Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY?

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 231 - 248, 23.05.2006

Öz

This article deals with three different schools of thought in terms of the constitution of self and the public sphere in modern times. The first trend (e.g. Durkheim and Parsons) advocates that the self or individuality finds the best environment for its maximal realization within a rational-universal sphere that is the modern publicity. The second trend, “Marxian- Nietzschean radical-critical trend”, claims that individuality is oppressed by the modern public sphere and its socio-economic political environment. On the other hand, the third trend (e.g. Simmel and Habermas) insists that along with its disadvantages the modern socio-economic system brings its own advantages for the autonomy of self and individuality.

Kaynakça

  • Avineri, Shlomo, 1969, The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas, 1966, The Social Construction of Reality; a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
  • Coser Lewis A., 1977, Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.
  • Calhoun, Craig, 1992, Introduction to Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Durkheim, Emile, 1949, Division of Labor in Society, translated from the French by George Simpson, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
  • Durkheim, Emile, 1984, The Division of Labor in Society, translated by W.D. Halls, Free Press, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1979, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, translated from the French by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Books, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1980, Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon, translated by Colin Gordon, Pantheon Books, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Subject and Power, edited in Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, by H. L. Dreyfus and P.Rabinow, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Frisby, David, 1984, George Simmel, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, Tavistock Publications, London, New York.

MODERNLİK NASIL ANLAŞILMALI

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 231 - 248, 23.05.2006

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Avineri, Shlomo, 1969, The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Berger, Peter, Luckmann, Thomas, 1966, The Social Construction of Reality; a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
  • Coser Lewis A., 1977, Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.
  • Calhoun, Craig, 1992, Introduction to Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Durkheim, Emile, 1949, Division of Labor in Society, translated from the French by George Simpson, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.
  • Durkheim, Emile, 1984, The Division of Labor in Society, translated by W.D. Halls, Free Press, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1979, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, translated from the French by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Books, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1980, Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon, translated by Colin Gordon, Pantheon Books, New York.
  • Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Subject and Power, edited in Michel Foucault Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, by H. L. Dreyfus and P.Rabinow, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Frisby, David, 1984, George Simmel, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, Tavistock Publications, London, New York.
Toplam 10 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Modern Türk Tarihi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İbrahim Mazman Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Mayıs 2006
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Ocak 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Mazman, İ. (2006). HOW TO UNDERSTAND MODERNITY? Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 231-248.