Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples

Öz

Objective: Rotaviruses are the most common cause of acute infectious diarrhea in children under 5 years of age worldwide. This study aims to compare the immunochromatographic and ELISA methods, determine the sensitivity and specificity of the methods used, and shed light on humanity to diagnose the disease correctly. Method: Stool samples of 1000 patients were sent to Diyarbakır Pediatric Hospital for rapid antigen testing of Rotavirus. Single-step Rotavirus and Adenovirus Co-immunochromatographic and ELISA methods were used in the examination of the samples. Samples with positive rapid test results were collected in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes, and positive antigen samples collected for the ELISA test were stored at -80°C until the time of study. Results: Of 1000 stool samples analyzed, 40 (11.59%) of 345 girls and 60 (9.16%) of 655 boys had Rotavirus antigen in a total of 100 (10%) and 20 (2%) had Adenovirus antigen (P> 0.05). Viral antigen-positive cases were most frequently seen in winter months (December, January, February). There was no statistically significant difference between the data in terms of age and gender (P <0.05). Conclusion: In this study, Rotavirus was detected in one-tenth of diarrhea cases in pediatric patients and it was revealed that it increased seasonally in winter months.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Cunliffe, N. A., & Glass, R. I. (2014). Rotavirus and Other Viral Diarrhoea. Manson’s Tropical Infectious Diseases, 207–214.e3.
  2. 2. Ferreira, M. R., da Xavier, M. P., de Tinga, A. C., Rose, T. L., et al. (2012). Assessment of gastroenteric viruses frequency in a children’s day care center in rio de janeiro, brazil: A fifteen year study (1994-2008). PLoS One,7(3): 7: 1-7.
  3. 3. Parashar, U. D., Nelson, E. S., & Kang, G. (2018). Diagnosis, management, and prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children. BMJ, 347: f7204.
  4. 4. Glass, R. I., Tate, J. E., Jiang, B., & Parashar, U. (2021). The Rotavirus Vaccine Story: From Discovery to the Eventual Control of Rotavirus Disease. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1;224:S331–42.
  5. 5. Omatola, C. A., & Olaniran, A, O. (2022). Rotaviruses: From Pathogenesis to Disease Control- A Critical Review. Viruses, 14(5):875.
  6. 6. Crawford, S. E., Ramani, S., Tate, J. E., Parashar, U. D., et al. (2017). Rotavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 9 (3): 17083.
  7. 7. Leung, A. C., & Hon, K. L. (2020). Paediatrics: How to manage viral gastroenteritis. Drugs Context, 10: 2020-11-7.
  8. 8. Liu, L., & Moore, M. D. (2020). A survey of analytical techniques for noroviruses. Foods, 9(3): 318.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Eylül 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Nisan 2023

Kabul Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
İlhan, O., Bayraktar, M. T., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 262-269. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.1275682
AMA
1.İlhan O, Bayraktar MT, Ibrahim B. Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2024;8(3):262-269. doi:10.46237/amusbfd.1275682
Chicago
İlhan, Oktay, Mehmet Tevfik Bayraktar, ve Bashar Ibrahim. 2024. “Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 8 (3): 262-69. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.1275682.
EndNote
İlhan O, Bayraktar MT, Ibrahim B (01 Eylül 2024) Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 8 3 262–269.
IEEE
[1]O. İlhan, M. T. Bayraktar, ve B. Ibrahim, “Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples”, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 8, sy 3, ss. 262–269, Eyl. 2024, doi: 10.46237/amusbfd.1275682.
ISNAD
İlhan, Oktay - Bayraktar, Mehmet Tevfik - Ibrahim, Bashar. “Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 8/3 (01 Eylül 2024): 262-269. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.1275682.
JAMA
1.İlhan O, Bayraktar MT, Ibrahim B. Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2024;8:262–269.
MLA
İlhan, Oktay, vd. “Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 8, sy 3, Eylül 2024, ss. 262-9, doi:10.46237/amusbfd.1275682.
Vancouver
1.Oktay İlhan, Mehmet Tevfik Bayraktar, Bashar Ibrahim. Comparison of Two Different Serological Methods in The Diagnosis of Rotavirus and Adenovirus in Stool Samples. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Eylül 2024;8(3):262-9. doi:10.46237/amusbfd.1275682