Farklı Sıra Aralarının Bazı Fiğ (Vicia sativa L.) Çeşitlerinin Tohum Verimine Etkisi

Öz

Araştırma 2013-2014 yıllarında Orta Anadolu koşullarında yürütülmüştür. Beş fiğ (Vicia sativa L.) çeşidi (Kubilay-82, Cumhuriyet, Alinoglu-2001, Alper ve SZF-1) bölünmüş parseller deneme deseninde üç tekerrürlü olarak yetiştirilmiştir. Sıra araları (20, 40 ve 60 cm) ana parselleri, çeşitler alt parselleri oluşturmuştur. Bitki boyu, bitkide bakla sayısı, baklada tane sayısı, bin tane ağırlığı, biyolojik verim, tohum verimi ve hasat indeksi özellikleri incelenmiştir. Fiğ çeşitlerinin farklı sıra arası uygulamalarında tohum verimleri 39-112 kg/da arasında değişmiştir. Sıra arası mesafeleri arasında önemli farklar gözlenmemiştir. İlk iki uygulamada benzer verimler elde edilmiş, 60 cm uygulamasında verimin azaldığı belirlenmiştir. Biyolojik verim 108-287 kg/da arasında değerler almıştır. Yüksek verimler dar sıra aralığında alınmış, en düşük değer 60 cm uygulamasında saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fiğ,Vicia sativa L.,sıra arası,tohum verimi

The Effects of Different Row Spacings on Seed Yield of Some Common Vetch Varieties (Vicia sativa L.)

Abstract

This research was conducted under Middle Anatolian conditions in 2013 and 2014. Five common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) varieties (Kubilay-82, Cumhuriyet, Alinoglu-2001, Alper and SZF-1) were grown in a split plot design with three replications, varieties being sub plots and three row spacing applications (20, 40 and 60 cm) as main plots. Plant height, pod number per plant, seed number per pod, thousand seed weight, biological and seed yields, and harvest index were recorded.

Seed yields of common vetch varieties under different row spacings ranged between 0.39-1.12 t ha^-1. There were not significant differences among row spacings. Similar yields were obtained with the first two row spacings, but the yield decreased in 60 cm application. Biological yield changed from 1.08 to 2.87 t ha^-1. High yields were observed in narrow spacings while the lowest value was belonged to 60 cm.

Keywords

• Vetch,Vicia sativa L.,row spacing,seed yield

Kaynakça

1. Abbasi, A. R., R. Sarvestani, B. Mohammadi, and A. Baghery. 2014. Drought stress-induced changes at physiological and biochemical levels in some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 16 (3): 505-516.
2. Acar, Z., C. O. Sabancı, M. Tan, C. Sancak, M. Kızılşimşek U. Bilgili, İ. Ayan, A. Karagöz, H. Mut, H., A. Ö Önal, U. Başaran, B. Kır, S. Temel, G. B. Yavuzer, R. Kırbaş, M. A. Pelen. 2015. Yem bitkileri üretiminde değişimler ve yeni arayışlar. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VIII. Teknik Kongresi 12-16 Ocak 2015. Cilt 1, s. 508-547.
3. Al, V., and I. Baysal. 1996. A research on the effect of row spacing to some agricultural characters of three local bitter vetch [Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd.] grown in Sanlıurfa. Turkey Third Congress of Pasture, Meadow and Forage Crops. 17-19 June 1996. p. 274-279. Ataturk Uni. Agr. Fac., Erzurum, Turkey. (in Turkish).
4. Albayrak, S., M. Guler, and O. Togel. 2005. Relations between seed yield and yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines. J. of Fac. of Agric, OMU 20 (1): 56-63.
5. Avci, M. 1994. An investigation on yields and adaptabilities of some common vetch varieties/lines/populations. M.Sc. Thesis. Ataturk Uni. Ins. of Science, Erzurum, Turkey. (in Turkish).
6. Avci, M., and A. Gokkus. 1997. Morphologic, phenologic and agronomic characteristics of some common vetch genotypes under unirrigated conditions. J. Field Crops Central Research Institute, 6 (2): 39-47. (in Turkish).
7. Babat, S., and A. E. Anlarsal. 2011. A study about the determination of yield and yield components of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) on ecological conditions of Diyarbakir. Cukurova Uni. J. Inst. of Nat. and Appl. Sci. 26 (3): 37-46. (in Turkish).
8. Basbag, M., and C. Peker. 2003. An investigation on the effect of different row spacing and seeding rates to the seed yield and some yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) in Diyarbakir conditions. Turkey 5. Field Crops Congress, 13-17 Oct. 2003. p. 438-443. Diyarbakir. (in Turkish).

