Bağlanma Stilleri İle Nedensellik Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişkide Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaç Doyumu Aracı Rolünün Etkisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 759 - 773, 27.09.2021

İrem Yola Çetin

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.761704

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik ihtiyaç (özerklik, yeterlik ve ilişkili olma) doyumunun güvenli ve güvensiz bağlanma stilleri ile nedensellik yönelimleri (özerk, kontrol ve kişisel olmayan) arasındaki ilişkide aracı etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın verileri Googleforms üzerinden internet aracılığıyla ve Işık Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü öğrencilerinden yüz yüze yapılan anketler aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Bu şekilde örneklem toplamda 203 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Kişisel Bilgi Formu, İlişki Ölçekleri Anketi, İhtiyaç Doyumu Ölçeği ve Genel Nedensellik Yönelimleri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Betimleyici istatistikler, Pearson korelasyon ile bir dizi tekli ve çoklu regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular güvenli bağlanma ve kişisel olmayan yönelim arasında ilişkili olma, yeterlik ve özerklik ihtiyaç doyumunun tam aracı etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Güvensiz bağlanma ve kişisel olmayan yönelim arasında ise yeterlik ve özerklik ihtiyaç doyumunun kısmi aracı etkisi gözlenmiş; ilişkili olma ihtiyaç doyumunun aracı etkisi olmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Beklenilenin aksine özerk yönelimin güvenli ve güvensiz bağlanma stili ile; kontrol yöneliminin ise yeterlik, özerklik ve ilişkili olma ihtiyaç doyumu ile anlamlı bir ilişkisi bulunamamıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre yeterlik, ilişkili olma ve özerklik ihtiyaç doyumunun güvenli ve güvensiz bağlanma stiline kıyasla nedensellik yönelimlerini belirlemede daha önemli bir kavram olduğu düşünülmektedir. Buna göre kişinin içinde bulunduğu sosyal bağlamın belirtilen psikolojik ihtiyaçları karşılayacak duruma getirilmesinin kişinin yaşamının çeşitli alanlarında önemli ve olumlu sonuçlarla ilişkili olabileceği düşünülmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Özerklik, kişisel olmayan yönelim, güvenli bağlanma

The Effect of the Mediator Role of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction on the Relationship between Attachment Styles and Causality Orientations

Öz

The purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating effect of psychological needs satisfaction in the relationship between secure/insecure attachment styles and causality orientations. Data of the study was collected in two ways. Data was collected by Googleforms and questionnaire from the students of Işık University Psychology Department. Two hundred and three adults participated in this study. The questionnaire includes a Sociodemographic Form, Relationships Scales Questionnaire, The Basic Psychological Needs Scale and The General Causality Orientations Scale. Descriptive Analysis, Pearson correlation, simple and multiple regression statistical methods were conducted. According to the study, the relationship between secure attachment style and impersonal orientation was fully mediated by psychological needs satisfaction which are autonomy, competence and relatedness. And the relationship between insecure attachment style and impersonal orientation was partially mediated by psychological needs satisfaction which are autonomy and competence. Psychological needs satisfaction are seemed to be more basic in determining causal orientations than secure and insecure attachment styles. Therefore, it seems that arranging the social context of the person in a way satisfying basic psychological needs may be related to important and positive results in various areas of individual’s life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Autonomy, impersonal orientation, secure attachment

