Özel Yetenekli İlkokul Öğrencilerinin Çevreye Yönelik Tutum ve Sorumlu Davranışlarının Çeşitli Demografik Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 897 - 917, 26.09.2023

Salih Ceylan , Tuğba Tetik , Ramazan Peker

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1072910

Öz

Bu araştırmada, ilkokul dördüncü sınıfta öğrenim gören özel yetenekli öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik tutumlarının ve çevreye yönelik sorumlu davranışlarının bazı demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Betimsel tarama modeli olarak tasarlanan araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2021-2022 Eğitim Öğretim yılı birinci döneminde 8 farklı ildeki bilim ve sanat merkezinde öğrenim gören 281 özel yetenekli dördüncü sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Veriler ‘Kişisel Bilgi Formu’, ‘Çevreye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği’ ve ‘Çevreye Yönelik Sorumlu Davranış Ölçeği’ ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmada; özel yetenekli ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutumlarının yüksek düzeyde olumlu olduğu; öğrencilerin cinsiyetleri bakımından da kız öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilere göre çevreye yönelik daha olumlu tutuma sahip oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır. Sosyoekonomik durumlarına göre, düşük gelir grubunda bulunan öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik tutumlarının diğer gelir gruplarındaki öğrencilere göre daha yüksek düzeyde olumlu olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Özel yetenekli ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik sorumlu davranışları ortaya koyma düzeylerinin yüksek olduğu, kız öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilere göre çevreye yönelik daha sorumlu davranışlara sahip oldukları; okul gezisine katılan öğrencilerin katılmayan öğrencilere göre çevreye yönelik daha sorumlu davranışa sahip oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır. Özel yetenekli ilkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutumları ile çevreye yönelik sorumlu davranışları arasında pozitif yönde orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İlkokul öğrencileri, çevre eğitimi, özel yetenekli öğrenciler, çevreye yönelik tutum, çevreye yönelik sorumlu davranış

Investigation of Gifted Primary School Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors toward Environment in Terms of Various Demographic Variables

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the environmental attitudes and environmental responsible behaviors of gifted students in the fourth grade of primary school according to some demographic variables. The population of this study, in which is designed as a descriptive survey model, consists of 281 fourth grade gifted students who are attending Science and Art Centers (SAC) in eight Province of Turkey in the first term of 2021-2022 academic year. Research’s data were collected through ‘Personal Information Form’, ‘Responsible Behavior toward the Environment Scale’ and ‘Attitude toward the Environment Scale’. Findings of research show that students’ attitudes towards the environment are high level; female students have more positive attitude than male students; students whose mothers are housewives have a higher level of positive attitudes towards the environment than students whose mothers are in other profession; in the low income group have a higher level of positive attitudes towards the environment than students in other income groups. It was found that the frequency of the students’ responsible behaviors towards the environment was ‘I do it frequently’ and high level; female students have more responsible behavior towards environment than male students; students participating in the field trip have more responsible behavior towards the environment than the students who do not. As a result of the research, it was revealed that a moderate positive correlation between students’ attitudes towards the environment and their responsible behavior towards the environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primary school students, environmental education, gifted students, attitudes toward the environment, responsible behaviors toward the environment

