Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimlerinin ve Algılarının Belirli Faktörlere Göre Analizi: Kesitsel Bir Karma Yöntem Çalışması

Öz

Amaç: Bu kesitsel karma yöntem araştırması, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerini ve algılarını belirli faktörleri göz önünde bulundurarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: 358 hemşirelik öğrencisi katılmıştır. Nicel veriler, "Kişisel Bilgi Formu" ve "Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimi Ölçeği (EDEÖ)" kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler 4 soruluk açık uçlu bir anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular: EDEÖ alt boyut puan ortalamaları 37.95±7.02, 42.44±7.53, 54.15±8.76, 22.72±4.17, 12.12±2.23 olarak bulundu. Gelir düzeyi, bölümü isteyerek seçme, bölümü sevme ve EDEÖ'nün alt boyutları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Hemşirelik öğrencileri eleştirel düşünme becerilerini genellikle ailelerinde/eğitimleri sırasında kazandıklarını, eleştirel düşünmenin hastaları teşhis etmede önemli bir beceri olduğunu düşündüklerini ve eleştirel düşünme becerilerinin geliştirilmesi için hemşireliğin profesyonelleştirilmesi gerektiğini belirtmişlerdir. Araştırmada hemşirelik öğrencilerinin EDEÖ alt boyut puan ortalamaları orta ve yüksek düzeyde bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Nitel verilerin nicel verilerle uyumlu olduğu görüldü. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinde eleştirel düşünme geliştirilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hemşirelik öğrencisi
• Hemşirelik eğitimi
• Eleştirel düşünme
• Eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri
• Kesitsel karma yöntem

Proje Numarası

yok

Analysis of Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Dispositions and Perceptions Considering Certain Factors: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Öz

Objective: This cross-sectional mixed-methods study aims to analyze the nursing students' CT dispositions and perceptions considering certain factors. Method: 358 nursing students participated. The quantitative data were collected using a "Personal Information Form" and the "Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CDTS)". The qualitative data were collected through a 4-question open-ended questionnaire. Results: The mean scores of the sub-dimensions of CDTS were found to be 37.95±7.02, 42.44±7.53, 54.15±8.76, 22.72±4.17, 12.12±2.23. There was statistically significant differences between income level, choosing department willingly, liking the department and the sub-dimensions of CDTS. Nursing students stated that they usually gained CT skills in their family/during their education, they thought that CT was a significant skill in diagnosing patients, and nursing should be professionalized to improve CT skills. In the study, the nursing students' mean scores of CDTS sub-dimensions were found to be at medium and high levels. Conclusion: Qualitative data were found to be compatible with quantitative data. Critical thinking should be enhanced in nursing students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nursing student
• Nursing education
• Critical thinking
• Critical thinking dispositions
• Cross-sectional mixed-methods

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

We all authors want to thank to all participants.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Jeppesen, K. H., Christiansen, S., & Frederiksen, K. (2017). Education of student nurses: A systematic literature review. Nurse Education Today, 55, 112-121.
2. 1. Jeppesen, K. H., Christiansen, S., & Frederiksen, K. (2017). Education of student nurses: A systematic literature review. Nurse Education Today, 55, 112-121.
3. 2. Cui, C., Li, Y., Geng, D., Zhang, H., & Jin, C. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based nursing on development of nursing students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 65, 46–53.
4. 2. Cui, C., Li, Y., Geng, D., Zhang, H., & Jin, C. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based nursing on development of nursing students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 65, 46–53.
5. 3. Falcó-Pegueroles, A., Rodríguez-Martín, D., Ramos-Pozón, S., & Zuriguel-Pérez, E. (2021). Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue. Nurs Philos 22:e12332.
6. 3. Falcó-Pegueroles, A., Rodríguez-Martín, D., Ramos-Pozón, S., & Zuriguel-Pérez, E. (2021). Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue. Nurs Philos 22:e12332.
7. 4. Bakalis, N. A., & Watson, R. (2005). Nurses’ decision-making in clinical practice. Nursing Standard, 19, 33–39.
8. 4. Bakalis, N. A., & Watson, R. (2005). Nurses’ decision-making in clinical practice. Nursing Standard, 19, 33–39.

