Ekonomi Alanında Rekabet Gücü ve Uygulamalarını Konu Alan Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2024, , 393 - 411, 31.05.2024

Gülhan Duran

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1253274

Öz

Araştırma, “Ekonomi” alanında önde gelen uluslararası dergilerde “Rekabet Gücü” ve uygulamalarını konu alan çalışmaların ağ analizleriyle birlikte bibliyometrik yöntemler kullanılarak akademik yazına katkı sağlanması hedeflenmektedir. Bu hedef doğrultusunda, Şubat 2023’te 1980-2023 yılları arasında “Web of Science (WoS)” veri tabanında “Ekonomi” kategorisindeki dergilerde yayınlanan 16.847 çalışma tespit edilerek analize tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre çalışmalar ve atıf sayıları 2017 yılında maksimum seviyede arttığını, “Elsevier” bu alanda öncü bir dergi olduğunu, “Huang, M.X.” en çok çalışma yapan ve “Huggins, Robert” en çok atıf alan yazar olduğunu, çalışmaların en çok “Makale” alanında değerlendirildiği, yazım dili olarak “İngilizce” kullanıldığı, ortak yazarlı çalışmaların fazla olduğu, büyük çoğunluğunun çoklu disiplinler arasında değerlendirildiğini göstermektedir. En önemli bulgulardan bir diğeri ise, yayın yapılan ülke (İspanya) ile en çok atıf alan (ABD) çalışma ülkelerinin aynı olmadığı görülmektedir. Son olarak çalışma alanı ve en çok alıntı yapılan çalışmalar alanında Porter, Gereffi ve Martin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science, VOSviewer, Rekabet Gücü

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Competitiveness and Applications in the Field of Economics

Öz

The research aims to contribute to the academic literature by using bibliometric methods together with the network analysis of the studies on "Competitiveness" and its applications in leading international journals in the field of "Economics". In line with this goal, 16,847 studies published in the journals in the "Economics" category in the "Web of Science (WoS)" database between 1980 and 2023 were identified and analyzed in February 2023. According to the results of the research, it shows that the number of studies and citations increased at the maximum level in 2017, "Elsevier" is a leading journal in this field, "Huang, M.X." is the author who does the most work and "Huggins, Robert" is the author who receives the most citations, the studies are evaluated most in the field of "Article", "English" is used as the writing language, there are more co-authored studies, the vast majority of them are evaluated between multiple disciplines. Another of the most important findings is that the country of publication (Spain) and the most cited (USA) study countries are not the same. Finally, it was determined that Porter, Gereffi and Martin were in the field of study and the most cited studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliometric Analysis, Web of Science, VOSviewer, Competitiveness

