Investigating Language Teacher Immunity in Terms of Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Development

Abstract

This study seeks to determine the psychological immunity levels of English language teachers and the variables that may affect their psychological immunity, whether it be adaptive or maladaptive. The study also aims to offer light on the perceived teacher immunity of EFL instructors with regard to professional teacher development as well as the possibilities and obstacles they might encounter in their career. Two phases of data collection were used in a mixed method research design to accomplish the study's objectives. A 6-point Likert-type scale with 39 items was used in the first phase of the quantitative research to collect data from university EFL instructors who were currently employed at foundation and public universities in the southern region of Türkiye. 15 open-ended questions were posed during the qualitative phase. The quantitative data showed that, with a 3.76 average point, 117 participant teachers are around halfway through immunity. The findings of the MANOVA test showed a statistically significant relationship between immunity level and gender, degree, and kind of university instructors teach at. Additionally, the qualitative data showed that teacher immunity is positively impacted by participation in professional development activities, pursuing lifelong learning in trying circumstances, and academic collegiality.

Keywords

• complex dynamic systems theory
• coping
• English language teacher immunity
• professional development resilience
• teacher motivation

Kaynakça

1. Akour, A., Ala’a, B., Barakat, M., Kanj, R., Fakhouri, H. N., Malkawi, A., & Musleh, G. (2020). The impact of the covid-19 pandemic and emergency distance teaching on the psychological status of university teachers: A cross-sectional study in jordan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(6), 2391-2399.
2. Arslan, F. Y., & Almacıoğlu, G. (2023). Teaching immunity of language teachers: A reflective approach. Participatory Educational Research, 11(1), 89-104.
3. Attaran, A., Ghonsooly, B., Fatemi, A. H., & Shahriari, H. (2019). Immunology of language learners: A social psychological perspective. Interchange, 50(1), 57-76.
4. Bardakçı, M., & Yoğun, M. S. (2023). An analysis of shifting EFL teachers' perceptions on continuing professional development through lesson observation: EFL teachers' perceptions on continuing professional development. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 15(3), 1497-1522.
5. Bilgi, T. (2023). A systematic review of literature of pre-service and in-service language teachers’ identity construction process from 2010 to 2022. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 98-112.
6. Boran, G. S. (2020). Views of prospective teachers and supervisors on a practicum program: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 417-435.
7. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2005). Using statistics to examine relationships. In Burns N, Grove SK (Eds.), The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (pp. 486-700). Elsevier.
8. Caena, F. (2011). Literature review quality in teachers’ continuing professional development. European Commission, 2(20), 1-24.

9. Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: An investigation employing the job demands-resources model as relevant to workplace exhaustion, disengagement, and commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 125-136.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
11. Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Open University Press.
12. Day, C., Sammons, P., & Stobart, G. (2007). Teachers matter: Connecting work, lives and effectiveness. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
13. Dikilitaş, K., & Comoglu, I. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-17.
14. Dikilitaş, K., & Yaylı, D. (2018). Teachers’ professional identity development through action research. ELT Journal, 72(4), 415-424.
15. Durmaz, Z. (2023). Tracing the development of teacher agency of an efl teacher: a case study. In Sahinkarakas, S., Inozu, J., Can, C., &Tokoz, F. (Eds), Teachers matter (pp.31-43). Çağ University Publications.
16. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
17. Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (Eds.). (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning (Vol. 81). Multilingual Matters.
18. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation. Routledge.
19. Eken, D. K., & Bosson, A. (2017). Teacher development a practical language teacher content. Ankara: BlackSwan.
20. Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861.
21. Er, H. K. &Küçükali E. (2023). An analysis of the interplay between affective and cognitive components of teacher identity among Turkish native and non-native EFL in-service trainees. Educational Role of Language Journal, 1(9), 134-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36534/erlj.2023.01.11
22. Fessler, R., & Christensen, J. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers (pp. 21-44). Allyn and Bacon.
23. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6. Ed.). McGraw Hill. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning. Edward Arnold.
24. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning (Vol. 786). Rowley.
25. Garrett, P., & Young, R. F. (2009). Theorizing affect in foreign language learning: An analysis of one learner's responses to a communicative Portuguese course. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 209-226. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. SAGE.
26. Gkonou, C., Dewaele, J. M., & King, J. (Eds.). (2020). The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
27. Goktepe, F. T., & Kunt, N. (2021). “I’ll do it in my own class”: Novice language teacher identity construction in Turkey. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 472-487.
28. Graham, A., & Phelps, R. (2003). 'Being a teacher': developing teacher identity and enhancing practice through metacognitive and reflective learning processes. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 11-24.
29. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (105-117). Sage Publications.
30. Gürsoy, S. K. (2018). The dynamic development of student immunity in language learning. Nobel Scientific Works.
31. HaseliSonghori, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Afraz, S. (2018). Language teacher immunity among Iranian EFL teachers: A self-organization perspective. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 128-143.
32. Hiver, P. (2015). Once burned, twice shy: The dynamic development of system immunity in teachers. Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning, 214-237.
33. Hiver, P. (2017). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 669-690.
34. Hiver, P. (2018). Teachstrong: The power of teacher resilience for L2 practitioners. In S. Mercer & A. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language teacher psychology (pp. 231–246). Multilingual Matters.
35. Hiver, P. V. (2016). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Nottingham.
36. Hiver, P., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Language teacher immunity: A double-edged sword. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 405-423.
37. Hiver, P., & Larsen–Freeman, D. (2020). Motivation: It is a relational system. In A. H. Al–Hoorie & P. D.MacIntyre (Eds.), Contemporary language motivation theory: 60 years since Gardner and Lambert (1959) (pp. 285–303). Multilingual Matters.
38. Kızıltepe, Z. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5-6), 515-530.
39. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. Routledge.
40. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 45(2), 202.
41. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten ‘lessons’ from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Multilingual Matters.
42. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Complexity theory and language development (pp. 11-50). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
43. MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., & Henry, A. (2015). Hot enough to be cool: The promise of dynamic systems research. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 419–429). Multilingual Matters.
44. MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System, 94, 102352.
45. Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of Personality, 22, 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb01136.x
46. McDonough, S. (2007). Motivation in ELT. Elt Journal, 61(4), 369.
47. Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427-436.
48. Mercer, S., & Kostoulas, A. (Eds.). (2018). Language teacher psychology (Vol. 1). Multilingual Matters.
49. Namaziandost, E., Heydarnejad, T., Rezai, A., & Javanmard, K. (2024). A voyage of discovering the impacts of teacher immunity and emotion regulation on professional identity, autonomy, and work motivation in Iranian EFL landscape. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 43.
50. Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293-306.
51. Noels, K. A. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivation. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 43-68.
52. Ordem, E. (2017). A language teacher's reflection on maladaptive immunity, possible selves and motivation. International Education Studies, 10(9), 1-8.
53. Örük, C. (2023) Investigating a turkish efl teacher’s emerging emotions: a case study from complex dynamic system perspective. In Sahinkarakas, S., Inozu, J., Can, C., &Tokoz, F. (Eds), Teachers matter (pp.31-43). Çağ University Publications.
54. Rahimpour, H., Amirian, S. M. R., Adel, S. M. R., &Zareian, G. R. (2020). A model of the factors predicting English language teacher immunity: A path analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 73-83.
55. Rahmati, T., Sadeghi, K., & Ghaderi, F. (2019). English as a foreign language teacher immunity: An integrated reflective practice. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 91-107.
56. Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge.
57. Rogers, C. (1962). Toward becoming a fully functioning person. In A.W. Combs (Ed.), Perceiving behaving becoming a new focus for education (pp. 183–196). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
58. Şahinkarakaş, Ş., & Tokoz-Göktepe, F. (2018). My story in the internship: An action research project of student teachers during an internship. In G. Barkhuizen, A. Burns, K. Dikilitaş, & M. Wyatt (Eds.), Empowering teacher researchers, empowering learners (pp. 39–46). IATEFL.
59. Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
60. Samavarchi, L., & Hosseini, A. F. (2019). Learner immunity in an EFL context: A qualitative case study of Iranian university students majoring in English. IUP Journal of English Studies, 14(2), 95-115.
61. Sariçoban, A., & Kirmizi, Ö. (2021). Language teacher immunity: Insights from Türkiye. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 1172-1189.
62. Saydam, D. (2019). English language teacher immunity: The METU case. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
63. Seligman, M. E. (2011). Building resilience. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 100-106.
64. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
65. Smit, B. (2021). Introduction to ATLAS. ti for mixed analysis. In Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie & R. Burke Johnson (Eds.), The routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis (pp. 331-342). Routledge.
66. Tabachnick, B. R. (1989). Needed for teacher education: Naturalistic research that is culturally responsive. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(2), 155-163.
67. Taylor, F. (2014). Relational views of the self in SLA. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 92-108). De Gruyter Brill.
68. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
69. Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: A theoretical overview. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 1-8). De Gruyter Brill.
70. van Lier, L. (2008). The ecology of language learning and sociocultural theory. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 9, 53-65.
71. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
72. Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 9(3), 213-238.