9. 5. Sommers, C. L. (2018). Measurement of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgmentin culturally diverse nursing students–A literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 30, 91-100.
10. 5. Sommers, C. L. (2018). Measurement of critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgmentin culturally diverse nursing students–A literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 30, 91-100.
11. 6. Woo, J. H. & Song J. H. (2020). The relationship between communication self-confidence, critical thinking disposition and nursing professionalism in nursing students. Journal of Industrial Convergence, 18(4), 101–110.
12. 6. Woo, J. H. & Song J. H. (2020). The relationship between communication self-confidence, critical thinking disposition and nursing professionalism in nursing students. Journal of Industrial Convergence, 18(4), 101–110.
13. 7. Andreou, C., Papastavrou, E. & Merkouris, A. (2014). Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today, 34(3), 362–371.
14. 7. Andreou, C., Papastavrou, E. & Merkouris, A. (2014). Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today, 34(3), 362–371.
15. 8. Carvalho, D. P. S. R. P., Azevedo. I. C., Cruz, G. K. P., Mafra, G. A. C., Rego, A. L. C., Vitor, A. F., et al. (2017). Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today, 57, 103-107.
16. 8. Carvalho, D. P. S. R. P., Azevedo. I. C., Cruz, G. K. P., Mafra, G. A. C., Rego, A. L. C., Vitor, A. F., et al. (2017). Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Today, 57, 103-107.
17. 9. Zhang, H. & Lambert, V. (2008). Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China. Nursing and Health Sciences, 10, 175–181.
18. 9. Zhang, H. & Lambert, V. (2008). Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China. Nursing and Health Sciences, 10, 175–181.
19. 10. American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report, Committee on Pre- college Philosophy ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315-423.
20. 10. American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report, Committee on Pre- college Philosophy ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315-423.
21. 11. American Association of Colleges of Nursing, (1999). A vision of baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: the next decade. J. Prof. Nurs, 15 (1), 59–65.
22. 11. American Association of Colleges of Nursing, (1999). A vision of baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: the next decade. J. Prof. Nurs, 15 (1), 59–65.
23. 12. National League for Nursing, (1992). Criteria and guidelines for the education of baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing. National League for Nursing, New York.
24. 12. National League for Nursing, (1992). Criteria and guidelines for the education of baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing. National League for Nursing, New York.
25. 13. WHO partners in life skills, (1999). https://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/30.pdf, (Accessing date: 21.06.2019).
26. 13. WHO partners in life skills, (1999). https://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/30.pdf, (Accessing date: 21.06.2019).
27. 14. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. United States of America: Pearson Education Inc. https://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780133115284/samplepages/0133115283.pdf.
28. 14. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. United States of America: Pearson Education Inc. https://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780133115284/samplepages/0133115283.pdf.
29. 15. Cüceloğlu, D. (1995). İyi düşün doğru karar ver. 10th eds. Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
30. 15. Cüceloğlu, D. (1995). İyi düşün doğru karar ver. 10th eds. Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
31. 16. Doğanay, A., & Ünal, F., (2006). Teaching critical thinking. A., Şimşek (Ed.), in: Instruction Based on Content Types. (ss 209-264). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
32. 16. Doğanay, A., & Ünal, F., (2006). Teaching critical thinking. A., Şimşek (Ed.), in: Instruction Based on Content Types. (ss 209-264). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
