Economic Analysis and Marketing Margins of Chickpea Prices in Turkey

Abstract

The study examined the producer-consumer prices and marketing structure of the chickpeas in Turkey, with a focus on the production-consumption, foreign trade, price fluctuations and marketing between the years 2003-2017. Despite the reduction in acreage and production rates in Turkey, an increase was observed in the production. In this study, marketing margins of chickpea are calculated according to current and real prices (2017=100). Producer and consumer chain indexes are also calculated according to current prices and compared with annual inflation rates. In fifteen years, the average yield was determined as 113 kg da-1, and the average consumption per person was 6.5 kg year. In fifteen years, the producer earned from 1 kg chickpea production increased by 55% and the amount paid by the consumer increased by 86%. In the fifteen-year period, prices have been in real favor for the producers and against the consumer. The model related to chickpea production function was estimated and agricultural real worker price was found to be effective on chickpea production.

Keywords

• Marketing structure
• Price fluctuations
• Chickpeas

Kaynakça

1. Altundağ, S. and Güneş T., (1992), Production Amount Price Relations with the potatoes and onions in Turkey. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture. Ankara University Press, p.52-65. Ankara.
2. Anonymous, (2017). http://www.millermagazine.com/ world-dry Beans-chickpea-market
3. Aşkan, E. and Dağdemir, V., (2015), Economic Analysis of Turkey Garlic Market. Alınteri Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28(B), 19-26. ISSN: 1307-3311.
4. Bayrak, H., (2010). Determination of Agricultural, Technological and Nutritional Characters of Local Chickpea Populations and Varieties Cultivated in Konya Ecology. PhD Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Field Crops USA, Konya.
5. Dağdemir, V,, (1998). Economic Analysis of Turkey Onion Market. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Volume: 12, Number: 1/2, Page 99-114
6. Dağdemir, V. and Birinci. A., (1999). Effects of Potato Production Marketing and Price Fluctuation in Turkey. II. National Potato Congress, 28 - 30 June, Erzurum.
7. Eser, (1976). Inheritance Values of Main Plant Characteristics in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Relationships Between Plant Characteristics and Inheritance of Resistance to Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.). A. Ü. Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 620. 40 p.
8. FAO, 2019. http://www.fao.org

9. GDM, 2019. https://www.mgm.gov.tr
10. IAEPD, 2019. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/tepge
11. Reddy, M.V. and Singh, K.B., (1984). Evaluation of a World Collection of Chickpea Germ Plasm Accessions for Resistance to Ascochyta Blight. Plant Disease.68.900-901. 33
12. Reddy, M. V., Kabbabeh , S ., (1985). Pathogenic Variability in Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lab. in Syria and Lebanon. Phytopath. Medit.24: 265-266.
13. Şehirali, S., (1988). Edible legumes. A.Ü Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 1089, Textbook: 314. 435s.
14. TEA, 2019. http://www.tim.org.tr/, 2019
15. TSI, 2019. http://www.tuik.gov.tr, 2019
16. Topcu, Y., 2003. Marketing Margin and Algebraic Analysis in Food Products. Ataturk University. Agriculture Faculty. Journal, 34 (2): 199-207.
17. UCCET, 2019. https://www.tobb.org.tr
18. Uzunöz, M., (2009). Legumes Internal Terms of Trade in Goods in Turkey. Gazi Osman Pasa University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, Tokat, 26 (1): 29-37.