Pencere ve Gün Işığı, Yoğun Bakım Çalışanlarında Tükenmişlik Sendromunu Azaltıyor

Yıl 2019, , 50 - 59, 22.03.2019

Mükremin Er , Habibe Hezer Emine Argüder Ebru Şengül Parlak Sultan Şıvğın Til Bedriye Öztürk Hatice Canan Hasanoglu

https://doi.org/10.17098/amj.542162

Öz

Amaç: Yoğun bakım ünitelerinde (YBÜ)
çalışan sağlık personelinde tükenmişlik sendromu yaygın olup bu durum sağlık
çalışanlarının mesleki bakım kalitesini ve performansını etkileyebilmektedir.
Bu çalışma yoğun bakım ortamında gün ışığı faktörünün tükenmişlik sendromuna
etkisini incelemek amacıyla planlanmıştır. 

Materyal ve Metot: Yoğun bakım ünitesinde çalışan
doktor ve hemşirelere iki bölümden oluşan anket formu uygulanmıştır. Anketin
ilk bölümünde sosyo-demografik veriler, çalıştıkları yoğun bakımın koşulları ve
yoğun bakım ortamı ile ilgili sorular, ikinci bölümde ise “Maslach Tükenmişlik
Ölçeği” bulunmaktadır. Çalışmada pencereli ve penceresiz YBÜ’de çalışanlar iki
gruba ayrılarak karşılaştırıldı.

Bulgular: Araştırmaya gün ışığı alan
olan üst YBÜ’nde çalışan 46 ve penceresiz olan alt YBÜ’lerde çalışan 59; toplam
105 kişi katıldı. Yaş ortalaması sırasıyla 31,17±6.00 ve 28,53±5,23 (p=0,02)
bulundu. Katılanların 75'i (%71,4) hemşire ve 30'u (%28,6) doktordu.
Katılımcıların %98'i "çalışma ortamınızda pencere bulunsun mu?"
sorusuna evet cevabını verdi, %89' u ise ortam gün ışığının performansını
olumlu etkileyeceğini belirtti. Alt katlarda bulunan penceresiz YBÜ’de
çalışanlarda duygusal tükenmişlik ve duyarsızlaşma gün ışığı alan üst kat YBÜ
çalışanlarına göre anlamlı oranda yüksek bulundu (sırasıyla p=0,02, p=0,002).

Sonuç: Yoğun bakım ünitelerinin gün ışığı
alacak şekilde düzenlenmesi, tükenmişlik sendromu gelişme oranını azaltarak
YBÜ’nde çalışan sağlık personelinin iş performans ve verimliğini arttıracağı
gibi, tıbbi hata yapma olasılıklarını da azaltacaktır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gün ışığı, tükenmişlik sendromu, yoğun bakım ünitesi çalışanları.

Window and Day Light, Reduce Burnout Syndrome in Intensive Care Staff

Öz

Objectives: Burnout
syndrome is widespread among health care workers working in intensive care units
(ICU), which can affect the quality of patient care and performance. This study
was planned to investigate the effect of windows and daylight on burnout
syndrome in an intensive care setting.

Materials and
Methods: A questionnaire consisting of two parts was applied
to doctors and nurses working in intensive care units. In the first part of the
questionnaire, questions about socio-demographic data, intensive care
conditions and intensive care environment were studied, and the second part was
the "Maslach Burnout Scale". Two groups, workers in the ICU with and
without windows were compared in the study.

Results: There are 46
workers in the upper ICU who are taking daylight and 59 workers in the lower
ICU without windows; a total of 105 people attended to the research. The mean
age was 31.17±6.00 and 28.53±5.23, respectively and 75 (71.4%) of the
participants were nurses, 30 (28.6%) were doctors. To the question "Do you
want a window in your working environment?" 98.1% of respondents gave the
answer yes and 89.5% stated that the ambient daylight would have a positive
effect on their performance. Exhaustion and cynicism were significantly higher
at the lower floor ICU workers than the upper floor ICU workers (p=0.02,
p=0.002). 