Kaynakça

• Ando, K., Yorifuji, K., Ohnuma, S., Matthies, E., &Kanbara, A. (2015). Transmitting pro-environmental behaviors to the next generation: A comparison between Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of SocialPsychology, 18(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12078
• Atasoy, E. (2019). İnsan-doğa etkileşimi ve çevre için eğitim. Bursa: Sentez Yayıncılık.
• Ayaydın, Y., Ün, D., Şeşen, B., Usta Gezer, S., & Camcı Erdoğan, S. (2018). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin çevre farkındalık ve duyarlılıkları: “Bilim ve sanat kâşifleri doğada” [Environmental Awareness and Sensitivity of the Gifted Students: “Science and Art Explorers in The Nature”]. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 507-536. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.379723
• Aydın, F., Coşkun, M., Kaya, H., & Erdönmez, İ. (2011). Gifted students’ attitudes towards environment: a case study from Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (7), 1876-1883. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.288
• Bakar, F., & Aydınlı, B. (2012, 27-30 Haziran). Bilim ve sanat merkezi öğrencilerinin plastik ve plastik atıkların geri dönüşümü ve çevreye etkileri konularında tutumlarının belirlenmesi[Determining the attitudes of science and arts center students on recycling of plastic and plastic waste and its effects on the environment].[Sözlü bildiri].10. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Niğde Üniversitesi, Niğde, Türkiye.
• Bakar, F., Avan, Ç., & Aydınlı, B. (2018). Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler ve normal akranlarının geri dönüşüm ve çevresel etkileri üzerine tutumlarının karşılaştırılması [The Attitude Comparison of Gifted Students and Normal Peers on the Recycling and Environmental Effects]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(3), 935-944. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.413389
• Barrera-Hernández, L. F., Sotelo-Castillo, M. A., Echeverría-Castro, S. B., & Tapia-Fonllem, C. O. (2020). Connectedness to nature: Its impact on sustainable behaviors and happiness in children. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00276
• Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1988). Profiles of the Gifted and Talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200202
• Bland, J. M., &Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach'salpha. Bmj, 314(7080), 572.
• Blocker, T. J., &Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 841-858. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863735
• Bogner, F. X., &Wilhelm, M. G. (1996). Environmental perspectives of pupils: the development of an attitude and behaviour scale. Environmentalist, 16(2), 95-110. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01325101
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum[Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation]. Pegem Akademi.
• Chawla, L. (1999) Life paths into effective environment alaction, The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598628
• Chawla, L.,Keena, K., Pevec, I., &Stanley, E. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health&Place, 28, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
• Cheng, J. C. H., &Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and behavior, 44(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
• Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (5th edition). Ohio: Pearson.
• Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted. Developing the potential of children at home and at school. UpperSadleRiver, New Jersey: PrenticeHall.
• Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwarah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Collado, S., Evans, G. W, & Sorrel, M. A. (2017). The role of parents and best friends in children's pro-environmentalism: Differences according to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.007
• Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2011). Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach.WileyPublication.
• Çağlar, D. (1972). Üstün zekâlı çocukların özellikleri[Characteristics of gifted children]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3), 95 – 110. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000389
• Çelik, M., & Doğru, M. (2019). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının çevre sorunlarına yönelik davranışlarının incelenmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 1791-1813.
• Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596283003
• Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Enrichment and grouping. In G. A. Davis & S. B. Rimm (Eds.) Education of the gifted and talented (5th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• De Leeuw, A.,Valois, P., Ajzen, I., &Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmentalpsychology, 42, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
• Demcakova, A., Sera, B., & Sery, M. (2021). Environmental pollution as a part of environmental educaton in school education–example from Slovakia. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 30(2 A), 2045-2052.
• Demirkaya, H. (2006). Çevre eğitiminin Türkiye’deki coğrafya programları içerisindeki yeri ve çevre eğitimine yönelik yeni yaklaşımlar[The Place of Environmental Education in Geography Curricula in Turkey and New Approaches to Environmental Education]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 207-222.
• Domingues, R. B., & Gonçalves, G. (2020). Assessing environmental attitudes in Portugal using a new short version of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory. CurrentPsychology, 39(2), 629-639.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9786-x.