Kaynakça

• Acevedo Prins, N.M., Jiménez Gómez, L.M., & Rojas Lopez, M.D. (2017). Análisis bibliométrico de publicaciones sobre competitividad nacional en la base de datos scopus. Espacios, 8(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071877.
• Arda, M. (2008). Küreselleşen dünyada rekabetçilik. Türkiye Dış Ticaret Derneği Yayını.
• Artsın, M. (2020). Bir metin madenciliği uygulaması: Vosvıewer. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi B-Teorik Bilimler, 8(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227291.
• Bahar, O., & Kozak, M. (2005). Küreselleşme sürecinde uluslararası turizm ve rekabet edebilirlik. Detay Yayıncılık.
• Bakır, Z.S. (2015). Türkiye hazır giyim sektörünün 2005-2014 dönemi için rekabet gücünün ölçülmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi]. YÖK Açık Erişim Sistemi.
• Balkyte, A., & Tvaronaviciene, M. (2010). Perception of Competitiveness in the Context of Sustainable Development: Facets of "Sustainable Competitiveness". Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341-365. 10.3846/jbem.2010.17.
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 3(1), 361– 362. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/13937.
• Benckendorff, P. (2009). Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: A social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994-2007). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.1.
• Benckendorff, P., & Zehrer, A. (2013). A network analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 43(0), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005.
• Bishop, S., & Walker, M. (1999). The economics of ec competition law. JAIRM.
• Bonilla, C., Merigó, J.M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(0), 1239–1252. 10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7.
• Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). Overlay maps based on mendeley data: The use of Altmetrics for readership networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3064– 3072. 10.1002/asi.23569.
• Bradford, D., & Oates, W. (1971). The analysis of revenue sharing in a new approach to collective fiscal decisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85(3), 416-439. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/oupqjecon/v_3a85_3ay_3a1971_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a416-439..htm.
• Broadus, R.N. (1987). Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680.
• Capobianco-Uriarte, M., Casado-Belmonte, M., Marín-Carrillo, G., & Terán-Yépez, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international competitiveness (198–2017). Sustainability, 11(0), 1877-1897. doi:10.3390/su11071877.
• Carvalho, M.M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A.P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology road mapping (TRM): Contributions and Trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Elsevier, 80(7), 1418-1437. 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.008.
• Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. 10.1002/asi.20317.
• Chun, H., & Jian, M. (2012). A bibliometric study of financial risk literature. A Historic Approach Applied Economics, 44 (20), 2827-2839. 10.1080/00036846.2011.566208.
• Cipolletta, I. (1980). The competitiveness and relative profitability of exporting of Italian industry in the 1970s. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, 1(1), 139-172. 10.1080/00036846.2011.566208.
• Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. 10.1002/asi.21525.
• Colander, D.C. (2003). Economics. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
• Cole, F., & Eales, N. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress (1916-1919), 11(44): 578-596. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40135555.
• Çiftçi, H. (2004). İktisadi gelişmede uluslararası rekabet ve ulusal kurumlar dinamiği. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Depren, A., Kartal, M.T. & Kılıç Depren, S. (2018). Borsalarda oynaklık üzerine yayınlanmış akademik çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Bankacılık ve Sermaye Piyasası Araştırmaları Dergisi-Bspad, 2(6), 1-15. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.57895.
• Derindağ, O.F., Lambovska, M., & Todorova, D. (2022). Innovation development factors: Switzerland experience. Pressburg Economic Review, 1(1): 57–65. https://review.pressburgcentre.org/per/article/view/7.
• Dilek, S., Kesgingöz, H., & Güney, O. (2020). Türkiye’de rekabet gücü ve rekabet avantajı konularındaki lisansüstü tezlerinin bibliyometrik profili (2000-2018). Econder International Academic Journal, 4(1), 6-25.
• Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal Of Informetrics, 5(1): 187-203. 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.008.
• Düzgün, R. (2007). Türkiye’nin uluslararası rekabet gücü: Çok değişkenli istatistiksel bir analiz. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 421- 440. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.618541.
• Frenken, K., & Hoekman, J. (2014). Spatial scientometrics and scholarly impact: A review of recent studies, tools, and methods. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly İmpact, 0(0), 127–146. 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_6.
• Gökmenoğlu, M., Akal, M., & Altunışık, R. (2012). Ulusal rekabet gücünü belirleyen faktörler üzerine değerlendirmeler. Rekabet Dergisi, 13(4), 765-876.
