Çevresel Kalite, Küreselleşme ve Kurumlar Arasındaki İlişki: G-20 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Küreselleşme, çevresel kalite, kurumsal kalite, G-20 ülkeleri, panel veri analizi
Kaynakça
- Ahad, M., ve Khan, W. (2016). Does globalization impede environmental quality in Bangladesh? The role of real economic activities and energy use. Bulletin of Energy Economics, 4(3), 258-279.
- Ali, H. S., Zeqiraj, V., Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Yusop, Z., Bare, U. A. A., ve Chin, L. (2019). Does quality institutions promote environmental quality?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 10446-10456.
- Amuakwa-Mensah, F., ve Adom, P. K. (2017). Quality of institution and the FEG (forest, energy intensity, and globalization)-environment relationships in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21), 17455-17473.
- Baliamoune-Lutz, M. (2017). Trade and environmental quality in African countries: Do institutions matter?. Eastern Economic Journal, 43(1), 155-172.
- Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., ve Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 176-184.
- Bayar, Y., ve Sasmaz, M. U. (2017). Impact of foreign direct investments on unemployment in emerging market economies: A co-integration analysis. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), 10(3), 90-96.
- BP (2020). BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020.
- Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24(2), 151-173.
- Breusch, T. S., ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
- Dasgupta, S., ve De Cian, E. (2016). Institutions and the environment: existing evidence and future directions.