Conclusion: Arranging
ICUs with windows to receive daylight is a useful way to increase the work
performance and productivity and to decrease medical mistakes of health staff
who works in ICUs by reducing the incidence of burnout syndrome. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Daylight, burnout syndrome, intensive care unit staff

Kaynakça

• Gracia-Gracia P, Oliván-Blázquez B. Burnout and mindfulness self-compassion in nurses of intensive care units: Cross-sectional study. Holist Nurs Pract 2017; 31(4):225-33.
• Teixeira C, Ribeiro O, Fonseca AM, Carvalho AS. Burnout in intensive care units - a consideration of the possible prevalence and frequency of new risk factors: A descriptive correlational multicentre study. BMC Anesthesiology 2013; 13(1):e38.
• Chuang CH, Tseng PC, Lin CY, Lin KH, Chen YY. Burnout in the intensive care unit professionals: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(50):e5629.
• Poncet MC, Toullic P, Papazian L, et al. Burnout syndrome in critical care nursing staff. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175(7):698-704.
• Malaquin S, Mahjoub Y, Musi A, et al. Burnout syndrome in critical care team members: A monocentric crosssectional survey. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2017; 36(4):223- 8.
• Shamali M, Shahriari M, Babaii A, Abbasinia M. Comparative study of job burnout among critical care nurses with fixed and rotating shift schedules. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2015; 4(3):e27766
• Martins Pereira S, Teixeira CM, Carvalho AS, Hernández-Marrero P. Compared to palliative care, working in intensive care more than doubles the chances of burnout: Results from a nationwide comparative study. PLOS One 2016; 11(9):e 0162340.
• Padilla Fortunatti C, Palmeiro-Silva YK. Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among ICU nursing staff: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Res 2017; 66(5):410-6
• Postolache TT, Oren DA. Circadian phase shifting, alerting, and antidepressant effects of bright light treatment. Clin Sports Med 2005; 24(2), 381–13.
• Crepeau LJ, Bullough J D, Figueiro MG, Porter S, Rea MS. Lighting as a circadian rhythm entraining and alertness enhancing stimulus in the submarine environment. (Unpublished conference paper). Undersea HSI Symposium 2006; Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/6574/1/059-uhsis06.pdf
• Cajochen C. Alerting effects of light. Sleep Med Rev 2007; 11(6):453-64.
• Shepley MM, Gerbi RP, Watson AE, Imgrund S, Sagha-Zadeh R. The impact of daylight and views on ICU patients and staff. HERD 2012; 5(2): 46-60.
• Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52:397-422.
• Ergin C. Maslach tükenmişlik ölçeğinin Türkiye sağlık personeli normları. 3P Dergisi 1996; 4(1):28-33.
• Mohammadi M, Peyrovi H, Mahmoodi M. The relationship between Professional quality of life and caring ability in critical care nurses. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2017; 36(5):273-7
• Guirardello EB. Impact of critical care environment on burnout, perceived quality of care and safety attitude of the nursing team. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2017; 25:e2884
• Fumis RRL, Junqueira Amarante GA, de Fátima Nascimento A, Vieira Junior JM. Moral distress and its contribution to the development of burnout syndrome among critical care providers. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7(1):71.
• Burghi G, Lambert J, Chaize M, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and consequences of severe burnout syndrome in ICU. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40(11):1785-6.
• Sherman SA, Varni JW, Ulrich RS, Malcarne VL. Post-occupancy evaluation of healing gardens in a pediatric cancer center. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005; 73(2):167-83.
• Pati D, Harvey TE, Barach P. Relationships between exterior views and nurse stress: An exploratory examination. Health Environments Research & Design Journal 2008; 1(2):27-38.
• Alimoglu MK, Donmez L. Daylight exposure and the other predictors of burnout among nurses in a university hospital. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2005; 42: 549-55.
• Finnegan MC, Solomon LZ. Work attitudes in windowed vs windowless environments. Journal of Social Psychology 1981; 115:291-2.
• Zadeh RS, Shepley MM, Williams G, Chung SS. The impact of Windows and daylight on acute-care nurses’ physiological, psychological, and behavioral health. HERD 2014; 7(4):35-61.