Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Tatmini Düzeylerinde Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırmada, öğretmenlerin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerinin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü incelenmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda geliştirilen model, 2025–2026 eğitim-öğretim yılında Kilis ilinde görev yapan 412 öğretmenden elde edilen verilerle test edilmiştir. Araştırmada örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel destek ve iş tatmini ölçekleri kullanılmış; veriler SPSS 21 ve AMOS 20 programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, araştırmaya dahil olan öğretmenlerin örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel destek ve iş tatmini düzeyleri arasında pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, örgütsel desteğin, örgütsel özdeşleşmenin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde kısmi aracılık rolü üstlendiği belirlenmiştir. Genel olarak model, örgütsel özdeşleşmenin hem doğrudan hem de örgütsel destek aracılığıyla dolaylı olarak iş tatminini artırdığını göstermektedir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular, örgütsel davranış literatürüne kuramsal katkılar sunmakta ve eğitim kurumlarında çalışan memnuniyetini artırmaya yönelik uygulamalara ışık tutmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öğretmen
• örgütsel özdeşleşme
• örgütsel destek
• iş tatmini
• yapısal eşitlik modellemesi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Etik Kurul Komisyonu’nun 04.09.2025 tarihli ve 2025/13 sayılı onay kararı doğrultusunda yürütülmüş olup, araştırma sürecinin tüm aşamalarında etik ilkelere titizlikle uyulmuştur. Etik standartlar gereği, tüm katılımcılara bilgilendirilmiş onam formu sunulmuş, katılımlarından önce formu inceleyip imzalamaları sağlanmıştır.

The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support in the Impact of Teachers’ Levels of Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction

Öz

This study examines the mediating role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between teachers’ organizational identification levels and job satisfaction. The model developed for this purpose was tested using data collected from 412 teachers working in Kilis during the 2025–2026 academic year. Organizational identification, organizational support, and job satisfaction scales were employed in the research, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 21 and AMOS 20. The results revealed positive and significant relationships among teachers’ levels of organizational identification, organizational support, and job satisfaction. In addition, perceived organizational support partially mediated the effect of organizational identification on job satisfaction. Overall, the model indicates that organizational identification enhances job satisfaction both directly and indirectly through organizational support. The study's findings contribute to the organizational behavior literature and offer insights for practices aimed at improving employee satisfaction in educational institutions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• teacher
• organizational identification
• organizational support
• job satisfaction
• structural equation modeling

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with the approval decision numbered 2025/13 dated 04.09.2025 by the Ethics Committee Commission of Kilis 7 Aralık University Rectorate, and ethical principles were meticulously followed throughout all stages of the research process. In accordance with ethical standards, all participants were provided with an informed consent form, which they reviewed and signed prior to their participation in the study.

Kaynakça

1. Akı, G. & Çoruk, A. (2022). Relationship between whistleblowing and job satisfaction in secondary education ınstitutions. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 93-122. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.935013
2. Akman, Y. (2017). The relationship between work motivation and organisational identification according to perceptions of teachers HAYEF: Journal of Education, 14(1), 71–88. Retrieved from https://research.ebsco.com/c/6ihkfc/viewer/pdf/mkbbtnjwsz
3. Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., & Griffeth, R.W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00222-2
4. Altınöz, M., Çöp, S., Çakıroğlu, D., Kervancı, F., & Keskin, N. (2013). A field study on the link between perceived organizational support and office workers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 26, 149-163. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sbe/issue/23225/248020
5. Annakkaya, E. E. (2022). Lise öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sermaye ile iş doyumu arasındaki ilişki [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul Okan University.
6. Aslan, H. (2020). Mediating Role of psychological capital in the effect of perceived organizational support on job satisfaction. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 9(2), 1452-1469. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.665954
7. Basım, H. N. & Şeşen, H. (2009, Mayıs 21–23). Örgütsel adalet algısı-örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisinde iş tatmininin aracılık rolü. In 17. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Eskişehir.
8. Bedük, A. & Ertürk, E. (2015). The impact of power distance and organizational justice perceptions on the organizational citizenship behaviour in the context of social exchange theory. The Journal of Business Science, 3(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22139/ibd.72405

