Öğretmenlerin Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri ile Araştırma Okuryazarlığı Becerileri Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bilgi çağında, bireylerin bilgiye erişme, bilgiyi kullanma ve aktarma becerileri kişisel ve mesleki başarı için temel önem taşımaktadır. Dijital ve araştırma okuryazarlığı, çağdaş eğitim süreçlerinde öğretmenlerin mesleki yeterliliklerini güçlendiren kritik becerilerdir. Bu çalışma, öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık becerileri ile araştırma okuryazarlığı yeterlilikleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Nicel araştırma yaklaşımının kullanıldığı çalışmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır Çalışmanın örneklemi, Türkiye’nin doğu bölgesindeki bir merkez ilçede görev yapan tüm branş öğretmenlerinden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmaya toplam 604 öğretmen çevrimiçi olarak katılmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” ile geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği titizlikle test edilen “Dijital Okuryazarlık Ölçeği” ve “Araştırma Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Normallik analizlerine göre veriler normal dağılmamaktadır. Analizlerde Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H testleri ve Spearman Korelasyon Analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, cinsiyet, bölüm, yaş, bilgisayar sahipliği ve günlük internet kullanım süresi gibi demografik parametrelere dayalı olarak öğretmenlerin dijital okuryazarlık becerilerinde önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Benzer şekilde, öğretmenlerin araştırma okuryazarlığı becerilerinde de cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi ve bilgisayar sahipliğine dayalı farklılıklar bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, dijital okuryazarlık ve araştırma okuryazarlığı becerileri arasında güçlü bir pozitif ilişki görülmekte, bu da bir beceri geliştiğinde diğer becerinin de geliştiğini göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişim süreçlerinde dijital okuryazarlık ve araştırma okuryazarlığının ele alınmasının önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• dijital okuryazarlık
• araştırma okuryazarlığı
• okuryazarlık
• öğretmenler

The Relationship Between Teachers’ Digital Literacy Levels and Research Literacy Skills

Abstract

In the information age, individuals’ ability to access, use, and transfer information is fundamental for personal and professional success. Digital and research literacy are critical skills that strengthen teachers’ professional competencies in contemporary educational processes. This study examines the correlation between teachers’ proficiency in digital literacy and their proficiency in research literacy. A quantitative research approach is utilized, employing a relational survey design. The study sample consists of all subject-area educators who are employed in a central district within the eastern region of Türkiye. A total of 604 teacher participated in the study online Data gathering entails the utilization of a “Personal Information Form” devised by the researchers, in conjunction with the “Digital Literacy Scale” and “Research Literacy Scale,” all of which have undergone meticulous testing to ensure their validity and reliability. According to normality analyses, the data are not normally distributed. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis H tests, Spearman Correlation Analyses were used as analyses The findings reveal substantial disparities in the digital literacy skills of instructor based on demographic parameters including gender, department, age, computer ownership, and daily internet usage time. Likewise, there are differences in instructors’ research literacy skills based on gender, level of education, and ownership of computers. Moreover, a strong positive association is seen between digital literacy and research literacy skills, suggesting that when one ability improves, the other skill also improves. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing digital and research literacy in teachers’ professional development processes.

Keywords

• literacy
• digital literacy
• research literacy
• teachers

Kaynakça

1. Admiraal, W., Van Vugt, F., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., & Lockhorst, D. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1163283
2. Akın, S., & Solmaz, G. (2019). Empowering teachers as researchers: A case study. Ege Journal of Education, 20(2), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.588166
3. Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9401-9
4. Allen, C., & Berggren, J. (2016). Digital literacy and sustainability -a field study in EFL teacher development. CALL communities and culture -short papers from EUROCALL 2016. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.531
5. Armağan, Y. (2012). The evaluation of school principals views on the base of educational researches (Thesis No. 327452) [Master’s thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University-Tokat]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
6. Arslan, S. (2019). Investigation of digital literacy levels of teachers working in primary and secondary schools in terms of various variables (Thesis No. 584170) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University-Sakarya]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
7. Aşiroğlu, S. C. (2016). Examining the relation between the attitudes of teacher candidates towards scientific research and their success levels at scientific research classes. Usak University Journal of Educational Research 2(2), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.232429
8. Aydemir, Z. (2017). Developing fourth grade students’ new literacy skills through instruction of search-comprehension strategies on the internet (Thesis No. 469605) [Doctoral thesis, Marmara University-Istanbul]. National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education.

