The Effects of Different Types Floor on Some Behavioural Traits and Hygiene of Brown Swiss Cows

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine effects of different types floor on behavioural properties and cleaning situations of Brown Swiss cows. The experiment was carried out at the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture at Atatürk University by using 33 Brown Swiss cows. The cows were allocated to three groups called as concrete, rubber mat and mattress groups. The results have shown that behavioural traits in different types floor groups such as lying, standing, rumination at standing position behaviours were highly significant (P<0.01) among groups, the feeding and drinking behaviours were also significant (P<0.05), but, rumination behaviour at lying positions were not statistically significant. Hygiene scores of the different groups were highly significant (P<0.01). As a result of the study, it was concluded that mattress should be used in tied closed barn for lactating Brown Swiss cows.

Keywords

• Browns Swiss,Concrete,Mattress,Rubber Ma

Farklı Zemin Tiplerinin Esmer Sığırlarda Bazı Davranış ve Temizlik Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışmada, farklı zemin tiplerinin Esmer ırkı süt sığırlarında davranış özellikleri ve temizlik skorları üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Denemenin hayvan materyali Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Çiftliği Sığırcılık Şubesinde bulunan 33 baş sığır oluşturmuştur. Deneme beton, kauçuk ve matress olmak üzere 3 grup oluşturulmuştur. Deneme sonunda elde edilen verilere göre davranış özellikleri bakımından zemin grupları arasındaki farklar yatma davranışı, ayakta durma davranışı ve ayakta ruminasyon davranışı çok önemli (P<0.01), yem yeme ve su içme davranışları önemli (P<0.05) ve yatarak ruminasyon davranışı önemsiz bulunmuştur. Temizlik skorları bakımından gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar çok önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.01). Araştırma sonunda matress zemin tipinin kapalı bağlı ahırlarda barındırılan sağmal Esmer ırkı sığırlarında kullanılması tavsiye edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Beton,Esmer Sığır,Kauçuk,Matress

Kaynakça

1. Calamari, L., Calegari, F., Stefanini, L., 2009. Effect of different free stall surfaces on behavioural, productive and metabolic parameters in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120 ( 1): 9-17.
2. Chaplin, S.J., Tierney, G., Stockwell, C., Logue, D.N., Kelly, M., 2000. An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66(4):263-272.
3. De Belie, N., Richardson, M., Braam, C R, Svennerstedt B., Lenehan J.J., Sonck, B., 1997. Durability of building materials and components in the agricultural environment, part I: the agricultural environment and timber structures. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 75(3): 225–241
4. Dechamps, P., Nicks, B., Camart, B., Gielen, M., Istasse, L., 1989. A note on resting behaviour of cows before and after calving in two different housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23: 89–105.
5. Frogensi, J.A., Veria, D.M., von Keyserlink, M.A.G., Weary, D.M., 2007.Effect of bedding qualitiy on laying behaviour of dairy cows. J.Dairy Sci. 90: 5468-5472
6. Fulwider, W.K., Grandin, T., Garrick, D.J., Engle, T.E., Lamm, W.D., Dalsted, N.L., and Rollin,
7. B.E., 2007. Influence of free-stall base on tarsal joint lesions and hygiene in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90: 3559–3566
8. Gooch, C.A., 2004. Flooring consideration for dairy cows. http://www.ansi.cornell.edu/ prodairy/facilities/flooring.pdf.