9. Baskoy, S. 2015. Determination of the effects of different row spacings on seed yield of some common vetch varieties. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Ahi Evran, Kirsehir, Turkey, 41p. (in Turkish).
10. Buyukburc, U., S. Iptas, Y. Karadag, and A. A. Acar. 2004. Determination of seed yield and some yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) line and cultivars under Tokat-Kazova winter sowing conditions. J. Fields Crop Research Institute, 10 (1-2): 88-100. (in Turkish).
11. Cil, A. N., C. Yücel, A. Cil, and H. K. Firincioglu. 2004. The determining of the dry herbage yield and other related characteristics of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines in the gap region conditions. J. Fields Crop Central Research Institute, 13 (1-2). (in Turkish).
12. Dong, R., M. Z. Z. Jahufer, D. K. Dong, Y. R. Wang, and Z. P. Liu. (2016). Characterisation of the morphological variation for seed traits among 537 germplasm accessions of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) using digital image analysis, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 59 (4): 422-435. DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2016.1229682.
13. Dundar, F. C. 2010. Determination of yield and yield components of some common vetch cultivars in summer sowing. M.Sc. Thesis, Namık Kemal Uni. Ins. of Science, Tekirdag. (in Turkish).
14. Firincioglu, H. K. 2014. A comparison of six vetches (Vicia spp.) for developmental rate, herbage yield and seed yield in semi-arid central Turkey. Grass and Forage Science 69 (2): 303-314.
15. Gorgulu, G. 2010. Determination of forage and seed yield with yield components of common vetch cultivars under Isparta conditions. M.Sc. Thesis, Suleyman Demirel Uni. Ins. of Science, Isparta. (in Turkish).
16. Karadag, Y., S. Iptas, and M. Yavuz. 2008. Evaluation of adaptivity of common vetch lines in ecological transition zones in mid-north of Anatolia (Tokat and Amasya). TABAD Research J. of Agricultural Sciences. 1 (2): 11-18. (in Turkish) Kendir, H. 2000. Seed yields and some plant traits of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines. J. of Agric. Sciences 6 (2): 1-7. (in Turkish).
17. Kim, T. S., S. Raveendar, S. Suresh, G. A. Lee, J. R. Lee, J. H. Cho, S. Y. Lee, K. H. Ma, G. T. Cho, and J. W. Chung. 2015. Transcriptome analysis of two Vicia sativa subspecies: mining molecular markers to enhance genomic resources for vetch improvement. Genes. 6: 1164–1182.
18. Kokten, K. 2011. Determination of seed yield and some agronomical characteristics of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines and varieties in Bingol ecological conditions. Science J. Bingol Univ. 1 (2): 81-85. (in Turkish).
19. Ozpınar, H., C. O. Sabancı, and G. Eginlioglu. 1999. Effect of seed rates on herbage and seed yields of Urem-79 and Kubilay-82 (Vicia sativa L.) cultivars. Anadolu, J. of Aegean Agr. Res. Ins. 9 (2): 41-55. (in Turkish).
20. Russell, F. 1986. Microcomputer statistical program (MSTAT) version 4.00/EM. Mcihigan State University. Mstat/crop and soil sciences. 324B. Agricultural Hall. East lansing, Michigan. USA.
21. Serin, Y., M. Tan, and H. Şeker. 1995. The effects of row spacings and seed rates on the seed yield and some characteristics of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). J. Fac. Agr. Ataturk Uni. 26 (2): 159-170. (in Turkish).
22. Seydosoglu, S. 2014. Researches on determination yield and yield components of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes in ecological conditions of Diyarbakir. Turkish J. of Agricultural Research, 1 (2): 117-127. (in Turkish).
23. Stevovic, V., R. Stanisavljevic, D. Djukic, and D. Djurovic. 2012. Eff ect of row spacing on seed and forage yield in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) cultivars. Turk J. Agric. For. 36: 35-44. DOI: 10.3906/tar-1006-1018. Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. Mc Graw Hill Book Company Inc., New-York.
24. Tamkoc, A., and M. A. Avci. 2004. The determination of some agronomical characters common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines selected from nature. J. Agr. and Food Sciences, 18 (34): 118-121. (in Turkish)
25. Tigka, E. L., D. F. Beslemes, D. Vlachostergios, and D. Bilalis. 2016). Evaluation of Vicia sativa L. as green manure: Case study of genotype and plant density influence on N availability. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture, 73 (1): 142-143.
26. Yucel, C., R. Gultekin, I. Inal, and M. Avci. 2008. The determining of yield and yield characteristics of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) lines in Cukurova conditions. Anadolu, J. of Aegean Agr. Res. Ins. 18 (2): 8-54. (in Turkish).
27. Yurtsever, N. 1984. Deneysel Istatistik Metotları. Köy Hizmetleri Toprak ve Gübre Arş. Enst. Müdürlüğü Yayınları Genel Yayın No. l21 Ankara.