• Engdahl, I., &Rabušicová, M. (2011). Children’s voices about the state of the earth. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(2), 153-176.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-011-0031-0.
• Erten, S. (2004): Çevre Eğitimi ve Çevre Bilinci Nedir, Çevre Eğitimi Nasıl Olmalıdır?, Çevre ve İnsan Dergisi, Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Yayın Organı. Sayı 65/66. 2006/25 Ankara.
• Esen, T. (2011). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının incelenmesi[A research study on gifted student’s knowledge and attitudes towards environment](Tez Numarası: 295022) [Yüksek Lisans tezi, Adıyaman Üniversitesi].Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Federico, F. (2020). Natural environment and social relationship in the development of attentional network. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1345.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
• Hartsell, B. (2006). Teaching towardcompassion: Environmentalvalues education for secondary students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,17(4), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-406
• Ibrahim, H., Mariapan, M., Lin, E. L. A., &Bidin, S. (2021). Environmental Concern, Attitude and Intention in Understanding Student’s Anti-Littering Behavior Using Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability, 13(8), 4301. https://doi.org /10.3390/su13084301.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2006). Yeni insan ve insanlar sosyal psikolojiye giriş[New man and people introduction to socialpsychology]. Evrim Yayınevi.
• Kahn, P. H. J. (1999). The Human Relationship with nature: Development and Culture. MA:MIT Press.
• Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999a). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0107
• Karakaya, F., Ünal, A., Çimen, O., & Yılmaz, M. (2018). Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler ve akranlarının çevre algılarının incelenmesi [Investigation of Environmental Perceptions of Gifted Students and Their Peers]. Online Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 3(1), 25-32. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/547674
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler[Scientific research method:Concepts, principles, techniques]. Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Karnes, F. A., & Riley, T. L. (2005). Developing an early passion for science through competitions. In S.K. Johnsen & J. Kendrick (Eds.), Science education for gifted students. Texas: Prufrock Press.
• Klein, B. S. (2006). Raising gifted kids: Everything you need to know to help your exceptional child thrive. New York: Amacom.
• Köşker, N. (2019). Okulöncesi çocuklarında doğa algısı. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 294-308.
• Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, 1, 1-24.
• Leeming, F. C., Dwyer, W. O., &Bracken, B. A. (1995). Children's environmental attitude and knowledge scale: Construction and validation. The journal of environmental education, 26(3), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1995.9941442.
• Lehman, P. K., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and social issues, 13(1), 13-33.
• Lindsey, L.L. (2010). Gender roles a sociological perspective. Boston: Pearson Education.
• MalbergDyg, P., & Wistoft, K. (2018). Wellbeing in school gardens–the case of the Gardens for Belliesfood and environmental education program. Environmental Education Research, 24(8), 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1434869.
• Malhotra, T., & Chabra, S. (2014). A study of responsible environmental behavior among B. Ed. Distance learners with reference to their locality, gender, stream and socio-economic status. International Woman Online Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-10. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/92009
• McMillan, M., Hoban, T. J., Clifford, W. B., &Brant, M. R. (1997). Social and demographic influences on environmental attitudes. Journal of RuralSocialSciences, 13(1), 5. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1198&context=jrss.
• Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 26-32.
• Nuhoğlu, H., & İmamoğlu, Y. (2018). An Interdisciplinary nature education program for gifted primary school students and its effect on their environmental literacy. Elementary Education Online, 17(4). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/49958/506905.
• Otto, S., Evans, G. W., Moon, M. J., &Kaiser, F. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947.
• Önal, N. T. (2020). Investigation of gifted students’ environmental awareness. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2), 95-107. http://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/500
• Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi cilt-1[Statistical data analysis with package programs volume-1]. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi.
• Peker, R. (2020). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre algıları ile çevreye yönelik tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi [Doktora tezi, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi].Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Piechowski, M. M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Ed.) Handbook of Gifted Education (2nd ed.)(pp. 366-381). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
• Ramstetter, L., &Habersack, F. (2019). Do women make a difference? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of Members of the European Parliament. EnvironmentalPolitics, 29(6), 1063-1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1609156
• Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is thingcalled giftedness and how do we develop it? A twenty-five yearperspective. Journal for the Education of Gifted,23(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902300102
