Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Effects of Urban Logistics and Destination Competence on Tourism: Comparative Analysis of Gastronomy Cities of Afyonkarahisar, Hatay and Gaziantep

Yıl 2022, , 223 - 237, 27.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.891977

Öz

People migrate from rural areas to urban areas to have a better standard of living and education, healthcare and job opportunities. Along with trade and tourism, the high living standards of citizens are developing due to communication and transportation. The reason why gastronomy cities want to join the UNESCO Creative Cities Network is that they want to increase the living standards of the city and country residents by taking the share they want from the tourism market in the world. Therefore, logistics and destination competences are important for gastronomy cities. In the literature review, it was seen that there was no study on the relationship and effects of urban logistics and destination capabilities with gastronomy cities. For this reason, this study was conducted as a comparative research on the logistics and destination capabilities of gastronomy cities. It is seen that Afyonkarahisar ranks first in gastronomy and destination capabilities. However, It is seen that Afyonkarahisar ranks 10th in the life index of Turkey. Hatay ranks the first in the life index. Gaziantep and Afyonkarahisar, which are gastronomy cities, have the same ranking in livability. Furthermore, considering sustainability, Afyonkarahisar ranks first with the highest score. In terms of mobility, Gaziantep is the first and Afyonkarahisar ranks the second. 

Kaynakça

  • Acar, A. Z. & Zehir, C. (2009). The role of logistics capabilities in creating competitive advantage and their effects on firms performance. 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İşletme Bölümü, 411-418.
  • Afyonkarahisar Culture and Tourism Provincial Directorate (2021). Important days and festivals. https://afyon.ktb.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • Akben, İ. & Pekmez Bahçeci̇, A. (2018). Urban logistics: a model of Gaziantep. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (6), 211-229.
  • Aksungur, M. & Bekmezci, M. (2020). Logistics performance evaluation of turkey: a dimensional research. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (12), 19-40.
  • Bakan, İ. & Şekkeli, Z. H. (2015). Logistics Capability and logistics performance perceptions in logistics firm spiral: a field research. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2 (5), 398-422.
  • Bakan, İ., Erşahan, B. & Ki̇raz, E. (2020). Logistics capability and logistics performance perceptions in logistics firm spiral: a field research. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36) , 412-454. doi: 10.14520/adyusbd.807748.
  • Bakan, İ.,Sekkeli̇, Z. & Yi̇lmaz, S. (2017). Logistics capability and ıts effects on competitiveness: an empirical study throughout Turkey. Press Academia Procedia, 3 (1), 206-217. doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.405.
  • Bi̇lgi̇ner, N. Kayabaşı, A. & Sezi̇ci̇, E. (2015). An empirical study on evaluation of the factors effecting the processive ımpact of logistical activities. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (22), 1-21.
  • Gaziantep Provincial Directorate of culture and tourism (2021). Festivals, Fairs and Local Events.https://gaziantep.ktb.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • General Directorate of Investments and Businesses (2021), http://yatirimisletmeleruygulama.kultur.gov.tr (Accessed: 27.02.2021).
  • Gürel, Ö. & Asan, S. S. (2018). City logistics and ındustry 4.0, ıntegration. Irditech 2018 Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi, İstanbul: Okan Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018. 225-238.
  • Hatay Governorship (2021). Festivals and Events. http://hatay.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • Higher Education Program Atlas (2020). Higer education program. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr (Accessed: 12.02.2021).
  • İncaz, S. (2015). New approaches in the context of logistics and sustainability. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1), 149-162.
  • İstanbul Development Agency (2014). istanbul logistics sector analysis report. https://www.istka.org.tr (Accessed: 04.03.20219).
  • Kasımoğlu, B. S. (2018). City Logistics performance ındex and a pilot evaluatoon. İstanbul T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul
  • Minister of Transport and Infrastructure Limitations (2020). https://www.uab.gov.tr (Accessed: 22.02.2021).
  • Ölmez, S. & Mutlu, H. (2017). The effect of relationship quality on logistic performance. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5 (4) , 79-90.
  • Savrun, B. & Mutlu, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis on city logistics. Kent Akademisi 12 (2), 364-386.
  • Taniguchi, E. Thompson, R. G. Yamada, T. & Van Duin, R. (2001). City logistics – Network modelling and intelligent transport systems. Pergamon, Oxford; 2001, p. 1-15.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2015). Indicator values of well-being index for provinces, https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 02.02.2021).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2020). Gösterge uygulaması, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 07.02.2021).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2020). Göstergeler, https://cip.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 17.02.2021).
  • Witkowski, J. & Kiba-Janiakb, M. (2012). Correlation between city logistics and quality of life as an assumption for referential model. The Seventh International Conference on City Logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 568 – 581.
  • Yangınlar, G. & Bal, N. (2019). Interpretation of Concepts Lean Managment and Lean Logistics. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3 (1), 151-161. doi: 10.30692/sisad.492188.
  • Yorulmaz, M.,& Birgün, S. (2016). Research of Logistics Capabilities on Literature and the Determınatıon of the Maritime Logistics Service Capabilities. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (25). 313-331.

