Araştırma Makalesi

Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1 29 Ocak 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions

Öz

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences education, understanding learners' experiences, engagement and literacy of these tools is critical. This study explores AI literacy among Turkish EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students regarding their familiarity, knowledge, and ethical perceptions of AI technologies in academic writing. Using a descriptive exploratory approach, the study surveyed 427 students from two Turkish universities. Findings reveal a moderate level of AI familiarity and usage among participants, with a significant reliance on AI tools for translation and grammar proofreading. Despite recognizing AI's potential to enhance academic writing, students exhibited limited technical proficiency and understanding of AI's underlying mechanisms, highlighting a need for targeted and structured AI education for EFL writing. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on AI integration in EFL education, offering insights for policymakers, educators, and researchers to better prepare students for an AI-driven academic environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murph, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., ... & Weber, N. (2019). Horizon report 2019 higher education edition (pp. 3-41). EDU19. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208644/ Al Mahmud, F. (2023). Investigating EFL students’ writing skills through artificial intelligence: Wordtune application as a tool. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1395-1404. https://jltr.academypublication.com/index.php/jltr/article/view/6649
  2. Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9, p. 1347421. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421
  3. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
  4. Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC horizon report: 2018 higher education edition. Louisville, CO: Educause. https://cit.bnu.edu.cn/docs/2018-09/20180918163624337480.pdf
  5. Bianchi, T. (2023). ChatGPT website visits 2023. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1415201/chatopenaicom-chatgpt-audience-reach-visitors/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  6. Bosch, T., & Uzuegbunam, C. E. (2023, November 19). South African university students use AI to help them understand – not to avoid work. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/south-african-university-students-use-ai-to-help-them-understand-not-to-avoid-work-216754
  7. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  8. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9069875

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Öğretim Teknolojileri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Ocak 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Ağustos 2024

Kabul Tarihi

18 Aralık 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Hossain, Z., Çelik, Ö., & Hınız, G. (2025). Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 18(1), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1538011
AMA
1.Hossain Z, Çelik Ö, Hınız G. Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2025;18(1):157-181. doi:10.30831/akukeg.1538011
Chicago
Hossain, Zakir, Özgür Çelik, ve Gökhan Hınız. 2025. “Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 18 (1): 157-81. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1538011.
EndNote
Hossain Z, Çelik Ö, Hınız G (01 Ocak 2025) Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 18 1 157–181.
IEEE
[1]Z. Hossain, Ö. Çelik, ve G. Hınız, “Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions”, Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, c. 18, sy 1, ss. 157–181, Oca. 2025, doi: 10.30831/akukeg.1538011.
ISNAD
Hossain, Zakir - Çelik, Özgür - Hınız, Gökhan. “Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences 18/1 (01 Ocak 2025): 157-181. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1538011.
JAMA
1.Hossain Z, Çelik Ö, Hınız G. Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 2025;18:157–181.
MLA
Hossain, Zakir, vd. “Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions”. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, c. 18, sy 1, Ocak 2025, ss. 157-81, doi:10.30831/akukeg.1538011.
Vancouver
1.Zakir Hossain, Özgür Çelik, Gökhan Hınız. Exploring EFL Students’ AI Literacy in Academic Writing: Insights into Familiarity, Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences. 01 Ocak 2025;18(1):157-81. doi:10.30831/akukeg.1538011

Cited By