• Grant, J., Cottrel, R., Cluzeau, F., & Fawcett, G. (2000). Evaluating “Payback” on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines. Applied Bibliometric Study BMJ, 0(0), 320-1107. //doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.975492.
• Gurpur, S., Kamthan, M., & Tiwari, V. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of research trends of inter linkages between disaster management and law. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0(0), 1–18. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5707).
• Hall, M.C. (2011). Publish and perish? bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management, 32(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.907.
• Hasto, S.H. (1980). This year’s wage settlement and the competitiveness of the finnish economy. Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift, 33(4), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616352820.022.
• Ho, H.C., & Ho, Y.S. (2015). Publications in dance field in arts & humanities citation ındex: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1031–1040. 10.1007/s11192-015-1716-1.
• Imani, B., Mirezati, S.Z., & Saberi, M.K. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international journal of nursing studies (1963–2018). Library Philosophy and Practice, 0(0), 1-14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac).
• İnceoğlu, Ç. (2014). Türkiye’de sinemayı konu alan doktora tezleri üzerine bibliyometrik bir çözümleme. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 1(21), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16878/gsuilet.96674.
• Kartal, M.T. (2018). Türkiye’de faizsiz bankacılık alanında yayınlanmış tezlerin analizi. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, 110(0), 175-198. 10.20491/isarder.2020.919.
• Kösekahyaoğlu, L., & Özdamar, G. (2005). Türkiye, Çek Cumhuriyeti, Macaristan, Polonya ve Estonya’nın sektörel rekabet gücü ve dış ticaret yapısı üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Sosyo-Ekonomi Dergisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayını, 0(0), 73-102. 10.2005/j.annals.2005.10.006.
• Köseoglu, M.A., Sehitoglu, Y., & Parnell, J.A. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of scholarly work in leading tourism and hospitality journals: The Case of Turkey. Anatolia, 26(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.446248.
• Köseoğlu, M.A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61(0), 180–198. 10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006.
• Krugman, P.R., Wells, R., & Graddy, K. (2010). Essentials of economics. Worth Publishers.
• Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973–1986. 10.1002/asi.22628.
• Mankıw, N.G. (2011). Essentials of economics. South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Mazurenko, O., &Tiutiunyk, I. (2021). The international tax competitiveness: Bibliometric analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(1), 2521-1250. http://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(1).126-138.2021.
• Mcallister, J. T., Lennertz, L., & Atencio Mojica, Z. (2022). Mapping a Discipline: A Guide to Using VOSviewer for Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. Science and Technology Libraries, 41(3), 319–348. 10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547.
• Mccain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI).
• Mccain, K.W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI).
• Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015). A bibliometric overview of the journal of business research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2645–2653. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.006.
• Muhuri, P. K., Shukla, A. K., & Abraham, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78(0), 218–235. 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007.
• Mulet-Forteza, C., Genovart-Balaguer, J., Mauleon-Mendez, E., & Merigó, J.M. (2019). A bibliometric research in the tourism, leisure and hospitality fields. Journal of Business Research, 101(0), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2022.994.
• Neely, K. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25 (20), 1264- 1277. 10.1108/01443570510633648.
• Norton, M.J. (2001). Introductory concepts in information science. Information Today Medford.
• Olczyk, M. (2016). Bibliometric approach to tracking the concept of international competitiveness. J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 17(0), 945–959. 10.3846/16111699.2016.1236035.
• Onyancha, O.B. (2018). Mapping collaboration and impact of library and information science research in Sub- Saharan Africa, from 1995 to 2016. Library Management, 39(6), 349-363. 10.1108/LM-06-2017- 0059-y.
• Orduña-Malea, E., & Costas, R. (2021). Link-Based approach to study scientific software usage: The case of VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 126(9), 8153–8186. 10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y.
• President’s Commission On Industrial Competitiveness, (1985). President’s commission on ındustrial competitiveness, INC Washington.
• Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348- 349. 10.4236/jsea.2010.39103.
• Ramos-Rodrígue, A R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. 10.1002/smj.397.
• Reinert, E.S. (1994). Competitiveness and ıts predecessors – a 500 - year cross- national perspective, business history conference papers. STEP Report N. R-03 Williamsburg Virginia.
