Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for Cognitive Function, Quality of Life and Mobility in Stroke Patients

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to show the meaningfulness of the clinical outcome measurements for cognitive function, quality of life, and mobility in the frame of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Set for Stroke.

Method: Sixty stroke patients attended the study. A-24-item International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Set for Stroke (a short form) was created to show the significant relationship with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0, Rivermead Mobility Index, and Home Safety Checklist..

Results: The mean value of the washing oneself (d510) category in the short International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Set for Stroke showed a high correlation with the daily living activities of the SIS and the self-care parameters (p=0.000, r=-0.727).The short International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Set for Stroke had moderate correlations with the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination total score, domains of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0, and the Rivermead Mobility Index total score (p≤0.001).There was no significant correlation between the Home Safety Checklist and the other International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Set for Stroke categories (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The results of this study can contribute to the transfer of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Core Sets for Stroke in rehabilitation services. Healthcare professionals may benefit from the study to plan individualized preventive and rehabilitative programs and to classify the functionality of stroke patients for optimizing functional health status.

 

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
• Stroke
• Activity
• Participation

İnme Hastalarında Bilişsel İşlev, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Hareketlilik için İşlevsellik, Yeti Yitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması Çekirdek Setinin Uygulanması

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma inme için İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti çerçevesinde bilişsel işlev, yaşam kalitesi ve mobilite için klinik sonuç ölçümlerinin anlamlılığını göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Yöntem: Çalışmaya 60 inmeli hasta katıldı. Standardize Mini-Mental Durum Değerlendirmesi, İnme Etki Ölçeği 3.0 Versiyonu (SIS), Rivermead Mobilite İndeksi ve Ev Güvenlik Kontrol Listesi ile anlamlı ilişkiyi göstermek için A-24 maddelik İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti (kısa formu) oluşturuldu.

Bulgular: İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti Kısa Formu kendini yıkama (d510) kategorisinin ortalama değeri, İnme Etki Ölçeğinin günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve öz bakım parametreleri ile yüksek korelasyon gösterdi (p=0,000, r=-0,727). İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti Kısa Formu, Standardize Mini-Mental Durum Değerlendirmesi toplam puanı, İnme Etki Ölçeği alanları ve Rivermead Mobilite İndeksi toplam puanı ile orta düzeyde korelasyona sahipti (p≤0,001). Ev Güvenlik Kontrol Listesi ile diğer İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti Kısa Formu kategorileri arasında anlamlı bir korelasyon yoktu (p>0,05).

Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırması-İnme için Çekirdek Seti Kısa Formlarının rehabilitasyon hizmetlerine aktarılmasına katkıda bulunabilir. Sağlık çalışanları bireyselleştirilmiş önleyici ve rehabilite edici programlar planlamak ve fonksiyonel sağlık durumunu optimize etmek için inme hastalarının işlevselliğini sınıflandırmak için çalışmadan yararlanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uluslararası İşlevsellik, Engellilik ve Sağlık Sınıflandırması
• İnme
• Aktivite
• Katılım

Etik Beyan

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were under the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the University of Pamukkale Ethics Committee (Year: 2015, 60116787-020/9175).

Kaynakça

1. 1. Shrivastav, S. R., Ciol, M. A., & Lee, D. (2022). Perceived Community Participation and Associated Factors in People with Stroke. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl, 4(3), 100210. doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100210
2. 2. Aşkın, A., Atar, E., Tosun, A., Demirdal, Ü., & Koca, Ö. (2020). Activities and participation after stroke: validity and reliability of the Turkish version of IMPACT-S questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil, 42(13), 1912-1917. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1542038
3. 3. Ezekiel, L., Collett, J., Mayo, N. E., Pang, L., Field, L., & Dawes, H. (2019). Factors associated with participation in life situations for adults with stroke: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 100(5), 945-955. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.017
4. 4. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), 28-66.
5. 5. Leonardi, M., & Fheodoroff, K. (2021). Clinical Pathways in Stroke Rehabilitation: Evidence-based Clinical Practice Recommendations (T. Platz Ed. 1st ed.): Springer Nature.
6. 6. Okochi, J., Utsunomiya, S., & Takahashi, T. (2005). Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 3(1), 1-13. doi:10.1186/1477-7525- 3-46
7. 7. Paanalahti, M., Berzina, G., Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Arndt, T., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2019). Examination of the relevance of the ICF cores set for stroke by comparing with the stroke impact scale. Disabil Rehabil, 41(5), 508-513. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1396368
8. 8. Karlsson, E., & Gustafsson, J. (2021). Validation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core sets from 2001 to 2019–a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil, 1-13. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1878562

