COMPARATİON OF FUNCTİONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN SCORES OF 13 AND 17 YEAR OLD SOCCER PLAYER

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 112 - 116, 21.12.2017

Serdar Arslan , Engin Dinç Gökmen Yapalı

Öz

ABSTRACT

Aim: Functional
movement screen (FMS) is a system based on scoring seven movement patterns that
form the basis of human movement according to certain criteria. The purpose of
this study is to compare the FMS scores of male soccer players who aged 13
years with the FMS scores of male soccer players who aged 17 years.

Method: 29 boys who
playing football in a football academy were taken to study. Players with any
musculoskeletal injuries were not included in the study. FMS evaluation was
done by the same tester.

Results: The mean of
the FMS scores of the 13-year-old participants was 14.07 ± 1.63, and the FMS
scores of the 17-year-old participants was 16.60 ± 1.50. The difference between
the FMS scores of the two age groups was statistically significant (p
<0.05). In addition, the scores of the 13-year-old group were at the limit
for risk for musculoskeletal injury according to this scoring system.

Conclusion: Considering the findings, it
can be concluded that male children playing football at the age of 13 are more
vulnerable to musculoskeletal injuries than those of 17 years old.

Anahtar Kelimeler

movement, soccer, screening

13 VE 17 YAŞ ERKEK FUTBOL OYUNCULARININ FONKSİYONEL HAREKET TARAMASI SKORLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Amaç: Fonksiyonel hareket taraması (FHT) insan hareketine
temel oluşturan yedi hareket paterninin belirli kriterlere göre puanlanmasını
esas alan bir sistemdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı 13 yaşındaki erkek futbol
oyuncularının FHT skorlarını 17 yaşındaki erkek futbol oyuncularının FHT
skorları ile karşılaştırmaktır.

Yöntem: Bir futbol
akademisinde futbol oynayan 29 erkek çocuk çalışmaya alındı.  Herhangi bir muskuloskeletal yaralanması olan
futbolcu çalışmaya alınmamıştır. Katılımcılara aynı test edici tarafından FHT
değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır.

Bulgular: Katılımcılardan
13 yaşında olanların FHT skorları toplamının ortalaması 14.07±1.63, 17
yaşındaki katılımcıların FHT skorları toplamının ortalaması 16.60±1.50 idi. İki
yaş grubunun FHT skorları toplamı arasındaki fark istatiksel olarak anlamlıydı
(p<0.05). Ayrıca 13 yaş grubunun skorları bu skorlama sisteminin
muskuloskeletal yaralanma için risk saydığı sınırda bulundu.

Sonuç: Bulgular göz
önüne alındığında 13 yaşında futbol oynayan erkek çocukların 17 yaşındakilere
göre muskuloskeletal yaralanmalara daha açık olduğu sonucu çıkarılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

hareket, futbol, tarama

Kaynakça

• 1. Gabbe, B. J., Finch, C. F., Cameron, P. A., & Williamson, O. D. Incidence of serious injury and death during sport and recreation activities in Victoria, Australia. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005,39(8): 573-577.
• 2. Herbert, RD and Gabriel, M. Effects of stretching before and after exercise on muscle soreness and risk of injury: Systematic review. BMJ, 2002, 325(7362): 468, 2002.
• 3. Pope, RP, Herbert, RD, Kirwan, JD, and Graham, BJ. A randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000,32(2): 271–277.
• 4. Nadler, SF, Malanga, GA, Feinberg, JH, Ruanni, M, Moley, P, and Foye, P. Functional performance deficits in athletes with previous lower extremity injury. Clin J Sport Med 2002,12(2): 73–78.
• 5. Plisky, PJ, Rauh, MJ, Kaminski, TW, and Underwood, FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006, 36(12): 911–919.
• 6. Carling, C., Bloomfield, J., Nelsen, L., & Reilly, T. The role of motion analysis in elite soccer. Sports medicine, 2008,38(10): 839-862.
• 7. Cook G; Burton L; Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–part 1. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 2006, 1(2): 62.
• 8. Cook G; Burton L; Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 2. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 2006, 1(3): 132.
• 9. Minick, K. I., Kiesel, K. B., Burton, L., Taylor, A., Plisky, P., & Butler, R. J. Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2010,24(2): 479-486.
• 10. Onate, J. A., Dewey, T., Kollock, R. O., Thomas, K. S., Van Lunen, B. L., DeMaio, M., & Ringleb, S. I. Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2012,26(2): 408-415.
• 11. Mokha, M., Sprague, P. A., & Gatens, D. R. Predicting musculoskeletal injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes from asymmetries and individual-test versus composite functional movement screen scores. Journal of athletic training, 2016,51(4): 276-282.
• 12. Yeung, J., Cleves, A., Griffiths, H., & Nokes, L. Mobility, proprioception, strength and FMS as predictors of injury in professional footballers. BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2016,2(1): e000134.
• 13. Warren, M., Smith, C. A., & Chimera, N. J. Association of the functional movement screen with injuries in division I athletes. Journal of sport rehabilitation, 2015,24(2): 163-170.
• 14. Kraus, K., Schütz, E., Taylor, W. R., & Doyscher, R. Efficacy of the functional movement screen: a review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2014,28(12): 3571-3584.
• 15. Portas, M. D., Parkin, G., Roberts, J., & Batterham, A. M. Maturational effect on Functional Movement Screen™ score in adolescent soccer players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2016,19(10): 854-858.
• 16. Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Radnor, J. M., Rhodes, B. C., Faigenbaum, A. D., & Myer, G. D. Relationships between functional movement screen scores, maturation and physical performance in young soccer players. Journal of sports sciences, 2015,33(1): 11-19.