The Impact of Crises on Azerbaijan–European Union Economic Relations: A Trade Intensity Index Approach

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 706 - 714, 29.09.2025

Emine Arzu İmren Karaosmanoğlu , Fuad Selamzade , Madaim Rahimli

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1571652

Öz

The primary aim of this research is to evaluate the bilateral trade and economic relations between Azerbaijan and the European Union (EU) from 2004 to 2023, utilizing the trade intensity index. The study also examines the effects of positive agreements designed to bolster these relations, along with the influence of negative factors such as economic downturns, political obstacles, and the pandemic on Azerbaijan's path toward integration with the EU. Furthermore, it seeks to assess whether the trade intensity index between Azerbaijan and the EU stands above or below the global average. After reaching a high point in 2007, trade relations between Azerbaijan and the EU were adversely impacted by external events like the 2008 global financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Second Karabakh War. Nonetheless, bilateral agreements, including the Eastern Partnership Program, have reinforced trade relations between the two, contributing to a positive trend in trade intensity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

EU , Azerbaijan , Trade Intensity Index , Covid-19 , Economic Integration , Crises

Krizlerin Azerbaycan'ın Avrupa Birliği'ne Ekonomik Entegrasyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi: Ticaret Yoğunluğu Endeksi Bağlamında Bir Analiz

Öz

The primary aim of this research is to evaluate the bilateral trade and economic relations between Azerbaijan and the European Union (EU) from 2004 to 2023, utilizing the trade intensity index. The study also examines the effects of positive agreements designed to bolster these relations, along with the influence of negative factors such as economic downturns, political obstacles, and the pandemic on Azerbaijan's path toward integration with the EU. Furthermore, it seeks to assess whether the trade intensity index between Azerbaijan and the EU stands above or below the global average. After reaching a high point in 2007, trade relations between Azerbaijan and the EU were adversely impacted by external events like the 2008 global financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Second Karabakh War. Nonetheless, bilateral agreements, including the Eastern Partnership Program, have reinforced trade relations between the two, contributing to a positive trend in trade intensity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

EU , Azerbaijan , Trade Intensity Index , Covid-19 , Economic Integration , Crises

