Araştırma Makalesi

Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 31 Ocak 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review

Öz

Objective: In the current literature, there are many studies that include different measurement methods and different statistical analyzes in determining obesity in children. The aim of this study is to review the anthropometric measurement methods used to measure obesity in children.
Method: A systematic review was completed for studies of anthropometric measurement methods used to measure obesity in children. The databases Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar were searched. Methodological quality of studies was examined using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Subsequently, important findings were synthesized.
Results: Twenty four studies published between the years 2006-2020 were included in the review. Sample sizes varied between 30 and 23043 participants. The age range of the participants varied between 2-18 years. In 87.5% of the studies (n=21), Body Mass Index (BMI) was used as the measurement method and the performance of BMI was compared with other anthropometric measurement methods. Waist circumference (n=16), waist-hip ratio (n=13) and arm circumference measurements (n=8) are the most common used methods.
Conclusion: BMI score is seen as the gold standard in comparison of anthropometric measurements used to evaluate the obesity and overweight status of the child population. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio are the most commonly used and effective tools for measuring obesity and overweight in children when more accurate techniques such as Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) and Air-Displacement Plethysmography (ADP) are unfeasible.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation group on obesity. Geneva: WHO; 2000 (WHO Technical Report Series, 894).
  2. 2. Deshmukh-Taskar P., Nicklas T. A., Morales M., Yang S. J., Zakeri I., Berenson G. S. (2006). Tracking of overweight status from childhood to young adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60(1):48e57.
  3. 3. Starc G., Strel J. (2011). Tracking excess weight and obesity from childhood to young adulthood: a 12-year prospective cohort study in Slovenia. Public Health Nutr 2011;14(1):49e55.
  4. 4. Norgan N.G. (2005). Laboratory and field measurements of body composition. Public Health Nutr 2005;8(7A):1108e22.
  5. 5. Kehoe S. H., Krishnaveni G. V., Lubree H. G., Wills A. K., Guntupalli A. M., Veena S. R., et al. (2011). Prediction of body-fat percentage from skinfold and bio-impedance measurements in Indian school children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65(12):1263e70.
  6. 6. Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 52(6), 377-384.
  7. 7. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg, 8(5), 336-341.
  8. 8. Jayawardene, W., Dickinson, S., Lohrmann, D., & Agley, J. (2018). Arm circumference-to-height ratio as a situational alternative to BMI percentile in assessing obesity and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents. Journal of obesity, 2018.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ocak 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Nisan 2021

Kabul Tarihi

23 Kasım 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Tekin, F., & Özkoçak, V. (2022). Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.908212
AMA
1.Tekin F, Özkoçak V. Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;6(1):52-64. doi:10.46237/amusbfd.908212
Chicago
Tekin, Fatih, ve Vahdet Özkoçak. 2022. “Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (1): 52-64. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.908212.
EndNote
Tekin F, Özkoçak V (01 Ocak 2022) Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 6 1 52–64.
IEEE
[1]F. Tekin ve V. Özkoçak, “Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review”, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 6, sy 1, ss. 52–64, Oca. 2022, doi: 10.46237/amusbfd.908212.
ISNAD
Tekin, Fatih - Özkoçak, Vahdet. “Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 6/1 (01 Ocak 2022): 52-64. https://doi.org/10.46237/amusbfd.908212.
JAMA
1.Tekin F, Özkoçak V. Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;6:52–64.
MLA
Tekin, Fatih, ve Vahdet Özkoçak. “Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review”. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 6, sy 1, Ocak 2022, ss. 52-64, doi:10.46237/amusbfd.908212.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Tekin, Vahdet Özkoçak. Comparing Anthropometric Measurements in Determining Obesity in Children: A Systematic Review. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Ocak 2022;6(1):52-64. doi:10.46237/amusbfd.908212

Cited By