9. Göncü, S., 2000. Adana entansif süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde yetiştirilen saf ve melez Siyah Alaca inek sütlerinde somatik hücre sayısına etki eden faktörler ve mastitis ile ilişkisi. Ç.Ü.Fen Bil. Ens. Doktora Tezi (Basılmamış).
10. Grant, R.J., 2006. Incorporating dairy cow behavior into management tools. Penn State Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop, pp. 31–41.
11. Haley, D.B., Passille, A.M., Rushen, J., 2001. Asseing Cow Comfort: Effects of two floor types and two tie stall designs on the behaviour of lactating dairy cows. App. Anim.Behav. Sci., 71: 105-117.
12. Hultgren, J., 2001. Effects of two stall flooring systems on the behaviour of tied dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73 (1): 167-177.
13. Hultgren, J., Bergsten, C., 2001. Effects of a rubber-slatted flooring system on cleanliness and foot health in tied dairy cows. Pre. Vet. Med. 52 (1), 75-89.
14. Kara, N.K., Galic, A., Koyuncu, M., 2011.Effects of stall type and bedding metarials on lameness and hygine score and effect of lameness on some reproductive problems in dairy cattle. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 39 (4): 334-338
15. Karakök, S.G., Uslucan, B., Tapki, I., Gokce, G., 2009. the effect of straw bedding usage in loose housing systems on behavior and milk production of Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Anımal and Veterınary Advances. 8 (9 ): 1824-1828.
16. Krohn, C.C., Munksgaard, L., 1993. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose house/pasture) or intensive (tie-stall) environments. II. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 37 (1): 1–16.
17. Lowe, D.E., Steen, R.W.J., Beattie, V.E., Moss, B.W., 2001. The effects of floor type systems on the performance, cleanliness, carcass composition and meat quality of housed finishing beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 69 :33–42
18. Maatta Jenni, Maarit Hellstedt, Risto Kuismaa, Hanna-Riitta Kyma¨ la¨inen, Riitta Mahlberg , AnnaMaija
19. Sjo¨berg, 2009. Effects of chemical and mechanical wearing on the cleanability and surface properties of traditional and new surface materials in cattle barns – a laboratory study. Biosystems Engineering 103:464-473
20. Manninen, E., de Passillé, A.M., Rushen, J., Norring, M., Saloniemi, H., 2002. Preferences of dairy cows kept in unheated buildings for different kind of cubicle flooring. App. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75 (4): 281-292.
21. McDaniel B.; Wilk, J., 1991. Lameness in dairy cows. In: Proceedings of British Cattle Veterinary Association, pp 66–80.
22. Metin, J., 2009. Klasik batı müziğinin Esmer sığırlarda süt verimi, süt bileşenleri , günlük davranış ve sağım öncesi davranış özellikleri üzerine etkisi.Doktora Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Erzurum.
23. Mitev, J.,Varlyakov, I., Mıteva, T., Vasılev, N., Gerkovska, J., Uzunova, K., Dımova., 2012. Preferences of freestall housed dairy cows to different bedding materials. İstanbul Üniv.Vet. Fak. Derg. 38 (2):135-140.
24. Mogensen, L., Krohn, C.C., Sorensen, J. T., Hindhede, J., Nielsen, L. H., 1997. Association between resting behaviour and live weight gain in dairy heifers housed in pens with different space allowance and floor type. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55: 11-19.
25. Nilson, C., 1992. Walking and lying surfaces in livestock houses. 93-110, Ed.Phillips, C., Piggins, D., Farm animals and the environment, cab international walingford oxon, ox10 8de uk. isbn 0 851987885.
26. Norring, M., Manninen, E., Passille, A.M., Rushen, J.,Saloniemi, H., 2010.Pereferences of dairy cows for three stall surface materials with small amounts of bedding. J. Dairy Sci. 93(1): 70-74.
27. Reneau, J.K., A.J.Seykora, B.J. Heins, R.J. Farnsworth and Bey R.F., 2005 Association between hygiene scores and somatic cell scores in dairy cattle. JAVMA-Journal of The Amerıcan Veterınary Medıcal Assocıatıon 227 (8): 1297-1301
28. Rushen, J., A.M.de Passillė. 2006.Effect of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomation. J.Dairy Sci. 89 (8): 2965-2972.
29. Rushen, J., Haley, D., de Passille, A. M., 2007 Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90 : (8) 3647–3651
30. Sainsbury, D., 1967. Animal health and housing. Great Britain, Billing and Sons Limited Guildford and London.
31. Schreiner, D.,A Ruegg, P.L., 2003. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis.Journal of Daıry Scıence. 86 (11): 3460-3465
32. Soysal, M.İ., 2000. Biyometrinin Prensipleri (istatistik 1 ve 2 ders notları). Trakya. Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak. Zootekni Böl., Yay No: 95, Ders Notu No: 64, Tekirdağ.
33. SPSS, 2004. SPSS for Windows Release 13.0 SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
34. Stefanowska, J. Swıerstra, J., Van Den Berg, V., Metz, J.H.M., 2002. Do Cows Prefer a Barn Compartment with a Grooved or Slootted Flor? J. Dairy Sci. 85 (1): 79-88.
35. Şeker, İ., Rişvanlı A., Kul S., Bayraktar M., Kaygusuzoğlu E., 2000. İsviçre Esmeri ineklerde meme özellikleri ve süt verimi ile CMT skoru arasındaki ilişkiler. Lalahan Hay. Araş. Ens. Derg. 40 (1):29–38.
36. Telezhenko, E., and Bergsten, C., 2005. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93(3-4): 183-197.
37. Telezhenko, E., Lidfors, L., Bergsten, C., 2007.Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when ISSN:1307-3311 standing or walking. J. Dairy Sci. 90 (8):3717–3724.
38. Tossev, A., Varlyakov, I., Sivkova, K., 1989.Behaviour of cows under an intensive production sytem.AA-CSIT Sofia, pp.56.
39. Tucker, C.B., and Weary, D.M., 2004. Bedding on Geotextile Mattresses: How Much is Needed to Improve Cow Comfort? © American Dairy Science Association, J. Dairy Sci. 87(9): 2889- 2895.
40. Uslucan, B., ve Özkütük, K., 2007. Entansif süt sığırı yetiştiriciliğinde altlık materyallerin kullanımı, önemi ve çeşitleri. 3. Ulusal Zootekni Öğrenci Kongresi, Kahramanmaraş.
41. Uzmay, C., Kaya, İ., Akbaş, Y., Kaya, A., 2003. Effects of udder and teat morphology, parity and lactation stage on subclinical mastitis in Holstein cows. Türk J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 27(3): 695– 701.
42. Yanar, M., Kartal, T.Z., Aydın, R., Koçyiğit, R., Diler, A., 2010. Effect of different floor types on the growth performance and some behavioural traits of Holstein Friesian calves. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 20 (3): 175-179.