Economic Effect of Certified Organic Fertilizer Usage: A Case Study in Menderes District, Izmir Province

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 30 - 44, 29.06.2023

Hakan Adanacıoğlu , Hasan Emre Yağ

https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1276361

Öz

In this study, an answer has been sought to the question of whether a partial or a full transition into using certified organic fertilizer usage is economical for the farmers or not. In this context, the findings of a field work which were collected by face-to-face interviews with 140 farmers in Menderes district of Izmir province in Türkiye were analysed. Of the 140 farmers interviewed; 50 of them were certified organic fertilizer users and 90 of them were non-users. In order to compare the partial economic impact of producing foods using certified organic fertilizers to relying solely on inorganic fertilizers, partial budget analysis method has been utilized. In the analysis which was made about mandarin in open-area and cucumber in greenhouse, if the farmers who use only inorganic fertilizers in production adopt a certified organic fertilizer + farmyard manure + inorganic fertilizer combination, the economic effect of this change would be positive. According to the partial budget analysis, in the case of such change; mandarin producers can gain a significant profit (+) US$6690.71 ha-1, and cucumber producers can gain a significant profit (+) US$11822.96 ha-1. These results prove that the most profitable option for the farmers is the combined fertilizer application including certified organic fertilizer.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organic fertilizer, certified organic fertilizer, farmers, economic effect, economic analysis

Destekleyen Kurum

Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Proje Numarası

16-ZRF-022

Teşekkür

The authors would like to thank the Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit for its financial support. The authors also wish to thank the farmers who contributed to the farm survey.

Sertifikalı Organik Gübre Kullanımının Ekonomik Etkisi: İzmir İli Menderes İlçesi Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmada esas olarak sertifikalı organik gübre kullanımının çiftçiler açısından ekonomik olup olmadığı sorusuna yanıt aranmıştır. Bu sorunun yanıtı açık alanda ve örtü altında gerçekleştirilen tarımsal üretim koşullarında verilmiştir. Bu kapsamda Türkiye’de İzmir’in Menderes ilçesinde 140 çiftçi ile yüz yüze gerçekleştirilen bir saha çalışmasının bulguları analiz edilmiştir. Görüşme yapılan 140 çiftçinin 50’sini sertifikalı organik gübre kullananlar, 90’ını ise kullanmayanlar oluşturmaktadır. Sertifikalı organik gübre kullanımının işletmeler üzerindeki ekonomik etkisi analiz edilirken kısmi bütçeleme analizi kullanılmıştır. Açık alanda mandalina, örtü altında ise hıyar üzerinde yapılan incelemede, üretimde sadece inorganik gübre kullanan çiftçiler sertifikalı organik gübre+çiftlik gübresi+inorganik gübre interaksiyonunu uygulamaya başlamaları durumunda bu değişikliğin ekonomik etkisi pozitif çıkmaktadır. Kısmi bütçeleme analizine göre, mandalina üretimi yapan çiftçiler böyle bir değişikliğe gitmeleri durumunda birim alan başına (+)US$669,07 da-1, hıyar üretimi yapan çiftçiler ise birim alan başına (+)US$1.182,29 da-1 gibi önemli sayılabilecek düzeyde kar elde etmektedir. Bu sonuçlar, gübre uygulamaları açısından çiftçiler için en karlı seçeneğin sertifikalı ticari organik gübrenin de içinde olduğu karma gübre uygulaması olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organik gübre, sertifikalı organik gübre, çiftçiler, ekonomik etki, ekonomik analiz