9. Baş, G., & Kıvılcım, Z. S. (2017). Teachers’ views about educational research: A qualitative study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(2), 60-73.
10. Basargekar, P., & Singhavi, C. (2017). Factors affecting teachers’ perceived proficiency in using ICT in the Classroom. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.5.2.03
11. Bell, M., Cordingley, P., Isham, C., & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. CUREE, GTCE, LSIS & NTRP.
12. Bilgili, Y. (2005). The teachers’ process of change through action research. [Doctoral Thesis]. Florida State University College of Education.
13. Booher, L., Nadelson, L. S., & Nadelson, S. G. (2020). What about research and evidence? Teachers’ perceptions and uses of education research to inform STEM teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1782811
14. Boyacı, Z. (2019). The relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and digital literacy levels of pre-service teachers (A Düzce University sample) (Thesis No. 586302) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University-Sakarya]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
15. Boyd, P. (2021). Teachers’ research literacy as research-informed professional judgment. In P. Boyd, A. Szplit, & Z. Zbróg (Eds.), Developing teachers’ research literacy. International perspectives (pp. 17-44). Wydawnictwo Libron.
16. British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a selfimproving education system. BERA-RSA.
17. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A literature review. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 8(1), 136-155.
18. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences (14th ed.). Pegem Akademi. Cain, T., & Allan, D. (2017). The invisible impact of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 718-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1316252
19. Çakmak, Z., Taşkıran, C., & Bulut, B. (2015). Examining attitudes of social studies pre-service teachers towards scientific research. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 266-287. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.02575
20. Çetin, O., Çalışkan, E., & Menzi, N. (2012). The relationship between technological competencies and attitudes of pre-service teachers towards technology. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 273-291.
21. Christie, D., Donoghue, M., Kirk, G., McNamara, M., Menter, I., Moss, G., Noble Rogers, J., Oancea, A., Rogers, C., Thomson, P., & Whitty, G. (2012). Prospects for education research in education departments in Higher Education Institutions in the UK. London: BERA-UCET Working Group on Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/news/beraucet-report
22. Conway, P. F., & Munthe, E. (2014). The practice turn: Research-informed clinical teacher education in two countries. In From Vocational to Professional Education,146-163. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757131-10
23. Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford review of education, 41(2), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020105
24. Cote, T., & Milliner, B. (2018). A survey of EFL teachers’ digital literacy: A report from a Japanese Unıversity. Teaching English with Technology 4, 71-89.
25. Crain-Dorough, M., & Elder, A. C. (2021). Absorptive capacity as a means of understanding and addressing the disconnects between research and practice. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 67-100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X21990614
26. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
27. Cui, Y., Jin, H., & Gao, Y. (2023). Developing EFL teachers’ feedback literacy for research and publication purposes through intra-and inter-disciplinary collaborations: A multiple-case study. Assessing Writing, 57, 100751.
28. Doğan, T., & Benzer, S. (2023). Investigation of digital literacy levels of science teachers according to various variables. Journal of Individual Differences in Education, 5(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.47156/jide.1243400
29. Dombaycı, M. A., & Ercan, O. (2017). Examining the scientific literacy levels and attitudes towards scientifıc research of the teacher candidates’ in terms of various variables. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(3), 1265-1284. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338822
30. Elçi, C. A., & Sarı, M. (2016). An investigation of the views of students about information technology and software course’s curri̇culum in the context of digital citizenship. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 25(3), 87-102.
31. Eriksen, T. M., & Brevik, L. M. (2023). Developing a “research literacy way of thinking” in initial teacher education: Students as co-researchers. In The Palgrave handbook of teacher education research (pp. 231-256). Springer.
