Araştırma Makalesi

Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster

Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1 25 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster

Öz

Working with individuals who have experienced trauma increases the risk of secondary traumatic stress for professionals. This study aims to examine the levels of secondary traumatic stress experienced by professionals providing psychosocial support in the disaster area following the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on February 6, 2023 in relation to various variables. The study employed a quantitative correlational survey method. The sample consisted of 341 psychosocial support team professionals working in the disaster area who voluntarily participated in the study. The following factors were found to be protective against secondary traumatic stress: male gender; a high level of knowledge about post-disaster psychosocial support; education in post-disaster psychosocial support services beyond undergraduate level; previous experience in post-disaster psychosocial support; short periods of time spent in the psychosocial support team in the disaster area (8–14 days); accepting the role voluntarily; and an absence of personal trauma history. The study's results have identified variables that may be risk or protective factors for professionals providing post-earthquake psychosocial support. Notably, a high level of knowledge about post-disaster psychosocial support, relevant training, and experience in this field are important factors in supporting the mental health of professionals working in this area.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Disaster, Earthquake, Psychosocial Support, Social Worker, Secondary Traumatic Stress

Kaynakça

  1. AFAD (2023). Kahramanmaraş’ta meydana gelen depremler hk - 34. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kahramanmarasta-meydana-gelen-depremler-hk-34
  2. Akcanbaş, M., & Keskiner, M. (2020). Travmatize olmuş mağdurları temsil eden avukatlarda ikincil travmatik stres oluşumu. OHS Academy, 3(3), 162-182. https://doi.org/10.38213/ohsacademy.777212
  3. Aktaş-Ceyhan, E. (2023). İnsani yardım çalışanlarının ikincil travmatik stresleri ve psikolojik dayanıklılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi. Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  4. Altekin, S. (2014). Vicarious traumatization: an investigation of the effects of trauma work on mental health professionals in Turkey. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boğaziçi University,İstanbul https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=vu2cPR2SW7mJPEc8rYSIOA&no=AqQIQjmwHb2orFD5Q3M22Q
  5. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth edition text revision (DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. ISBN: 978-0-89042-576-3.
  6. Baum, N. (2014). Female receptivity and secondary traumatization in the family. Family Process, 53(2), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12049
  7. Baum, N. (2016). Secondary traumatization in mental health professionals: A systematic review of gender findings. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015584357
  8. Baum, N., Rahav, G., & Sharon, M. (2014). Heightened susceptibility to secondary traumatization: A meta-analysis of gender differences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099383
  9. Benavides, J. L., Modeste-James, A., Osborn, P., Radney, A., Stepney, L., Smith, M., Rawlins, M., & Borne, M. (2024). Addressing secondary traumatic stress in pediatric emergency room social workers: A toolkit for new graduates. Clinical Social Work Journal, 1-12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10615-024-00930-5
  10. Boetto, H. (2024). Addressing disaster fatigue: A SAFE framework for enhancing disaster resilience in social work. International Social Work 67(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728241269717

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kaya, Ç. S., & Kara, F. R. (2026). Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 28(1), 174-185. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1755766
AMA
1.Kaya ÇS, Kara FR. Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster. AKÜSBD. 2026;28(1):174-185. doi:10.32709/akusosbil.1755766
Chicago
Kaya, Çağatay Serkan, ve F. Rana Kara. 2026. “Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 28 (1): 174-85. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1755766.
EndNote
Kaya ÇS, Kara FR (01 Mart 2026) Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 28 1 174–185.
IEEE
[1]Ç. S. Kaya ve F. R. Kara, “Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster”, AKÜSBD, c. 28, sy 1, ss. 174–185, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.32709/akusosbil.1755766.
ISNAD
Kaya, Çağatay Serkan - Kara, F. Rana. “Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 28/1 (01 Mart 2026): 174-185. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1755766.
JAMA
1.Kaya ÇS, Kara FR. Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster. AKÜSBD. 2026;28:174–185.
MLA
Kaya, Çağatay Serkan, ve F. Rana Kara. “Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster”. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 28, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 174-85, doi:10.32709/akusosbil.1755766.
Vancouver
1.Çağatay Serkan Kaya, F. Rana Kara. Secondary Traumatic Stress Levels of Professionals Providing Psychosocial Support Services After Disaster. AKÜSBD. 01 Mart 2026;28(1):174-85. doi:10.32709/akusosbil.1755766