• Rusydiana, A.S., Rahardjo, S., & Soeparno, W.S. (2021). Mapping research on halal logistics using VOSviewer. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0(0), 1-14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac).
• Sabır, H. (2007). Küreselleşen pazar ekonomileri ve rekabet politikaları. Derin Yayınları.
• Santos, G., Marques, C.S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2018). A look back over the past 40 years of female entrepreneurship: Mapping knowledge networks. Scientometrics, 115(2), 953–987. 10.1007/s11192-018-2705-y.
• Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P. (2019). Self-Citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004.
• Sengupta, I.N. (1992). Bibliometrics, ınformetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: An Overview. Libri, 42(2), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.75.
• Tağraf, H. (2002). Küreselleşme süreci ve çokuluslu işletmelerin küreselleşme sürecine etkileri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 776-887. https://doi.org/10.1002/(2002).
• Taşkın, H., &Adalı, M.R. (2003). Teknolojik zekâ ve rekabet stratejileri. Değişim Yayınları.
• Tekin, M. (2006). Değişim çağında teknoloji yönetimi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 0(0), 64- 416. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343?seq=1).
• Tongzon, J. (2007). Determinants of competitiveness in logistics: Implications for the Region. Maritime Economics and Logistics Journal, 9(1), 67-83. http://www.nesdb.go.th/ Portals/0/tasks/dev_ability/seminar/ic/08-JoseTongzon-A.pdf.
• Tomaszewski, R. (2020). Application of bibliometric analysis to letters journals in organic chemistry. The Serials Librarian, 79(1–2), 91–106. 10.1080/0361526X.2020.1760185.
• Trivedi, G. (2019). Visualization and scientometric mapping of global agriculture big data research. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0(0), 1–14. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac).
• Trotta, D., & Garengo, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 key research topics: A bibliometric review. In 2018 7th İnternational Conference on İndustrial Technology and Management (ICITM), 0(0), 113-117. 10.1109/ICITM.2018.8333930.
• Tutar, A., Adıgüzel, M., & Nam, S. (2022). Visual mapping and bibliometric analysis of publicatıons on global competitiveness. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(45), 1008-1031. 10.46928/iticusbe.1056891.
• Türk Dil Kurumu, (1988). Türkçe sözlük. C. II Ankara.
• Türkkan, E. (2015). Rekabet nedir? Rekabet Derneği, http://www.rekabetdernegi.org/rekabethakkinda. htm#rekabetnedir, (24.04.2021).
• Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238.
• Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-Based clustering of publications using citnetexplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
• Van Eck, N.J., &Waltman, L. (2022). VOSviewer manual version 1.6.18. CWTS meaningful metrics. CWTS Meaningful Metrics. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf. (02.02.2022).
• Van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 0(0), 19–50. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1091405.
• Vines, D. (1980). Competitiveness, technical progress and balance of trade surpluses. Manchester School Of Economic and Social Studies, 48(4), 378-391.
• Yamanaka, G. K., Campos, M. V., Roble, O. J., & Mazzei, L. C. (2021). Esport: A State-of-the-Art Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(6), 3547–3555. 10.7752/jpes.2021.06480.
• Zhao, L., Tang, Z., & Zou, X. (2019). Mapping the knowledge domain of smart-city research: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis. Sustainability, 11(23), 6648-6653. 10.3390/su11236648.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. 10.1177/1094428114562629.
• Wagstaff, A., & Culyer, A.J. (2012). Four decades of health economics through a bibliometric lens. Journal of Health Economics, 31 (12), 406-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.03.002.
• Waheeduzzaman, M., & Ryans, J.K. (1996). Definition, Perspective, and understanding of ınternational competitiveness: A Quest For a Common Ground. Competitiveness Review, 6(2), 102-135. 10.1108/eb046333.
• Wang, X., Liu, M., Li, Q., & Gao, Y. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of 15 years of research on open educational resources. Y. Hayashi ve diğerleri (Yay. haz.) Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computers in Education. South Island: New Zealand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. http://icce2017. canterbury.ac.nz/proceedings_main. (02.02.2022).
• Wang, X., Xu, Z., & Dzitac, I. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis on Research Trends of International Journal of Computers Communications & Control. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 14(5), 711–732. 10.15837/ijccc.2019.5.3685.
• White, H. D., & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302.
• White, H.D., & Mccain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author Co-Citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI).
• Widen, R. (1980). This year wage settlement and the competitiveness of the finnish economy. Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift, 33(4), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1004/(SICI).