Rekabetçilik ve İnovasyon Performansı Değerlendirmesi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2024, , 909 - 922, 30.09.2024

Dilek Murat , Simla Güzel

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1510889

Öz

Ülke ekonomilerinin gelişmesi açısından önemli bir yere sahip olan rekabetçilik ve inovasyon 1970’lerden itibaren üzerinde çok durulmaya başlanan konular haline gelmiştir. Ekonomik performansın iyileşmesi için rekabetçi bir ekonomiye sahip olmak gerekir. Rekabetçiliği de güçlendiren en önemli etkenlerden biri inovasyon olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada verilerine ulaşılabilen Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İş birliği Örgütü (OECD) ülkelerinin rekabet ve inovasyon alanındaki performanslarının analiz edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Söz konusu alanlardaki performansı etkilediği düşünülen kriterler; Küresel Rekabet Endeksi (Global Competitiveness Index-KRE), yenilik belirleyicileri olarak da Ar-Ge harcamaları, toplam patent sayısı, işgücü verimliği ve araştırmacı sayısı şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemi olan EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) metodunun kullanıldığı çalışmada en güncel verilere ulaşılabilen yıl olan 2022 yılı verileri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen ampirik bulgulara göre en iyi performansa sahip ülkenin Japonya olduğu ve bunu Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) ve Kore’nin izlediği tespit edilmiştir. Rekabet ve inovasyon konularının bir arada incelenmesi ve OECD ülkeleri özelinde EDAS metodu performans analizi yapılması yönüyle çalışmanın literatürdeki boşluğu dolduracağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rekabetçilik, İnovasyon, OECD Ülkeleri, EDAS

Competitiveness and Innovation Performance Assessment: An Empirical Review on OECD Countries

Öz

Competitiveness and innovation, which have an important place in the development of the country's economies, have become the issues that have been emphasized since the 1970s. For economic performance to improve, it is necessary to have a competitive economy. Innovation is considered to be one of the most important factors that strengthen competitiveness. This study aims to analyze the performances of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in the field of competition and innovation. Criteria that are thought to affect performance in these areas; The Global Competitiveness Index (CRE) has been determined as R&D expenditures, total number of patents, workforce productivity and number of researchers as innovation determinants. In the study, in which the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method, which is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, was used, the data of 2022, the year in which the most up-to-date data could be accessed. According to the empirical findings, it has been determined that the country with the best performance is Japan, followed by the United States of America (USA) and Korea. It is thought that the article is going to fill the gap in the literature by examining competition and innovation together and performing EDAS method performance analysis specifically for OECD countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Competitiveness, Innovation, OECD Countries, EDAS