Proje Numarası

16-ZRF-022

Kaynakça

• Alimi,T., O.C. Ajewole, O.O. Olubode-Awosola, and E.O. Idowu. 2006. Economic rationale of commercial organic fertilizer technology in vegetable production in Osun State of Nigeria. Journal of Applied Horticulture 8(2): 159-164. doi: jah.2006.v08i02.37.
• Anonymous, 2021a. Chemical fertilizers-global market opportunities & strategies to 2022. https://www. businesswire.com/news/home/20190205005539/en/Chemical-Fertilizers---Global-Market-Opportunities-Strategies. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• Anonymous, 2021b. Organic fertilizers market by source: global forecast to 2022. Available at: https://www. marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/organic-fertilizer-Market-171744317.html. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• Aras, A. 1988. Agricultural Accounting. 1st ed. Izmir: Publication of the Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University. Bilge, B. and Artukoğlu, M. 2019. Türkiye’de Son Yıllarda Gübrede Uygulanan Politikalara Genel Bir Bakış. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 25(2): 275-281. doi:: 10.24181/tarekoder.629455.
• Buckler, L. 2018. The hidden dangers of chemical fertilizers. Available at: https://ohsonline.com/Articles /2017 /12/07/The-Hidden-Dangers-of-Chemical-Fertilizers. aspx ?Page=1. Accessed March 26, 2022. CBRT. 2019. Exchange rates. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Available at: https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/index. php. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• Chen, J.H. 2006. The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil-Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use, ed. Z.S. Chen, and T. Vearasilp, 1-11. Bangkok: Land Development Department.
• Demirtaş, E. I., C.F. Özkan, F. Öktüren, and A.N. Arı. 2012. The effects of some organic and chemical fertilizer applications on the yield and quality of tomato. Alatarım 11(2): 9-16.
• ECOFI. 2021. What are organic-based fertilizers? Available at: http://www.ecofi.info/benefits-of-organic-based-fertilizers/. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• FAO. 2019. World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2022. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/ca6746en/CA6746EN.pdf?eloutlink=imf2fao. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• FAO. 2021. Database on commercially available organic fertilizers and water-retaining products. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/orgfert/intro.htm. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• FMI. 2020. Organic fertilizer market organic fertilizer market: global industry analysis and opportunity assessment 2016-2026. Available at: http://www.sbwire.com/ press-releases/organic-fertilizer-market-industry analysis-size-share-and-forecast-2016-2026-1213784.htm. Accessed March 26, 2022.
• Gebremedhin, A.R., and G. Tesfay. 2015. Evaluating the effects of integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on socioeconomic performance of upland rice (Oryza Sativa L.) in Tselemti Wereda of North-Western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 5(7): 39-51.
• Han, S. H., J. Y. An, , J. Hwang, S.B. Kim., and B.B.Park. 2016. The effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendrontulipifera Lin.) in a nursery system. Forest Science and Technology 12(3): 137-143. doi:10.1080/21580103.2015.1135827.
• Henderson, C., S. Piya, and M. Kharel. 2016. Market-based strategies to upscale organic fertilizer use in Nepal to achieve productivity, Resilience, and the SDGs. Food Chain 6(2): 51-64. doi:10.3362/2046-1887.2016.006.
• Jjagwe, J., K. Chelimo, J. Karungi, A. J. Komakech, and J. Lederer. 2020. Comparative performance of organic fertilizers in maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield, and economic results. Agronomy 10, 69, 1-15. doi:10.3390/agronomy10010069.
• MAF. 2020. Organic fertilizer usage statistics in Turkey. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Plant Nutrition and Technology Development Department, Ankara, Turkey.
• MAF. 2021. Land-based agricultural subsidies. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Accessed April 10, 2022. https://www.tarimorman. gov.tr/Konular/Tarimsal-Destekler/Alan-Bazli-Destekler/Mazot-Gubde-ve-Toprak-Analizi-Destegi.
• Martey, E. 2018. Welfare effect of organic fertilizer use in Ghana. Heliyon 4: 1-26. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018 .e00844.
• OECD. 2022. Organic fertilizers. Available at: https://stats. oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1921. Accessed April 01, 2022.
• Rahman K. M. A., and D. Zhang. 2018. Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 10, 759: 1-15. doi:10.3390/su10030759.
• Sekumade, A. B. 2017. Economic effect of organic and ınorganic fertilizers on the yield of maize in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics 2(3): 63-68. doi:10.11648/j.ijae.2017 0203.13.
• Soha, M. E.-D. 2014. The partial budget analysis for sorghum farm in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science 59(1): 77-81. doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2014.06.011.
• Soomro A. F, S. Tunio, F.C. Oad, and I. Rajper. 2013. Integrated effect of inorganic and organic fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L). Pak. J. Bot. 45(4): 1339-1348.
• Tigner, R. 2018. Partial budgeting: a tool to analyze farm business changes. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. Available at: https://www.extension.iastate. edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c1-50.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2022.