32. Escudero, V. G., Gutiérrez, R. C., & Somoza, J. A. G. C. (2019). Análisis de la autopercepción sobre el nivel de competencia digital docente en la formación inicial de maestros/as. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(3), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.373421
33. Evans, C., Waring, M., & Christodoulou, A. (2017). Building teachers’ research literacy: Integrating practice and research. Research Papers in Education, 32(4), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1322357
34. Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Camberwell.
35. Furlong, J. (2015). Teaching tomorrow’s teachers: Options for the future of initial teacher education in Wales. Welsh Government.
36. Goh, E., & Sigala, M. (2020). İntegrating information & communication technologies (ICT) into classroom instruction: Teaching tips for hospitality educators from a diffusion of innovation approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2020.1740636
37. Gömleksiz, M. N., & Fidan, E. K. (2013). Self-efficacy perception levels of prospective classroom teachers toward technological pedagogical content knowledge. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 87-113.
38. Görgülü-Arı, A., & Arslan, K. (2020). Research lıteracy skılls of graduate scıence teachers. The Journal of International Social Research, 13(75), 510-525.
39. Groß-Ophoff, J., Wolf, R., Schladitz, S., & Wirtz, M. (2017). Assessment of educational research literacy in higher education: Construct validation of the factorial structure of an assessment instrument comparing different treatments of omitted responses. Journal for educational research online, 9(2), 37-68.
40. Günsel, E. (2019). Investigating the relationship between candidate teachers' self-directed learning with technology and online information searching strategies (Thesis No.584179) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University-Sakarya]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
41. Gyurova, V. (2020). The place of research and creative skills in the training of future teachers. Education and Self Development, 15(3), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.3.11
42. Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab.
43. Hamutoğlu, N. B., Güngören-Canan, Ö., Kaya-Uyanık, G., & Gür-Erdoğan, D. (2017). Adapting digital literacy scale into Turkish. Ege Journal of Education, 18(1), 408- 429. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.295306
44. Heikkilä, M., & Eriksen, A. (2024). Polyphonic agency as a precondition for teachers’ research literacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2224560
45. Holincheck, N. (2012). Update and validation of a teachers’ attıtudes toward education research scale. [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University] College of Education and Human Development.
46. Hutchinson, L., & Novotny, M. (2018). Teaching a critical digital literacy of wearables: A feminist surveillance as care pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 50, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.07.006
47. Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.002
48. JISC. (2018). Breaking through: stories of effective digital practice from UK further education (FE) and skills https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/breaking-through-stories-of-effective-digital-practice-from-uk-fe-and-skills
49. Kara, S. (2021). Examination of the relationship between digital literacy levels of teacher candidates and information search and interpretation strategies in the web environment (Thesis No. 658838) [Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University-Konya]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
50. Karanjakwut, C., & Sripicharn, P. (2024). Exploring the experiences, challenges, and perspectives in digital literacy training of older Thai EFL teachers with low digital literacy. Anatolian Journal of Education, 9(1), 81-96.
51. Kartika, E. F. R., VH, E. S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2021). Development and validation of web-based STEAM online platform to improve learning quality in pre-service chemistry teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1316
52. Katayev, Y., Saduakas, G., Nurzhanova, S., Umirbekova, A., Ospankulov, Y., & Zokirova, S. (2023). Analysis of teachers’ research competencies, scientific process skills and the level of using information and communication technologies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(5), 1184-1203. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3613
53. Kaufman, K. (2014). Information communication technology: Challenges & some prospects from pre-service education to the classroom. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2(1), 1-11.
54. Kaya, E. (2020). Social inequality and diiıtal literacy: A field research on high school students (Thesis No. 633031) [Master’s thesis, Selçuk University-Konya]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
55. Kazancı-Tınmaz, A. (2019). Investigation of theory, research and practice integrity in educational administration (Thesis No. 610792) [Doctoral thesis, Gazi University-Ankara]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
56. Kazancı-Tınmaz, A., & Sezgin, F. (2023). Development of the research literacy scale for teachers. Sage Open, 13(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231199033
57. Kibici, V. B. (2022). An Investigation into music teachers’ perceptions of technological competencies. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 6(1), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.344
58. Kılıç, B. G. (2006). Science teaching in the world and in Turkey. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, 63, 12-18.
