A Preliminary Study on the Determination of Carpel Characteristics, Yield Losses and Free Fatty Acid Content of Seed under Pre-Harvest Precipitation in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 161 - 166, 29.12.2022

Şerife Balcı Volkan Mehmet Çınar Aydın Ünay

https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1224464

Cited By: 1

Öz

Pre-harvest precipitation in some years in many cotton-growing regions may adversely affect cotton yield and quality. The effect of carpel characters of cultivars on fall out (ground losses) and free fatty acid of seed under different precipitation amounts were investigated. The experiment was arranged in a two-factor Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. The precipitation x cultivar interaction for carpel depth, free acid content and fall out were significant. Fall out values were between 38.9 kg ha-1 at 20 mm precipitation and 234.2 kg ha-1 at 125 mm precipitation. The amount of fall out in all varieties was negatively affected by the increase in precipitation. Gloria cultivar with a wide carpel had the lowest yield losses on the ground.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carpel openness, carpel angle, fall out, cotton, free fatty acid content, precipitation

Pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Hasat Öncesi Yağış Koşullarında Çenet Özellikleri, Verim Kayıpları ve Tohum Serbest Yağ Asitlerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Ön Çalışma

Öz

Birçok pamuk ekim bölgesinde bazı yıllarda gerçekleşen hasat öncesi yağışlar, verim ve kaliteyi olumsuz etkilemektedir. Farklı yağış miktarlarının pamuk çeşitlerinde dökülme oranı, çenet özellikleri ve tohum serbest yağ asitleri üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Deneme iki faktörlü Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Desenine göre 4 tekrarlamalı olarak düzenlenmiştir. Çenet derinliği, serbest yağ asitleri oranı ve dökülme oranı yönünden yağış x çeşit interaksiyonu önemli bulunmuştur. 20 mm yağış koşullarında 3,89 kg da-1 olan hasat kayıplarının 125 mm de 23,42 kg da-1 değerine ulaştığı saptanmıştır. Tüm çeşitlerde yağış miktarının hasat kayıplarını artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Geniş çenet yapısına sahip olan Gloria çeşidinin hasat kayıplarının daha az olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çenet açıklığı, çenet açısı, dökülme oranı, pamuk, serbest yağ asitleri, yağış

Kaynakça

• Anonymous. 1993. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists Society. 4th Edition. AOCS Press. Champaign, USA.
• Anonymous. 2014. Türkiye state meteorological service. Date of access: 25.11.2021
• Anonymous. 2016. SAS Institute Inc. 2016. JMP Statistical Software, Version 13. Cary, USA.
• Anonymous. 2019. How wet weather affects cotton harvesting. Certi-Pik, USA. Available at http://certipik.com/ 2019/03/how-wet-weather-affects-cotton-harvesting. Date of Access: 09.06.2022.
• Anonymous. 2021. Cotton: crop establishment. Ikisan Agri-Informatics&Services. Available at http://www. ikisan.com/ap-cotton-crop-establishment.htm. Date of Access: 07.12.2021
• Bednarz, C. W., W. D. Shurley, and W. S. Anthony. 2002. Losses in yield, quality, and profitability of cotton from improper harvest timing. Agronomy Journal 94(5):1004-1011.
• Chattopadhyay, N., R. P. Samui, and S. K. Banerjee. 2008. Effect of weather on growth and yield of cotton grown in the dry farming tract of Peninsular India. Mausam 59(3):339–346.
• Coskun, M. B. 2002. Determination of relationships between various aerodynamics, physio-mechanical and fiber properties in cotton. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry 26(6): 363-368.
• Faircloth, J., A. Stewart, A. Harper, K. Edmisten, and R. Wells. 2004. Investigating storm resistance in spindle-picked upland cotton. Crop Management 3(1): 1-7.
• Gemtos, T. A., and E. Mygdakos. 1998. Losses incurring during cotton mechanical harvesting, in Central Greece. pp. 1133-1136.In: Proc. World Cotton Research Conference-2. Athens, Greece. 6-12 September.
• Kilickan, A., and B. M. Coskun. 2009. The determination of some physical properties for machine harvest of cotton varieties in Aegean Region. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty 6(1): 87-90.
• Killi, F., and T. Beycioglu. 2020. Carpel characteristics, seed oil and protein contents of cotton genotypes under field conditions. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 7(9): 53-60.
• Lubbers, E. L., and P. W. Chee. 2009. The worldwide gene pool of G. hirsutum and its improvement. pp. 23–52. In: A.H. Paterson, (Ed.) Genetics and Genomics of Cotton. Springer, New York.
• Parvin, D. W., S. W. Martin, F. Cooke Jr, and B. B. Freeland Jr. 2005. Effect of harvest season rainfall on cotton yield. The Journal of Cotton Science 9: 115-120.
• Raper, T. 2019. String-out, fall out, and estimating yield loss in cotton. The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture. 2019 Country Standardized Trials Cotton Data Available at http://www.news.utcrops. com/2019/12/string-out-fall-out-and-estimating-yield-loss-in-cotton/. Date of access: 05.12.2021
• Rubio, K. 2018. Cotton harvesting snagged by rain. Available at http://www.uvaldeleadernews.Com /articles cotton-harvesting-snagged-by-rain. Date of access: 05.12.2021
• Silva, R. P., F. G. Souza, J. W. Cortez, C. E. Furlani, and G. P. Vigna. 2007. Spatial variability and statistical control of the losses process in the mechanized cotton harvest. Engenharia Agrícola 27(3): 742-752.
• Steel, R. G. D., J. A. Torrie, and D. A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edi. Mc Graw Hill Book. INC.
• Stephens, S. G. 1958. Salt water tolerance of seeds of Gossypium species as a possible factor in seed dispersal. The American Naturalist 92(863): 83–92.
• Waddle, B. M., and R. F. Colwick. 1961. Producing seeds of cotton and other fiber crops. pp. 188-192. The Yearbook of Agriculture.
• Williford, J. R., F. T. Cooke, D. F. Caillouet, and S. Anthony. 1995. Effect of Harvest Timing on Cotton Yield And Quality. pp. 633-635. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN. USA.
• Zaxos, D., S. Kostoula, E. M. Khah, A. Mavromatis, D. Chachalis, and M. Sakelariou. 2012. Evaluation of seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production and quality in relation to the different irrigation levels and two row spacings. International Journal of Plant Production 6(1): 129-148.