GÜÇLÜ YAPAY ZEKAYA KARŞI ÇİN ODASI ARGÜMANI

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 23 - 38, 03.06.2012

Fatma Dore

Öz

Bu makalede, Amerikalı filozof John Rogers Searle’ün Çin Odası Argümanı olarak bilinen ünlü düşünce deneyi incelenmiştir. Argüman, Searle tarafından, işlevi; yapay zeka kullanmaya dayalı bilgisayarların, aslında bilinçli olarak düşünmediklerinin bir kanıtı olmak üzere geliştirilmiştir. Makalede, Çin Odası Argümanı’nın detaylarına girilmeden önce, Searle’ün muhalif olarak düşünce deneyini geliştirdiği Alan Turing’in Turing Testi’ne bakılmıştır. Makalenin son bölümü, Searle’ün görüşünün doğurabileceği etik etkiler temelinde, bilgisayar bilinçliliği üzerinde odaklanmıştır.

ABSTRACT
This article is on the American philosopher John Rogers Searle’s famous thought experiment known as the Chinese Room Argument. It was developed by Searle to be a proof that computers, which function using artificial intelligence, do not actually consciously think. Before examing the Chinese Room Argument in some detail, this article first looks at Alan Turing’s Turing Test which Searle developed his thought experiment in opposition to. The final part of the article focuses on the ethical implications of Searle’s position on computaer consciousness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çin Odası Argümanı , Turing Testi , yapay zeka , bilinçlilik , robot hakları. , Chinese Room Argument , Turing Test , artificial intelligence , consciousness , robot rights

Kaynakça

• BBC NEWS, (2003), “Kasparov Fights Computer to Draw”, http://news.bbc.co.uk72/hi/technology/326303Lstm (12 November.
• CONNOR, Steve. (2008), “Computers 'to match human brains by 2030'”, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets- and- tech/news/computers-to match-human-brains-by- 203 0-782978 .html (16 February 2008).
• DAMPER, Robert I. (2004), “The Chinese Room Argument--Dead but Not yet Buried”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (5-6): 159¬169, http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/9561 (28 Jan 2009).
• DESCARTES, Rene. (1968), Discourse on Method and The Meditations (Translated with an Introduction by F. E Sutcliffe), Penguin Books.
• FREEMAN, Walter J. and Christine A. SKARDA. (1993), “Mind/Brain Science: Neuroscience on Philosophy of Mind”, (Eds.), Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick, John Searle and His Critics, UK: Blackwell.
• FITZPATRICK, Michael. “No, Robot: Japan's Elderly Fail to Welcome Their Robot Overlords”, BBC News, Tokyo - February 2011, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business- 12347219 (3 Feb 2011).
• GRAYLING, C. (2005), Descartes, London.
• HAUSER, Larry. (2005), “Searle’s Chinese Room Argument”, http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/chinesebiblio.html
• RAPAPORT, William J. (2003), “How to Pass a Turing Test”, (Ed.) James H. Moor, The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
• SAYGIN, Ayşe Pınar; ÇİÇEKLİ, İlyas ve AKMAN, Varol. (2003), “Turing Test: 50 Years Later”, (Ed.) James H. Moor, The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
• SEARLE, John. (1996), Akıllar, Beyinler ve Bilim (Çev.) Kemal Bek, İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
• SEARLE, John. (2004), Zihnin Yeniden Keşfi (Çev.) Muhittin Macit, İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık.
• SEARLE, John. (1990), “Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?” Scientific American, 262, no.1, 26-31.
• SEARLE, John. (1980), Minds, Brains, and Programs”, http://cogprints.org/7150/1/10.1.1.83.5248.pdf. ss. 1-19 (19 Aug 2001).
• SKIRBEKK, Gunnar and GILJE, Nils. (Eds.), (1971), Antik Yunan’dan Modern Döneme Felsefe Tarihi (Çev.) Emrah Akbaş ve Şule Mutlu, İstanbul: Üniversite Kitabevi Yayınları.
• STERRETT, Susan G. (2003), “Turing’s Two Tests for Intelligence”, (Ed.) James H. Moor, The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
• SWAINE, Michael R. “Computers”; “The Microprocessors”, Encyclopaedia Britannica 2005 Ultimate Reference Suite CD.
• TURING, A.M. (1950), “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Mind 49, ss. 433-460. 2 Bu konuda güncel bazı haberler için bk. Michael Fitzpatrick. “No, Robot: Japan's Elderly Fail to Welcome Their Robot 4 Detaylı bilgi için bk. “A Robotic Performance: Japanese