Kentsel Lojistik ve Destinasyon Yeteneklerin Turizme Etkileri: Afyonkarahisar, Hatay ve Gaziantep Gastronomi Şehirlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Yıl 2022, , 223 - 237, 27.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.891977

Öz

İnsanlar daha iyi bir yaşam standardı, eğitim, sağlık hizmetleri ve iş fırsatlarına sahip olmak için kırsal alanlardan kentsel alanlara göç ederler. Ticaret ve turizmin yanı sıra iletişim ve ulaşım sayesinde vatandaşların yüksek yaşam standartları gelişmektedir. Gastronomi şehirlerinin UNESCO Yaratıcı Şehirler Ağına katılmak istemelerinin nedeni, dünyadaki turizm pazarından istedikleri payı alarak şehir ve ülke sakinlerinin yaşam standartlarını yükseltmek istemeleridir. Bu nedenle lojistik ve destinasyon yetkinlikleri gastronomi kentleri için önemlidir. Literatür taramasında, kentsel lojistiğin ve destinasyon yeteneklerinin gastronomi kentleri ile ilişkisi ve etkileri üzerine bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada, gastronomi şehirlerinin lojistik ve destinasyon yetenekleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma olarak yapılmıştır. Afyonkarahisar'ın Türkiye’nin yaşam endeksinde 10. sırada yer aldığı görülmektedir. Yaşam endeksinde Hatay birinci sırada yer alırken, Afyonkarahisar, gastronomi ve destinasyon yeteneklerinde birinci sırada yer almaktadır. Gaziantep ve Afyonkarahisar gastronomi şehri yaşanabilirlik açısından aynı sıralamaya sahiptir. Sürdürülebilirlik açısından Afyonkarahisar gastronomi şehri en yüksek puana sahip olup ilk sırada yer almaktadır. Hareketlilik açısından Gaziantep birinci, Afyonkarahisar ikinci sıradadır. 

Kaynakça

  • Acar, A. Z. & Zehir, C. (2009). The role of logistics capabilities in creating competitive advantage and their effects on firms performance. 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İşletme Bölümü, 411-418.
  • Afyonkarahisar Culture and Tourism Provincial Directorate (2021). Important days and festivals. https://afyon.ktb.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • Akben, İ. & Pekmez Bahçeci̇, A. (2018). Urban logistics: a model of Gaziantep. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (6), 211-229.
  • Aksungur, M. & Bekmezci, M. (2020). Logistics performance evaluation of turkey: a dimensional research. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (12), 19-40.
  • Bakan, İ. & Şekkeli, Z. H. (2015). Logistics Capability and logistics performance perceptions in logistics firm spiral: a field research. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2 (5), 398-422.
  • Bakan, İ., Erşahan, B. & Ki̇raz, E. (2020). Logistics capability and logistics performance perceptions in logistics firm spiral: a field research. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36) , 412-454. doi: 10.14520/adyusbd.807748.
  • Bakan, İ.,Sekkeli̇, Z. & Yi̇lmaz, S. (2017). Logistics capability and ıts effects on competitiveness: an empirical study throughout Turkey. Press Academia Procedia, 3 (1), 206-217. doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.405.
  • Bi̇lgi̇ner, N. Kayabaşı, A. & Sezi̇ci̇, E. (2015). An empirical study on evaluation of the factors effecting the processive ımpact of logistical activities. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (22), 1-21.
  • Gaziantep Provincial Directorate of culture and tourism (2021). Festivals, Fairs and Local Events.https://gaziantep.ktb.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • General Directorate of Investments and Businesses (2021), http://yatirimisletmeleruygulama.kultur.gov.tr (Accessed: 27.02.2021).
  • Gürel, Ö. & Asan, S. S. (2018). City logistics and ındustry 4.0, ıntegration. Irditech 2018 Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi, İstanbul: Okan Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018. 225-238.
  • Hatay Governorship (2021). Festivals and Events. http://hatay.gov.tr (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
  • Higher Education Program Atlas (2020). Higer education program. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr (Accessed: 12.02.2021).
  • İncaz, S. (2015). New approaches in the context of logistics and sustainability. Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1), 149-162.
  • İstanbul Development Agency (2014). istanbul logistics sector analysis report. https://www.istka.org.tr (Accessed: 04.03.20219).
  • Kasımoğlu, B. S. (2018). City Logistics performance ındex and a pilot evaluatoon. İstanbul T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul
  • Minister of Transport and Infrastructure Limitations (2020). https://www.uab.gov.tr (Accessed: 22.02.2021).
  • Ölmez, S. & Mutlu, H. (2017). The effect of relationship quality on logistic performance. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5 (4) , 79-90.
  • Savrun, B. & Mutlu, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis on city logistics. Kent Akademisi 12 (2), 364-386.
  • Taniguchi, E. Thompson, R. G. Yamada, T. & Van Duin, R. (2001). City logistics – Network modelling and intelligent transport systems. Pergamon, Oxford; 2001, p. 1-15.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2015). Indicator values of well-being index for provinces, https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 02.02.2021).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2020). Gösterge uygulaması, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 07.02.2021).
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2020). Göstergeler, https://cip.tuik.gov.tr (Accessed: 17.02.2021).
  • Witkowski, J. & Kiba-Janiakb, M. (2012). Correlation between city logistics and quality of life as an assumption for referential model. The Seventh International Conference on City Logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 568 – 581.
  • Yangınlar, G. & Bal, N. (2019). Interpretation of Concepts Lean Managment and Lean Logistics. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3 (1), 151-161. doi: 10.30692/sisad.492188.
  • Yorulmaz, M.,& Birgün, S. (2016). Research of Logistics Capabilities on Literature and the Determınatıon of the Maritime Logistics Service Capabilities. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (25). 313-331.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler
Yazarlar

Binali Kılıç 0000-0001-8345-6617

Gül Esin Delipınar 0000-0001-5402-708X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Mart 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Mart 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Kılıç, B., & Delipınar, G. E. (2022). Kentsel Lojistik ve Destinasyon Yeteneklerin Turizme Etkileri: Afyonkarahisar, Hatay ve Gaziantep Gastronomi Şehirlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.891977