33. 17. Öztürk, C., Karayağız, G. M., & Dicle, A. (2007). A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students’ critical thinking dispositions. Nurse Education Today, 28(5), 627- 632.
34. 17. Öztürk, C., Karayağız, G. M., & Dicle, A. (2007). A comparison of problem-based and traditional education on nursing students’ critical thinking dispositions. Nurse Education Today, 28(5), 627- 632.
35. 18. Bruce, R. M. (2017). The control of ventilation during exercise: a lesson in critical thinking. Adv Physiol Educ, 41, 539–547.
36. 18. Bruce, R. M. (2017). The control of ventilation during exercise: a lesson in critical thinking. Adv Physiol Educ, 41, 539–547.
37. 19. Merisier, S., Larue, C., & Boyer, L. (2018). How does questioning influence nursing students' clinical reasoning in problem-based learning? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today, 10(65), 108-115.
38. 19. Merisier, S., Larue, C., & Boyer, L. (2018). How does questioning influence nursing students' clinical reasoning in problem-based learning? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today, 10(65), 108-115.
39. 20. Chan, Z. C. (2019). Nursing students' view of critical thinking as ‘Own thinking, searching for truth, and cultural influences. Nurse Educ Today, 78, 14-18.
40. 20. Chan, Z. C. (2019). Nursing students' view of critical thinking as ‘Own thinking, searching for truth, and cultural influences. Nurse Educ Today, 78, 14-18.
41. 21. Oktay, A. A., Taş, F., Doğaner, A., Gülpak, M., & Avnioğlu, S. (2019). Critical thinking tendencies of Health School students. Çukurova Medical Journal, 44(1), 33-43.
42. 21. Oktay, A. A., Taş, F., Doğaner, A., Gülpak, M., & Avnioğlu, S. (2019). Critical thinking tendencies of Health School students. Çukurova Medical Journal, 44(1), 33-43.
43. 22. Barry, A., Parvan, K., Tabrizi, F. J., Sarbakhsh, P., Safa, B. & Allahbakhshian, A. (2020). Critical thinking in nursing students and its relationship with professional self-concept and relevant factors. Res Dev 9(7), 7.
44. 22. Barry, A., Parvan, K., Tabrizi, F. J., Sarbakhsh, P., Safa, B. & Allahbakhshian, A. (2020). Critical thinking in nursing students and its relationship with professional self-concept and relevant factors. Res Dev 9(7), 7.
45. 23. Kobya, B. H. & Bulut, E. (2020). Critical thinking trends of pediatric nurses and the affecting factors. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 12(1), 37-48.
46. 23. Kobya, B. H. & Bulut, E. (2020). Critical thinking trends of pediatric nurses and the affecting factors. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 12(1), 37-48.
47. 24. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Education Research. İstanbul: Edam,.
48. 24. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Education Research. İstanbul: Edam,.
49. 25. Semerci, N. (2016). The development of critical thinking disposition scale (CTHD): Study on the revision of validity and reliability.” Journal of Turkish Studies, 11, 725-740.
50. 25. Semerci, N. (2016). The development of critical thinking disposition scale (CTHD): Study on the revision of validity and reliability.” Journal of Turkish Studies, 11, 725-740.
51. 26. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today, 24, 105–112.
52. 26. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today, 24, 105–112.
53. 27. Erdoğan, İ. (2015). Din Kültürü ve Ahlak Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme eğilim düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Marife, 15(1), 321-342.
54. 27. Erdoğan, İ. (2015). Din Kültürü ve Ahlak Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel düşünme eğilim düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Marife, 15(1), 321-342.
55. 28. Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N. (2018). A critical overview of metacognition and metacognition’s role in problem solving process. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 32, 87-103
56. 28. Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N. (2018). A critical overview of metacognition and metacognition’s role in problem solving process. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 32, 87-103
57. 29. Çelik, S., Yılmaz, F., Karataş, F., & Karakaş, N. S. (2015). Critical thinking disposition of nursing students and affecting factors. HSP, 2 (1), 74-85.