59. Kilincer, O. (2021). An ınvestigation of pre-service music teachers’ attitudes towards online learning during the Covıd-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(4), 587-600. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.304
60. Kır-Yiğit, M., & Özalemdar, L. (2022). Research literacy skills of biology and science teachers. International Journal of Education Technology & Scientific Researches, 7(17). 472-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.432
61. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2006-01-03
62. Konokman, G., Tanrıseven, I., & Karasolak, K. (2013). Examining prospective teachers’ attitudes towards educational research according to several variables. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(1), 141-158.
63. Korkmaz, M. (2020). Determining digital literacy levels of primary school (Thesis No. 639093) [Master’s thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University-Eskişehir]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
64. Koshmaganbetova, G. K., Kurmangaliyeva, S. S., Kashkinbayeva, A. R., Kurmangaliyev, K. B., & Alekenova, N. U. (2020). Research competencies of medical university teachers: Evaluation, perception, and perspective. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(E), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.3954
65. Kostoulas, A., Babić, S., Glettler, C., Karner, A., Mercer, S., & Seidl, E. (2019). Lost in research: Educators’ attitudes towards research and professional development. Teacher Development, 23(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1614655
66. Kozan, M., & Özek, B. M. (2019). Examination of department of CEIT teacher candidates’ digital literacy levels and cyberbullying sensitivities. Fırat University Journal of Social Science , 29(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538657
67. Küçükoğlu, A., Taşgın, A., & Çelik-Ercoşkun, N. (2013). An investigation of prospective teachers’ perceptions toward scientific research process. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 17, 11-24.
68. Kulaca, İ. (2023). Using web 2.0 tools in teaching social studies: A mixed method research (Thesis No. 842709) [Doctoral thesis, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi-Afyonkarahisar]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
69. Kürşad, Ş. M. (2015). Investigation of relationship between attitude toward scientific research and epistemological belief. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(2), 217-246. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2015.15.2-5000161321
70. Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education-a research mapping. European journal of teacher education, 39(5), 550-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
71. List, A. (2019). Defining digital literacy development: An examination of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Computers & Education, 138, 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.009
72. Liu, M., Chen, M., Zhong, L., Hua, W., & Pan, F. (2024). The development of research literacy among early career teachers in China: An exploratory study. International Journal of Higher Education and Sustainability, 5(2), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHES.2024.143684
73. Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-04.
74. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
75. Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2020). MOOC-based educational program and interaction in distance education: Long life mode of teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1022-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1553188
76. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Warinowski, A., & Iiskala, T. (2019). Teacher education in Finland and future directions. In J. Lampert (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of global perspectives on teacher education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.286
77. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2017). General competences of teaching profession. http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretmenlik-meslegi-genel-yeterlikleri/icerik/39
78. Mutlu, O. (2019). Scientific research self-effi̇cacy of primary school administrators (Thesis No. 568852) [Master’s thesis, Uşak University-Uşak]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
79. Mutlu, P., & Erdem, M. (2013). The relationship between IT teachers’ awareness of Turkey’s ICT vision and their teaching activities. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 981-999.
80. Nag, S., Chiat, S., Torgerson, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2014). Literacy, foundation learning and assessment in developing countries. Education Rigorous Literature Review.
81. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
82. Niemi, H. (2016). Academic and practical: Research-based teacher education in Finland. In B. Moon (Ed.), Do universities have a role in the education and training of teachers? An international analysis of policy and practice (pp. 19-33). Cambridge University Press.
83. Nikola, S. (2021). Teachers’key competencies for innovative teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 9(3), 331-345. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-331-345
84. O'Brien, M., & Rugen, L. (2001). Teaching literacy in the turning points school. Turning Points: Transforming middle schools. Center for Collaborative Education.
85. Öçal, F. (2017). Perceptions of digital literacy competence related to primary school teacher and parents themselves with their children (Thesis No. 450253) [Master’s thesis, Gazi University-Ankara]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
86. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2007). Knowledge management: Evidence and education: Linking research and practice.