9. Brown, M.E. (1969). Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391129
10. Bukhari, I. & Kamal, A. (2017). Perceived organizational support, its behavioral and attitudinal work outcomes: Moderating role of perceived organizational politics. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 32(2), 581–602.
11. Cherubin, G. L. (2011). Perceived organizational support and engagement. Master of Science in Organizational Leadership, School of Business and Leadership, Nyack College. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1013836681?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
12. Coyle-Shapiro, J.A-M. & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774
13. Creswell, J.W. (2017). Araştırma Deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. 3. Baskı, Eğiten Kitap Yayınevi.
14. Çakar, N. D. & Yıldız, S. (2009). The effects of organizational justice on job satisfaction: Is “perceived organizational support” a mediator? Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(28), 68–90.
15. Çobanoğlu, F. & Derinbay, D. (2011). The perceived organizational support level of primary school teachers. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40(40), 176-190.
16. Düzgün, E. (2017). Örgütsel destek ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik sermayenin etkisi: Otel işletmelerine yönelik bir araştırma [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
17. Dzhalalov, M. (2019). Örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel desteğin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of organizational identification organizational support on job satisfaction] [Unpublished Master’s dissertation]. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University.
18. Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00114.x
19. Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320601088195
20. Eğriboyun, D. (2014). Relation among organizational support and organizational commitment of the administrators/teachers who are charged in secondary education schools. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 25-53.
21. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lamastro, D.V. (1990). Perceived organizational support snd employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
22. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
23. Engin, E. (2015). İşgörenlerin örgütsel destek algılamalarının iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkileri: Sanayi ve hizmet sektörlerine yönelik bir alan araştırması [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Trakya University.
24. Fu, J., Sun, W., Wang, Y., Yang, X., & Wang, L. (2013). Improving job satisfaction of Chinese doctors: The positive effects of perceived organizational support and psychological capital. Public Health, 127(10), 946–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.017
25. Geçer, A. (2015). Liselerde çalışan öğretmenlerin kayırmacılık ve örgütsel destek algısı (Muğla ili örneği [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University.
26. Gkolia, A., Belias, D., & Koustelios, A. (2014). Teacher’s job satisfaction and self-efficacy: A review. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 321–342.
27. Göktaş Kulualp, H. (2015). Algılanan örgütsel destek, yönetimin açıklığı ve iş tatmininin örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki etkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bülent Ecevit University.
28. Guglielmi, D., Panari, C., Simbula, S., & Mazzetti, G. (2014). Is it possible to motivate teachers? The role of organizational identification. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1842–1847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.481
29. Gül, A. L. (2010). Lise öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre örgütsel destek (Ankara ili örneği) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
30. Güngör, S. K. & İlişen, E. (2018). Analysis of the relationship between teachers' perceptions of organizational support and organizational commitment. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education Journal, 19(1), 962-977.
31. Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391488
32. Hsieh, C.-C., Chien, W.-C., Yen, H.-C., & Li, H.-C. (2022). Same same but different? Exploring the impact of perceived organizational support at the school and teacher levels on teachers’ job engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1067054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067054
33. Hongying, S. (2007). Literature review of teacher job satisfaction. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400502
34. Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 159–174. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-03744-013
35. İnce, A. R. (2016). Mediation role of supervisor support on relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(57), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.03486
36. Kalidass, A. & Bahron, A. (2015). The relationship between perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and employee turnover intention. International Journal of Business Administration, 6(5), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v6n5p82
37. Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M., & Griffiths, M.D. (2015). Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2013-0359
38. Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayınevi.
39. Keser, E. & Dzhalalov, M. (2020). The role of organizational identification in the effect of perceived organizational support on job satisfaction. The Journal of Social Sciences, 7(49), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.29228/SOBIDER.48272
40. Kim, I., & Loadman, W.E. (1994). Predicting teacher job satisfaction. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. D383707). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED383707.pdf
41. Klassen, R. M. & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
42. Korkmaz, M. (2024). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve içsel motivasyonun örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisinde çalışan iyi oluşunun (öznel iyi oluş) aracılık rolü: Özel güvenlik çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Nişantaşı University.