9. 9. Hassani Mehraban, A., Fallahzadeh Abarghuei, A., Lajevardi, L., & Shamili, A. (2022). The Effect of ICF-Core Set-Based Occupational Therapy Interventions on the Function and Satisfaction of Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Occupational Therapy In Health Care, 1-19. doi:10.1080/07380577.2022.2114612
10. 10. Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Schouten, J., Dickson, H., Frommelt, P., Omar, Z., et al. (2004). ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med, 36(0), 135-141. doi:10.1080/16501960410016776
11. 11. Salter, K., Jutai, J., Teasell, R., Foley, N., Bitensky, J., & Bayley, M. (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil, 27(6), 315-340. doi:10.1080/09638280400008545
12. 12. Salter, K., Jutai, J. W., Teasell, R., Foley, N. C., & Bitensky, J. (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil, 27(4), 191-207. doi:10.1080/09638280400008545
13. 13. Salter, K., Jutai, J. W., Teasell, R., Foley, N. C., Bitensky, J., & Bayley, M. (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disabil Rehabil, 27(9), 507-528. doi:10.1080/0963828040008552
14. 14. Jette, A. M., Haley, S. M., & Kooyoomjian, J. T. (2003). Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med, 35(3), 145-149. doi:10.1080/16501970310010501
15. 15. Hoyle, M., Gustafsson, L., Meredith, P., & Ownsworth, T. (2012). Participation after stroke: Do we understand all the components and relationships as categorised in the ICF? Brain impair, 13(1), 4-15. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2012.9
16. 16. Molloy, D. W., & Standish, T. I. (1997). A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr, 9(S1), 87-94. doi:10.1017/S1041610297004754
17. 17. Güngen, C., Ertan, T., Eker, E., Yaşar, R., & Engin, F. (2002). Standardize mini mental test’in Türk toplumunda hafif demans tanısında geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13(4), 273-281.
18. 18. Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., Perera, S., & Investigators, G. A. i. N. A. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(7), 950-963. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
19. 19. Hantal, A. O., Dogu, B., Buyukavci, R., & Kuran, B. (2014). Stroke impact scale version 3.0: study of reliability and validity in stroke patients in the turkish population/Inme etki olcegi 3, 0: turk toplumundaki inmeli hastalarda guvenilirlik ve gecerlilik calismasi. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil, 60(2), 106-117. doi:10.5152/tftrd.2014.70487
20. 20. Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G., & Bradshaw, C. (1991). The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud, 13(2), 50-54. doi:10.3109/03790799109166684
21. 21. Akın, B., & Emiroğlu, O. (2007). Rivermead mobilite indeksi (RMI) Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenirliği.
22. Turk Geriatr Derg, 10(3), 124-130.
23. 22. Herdman, S. (2000). The elderly person with vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, FA: Davis Co.
24. 23. Portney, L. & Watkins, M. (2000). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. 24. Saa, J. P., Tse, T., Baum, C., Cumming, T., Josman, N., Rose, M., et al. (2019). Longitudinal evaluation of cognition after stroke–A systematic scoping review. PloS one, 14(8), e0221735. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221735
26. 25. Campos, T. F., Rodrigues, C. A., Farias, I. M. A., Ribeiro, T. S., & Melo, L. P. (2012). Comparison of instruments for sleep, cognition and function evaluation in stroke patients according to the international classifi cation of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Braz J Phys Ther, 16(1), 23-29. doi:10.1590/S1413-35552012000100005
27. 26. Fallahpour, M., Tham, K., Joghataei, M. T., & Jonsson, H. (2011). Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke. J Rehabil Med, 43(5), 388- 397.
28. 27. Prakash, V., Ganesan, M., Vasanthan, R., & Hariohm, K. (2017). Do commonly used functional outcome measures capture activities that are relevant for people with stroke in India? Top Stroke Rehabil, 24(3), 200- 205. doi:10.1080/10749357.2016.1234190
29. 28. Sumathipala, K., Radcliffe, E., Sadler, E., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C. (2012). Identifying the long-term needs of stroke survivors using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Chronic illness, 8(1), 31-44. doi:10.1177/1742395311423848
30. 29. Tistad, M., Ytterberg, C., Tham, K., & von Koch, L. (2012). Poor concurrence between disabilities as described by patients and established assessment tools three months after stroke: a mixed methods approach. J Neurol Sci, 313(1-2), 160-166. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.08.038
31. 30. Mazzoli, D., Giannotti, E., Rambelli, C., Zerbinati, P., Galletti, M., Mascioli, F., et al. (2019). Long-term effects on body functions, activity and participation of hemiplegic patients in equino varus foot deformity surgical correction followed by immediate rehabilitation. A prospective observational study. Top Stroke Rehabil, 26(7), 518-522. doi:10.1080/10749357.2019.1642651
32. 31. Geroin, C., Mazzoleni, S., Smania, N., Gandolfi, M., Bonaiuti, D., Gasperini, G., et al. (2013). Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med, 45(10), 987-996. doi:10.2340/16501977-1234