Kaynakça

• Aiginger, K., Bärenthaler-Sieber, S., & Vogel, J. (2013). Competitiveness under new perspectives (No. 44). WWW for Europe Working Paper.
• Aktaş, N. (2023). BRICS-T ülkelerinde inovasyonun rekabete etkisi: Ekonometrik bir analiz. Eurasian Econometrics Statistics & Emprical Economics Journal, (23), 37-47.
• Androniceanu, A.-M., Kinnunen, J., Georgescu, I., & Androniceanu, A. (2020). A multidimensional approach to competitiveness, innovation and well-being in the EU using canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(4), 5–21.
• Augusto Zobel De Ayala, J. (2023). The importance of country competitiveness, National Competitiveness Council, https://www.competitive.org.ph/node/404#:~:text=An%20economy%20cannot%20be%20competitive,ultimate%20driver%20of%20country%20competitiveness. (Accessed Date: 13.11.2023).
• Aydın, S., & Artan, S. (2021). İnovasyonların ticaret akımları üzerindeki etkileri: OECD ülkeleri örneği. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(3), 1112-1123.
• Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Korucuk, S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-EATWIOS multi-criteria methodology. Technology in Society, (68), 101896.
• Bąk, I., Wawrzyniak, K., & Oesterreich, M. (2022). Competitiveness of the regions of the European Union in a sustainable knowledge-based economy. Sustainability, 14(7), 3788.
• Behzad, M., Zolfani, S. H., Pamucar, D., & Behzad, M. (2020). A comparative assessment of solid waste management performance in the Nordic countries based on BWM-EDAS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 122008, 1-10.
• Bogatyrov, О.Baula,О., Liutak, О., & Galaziuk, Н. (2021). Conceptual foundations of financial support for increasing the innovative component of Ukraine’s international competitiveness. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(36), 341-350.
• Boikova, T., Zeverte-Rivza, S., Rivza, P., & Rivza, B. (2021). The determinants and effects of competitiveness: the role of digitalization in the European economies. Sustainability, 13(21), 11689.
• Cantwell, J. (2006). Innovation and competitiveness. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Editor: Jan Fagerberg, and David C. Mowery), 543-567.
• Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2014). Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice. J Technol Transf, 39, 199–218.
• Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 87-98.
• Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial marketing management, 38(2), 152-158.
• Ciocanel, A. B., & Pavelescu, F. M. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness in European context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 728-737.
• Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and competitiveness: a review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 363-395.
• Cvetanovic, S., Despotović, D., Mladenović, I., & Jovović, D. (2014). The analysis of innovation in Western Balkan countries in 2012. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 830–846.
• Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the Critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
• Doğan, E. (2016). The effect if innovatıon on competitiveness. İstanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal , (24) , 60-81.
• Erdil, T. S., Aydoğan, S., Ayar, B., Güvendik, Ö., Diler, S., & Gusinac, K. (2019). İnovasyon performansının rekabet gücü, firma performansı ve ihracat performansı üzerindeki etkisi: Birleşme ve satın alma işlemleri üzerine bir araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 40(2), 137-166.
• Eşiyok, S., & Demircioğlu, M. (2022). OECD ülkelerinin endüstri 4.0 düzeylerinin Critic ve Codas yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(43), 377-398.
• Eşiyok, S., Ariş, E., & Antmen, F. (2023). Ranking and evaluation of G7 countries and Turkey by gggi indicators using ENTROPY, CRITIC and EDAS methods. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(3), 647-660.
• Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: the role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163.
• Ferreira J. J., Fernandes, C. I., & Ratten V. (2017). Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: what is the connection? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18 (1), 73-95.
• Gurria, A. (2012). The challenge of competitiveness in Europe: an OECD perspective https://www.oecd.org/about/secretarygeneral/thechallengeofcompetitivenessineuropeanoecdperspective.htm. (Accessed Date: 13.11.2023).
• Gündüz, M., & Parlak, N. (2022). Ekonomik kalkınma, rekabet ve inovasyon ilişkisinin panel veri analizi ile incelenmesi: G20 ülkeleri örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 117-133.
• Hermundsdottir, F., Eide, A. E., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations in the manufacturing industry: a comparison of circular and climate innovation initiatives. Research Handbook of Innovation for a Circular Economy (Editor: Siri Jakobsen), 25-35.
• Işık, N., & Kılınç, E. C. (2012). İnovasyon-güdümlü kalkınma: Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1(1), 31-68.
• Ivanova, E., & Kordos, M. (2017). Competitiveness and innovation performance of regions in Slovak Republic. Marketing and Management of Innovations, No.1,145-158
• Ivanová, E., & Čepel, M. (2018). The impact of innovation performance on the competitiveness of the Visegrad 4 countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(1), 54-7.2
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451.
• La Falce, J. L., De Muylder, C. F., & Santos, M. F. (2020). Competitiveness: Theoretical reflections and relation with innovation. Revista Horizontes Interdisciplinares da Gestão, 4(2), 1-21.
• Lomachynska, I., & Podgorna, I. (2018). Innovation potential: Impact on the national economy’s competitiveness of the EU developed countries. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 262-270.
• Lookman, K., Pujawan, N., & Nadlifatin, R. (2023). Innovative capabilities and competitive advantage in the era of industry 4.0: A study of trucking industry. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 47, 1-15.
• Marčeta, M., & Bojnec, Š. (2021). Innovation and competitiveness in the European Union countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 13(1), 1-17.
• Mehralian, G., & Shabaninejad, H. (2014). The importance of competitiveness in new internationalized and competitive environment of pharmaceutical industry. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014 Spring;13(2):351-2.
• Newall, J.E. (1992). The challenge of competitiveness. Business Quarterly, 56, 94–100.
• Orhan, M., & Yalçın, İ. (2022). Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 208-226.
• Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related?. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302-312.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 73, 91.
• Sabatino, M., & Talamo, G. (2017). Innovation and competitiveness of European regions. Research in Applied Economics, 9(3), 45-69.
• Skvarciany, V., Lapinskaite, I., & Volskyte, G. (2021). Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries. Oeconomia copernicana, 12(1), 11-34.
• Sezer, B., & Bakan, İ. (2023). Firmaların rekabetçi pozisyon algılarının inovasyon düzeyi üzerindeki etkisi: Bir alan araştırması. International Journal of Management Economics & Business/Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 19(3).
• Širá, E., Vavrek, R., Kravčáková Vozárová, I., & Kotulič, R. (2020). Knowledge economy indicators and their impact on the sustainable competitiveness of the EU countries. Sustainability, 12(10), 4172.
• Şener, S., & Sarıdoğan, E. (2011). The effects of science-technology-innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 815–828.
• Ünlükaplan, İ. (2009). Avrupa Birliği üyesi ülkelerde iktisadi kalkınma, rekabetçilik ve inovasyon ilişkilerinin kanonik korelasyon analizi ile belirlenmesi. Maliye Dergisi, 157(2), 235-250.
• World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf (Accessed Date:15.10.2023)
• Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122114.