43. Köse, A. (2015). İşe angaje olma ile örgütsel destek algısı ve örgüt iklimi arasındaki ilişki (Kahramanmaraş ili örneği [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University.
44. Kreiner, G. E. & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.234
45. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
46. Kürü, S. A. & Kitapçı, H. (2023). The relationship between organizational ıdentification and job satisfaction: A meta analysis study over with Turkey sample studies conducted. Cankırı Karatekin University Journal of the Faculty of Economics, 13(1), 230–266. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.733917
47. Lambe, C. J., Wittmann, C. M., & Spekman, R. E. (2001). Social exchange theory and research on business-to-business relational exchange. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 8(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1300/J033v08n03_01
48. Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012
49. Li, L., Kanchanapoom, K., Deeprasert, J., Duan, N., & Qi, Z. (2025). Unveiling the factors shaping teacher job performance: Exploring the interplay of personality traits, perceived organizational support, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02324-1
50. Mascarenhas, C., Galvão, A. R., & Marques, C. S. (2022). How perceived organizational support, identification with organization and work engagement influence job satisfaction: A gender-based perspective. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020066
51. Munir, R. I. S. & Rahman, R. A. (2016). Determining dimensions of job satisfaction using factor analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30156-3
52. Nayır, F. (2011). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin öğretmenlere sağlanan örgütsel desteğe ilişkin görüşleri, öğretmenlerin örgütsel destek algısı ve örgütsel bağlılıkla ilişkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara University.
53. Pattnaik, S. & Tripathy, S. K. (2020). Organizational identification (OID): A review of major develop-ments in the field and recommendations for future research. South Asian Journal of Management, 27(1), 28–53.
54. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. http://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
55. Reyes, P. & Pounder, D. G. (1993). Organizational orientation in public and private elementary schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1993.9941171
56. Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698 Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R., & Hansen, J. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 1027–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.003
57. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2024). Organizational behavior, Global Edition (19th ed.). Pearson Education.
58. Sahito, Z. & Vaisanen, P. (2020). A literature review on teachers’ job satisfaction in developing countries: Recommendations and solutions for the enhancement of the job. Review of Education, 8(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3159
59. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and goodness-of-fit indices. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
60. Serinikli, N. (2019). The mediating role of job stress in employees’ perceptions of organizational support with respect to job satisfaction. Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(3), 585-597.
61. Sharma, R. D. & Jyoti, J. (2006). Job satisfaction among school teachers. IIMB Management Review, 18(4), 349–363.
62. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage Publications.
63. Stamper, C. L., & Johlke, M. C. (2003). The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00025-4
64. Şahin, E. (2014). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında örgütsel kimlik, örgütsel imaj, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel adalet (Bursa örneği) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
65. Taşdemir, S. (2013). Motivasyon kavramına genel bir bakış, motivasyon araçları ve Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu ölçeğinde bir model önerisi. [Administrative Specialization Thesis, Ankara, Information Technologies and Communications Authority].
66. Uzun, T. (2018). Öğretmenlerin algıladığı örgütsel destek ile örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişki: Örgütsel güvenin aracı rolü. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(18), 133–155.
67. Van Knippenberg, D. & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identifications versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.359
68. Wan-Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1998). The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 724-749 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01728.x
69. Wyrwa, J. & Kazmierczyk, J. (2020). Conceptualizing job satisfaction and its determinants: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Sociology, 21(5), 138-167. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2020-5-138-168
70. Yakut, E. (2020). Examining medaiting and moderating role of personnel empowerment in the effect of the perceived organizational support on intention to leave work: structural equation model application in textile sector. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(26), 4070–4100. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.738785
71. Yılmaz, D. (2014). Dağıtılmış liderliğin örgütsel güven ile algılanan örgütsel destek ve okul başarısıyla ilişkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
72. Yüksel, İ. (2006). Perception of organizational support and its determinants' relationship with turnover intention. Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration Journal, 35(1), 7-32.
73. Zagenczyk, T. J., Gibney, R., Few, W. T., & Scott, K. L. (2011). Psychological contracts and organizational identification: The mediating effect of perceived organizational support. Journal of Labor Research, 32(3), 254–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-011-9111-z
74. Zhu, Y. (2013). A review of job satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 9(1), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n1p293