Kaynakça

• Alpdoğan, H., Akal, M., & Hasanov, G. (2020). Turkey and Azerbaijan's foreign trade development. Journal of Business and Trade, 1(1), 16-26.
• Akbulaev, N., & Muradzada, I. (2023). Econometric analysis of foreign trade and economic growth relationship in Azerbaijan and Italy. Multidisciplinary Sciç J., 6(1), 2024002. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024002
• Anand, S. (2021). India’s bilateral trade with China: Empirical study based on trade intensity index & trade reciprocity index. Studies in Economics and Business Relations, 2(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.48185/sebr.v2i1.81
• Aydın, Ü. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and Azerbaijan’s economy: Policy lessons in hard times. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.988348
• Azakov, S. (2018). Contribution of Azerbaijan to the energy security of the European Union. In Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 459, 012011 (pp. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/459/1/012011
• Baghirov, A., & Ahadov, R. (2019). Bilateral trade intensity between Azerbaijan and China (2010-2016 period). In 1st International Conference on Economics and Management, 3, pp. 183-192).
• Baghirov, A., Ağayeva, X., Aliyeva, Ş., & Rzayeva, L. (2020). Azərbaycan və İtaliya arasında ikitərəfli ticarət yoğunlaşması. In F. Ahmadov (Ed.), II. International Postgraduate Conference on Economics and Management (pp. 1160-1175). Baku, Azerbaijan: UNEC.
• Brown, A. J. (1949). Applied Economics, Aspects of the World Economy in War and Peace. George Allen and Unwin.
• Çeştepe, H. (2012). Analysis of Turkey’s trade with selected Middle East Countries. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 8(2), 23-43.
• Demir M.A. (2020a). Analysis of trade intensity between Turkey and selected Middle East countries. Nazilli İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1(1), 1-14
• Demir, M. A. (2020b). Trade dynamics in BRICS countries: an analysis of trade intensity index with Turkey and BRICS group countries. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University Journal of Social Sciences, TBMM 100. Year Special Issue, 109-133, https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.748704
• Dinçer, M. (2023). The role of Azerbaijan as the EU’s energy supplier: a secondary alternative partner in natural gas. European Politics and Society, 25(4), 624–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2023.2288867
• Drieniková, K., Zubaľová, Ľ., & Horváth, M. (2024). The EU-US trade relations changes during the COVID-19. In 24th International Joint Conference Central and Eastern Europe in the Changing Business Environment: Proceedings (pp. 25-34). https://doi.org/10.18267/pr.2024.vol.2512.3
• Erkisi, K., & Ceyhan, T. (2019). Trade liberalization and economic growth: A panel data analysis for transition economies in Europe. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 6(2), 82-94. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1047
• Ersoy, Y., & Tehci, A. (2020). Lojistik pazarlama lojistik hizmetleri alanında faaliyette bulunan işletmelerde veri zarflama analizi ile etkinlik ölçümü. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 5(1), 1–9.
• Eyvazov, J. (2016). Ukrainian crisis of 2014 and changing regional conditions for national security of Azerbaijan. In P. Bajor (Ed.), Contemporary Azerbaijan in Social and Political Dimension (pp. 65-78). Księgarnia Akademicka.
• Həsənov, M. (2017). Müəssisənin innovasiya strategiyasının formalaşması. [Master’s thesis, Azerbaijan State Economic University Graduate and Doctoral Center].
• Ibrahimov, A., Baghirov, A., & Ashimova, Z. (2019). Bilateral trade intensity between Azerbaijan and Poland (2003-2016 period). Reforma, 3(83), 39-52.
• Imren Karaosmanoğlu, E., & Baghirov, A. (2022). Investigation of bilateral trade relations with export and import intensity index: In the case of Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan (2010-2019). InTraders International Trade Academic Journal, 4(2), 128-148.
• Kojima, K. (1964). The pattern of international trade among advanced countries. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 5(1), 16-36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43295433
• Kramskova, M. (2022). An Analysis of bilateral trade relation between Turkey and Russia: The challenges and opportunities of Russia-Ukraine war. PQDT-Global.
• Muradov, A., Tuzcuoğlu, F., Ahmadov, F., & Baghirov, A. (2023). Covid-19 salgınının ikili dış ticaret üzerindeki etkisinin ticaret yoğunluğu analizi ile araştırılması: Azerbaycan ve Kırgızistan örneği. In Ö. Karaman (Ed.), Türk Dünyası Jeopolitiği (1 ed., pp. 211-226). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Peter, D., & Ross, G. (1982). Trade intensities and the analysis of bilateral trade flows in a many-country world: A survey. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 22(2), 62-84. http://doi.org/10.15057/7939
• Selamzade, F. (2022). Türk Cumhuriyetleri arasında bir iktisadi işbirliği. Akademisyen Yayınevi. Doi: 10.37609/akya.1594
• Şimşek, N., Şimşek, H., & Zhanaltay, Z. (2017). Analysis of bilateral trade relations between Turkey and the Russian Federation. Bilig, 83, 1-26.
• Tabur, C. (2013). The evolution of EU’s neighbourhood policy towards Eastern Europe. Marmara Journal of European Studies, 21(2), 56-71. http://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.101
• Tuzcuoğlu, F., Selamzade, F., Baghirov, A., & Gasimova, Y. (2023). Azerbaycan ve Kırgızistan ticaret ilişkilerinin ihracat ve ithalat yoğunlaşma indeksi bağlamında değerlendirilmesi (2010-2019). In Ö. Karaman, (Ed.) Türk Dünyası Jeopolitiği (pp. 211-232). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
• Yazıcı, M. (2016). 1995-2014 döneminde Türkiye - İsrail dış ticareti. In Kırıkkale University, II International Middle East Symposium: State, Non-State Actors and Democracy in the Middle East (p. 32).