58. 29. Çelik, S., Yılmaz, F., Karataş, F., & Karakaş, N. S. (2015). Critical thinking disposition of nursing students and affecting factors. HSP, 2 (1), 74-85.
59. 30. Duman, E. Z. (2018). Flexible thinking as a kind of thinking. Turkish Studies, 13(26), 547-561.
60. 30. Duman, E. Z. (2018). Flexible thinking as a kind of thinking. Turkish Studies, 13(26), 547-561.
61. 31. Leininger, M. (2009). Transcultural nursing care in the community. Community Health Nursing. Eds: K. S. Lundy & S. Janes. (ss. 228-245). JONES AND Barlett Publishers.
62. 31. Leininger, M. (2009). Transcultural nursing care in the community. Community Health Nursing. Eds: K. S. Lundy & S. Janes. (ss. 228-245). JONES AND Barlett Publishers.
63. 32. Özdelikara, A., Bingöl, G., & Görgen, Ö. (2012). Critical thinking tendency of nursing students and factors influencing this. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg, 20(3), 219-226.
64. 32. Özdelikara, A., Bingöl, G., & Görgen, Ö. (2012). Critical thinking tendency of nursing students and factors influencing this. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg, 20(3), 219-226.
65. 33. Kong, L. N., Qin, B., Zhou, Y., Mou, S., & Gao, HM. (2014). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students’ critical thinking: A systematic review and meta- analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 458–469.
66. 33. Kong, L. N., Qin, B., Zhou, Y., Mou, S., & Gao, HM. (2014). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students’ critical thinking: A systematic review and meta- analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 458–469.
67. 34. Kaddoura, M. (2016). Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students’ critical thinking skills. Nursing and Health Sciences, 18, 350-354.
68. 34. Kaddoura, M. (2016). Impact of a concept map teaching approach on nursing students’ critical thinking skills. Nursing and Health Sciences, 18, 350-354.
69. 35. Zhang, C., Fan, H., Xia, J., Guo, H., Jiang, X., & Yan, Y. (2017). The effects of reflective training on the disposition of critical thinking for nursing students in China: A controlled trial.” Asian Nursing Research, 11, 194-200.
70. 35. Zhang, C., Fan, H., Xia, J., Guo, H., Jiang, X., & Yan, Y. (2017). The effects of reflective training on the disposition of critical thinking for nursing students in China: A controlled trial.” Asian Nursing Research, 11, 194-200.
71. 36. Garwood, J. K., Ahmed, A. H., & McComb, S. A. (2018). The effect of concept maps on undergraduate nursing students’ critical thinking. Nursing Education Perspective, 39(4), 208-214.
72. 36. Garwood, J. K., Ahmed, A. H., & McComb, S. A. (2018). The effect of concept maps on undergraduate nursing students’ critical thinking. Nursing Education Perspective, 39(4), 208-214.
73. 37. Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I. D., Sari, T. M., & Ismirawati, N. (2019). RICOSRE: A learning model to develop critical thinking skills for students with different academic abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417-434.
74. 37. Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I. D., Sari, T. M., & Ismirawati, N. (2019). RICOSRE: A learning model to develop critical thinking skills for students with different academic abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417-434.
75. 38. Sahsha, L., Ye, X., & Chen, W. (2019). Practice and effectiveness of “nursing case-based learning” course on nursing student's critical thinking ability: A comparative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 36, 91–96.
76. 38. Sahsha, L., Ye, X., & Chen, W. (2019). Practice and effectiveness of “nursing case-based learning” course on nursing student's critical thinking ability: A comparative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 36, 91–96.
77. 39. Rogers, B., & Franklin, A. E. (2021). Cognitive load experienced by nurses in simulation-based learning experiences: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today, 99, 104815.
78. 39. Rogers, B., & Franklin, A. E. (2021). Cognitive load experienced by nurses in simulation-based learning experiences: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Today, 99, 104815.
79. 40. Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327-342.
80. 40. Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327-342.