Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BEST VALUE IN THE BRITISH LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 265 - 287, 01.06.2007

Öz

This study aims to discuss the Best Value regime in local
public services in the United Kingdom. Discussion will focus on the
approach of the Conservatives to service delivery which was
compulsory competitive tendering, and the approach of the Labour
Government to service delivery which is the Best Value. The aims and
objectives of the Best Value, and the legislation and scope involved
with the Best Value will be outlined briefly.
The study will discuss management and measurement
techniques and will enable the reader to understand the role of
performance and service reviews within the concept of the Best Value
regime, and examine performance plans. A closer analysis will be
given to two performance measurement techniques –Excellence for
Quality Management (EFQM), and Benchmarking.

Kaynakça

  • Audit Commission (1983), Performance Review in Local Government: a Handbook for Auditors and Local Authorities, London: HMSO
  • Barlett, D., Corrigan, P., Dibben, P., Franklin, S., Joyce, P., Mcnulty, T. and Rose, A. (1999), Preparing for Best Value. Local Government Studies, vol.25, 3, pp.103.
  • Boyne, G. A. (1999), Processes, performance and Best Value in local government. Local Government Studies, 25, 3, pp.1-15.
  • Byrne, T. (2000), Local Government in Britain. Seventh Edition, London: Penguin Books
  • Boyne, G. (2000). External Regulation and Best Value in Local Government. Public Money & Management, July-September.
  • DETR (1998a) Modernising local government: Improving local services through Best Value, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1998b) Modern local government: In touch with the people, Cm 4014, London: The Stationary Office.
  • DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and The Regions) (1999), Targets for the Future. London: The Stationary Office.
  • DETR (1999a) Summary of responses to 'Modernising local government: Improving services through Best Value', London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999b) Protocol on intervention powers, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999c) Preparing for Best Value, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999d) Implementing Best Value: A consultation paper on draft guidance, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999e), Circular 10/99 Local Government Act 1999: Part I, Best Value, (DETR, London).
  • Doig, A. and Wilson, J. (2000) ‘Local government management: A model for the future?’. Public Management, Vol.2, issue.1.p.44-65
  • Geddes, M., and S.J. Martin. (2000). The Policy and politics of Best Value: currents, cross-currents and under-currents in the new regime’, Policy and Politics. Vol.28, num.3, July 2000: The Policy Press.
  • HMSO, (1999), Local Government Act. London: The Stationary Office.
  • Hughes, O.E. (1994), 'Public Management and Administration: An Introduction'. London, Macmillan.
  • Inlogov, (2000). Inlogov informs on Best Value: Part 1, Institute of local government studies. The University of Birmingham.
  • Lawton, A. and Rose, A. (1999), Public Services Management. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
  • Martin, S.J. 1999. 'Picking winners or piloting best value? An analysis of English Best Value bids', Local Government Studies 25, 2, pp.5357.
  • Parker, S. (2000), 'Costly inspection threatens services', Local Government Chronicle,30 June.
  • Rogers, S. (1999). 'Performance Management in Local Government'. London. Pittman.
  • Waine, B. and Cutler, T. (1994), 'Managing the Welfare State, The politics of public sector management' Berg, Oxford.
  • Walsh, K., Deakin, N., Smith, P. and Thomas, N. (1997), Contracting for Change: Contracts in Health, Social Care and other Local Government Services, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • www.audit-commision.gov.uk
  • www.detr.gov.uk
  • www.lga.org.uk

BEST VALUE IN THE BRITISH LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 265 - 287, 01.06.2007

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Birleşik Krallık'ta yerel kamu hizmetlerinde uygulanmaya başlanan 'en iyi değer rejimi' (Best Value Regime) tartışılmaktadır. Muhafazakar Parti'nin hizmet sunumu yaklaşımı olan "Zorunlu Rekbetçi Piyasa" (Compulsory Competative Tendering) ile İşçi Partisi'nin "En İyi Değer" (Best Value) sistemleri karşılaştırılmakta; daha sonra da en iyi değer rejiminin amacı, yasal durum ve kapsamı açıklanmaktadır. Çalışma, yönetim ve performans ölçüm tekniklerini, performans planlarını ve hizmet değerlendirmelerini 'en iyi değer' kavramı perspektifinden değerlendirmekte; kalite yönetiminde mükemmellik ve kıyaslama gibi, iki önemli performans ölçüm tekniğine özel vurgu yapmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Audit Commission (1983), Performance Review in Local Government: a Handbook for Auditors and Local Authorities, London: HMSO
  • Barlett, D., Corrigan, P., Dibben, P., Franklin, S., Joyce, P., Mcnulty, T. and Rose, A. (1999), Preparing for Best Value. Local Government Studies, vol.25, 3, pp.103.
  • Boyne, G. A. (1999), Processes, performance and Best Value in local government. Local Government Studies, 25, 3, pp.1-15.
  • Byrne, T. (2000), Local Government in Britain. Seventh Edition, London: Penguin Books
  • Boyne, G. (2000). External Regulation and Best Value in Local Government. Public Money & Management, July-September.
  • DETR (1998a) Modernising local government: Improving local services through Best Value, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1998b) Modern local government: In touch with the people, Cm 4014, London: The Stationary Office.
  • DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and The Regions) (1999), Targets for the Future. London: The Stationary Office.
  • DETR (1999a) Summary of responses to 'Modernising local government: Improving services through Best Value', London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999b) Protocol on intervention powers, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999c) Preparing for Best Value, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999d) Implementing Best Value: A consultation paper on draft guidance, London: DETR.
  • DETR (1999e), Circular 10/99 Local Government Act 1999: Part I, Best Value, (DETR, London).
  • Doig, A. and Wilson, J. (2000) ‘Local government management: A model for the future?’. Public Management, Vol.2, issue.1.p.44-65
  • Geddes, M., and S.J. Martin. (2000). The Policy and politics of Best Value: currents, cross-currents and under-currents in the new regime’, Policy and Politics. Vol.28, num.3, July 2000: The Policy Press.
  • HMSO, (1999), Local Government Act. London: The Stationary Office.
  • Hughes, O.E. (1994), 'Public Management and Administration: An Introduction'. London, Macmillan.
  • Inlogov, (2000). Inlogov informs on Best Value: Part 1, Institute of local government studies. The University of Birmingham.
  • Lawton, A. and Rose, A. (1999), Public Services Management. Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
  • Martin, S.J. 1999. 'Picking winners or piloting best value? An analysis of English Best Value bids', Local Government Studies 25, 2, pp.5357.
  • Parker, S. (2000), 'Costly inspection threatens services', Local Government Chronicle,30 June.
  • Rogers, S. (1999). 'Performance Management in Local Government'. London. Pittman.
  • Waine, B. and Cutler, T. (1994), 'Managing the Welfare State, The politics of public sector management' Berg, Oxford.
  • Walsh, K., Deakin, N., Smith, P. and Thomas, N. (1997), Contracting for Change: Contracts in Health, Social Care and other Local Government Services, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • www.audit-commision.gov.uk
  • www.detr.gov.uk
  • www.lga.org.uk
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Sefa Çetin Bu kişi benim

. . Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2007
Gönderilme Tarihi 8 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çetin, S., & ., . (2007). BEST VALUE IN THE BRITISH LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 265-287.

28220