87. Özerbaş, M. A., & Kuralbayeva, A. (2018). A review of digital literacy levels of future primary-school and secondary-school teachers in Turkey and Kazakhstan. MSKU Journal of Education, 5(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.314761
88. Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Dimensions of digital literacy based on five models of development. Culture and Education, 31(2), 232-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603274
89. Petko, J. T., Sivo, S. A., & Lambie, G. W. (2020). The research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research mentoring experiences of doctoral students in counselor education. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(1), 3.
90. Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859
91. Potyrała, K., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2021). Teachers in the lifelong learning process: examples of digital literacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1876499
92. Rawls, G. J. (2008). Research self-efficacy and research mentoring experiences as predictors of occupational commitment in counselor education doctoral students. Western Michigan University.
93. Rodriguez-Gomez, D., Castro, D., & Meneses, J. (2018). Problematic uses of ICT among young people in their personal and school life. Comunicar, 26(56), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-09
94. Roman, A. (2021). Research competencies and performance of higher education institutions (HEI) faculty. International Journal of Research Publications, 78(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100781620211975
95. Rose, J., Thomas, S., Zhang, L., Edwards, A., Augero, A., & Roney, P. (2017). Research learning communities: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation.
96. Şad, S. N., & Nalçacı, Ö., İ. (2015). Prospective teachers’ perceived competencies about ıntegrating ınformation and communication technologies into education. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(1), 177-197.
97. Sadıç, T. (2019). Correlation between high school teachers’ perception of innovativeness, attitude towards researches on education and research qualifications (Thesis No. 579998) [Master’s thesis, Yıldız Technical University-Istanbul]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
98. Seferoğlu, S. S. (2001). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions of professional development. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 20, 117-125.
99. Shank, G., & Brown, L. (2013). Exploring Educational Research Literacy. Routledge. Shidiq, A. S., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitudes and attributes toward the twenty-first century skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157(84), p. 042014. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042014
100. Starkey, L. (2016). An equitable curriculum for a digital age. Curriculum Matters, 12, 29-45. https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0012
101. Su, Y. (2023). Delving into EFL teachers’ digital literacy and professional identity in the pandemic era: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Heliyon, 9(6), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16361
102. Syahrial, S., Kurniawan, D. A., Asrial, A., Sabil, H., Maryani, S., & Rini, E. F. S. (2022). Professional teachers: Study of ICT capabilities and research Competencies in urban and rural? Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(7), 2247-2261. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590
103. Syvänen, A., Mäkiniemi, J. P., Syrjä, S., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., & Viteli, J. (2016). When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar, 12(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2281
104. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
105. Taşdemir, M., & Taşdemir, A. (2011). Scientific research review competences of prospective teachers. The Journal of Selçuk Unıversıty Socıal Scıences Instıtute, 26, 343-353
106. Tatto, M. T., & Furlong, J. (2015). Research and teacher education: Papers from the BERA-RSA Inquiry. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017404
107. Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Measurement of attitudes, and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel.
108. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers’ digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16017-16040.
109. Ulvik, M. (2014). Student-teachers doing action research in their practicum: why and how? Educational Action Research, 22(4), 518-533.
110. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2017). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, guidelines on adaptation of the UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. http://en.unesco.org/themes/teachers
111. Üstündağ, M. T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of digital literacy scale and ınvestigating pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy. Journal of Education and Future 12, 19-29.
112. Utama, C., & Nurkamto, J. (2019). Investigating Biology pre-service teacher perception of general Biology and digital literacy. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1), p. 012046. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012046
113. Velioğlu, E., & Özdemir, A. (2023). Levels of teacher’s scientifıc research skills: Mixed method research. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 58, 186-215. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.1125661
114. Waite, S., & Davis, B. (2006). Developing undergraduate research skills in a faculty of education: Motivation through collaboration. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600947426
115. Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2014). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746159
116. Westbury, I., Hansén, S.-E., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research‐based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500267937
117. Williams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369719
118. Yıldız, D., Kılıç, M. Y., Gülmez, D., & Yavuz, M. (2019). Research literacy skills of teachers: Scale development study. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.33907/turkjes.500780
119. Zhang, S., Mingyue Gu, M., Sun, W., & Jin, T. (2023). Digital literacy competence, digital literacy practices and teacher identity among pre-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2023.2283426