Aile İçinde Dijital Yorgunluk: Sürekli Bağlantılı Olmanın Psikososyal Yansımaları

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: Aile Özel Sayısı, 333 - 350, 19.10.2025

Ayşen Kovan

https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1722337

Öz

Dijital tekolojilerin günlük hayata hızla dahil olması, bireylerin birbirleriyle bağlantı kurma ve iletişim kurma şekillerini dönüştürürken, sürekli bağlantılı olmanın yol açtığı psikososyal etkilere ilişkin endişeler de ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki evli bireyler arasında dijital yorgunluk ve ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi, dijital yorgunluğun alt boyutlarının ilişkisel rolleri ve cinsiyete göre farklılaşma durumları bağlamında incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Aile Sistemleri Teorisi (AST) çerçevesinde yapılandırılan araştırmada, 384 resmi olarak evli yetişkinden (Xyaş = 37.42, SS = 8.17) çevrimiçi anket yoluyla elde edilen veriler üzerinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, dijital yorgunluğun ilişki doyumu ile anlamlı ve negatif yönde ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Alt boyutlar düzeyinde, psikolojik yorgunluk (β = –.41, p < .001) ilişki doyumu ile en güçlü negatif ilişki gösteren değişken olarak öne çıkarken; bunu dijital bağımlılık (β = –.32, p < .01), fiziksel/zihinsel yorgunluk (β = –.22, p < .05) ve psikosomatik sorunlar (β = –.17, p < .05) izlemiştir. Çoklu grup analiz sonuçları, psikolojik yorgunluk ile ilişki doyumu arasındaki negatif ilişkinin kadınlar açısından anlamlı ölçüde daha güçlü olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgular, dijital yorgunluğun ilişkisel iyi oluş üzerindeki sistemik etkilerini vurgulamakla beraber; kesitsel araştırma deseni ve özbildirim temelli veri toplama gibi sınırlılıkların sonuçların yorumlanmasında dikkate alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Türkiye’nin 2025 yılını “Aile Yılı” ilan etmesi bağlamında değerlendirildiğinde, bu çalışma dijital çağda ilişkisel dayanıklılığı güçlendirmeye yönelik zamanlı ve kuramsal temelli öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital yorgunluk , ilişki doyumu , evli bireyler , Aile Sistemleri Teorisi

Etik Beyan

Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Kurul Başkanlığı (No: E-56785782-050.02.04-2500164712; 06/16)

Digital Fatigue within the Family: Psychosocial Reflections of Constant Connectedness

Öz

The rapid integration of digital technologies into daily life has transformed how individuals connect and communicate, with emerging concerns about the psychosocial costs of constant connectivity. This study examines the relationship between digital fatigue and relationship satisfaction among married individuals in Türkiye, with attention to the associative roles of digital fatigue sub-dimensions and gender differences. Guided by Family Systems Theory (FST), the study employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using data from 384 legally married adults (Mage = 37.42, SD = 8.17) collected via online survey. SEM results indicated that digital fatigue significantly and negatively associated with relationship satisfaction, with psychological fatigue (β = –.41, p < .001) emerging as the strongest associated factor, followed by digital addiction (β = –.32, p < .01), physical/mental fatigue (β = –.22, p < .05), and psychosomatic problems (β = –.17, p < .05). Multi-group analysis further revealed that the negative effect of psychological fatigue was significantly stronger for females. While the findings underscore the systemic impact of digital fatigue on relational well-being, limitations such as the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-report data should be considered in interpreting the results. In light of Türkiye’s 2025 declaration as the “Year of the Family,” the study suggests timely guidance for strengthening relational resilience in the digital age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital fatigue , relationship satisfaction , married individuals , Family Systems Theory

Etik Beyan

Atatürk University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee (No: E-56785782-050.02.04-2500164712; 06/16)

