Araştırma Makalesi

Eş‘arî Âlimlerin Nazarında Hanbelîlik ve Hanbelîler (İhtilaflar ve İthamlar)

Sayı: 10 22 Haziran 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

Hanbalism and Hanbalities in the Viewpoint of Asharite Scholars (Disagreements and Accusations)

Abstract

Relations between sects are built on discourses first. Nicknames and negative qualifications often lead to negative associations. When viewed from this angle the bad accusations that the Ash'arite scholars use about the Hanbalities are really striking. So, both are included in the Ahl al-Sunnah. In terms of Ash'arî scholars, Hanbalism is a branch within the Ahl al-Sunnah and represents a true understanding of religion. However, the Hanbalites were subjected to very serious criticisms about the comment of Allah’s qualities, nature of the Holy Qur'an’s letters. Beside of this, they were accused of some extreme accusations such as Hashviyya, Mucessima, Mushabbiha, idler and ignorant. These negative qualifications concern with ensuring the legitimacy of the religious thought they represent, as well as religious sensitivities. On the other side, being supported politically after Nizam al-Mulk became vizier, to gain an advantageous position to spread their ideas and to get all the necessary opportunities for it influenced their language. Finally, the reaction of the Hanbalities to the rise of the Asharism, this reaction sometimes caused social violence, is reflected in their wordings too.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abdülhamid, İrfan. “Eş‘arî”. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi. Ankara: TDV Yayınları, 1995, 11: 441-447.
  2. Ahmed b. Hanbel (ö. 241/856). er-Red ale’l-Cehmiyye ve’z-Zenâdıka. thk. Sabri b. Sellâme Şâhîn. Riyad: Dâru’s-sübât, 2003.
  3. Ahmed, Hasan Hudayrî. Kıyâmu’d-devleti’z-Zeydiyye fi’l-Yemen. Kahire: Mektebetü’l-medbûlî, 1996.
  4. Akoğlu, Muharrem. “Mihne Hadiseleri ve Mu’tezile’nin Tarihi Seyrine Etkisi”. Doktora tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2001.
  5. Allâl, Hâlid Kebîr. Safahâtun min târîhi Ehli’s-Sünne ve’l-Cemâa bi-Bağdâd (ö. 200/815-500/1106). Cezair: Matbaatu hûme, ty.
  6. Avcu, Ali. Horasan-Maverâünnehir’de İsmâilîlik. Ankara: Asitan Yayınları, 2014.
  7. Bağdâdî, Ebû Mansûr Abdu’l-Kahir b. Tâhir b. Muhammed (ö. 429/1038). el-Fark beyne’l-fırak. Mısır: Dâru’l-maarif, ty.
  8. Bağdâdî, Ebû Mansûr Abdu’l-Kahir b. Tâhir b. Muhammed. Kitâbu’l-milel ve’n-nihal. thk. Nasrî Nâdir. Beyrut: Dâru’l-maşrik, 1986.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Haziran 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Ocak 2018

Kabul Tarihi

20 Nisan 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Sayı: 10

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD
Toru, Ümüt. “Eş‘arî Âlimlerin Nazarında Hanbelîlik ve Hanbelîler (İhtilaflar ve İthamlar)”. Amasya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 10 (01 Haziran 2018): 101-144. https://doi.org/10.18498/amauifd.382672.

Cited By


nnn