Yeni Kamu Yönetimi ve Geleneksel Kamu Personel Rejimi Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2018, , 191 - 210, 27.12.2018

Mehmet Boztepe

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.425043

Cited By: 13

Öz

Ülkemizde 2017 yılı Anayasa değişikliği sonrası kamu
personel rejiminin yeniden şekillendirilmesi kapsamında kamu personelinin
sözleşmeli statüye geçirilmesi, kamu personelinin başarı kriterinin performans sonuçları
ile ilişkilendirilmesi, üst düzey kamu görevlilerinin dışarıdan atanması ve
görev sürelerinin sınırlandırılması konuları gündeme gelmektedir. Bu talepleri
1980’li yılların ortalarından itibaren gelişmiş ülkelerde uygulamaya konulan “Yeni
Kamu Yönetimi” anlayışının kamu sektörünün yönetim tarzında meydana getirdiği
değişimlerin bir yansıması olarak görmek gerekmektedir. Öyle ki 20 yy boyunca
tüm kamu personel rejimine hakim olan Weber’in geleneksel bürokrasi teorisi,
katılığı ve değişime karşı uyumsuzluğu nedeniyle 1980’li yıllardan itibaren ciddi
şekilde eleştirilmeye başlanmıştır. Bunun sonucu olarak başta OECD Ülkeleri
olmak üzere tüm dünyada kamu yönetiminin esnek ve performans odaklı formlara
uyması ve sonuç odaklı faaliyette bulunması gerektiği tezinden hareketle “Yeni
Kamu Yönetimi” anlayışının şekillendirdiği kamu personel rejimi uygulamaya
sokulmuştur. Bu açıdan “Yeni Kamu Yönetimi” anlayışının
geleneksel kamu personel rejimine yönelik etkilerinin sağlıklı analiz edilmesi
ülkemizdeki değişim talebinin anlaşılması açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yeni Kamu Yönetimi, Geleneksel Kamu Yönetimi

The Understanding of A New Public Administration And Its Effects on Traditional Public Personnel Regime