Kaynakça

• Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., Purvis, R., (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831- 858. doi:10.2307/41409963
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
• Becvar, R. J., Becvar, D. S., & Reif, L. V. (2023). Systems theory and family therapy: A primer. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. M. (2004). Sourcebook of family theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Bhati, N., Pal, Y., & Talwar, T. (2022). Social media fatigue and academic performance: Gender differences. In Gender equity: Challenges and opportunities: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference of Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology (pp. 331-337). Singapore: Springer Nature.
• Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu (BTK). (2024). Türkiye elektronik haberleşme sektörü – 2024 3. dönemine ait pazar verileri raporu. [Türkiye electronic communications sector – Market data report for the third quarter of 2024]. Retrieved from https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/announcements/2024-3-donemine-ait-pazar-verileri-raporu-yayimlandi/pazar-verileri-raporu-2024-3.pdf
• Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485-493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
• Borelli, J. L., Nelson-Coffey, S. K., River, L. M., Birken, S. A., & Moss-Racusin, C. (2017). Gender differences in work-family guilt in parents of young children. Sex Roles, 76(5–6), 356–368. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0579-0
• Bouffard, S., Giglio, D., & Zheng, Z. (2022). Social media and romantic relationship: Excessive social media use leads to relationship conflicts, negative outcomes, and addiction via mediated pathways. Social Science Computer Review, 40(6), 1523-1541. doi:10.1177/08944393211013566
• Bowen, M. (1993). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
• Ceco, G., Taşkın, S., Uygun, E. G., Erus, S. M., & Satıcı, S. A. (2025). The indirect effect of mindfulness in marriage in the relationship between digital stress and dyadic adjustment: An investigation of dyadic effects. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 20(1), 177-191. doi:10.1007/s11482-024-10404-y
• Chamam, S., Forcella, A., Musio, N., Quinodoz, F., & Dimitrova, N. (2024). Effects of digital and non-digital parental distraction on parent-child interaction and communication. Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3, 1-9. doi:10.3389/frcha.2024.1330331
• Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2014). “I luv u :)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150–162. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
• Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11511/12102
• Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work–home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 411-440. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00530.x
• Doerr, J. M., Nater, U. M., Ehlert, U., & Ditzen, B. (2018). Co-variation of fatigue and psychobiological stress in couples’ everyday life. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 92, 135-141. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.01.016
• Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 601-619. doi:10.1037/a0013969
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630-649. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
• Gandarillas, M. Á., Elvira-Zorzo, M. N., Pica-Miranda, G. A., & Correa-Concha, B. (2024). The impact of family factors and digital technologies on mental health in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433725
• Gao, N., Nolan, S., Ji, K., Rumi, S. K., Heinisch, J. S., Anderson, C., David, K., & Salim, F. D. (2023). “Living within four walls”: Exploring emotional and social dynamics in mobile usage during home confinement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13304, 1-26. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.13304
• Gergen, K. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Monile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227-241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489471.018
• Goldenberg, I., Stanton, M., & Goldenberg, H. (2016). Family therapy: An overview. Boston, MA: Cengage.
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221-233. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.63.2.221
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis. In Multivariate data analysis (pp. 89-150). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Han, S. (2024). Digitalization and job stress: Exploring the mediating roles of job and personal aversion risk with gender as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370711
• Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. doi:10.2307/352430
• Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. (2013). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jain, H., & Tyagi, A. (2024). Together but alone: Exploring the predictors of phubbing behaviour in married individuals. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 12(3). doi:10.25215/1203.054
• Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.118.1.3
• King, D. B., & DeLongis, A. (2014). When couples disconnect: Rumination and withdrawal as maladaptive responses to everyday stress. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(4), 460-469. doi:10.1037/a0037160
• Kocyigit, M., & Uzun, M. (2025). Emotion regulation and couple burnout in marriage: A moderated moderation model of authenticity, sex of parents and having children. Current Psychology, 1-15. doi:10.1007/s12144-024-07253-1
• Kovan, A. (2023). Social media jealousy and life satisfaction in romantic relationships: Mediation role of communication skills. Actualidades en Psicología, 37(135), 111-127. doi:10.15517/ap.v37i135.51265
• Kovan, A., Usta, M., & Ormancı, N. (2021). Yetişkinlerin ilişki doyumu ile psikolojik sağlamlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: Covid-19 pandemi süreci örneği. Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 29-44.
• Kuss, D., & Griffiths, M. (2014). Internet addiction in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Springer.
• Kyalo, J. (2024). The impact of communication technology on family dynamics. Journal of Communication, 5(3), 1-16. doi:10.47941/jcomm.1981
• Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
• McDaniel, B. T. (2015). “Technoference”: Everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in the age of digital and social media (pp. 228-245). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
• McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
• McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027
• McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., & Drouin, M. (2021). Daily technoference, technology use during couple leisure time, and relationship quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637-665. doi:10.1080/15213269.2020.1783561
• McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., Cravens, J. D., & Drouin, M. (2018). “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303-313. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019
• Minuchin, S. (2018). Families and family therapy. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Nabela, H. R., & Rianto, P. (2020). The use of new media technology in families and its impact on intimacy. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 4(2), 87-98. doi:10.20885/asjmc.vol4.iss2.art3
• Pandey, M. K., & Rao, T. S. (2023). Distracted love: Navigating the perils of partner phubbing in the digital age. Journal of Psychosexual Health, 5(4), 195-197. doi:10.1177/26318318231203447
• Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105-115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
• Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
• Sbarra, D. A., Briskin, J. L., & Slatcher, R. B. (2019). Smartphones and close relationships: The case for an evolutionary mismatch. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 596-618. doi:10.1177/1745691619826535
• Silva, H. M. (2025). The reconfiguration of social bonds in the digital age: Virtual connections vs. face-to-face relationships. Nature Anthropology, 3(1), 1-10. doi:10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10003
• Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 278-303. doi:10.1177/0265407510378125
• Supriyadi, T., Sulistiasih, S., Rahmi, K. H., Pramono, B., & Fahrudin, A. (2025). The impact of digital fatigue on employee productivity and well-being: A scoping literature review. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(2), 1-13. doi:10.59429/esp.v10i2.3420
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Turel, O., & Serenko, A. (2012). The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(5), 512-528. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.1
• Tutar, H., & Mutlu, H. T. (2024). Dijital yorgunluk ölçeği (diyö): Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, (67), 56-74. doi:10.47998/ikad.1426571
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2024). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması, 2024 [Household information technology (IT) usage survey, 2024]. Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2024-53492
• Ünal, S. (2018). The effect of social media use to the time spent with family members. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(31), 550-578.
• Vangelisti, A. L. (2013). Routledge handbook of family communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Vaterlaus, J. M., Patten, E. V., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2015). # Gettinghealthy: The perceived influence of social media on young adult health behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 151-157. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.013