Kaynakça

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. ve Wall, S. N. (2015). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Psychology Press.
• Ainsworth, M. S. (1979). Infant–mother attachment. American psychologist, 34(10), 932.
• Barcza-Renner, K., Eklund, R. C., Morin, A. J. ve Habeeb, C. M. (2016). Controlling coaching behaviors and athlete burnout: Investigating the mediating roles of perfectionism and motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(1), 30-44.
• Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
• Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147-178. 10.1177%2F0265407590072001.
• Bartholomew, K. ve Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 226. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
• Behzadnia, B. (2020). The relations between students’ causality orientations and teachers’ interpersonal behaviors with students’ basic need satisfaction and frustration, intention to physical activity, and well-being. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1-20.
• Bıçaksız, P., Şermet, S. ve Giriş, Ç. (2019). Associations of self-determination and locus of control with accepted level of automation among Turkish drivers. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 157-168.
• Black, A. E. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science education, 84(6), 740-756. 10.1002/1098 237X(200011)84:6%3C740::AID-SCE4%3E3.0.CO;2-3.
• Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds: II. Some principles of psychotherapy: The Fiftieth Maudsley Lecture (expanded version). The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(5), 421-431. 10.1192/bjp.130.5.421.
• Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. ve Bacanlı, H. (2003). İhtiyaç doyum ölçeği uyarlama çalışması. VII. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresinde sunulan bildiri. İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Collins, N. L. ve Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(4), 644. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
• Costa, S., Cuzzocrea, F., Gugliandolo, M. C. ve Larcan, R. (2016). Associations between parental psychological control and autonomy support, and psychological outcomes in adolescents: The mediating role of need satisfaction and need frustration. Child Indicators Research, 9(4), 1059-1076.
• Dağ, İ. ve Şen, G. (2018). The mediating role of perceived social support in the relationships between general causality orientations and locus of control with psychopathological symptoms. Europe's journal of psychology, 14(3), 531.
• Deci EL. The Psychology of Self Determination. Lexington, MA: Health (LexingtonBooks), 1980.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985a). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182. 10.1037/a0012801
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. ve Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
• Erözkan, A. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bağlanma stilleri ve karar stratejileri. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 60-74.
• Fernet, C., Guay, F. ve Senécal, C. (2004). Adjusting to job demands: The role of work self-determination and job control in predicting burnout. Journal of vocational behavior, 65(1), 39-56. 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00098-8
• Griffin, D. W. ve Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment.
• Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 511. 10.1037/00223514.52.3.511
• Hetland, J., Hetland, H., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Andreassen, C. S. ve Pallesen, S. (2015). Psychological need fulfillment as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and positive job attitudes. Career Development International.
• Hodgins, H. S., Koestner, R. ve Duncan, N. (1996). On the compatibility of autonomy and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 227-237. 10.1177%2F0146167296223001
• Kanat-Maymon, Y., Benjamin, M., Stavsky, A., Shoshani, A. ve Roth, G. (2015). The role of basic need fulfillment in academic dishonesty: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 1-9.
• Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., Nanayakkara, A. ve Neighbors, C. (2002). Self-determination as growth motivation in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(5), 609-619. 10.1177%2F0146167202288005
• La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(3), 367.
• Leak, G. K. ve Cooney, R. R. (2001). Self-determination, attachment styles, and well-being in adult romantic relationships. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 25, 55-62.
• Leung, A. N. M. ve Law, W. (2019). Do extrinsic goals affect romantic relationships? The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 43(6), 857-873.
• Mih, C. ve Mih, V. (2016). Fear of failure, disaffection and procrastination as mediators between controlled motivation and academic cheating. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 20(2), 117.
• Mouratidis, A. ve Michou, A. (2011). Perfectionism, self-determined motivation, and coping among adolescent athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(4), 355-367.
• Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L. ve Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340. 10.1177%2F1745691612447309
• Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A. ve Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 434.
• Pelletier, L. G., Dion, S. C., Slovinec-D'Angelo, M. ve Reid, R. (2004). Why do you regulate what you eat? Relationships between forms of regulation, eating behaviors, sustained dietary behavior change, and psychological adjustment. Motivation and emotion, 28(3), 245-277.
• Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J. ve Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and emotion, 25(4), 279-306.
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1.
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
• Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., ve Fröhlich, S. M. (2010). Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between competence need satisfaction and subsequent motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 1-12.
• Soper, D.S. (2017). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. Available from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
• Stoeber, J. ve Eismann, U. (2007). Perfectionism in young musicians: Relations with motivation, effort, achievement, and distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(8), 2182-2192.
• Sümer, N. ve Güngör, D. (1999). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ölçeklerinin Türk örneklemi üzerinde psikometrik değerlendirmesi ve kültürlerarası bir karşılaştırma. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(43), 71-106.
• Şen, G. ve Dağ, İ. (2016). Genel Nedensellik Yönelimleri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğinin üniversite öğrencilerinde sınanması. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry/Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17. 10.5455/apd.204169.
• Şen, G., ve Dağ, İ. (2020). The Relationship between Insecure Attachment Patterns and Psychopathological Symptoms: The Mediating Role of General Causality Orientations. Psychological Thought, 13(2), 376-409.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics: International edition. Pearson2012.
• Vallerand, R. J. ve Blssonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of personality, 60(3), 599-620.10.1111/j.1467 6494.1992.tb00922.x
• Vansteenkiste, M., Smeets, S., Soenens, B., Lens, W., Matos, L. ve Deci, E. L. (2010). Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes. Motivation and emotion, 34(4), 333-353.
• Wei, M., Shaffer, P. A., Young, S. K. ve Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: The mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(4), 591. 10.1037/0022- 0167.52.4.591
• Westland, J.C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476-487.
• White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297. 10.1037/h0040934
• Wilson, P. M., Rodgers, W. M., Blanchard, C. M. ve Gessell, J. (2003). The Relationship Between Psychological Needs, Self‐Determined Motivation, Exercise Attitudes, and Physical Fitness 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2373-2392. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01890.x