Öz

Kaynakça

• Barzelay, Michael (2000). “How to Argue About The New Public Management”, International Public Management Journal 2, pp.183-216.Boyne, G., Jenkins, G., Poole, M. (1999). “Human Resources Management in the Public and Private Sector: An Empirical Comparison”, Public Administration, Vol.77, No:2, pp.407-420.Bozeman, B. and Straussman, J. D. (1990). Public Management Strategies Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass Public Administration Series, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Common, R. K. (1998a). “Convergence and Transfer: A Review of the Globalisation of New Public Management”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(6): pp.440-50. Common, R. K. (1998b). “The New Public Management and Policy Transfer: the Role of International Organizations”, Martin Minogue, Charles Polidano ve David Hulme (Ed.), Beyond The New Public Management-Changing Ideas and Practices in Governance, pp.59–75. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Dunsire, A. (1995). “Administrative Theory in the 1980s: A Viewpoint”, Public Administration, 73. vol. 1995, pp. 17-40. Dowding, K. (1993). ‘Managing the Civil Service; Structure and Management’ in Managing the United Kingdom ;An İntroduction to its Politic Economy&Public Policy, London, Sage Publications. Dunleavy, P., Hood, C.C. (1994). “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management”, Public Money and Management, 14/2, pp.9-16.Fábıán, A. (2010). “New Public Management And What Comes After”, Issues Of Business And Law, Vol: 2: pp.36-45.Falconer, P., K. (2000). Public Administration and the New Public Management: Lessons from the UK Experience, (https://sihombing17.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/6-public-administration-and-new-public-management.pdf.), (date of access: 28.12.2017).Farnham, D., Horton, S. (1996). Managing People in the Public Services, London, Mcmillan.Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Flynn, N., Alberto A. (2016). Public Sector Management, London, Sage Publication.Geri, L. R. (2001). “New Public Management and The Reform of International Organizations”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67: pp.445-60. Goodsell, C., T. (2004). The Case for Bureaucracy. A Public Administration Polemic, Washington DC: C. Q. Press.Greer, P. (1996). "The next Step Initiative: An Examination of the Agency Framework Documents". Ed.: D.J. Galligan, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Gruening, G. (2001). “Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management”, International Public Management Journal, 4:pp.1-25.Haktankaçmaz, İ. (2008). Yeni kamu Yönetimi Yaklaşımı: Kamu Sektörü Sorunlarına Çözüm mü? Geçici Bir Moda mı? , Türk İdare Dergisi, Yıl.80, Sayı 461, s.121-133.
• Haque, M. S. (2000). “Significance of Accountability under the New Approach to Public Governance”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66 (4), pp. 599-617.Hood, C.C. (1991). “A Public Management for All Seasons?”, Public Administration, 69/1, pp.3-19.Hope, Kempe Ronald (2001). “The New Public Management: Context and Practice in Africa”, International Public Management Journal, 4: pp.119-34.
• Hughes, O. E. (2014). Kamu İşletmeciliği ve Yönetimi, Çeviren: Buğra Kalkan, Bahadır Akın ve Şeyma Akın, BingBang Yayınları, Ankara.
• Hughes, O. E. (2017). Public Management and Administration, An İntroduction, 5.th ed., Palgrave, Macmillan.Kickert, W. J. M. (1996). Public Management in the United States and Europe, paper presented for the conference on the New Public Management in International Perspective Institute of Public Finance and Fiscal Law, St Gallen.Laking, R. (2000). “Don't Try This at Home? A New Zealand Approach to Public Management Reform in Mongolia”, International Public Management Journal, 2: pp.217-235.E. J. Lane (2000). The Public Sector. London: Sage.L. E. Lynn (1998). “A Critical Analysis of the New Public Management”, International Public Management Journal, C.1:s.109.Manning, N. (2001). “The Legacy of New Public Management in Developing Countries’. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67(2), pp. 298–312.Martin, B. (1993). In the Public Interest – Privatization and Public Sector Reform, London, Zed Books.Mathiasen D. G. (1999) “The New Public Management and Its Critics”, International Public Management Journal, 2(1): pp.90-l11.Morris, G. (1999). “Fragmenting the State: Implications for Accountability for Employment Practices in Public Services”, Public Law, Spring 1999, pp.64-93.OECD, (1995). Governance In Transition - Public Management Reforms In OECD Countries, Background Paper by the Secretariat , Paris.OECD, (2000), Recent Developments And Future Challenges In Human Resource Management In OECD Member Countries, Background Paper by the Secretariat, Paris.Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government, How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Plume, USA.Peters, B. G. (1997). “Policy Transfer Between Governments: The Case of Administrative Reforms”, West European Politics, 20(4):pp.71-88.Pollitt, C. (1997). Manageralism and the Public Services: The Anglo American Experience, Hardcover, Blackwell.Pollitt, C. (1998). Managerialism Revisited: Assesing Public Sector Reform, London, McGillQuenss’s University Press.
• Pollitt, C. (2000). "Is the Emperor in His Underwear? An Analysis of the Impacts of Public Management Reform", Public Management Vol 2, Issue 2, 2000, pp 181-199.
• Pollitt, C. (2007). “The New Public Management: An Overview of Its Current Status”, Administration and Public Management Review (Revista "Administratie si Management Public" (RAMP)), Issue: 08: pp.110-115.
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis of New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, Third Edition, Oxford University Press.Rainey, H. G., Chun, Y. H. (2005). “Public and Private Management Compared”, In Ferlie E, Lynn L and Pollitt, C (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp. 72-102.Rose, R. (1991). “What is Lesson Drawing?”, Journal of Public Policy, 11(1):pp.3-30.
• Sözen, S. ve Shaw, I.. (2002). “The International Applicability of “New” Public Management: Lessons From Turkey”, The International Journal Of Public Sector Management, 15(6):475-486.
• United Nations, (2005). Unlocking the Human Potential for Public Sector Performance. World Public Sector Report, Department of Social and Economic Affairs. New York.
• Wılson, E. and Doig A. (1996). “The Shape of Ideology: Structure, Culture and Policy Delivery in The New Public Sector”, 16(2): pp.53-61.