• Riechard, D. E., & Peterson, S. J. (1998). Perception of environmental risk related to gender, community socio economic setting, age, and locus of control. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809601858
• Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., &Collado, S. (2018). Nature experiences and adults’ self-reportedpro-environmentalbehaviors: the role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
• Saraç, H., & Özarslan, M. (2018). EnvironmentalAttitude Levels of Gifted and Talented Students and Analysis of Metacognitive in Terms of SomeVariables. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 6(11), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.364377.
• Sarıçam, H., & Şahin, S. H. (2015). The relationship between the environmental awareness, environmental attitude, curiosity and exploration in highly gifted students: Structural equation modelling. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2015.412.1
• Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 3–25). Denver, CO: Love.
• Silverman, L. K. (2003). Characteristics of giftedness scale: Research and review of the literature. Available from the Gifted Development Center, 1452(9).
• Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction?. Psyshology&Marketing, 11(4), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110405.
• Sontay, G., Gökdere, M., & Usta, E. (2014). The Relationship between the Environmental Awareness, Environmental Attitude, Curiosity and Exploration in Highly Gifted Students: Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Turkish Gifted and Talented, 4(2), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2015.412.1
• Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2014). Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Illustratedscientific research methods]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., &Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and behavior, 25(5), 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell. L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6. ed.)Pearson, Boston.
• Tai, L., Haque, M. T., McLellan, G. K., & Knight, E. J. (2006). Designing outdoor environments for children. New York: McGraw-HillCompanies.
• Thomas, G. O., Fisher, R., Whitmarsh, L., Milfont, T. L., &Poortinga, W. (2018). The impact of parenthood on environmental attitudes and behaviour: a longitudinal investigation of the legacy hypothesis. Population and environment, 39(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0291-1.
• Torkar, G. (2016). Secondary school students’ environmental concerns and attitudes toward forest ecosystem services: Implications for biodiversity education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11(18), 11019–11031. http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/4291/
• Türküm, A. S. (1998). Çağdaş toplumda çevre sorunları ve çevre bilinci. Çağdaş Yaşam Çağdaş İnsan. Anadolu Üniversitesi Açık Öğretim Fakültesi İlköğretim Öğretmenliği Lisans Tamamlama Programı, Eskişehir, 165- 181.
• Uğulu, İ. (2013). Üstün zekalı/yetenekli öğrenciler ile normal gelişim gösteren öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik tutumlarının karşılaştırılması.[Acomparison of environmental attitudes between gifted and talented students and normaly devolepment students]. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 1-14. http://acikerisim.deu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12397/31/1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Uğulu, İ. (2015). A quantitative investigation on recycling attitudes of gifted/talented students. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 29(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1047168.
• Uğulu, İ., Akkaya, Z., & Erkol, S. (2013). Üstün zekalı/yetenekli öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik tutumlarının belirlenmesi ve bazı demografik değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması [An investigation on environmental attitudes of gifted students and the assessments in terms of some demographic variables]. Education Sciences, 8(4), 400-410. https://doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2013.8.4.1C0595.
• Uslu, E. (2022). İlkokul ve ortaokula devam eden üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin çevreye yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarının belirlenmesi: Aydın ili örneği [Determining the knowledge and attitude of highly- gifted students who are attending primary and secondary schools towards environment: example of Aydın Provience] [Yüksek lisans tezi, Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi].Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi. http://adudspace.adu.edu.tr:8080/jspui/bitstream/11607/4685/1/EdibeUsluYLTez.pdf
• Van Griethuijsen, R. A., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Gencer Savran, A., &BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581-603.
• Williams, S.M., & R. McCrorie (1990). The Analysis of Ecological Attitudes in Town and Country. Journal of Environmental Management, 31, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80005-2.
• Wilson, E. O. (2007). Biophilia and the conservationethic. Evolutionary perspectives on environmental problems. Washington DC. 249-257.
• Wu Suen, L. J., Huang, H. M., & Lee, H. H. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. The Journal of Nursing, 61(3),105-111.
• Yaşaroğlu, C. (2012). İlköğretim birinci kademe öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi[The Evaluation of first stage elementary school students’ attitudes and behaviours towards environment][Doktora tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi].Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (6th Edition)]. Ankara:Seçkin Publishing.