile States”, (Ed.) J. Hartman, K. Butts, B. Bankus ve S. Carney, Sustainability and National Security, USA: United States Army War College.
• Jablonsky, D (2003), “The State of the National Security State”, Parameters, 32, 4-20.
• Kaul, I. (2013), Global Public Goods: A Concept for Framing the Post-2015 Agenda, Discussion Paper 2/2013, Germany: German Development Institute.
• Khagram, S., Clark, W. C., Raad, D. F. (2003), “From the Environment and Human Security to Sustainable Security and Development”, Journal of Human Development, 4(2), 289-313.
• Kidd, C. V. (1992), “The Evolution of Sustainability”, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethic, 5(1), 1-26.
• Korb, L., Duggan, S., Conley, L. (2009), Integrating Security Preparing for the National Security Threats of the 21st Century, USA: Center for American Progress.
• Langille, H. P. (2016), Sustainable Common Security, Mondial, Canada: World Federalists.
• Levin, S. (2006), “Learning to Live in a Global Commons: Socioeconomic Challenges for a Sustainable Environment”, Ecological Research, 21(3), 328-333.
• OECD (2007), OECD Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice, Paris: OECD.
• Orr, D. W. (2011), “National Security and Sustainability”, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1, 36-43.Oxford Research Group. (2011), Sustainable Security. A Briefing for Friends, http://nfpb.org.uk/f/nfpb/field/attachments/sustainability_security_briefing_web_0.pdf, (27.06.2017).
• Reed, M. G., Slaymaker, O. (1993), “Ethics and Sustainability”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 25(5), 723-739.
• Robinson, J. (2004), “Squaring the Circle? Some Thoughts on the İdea of Sustainable Development”, Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369-384.
• Rogers, P. (2007), Towards Sustainable Security Alternatives to the War on Terror, Oxford Research Group International Security Report 2007, UK: Oxford Research Group.
• Rogers, P. (2017), Sustainable Security in Trump Era, http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/paul_rogers_monthly_briefing/sustainable_security_trump_era, (27.06.2017).
• Rubenstein, R. E. (2017), “State Security, Human Security, and the Problem of Complementarity”, (Ed.) E. D. Jacobs, Rethinking Security in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Palgrave.
• Sandel, M. J. (2012), What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, USA: Straus and Giroux.
• Smith, G. E. (2008), In Search of Sustainable Security Linking National Security, Human Security, and Collective Security to Protect America and Our World, USA: Center for American Progress.
• Stoddart, H. (2011), A Pocket Guide to Sustainable Development Governance, UK: Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future.
• Suri, J., Valentino, B. (2016), Sustainable Security: Rethinking American National Security Strategy, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Stremlau, J. (1990), After the Cold War: Security for Development, Policy Research Working Paper, Washington: The World Bank.
• UNDP (1990), Human Development Report 1990, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
• UNDP (1994), Human Development Report 1994, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
• UNDP (2014), Foresight as a Strategic Long-Term Planning Tool for Developing Countries, Singapore: Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
• United Nations. (1972), Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. http://www.un-documents.net/aconf48-14r1.pdf, (27.06.2017).
• United Nations. (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, USA: Oxford University Press.
• United Nations. (2000a), United Nations Millennium Declaration, New York.
• United Nations. (2000b), Women, Peace and Security: Understanding the Implications, Fulfilling the Obligations, United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, New York.
• United Nations. (2004), A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, New York.
• United Nations. (2015), Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York.
• Vaahtoranta, T. (2010), “How Energy and Climate Change May Pose a Threat to Sustainable Security”, (Ed.) G. P. Herd, Great Powers and Strategic Stability in the 21st Century: Competing Visions of World Order, London: Routledge.
• Voigt, C. (2009), “Sustainable Security”, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 19(1), 163-196.
• Walker, B., Salt, D. (2006), Resilience Thinking, Washington: Island Press.
• Weber, M. (1946), “Politics as a Vocation”, (Ed.) H. H. Gerth ve C. W. Mills, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, USA: Oxford University Press.
• World Bank. (2011), World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development, Washington: The World Bank.
• Yüksel, C. (2006), “Kamu Yönetiminde Etik ve Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Etik Hakkında Yeni Yasal Düzenlemeler”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 64(2), 167-212.
• https://sustainablesecurity.org/category/marginalisation/inclusive-security/, (28.06.2017).
• https://sustainablesecurity.org/category/populism-and-sustainable-security/, (18.07.2017).
• http://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/doclibrary/171004_sfa_2017_report_txt.pdf, (14.07.2018).
• https://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/sustainable-security-index-research-note-on-global-opportunities-for-refugees-and-migrants, (28.06.2018).