Pedestrian’s Utilizations of Footbridge In Kano-Nigeria

Öz

Pedestrian crossing facilities such as crosswalk, pedestrian foot bridges overpass and underpass at intersection or midblock with crossing facilities are designed to separate pedestrians from the moving vehicles hence improving safety of the pedestrians. Questionnaire survey was used to determine the factors influencing use and utilization of foot bridge by pedestrians in Kano city, Nigeria. The survey results show that 70% of the respondents were frequent users of the bridge while 30% were found not be using it. Analysis of the survey result shows that age and gender were statistically significant in the utilisation of the bridge with p-value of 0.041 and 0.002 respectively while education level was found to be statistically insignificant p-value = 0.688. The major reasons influencing pedestrian to use the bridge were safety (66%), barricades (25%), then traffic flow (9%). For the pedestrians that does not use the bridge, they describe the bridge height (38.5%) as the major reason for not using the bridge followed by poor design of the ramps (26.5%). Improving the design of the bridges and using escalators will surely enhance use of the foot bridges by the pedestrians in Kano city.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pedestrians,Foot Bridge,Kano

Pedestrian’s Utilizations of Footbridge In Kano-Nigeria

Öz

Pedestrian crossing facilities such as crosswalk, pedestrian footbridges overpass, and under-pass at intersection or midblock with crossing facilities are designed to separate pedestrians from the moving vehicles hence improving safety of the pedestrians. Questionnaire survey was used to determine the factors influencing the use and utilization of footbridge by pedestrians in Kano city, Nigeria. The survey results show that 70% of the respondents were frequent users of the bridge while 30% were found not be using it. Analysis of the survey result shows that age and gender were statistically significant in the utilization of the bridge with a p-value of 0.041 and 0.002 respectively while education level was found to be statistically insignificant p-value = 0.688. The major reasons influencing pedestrian to use the bridge were safety (66%), barricades (25%), then traffic flow (9%). For the pedestrians that do not use the bridge, they describe the bridge height (38.5%) as the major reason for not using the bridge followed by poor design of the ramps (26.5%). Improving the design of the bridges and using escalators will surely enhance use of the footbridges by the pedestrians in Kano city. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pedestrians,Foot Bridge,Kano

Kaynakça

1. Amoako, C., Cobbinah, P. B., & Niminga-Beka, R. (2014). Urban Infrastructure Design and Pedestrian Safety in the Kumasi Central Business District, Ghana. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 6(3), 235–256. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2013.861887.
2. Anciaes, P. R., & Jones, P. (2018). Estimating preferences for different types of pedestrian crossing facilities. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 52, 222–237. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.025
3. Dommes, A., Granié, M.-A., Cloutier, M.-S., Coquelet, C., & Huguenin-Richard, F. (2015). Red light violations by adult pedestrians and other safety-related behaviors at signalized crosswalks. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80, 67–75.
4. Elvik, R., Sorensen, M. W. J., & T.O.Naevestad. (2013). Factors influencing safety in a sample of marked pedestrian crossings selected for safety inspections inthe city ofOslo. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 64–70.
5. Guo, H., Zhao, F., Wang, W., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wets, G. (2014). Modeling the Perceptions and Preferences of Pedestrians on Crossing Facilities, 2014.
6. Huan, M., Yang, X. B., & Jia, B. (2013). Crossing reliability of electric bike riders at urban intersections. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013.
7. Mfinanga, D. A. (2014). Implication of pedestrians’ stated preference of certain attributes of crosswalks. Transport Policy, 32, 156–164. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.011.
8. Mohammed, S. T. (2001). Evaluation of pedestrian speed in Jordan with investigation of some contributing factors. Journal of Safety Research, 32(2), 229–236.

9. Papadimitriou, E. (2012). Theory and models of pedestrian crossing behaviour along urban trips. Transportation Research Part F, 15(1), 75–94.
10. Papadimitriou, E., Lassarre, S., & Yannis, G. (2016). Introducing human factors in pedestrian crossing behaviour models. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 36, 69–82. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.003
11. Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G., & Golias, J. (2012). Analysis of pedestrian exposure to risk in relation to crossing behaviour. Transportation Research Record, 2299, 79–90.
12. Pulugurtha, S. S., Krishnakumar, V. K., & Nambisan, S. S. (2007). New methods to identify and rank high pedestrian crash zones: An illustration. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 800–811.
13. Räsänen, M., Lajunen, T., Alticafarbay, F., & Aydin, C. (2007). Pedestrian self-reports of factors influencing the use of pedestrian bridge. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(5), 969– 973.
14. Rizati, H., Ishak, S. Z., & Endut, I. R. (2013). The Utilization Rates of Pedestrian Bridges in Malaysia. In 2013 IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC) (pp. 646–650). http://doi.org/10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560210
15. WHO (World HealthOrganization). (2015). Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_ prevention/road_safety_status/2015/en