ÇAĞIN TEKNOLOJİK BAĞIMLILIĞI: SOSYOTELİZM (KAVRAMSAL BİR BAKIŞ)

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 464 - 476, 29.09.2021

Cansu Çaka

Öz

Web teknolojilerinde meydana gelen gelişmelerle birlikte akıllı telefonlar, günlük yaşamın ayrılmaz bir parçası haline gelirken; kullanıcılara farklı amaç ve gereksinimler için çeşitli fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte söz konusu teknolojilerin neden olabileceği sorunlar ve bireyler üzerindeki olumsuz etkileri çeşitlilik göstermekte olup, sosyotelizm tüm bu sorun durumları ile birlikte ele alındığında tamamlayıcı ve sorunları daha bütünsel ortaya koyan, çağın teknolojik bağımlılığı olarak ifade edilebilecek bir kavram olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Sosyotelizm, sosyal bir etkileşim sırasında cep telefonlarının aşırı kullanımı ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Sosyotelizmin yordayıcıları ve bireyler üzerinde ne gibi etkilere neden olabileceği incelendiğinde çarpıcı sonuçlar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Cep telefonlarının aşırı kullanımı, göz temasını azaltırken diğer bireylerle bağlantı kurmayı zorlaştırmaktadır. Dolayısıyla kişiler arası ilişkileri olumsuz etkileyerek sosyal ilişkilere zarar vermektedir. Her geçen gün daha fazla bireyin birer problemli cep telefonu kullanıcısı haline gelmesinin, bu durumun olası sonuçları hakkında birtakım endişeleri ortaya çıkarması kaçınılmazdır. Bu bağlamda sosyotelizm, önemle ele alınması gereken görece yeni bir kavramdır. Bu çalışmada bu kavramı daha derinlemesine tanımlamak ve olası etkilerini ortaya koymak amacıyla sosyotelizm üzerine değerlendirmelerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cep Telefonu Bağımlılığı, Sosyotelizm, Teknoloji Bağımlılığı

THE TECHNOLOGICAL ADDICTION OF THE ERA: PHUBBING (A CONCEPTUAL OVERVIEW)

Öz

With the developments in web technologies, mobile phones have become an integral part of daily life and also offer users various opportunities for different purposes and needs. However, the problems that these technologies can cause and their negative effects on individuals vary, and when phubbing is considered together with all these situations, it has emerged as a concept that can be expressed as the technological addiction of the era, which is complementary and reveals the problems more holistically. Phubbing is associated with the excessive use of mobile phones during a social interaction. When the predictors of phubbing and its effects on individuals are examined, striking results emerge. Excessive use of mobile phones reduces eye contact and makes it difficult to connect with other individuals. Therefore, it negatively affects interpersonal relations and harms social relations. It is inevitable that more and more individuals become problematic mobile phone users, raising some concerns about the possible consequences of this situation. In this context, phubbing is a relatively new concept that needs to be taken seriously. In this study, evaluations on phubbing were also made in order to define this concept in more depth and to reveal its possible effect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cell Phone Addiction, Phubbing, Technology Addiction

Kaynakça

• Aagaard, J. (2019). Digital akrasia: a qualitative study of phubbing. Al & Society, 35, 237-244.
• Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Ilyas, A., Fikri, M., & Syahputra, Y. (2019). An analysis of phubbing behaviour: preliminary research from counseling perspective. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 295, 270-273.
• Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2019). Trait boredom is a predictor of phubbing frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4, 245-252.
• Aman, T., Shah, N., Hussain, A., Khan, A., Asif, S., & Qazi, A. (2015). Effects of mobile phone use on the social and academic performance students of a public sector medical college in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Khyber Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(1), 99-103.
• Andreassen, C. S. & Pallesen, S. (2014). Social network site addiction-an overview. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(25), 4053-4061.
• Ang, C. S., Teo, K. M., Ong, Y. L., & Siak, S. L. (2019). Investigation of a preliminary mixed method of phubbing and social connectedness in adolescents. Addiction & Health, 11, 1-10.
• Augner, C. & Hacker, G. W. (2012). Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. International Journal of Public Health, 57(2), 437-441.
• Baron, N. S. & Campbell, E. M. (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34(1), 13-27.
• Benvenuti, M., Blachnio, A., Przepiorka, A. M., Daskalova, V. M., & Mazzoni, E. (2020). Factors related to phone snubbing behavior in emerging adults: the phubbing phenomen. M. Desjarlais (Ed.), The psychology and dynamics behind social media interactions içinde, (s. 164-187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
• Beranuy, M., Oberst, U., Carbonell, X., & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1182-1187.
• Bianchi, R., Schonfeld, I. S., & Laurent, E. (2014). Is burnout a depressive? A reexamination with special focus on atypical depression. International Journak of Stress Management, 21(4), 307-324.
• Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., & Rochat, L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1195-1210.
• Blachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Pantic, I. (2015). Internet use, Facebook instruction, and depression: results of a cross-sectional study. European Psychistry, 30(6), 681-684.
• Blachnio, A. & Przepiórka, A. (2019). Be aware! If you start using Facebook problematically you will feel lonely: phubbing, loneliness, self-esteem, and Facebook instruction. A cross-sectional study. Social Science Computer Review, 37, 270-278.
• Cameron, A-F. & Webster, J. (2011). Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organizating Science, 22(3), 754-771.
• Cheok, A. D., Sreekumar, A., Lei, C., & Thang, L. N. (2006). Capture the flag: mixed-reality social gaming with smart phones. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 5, 62-69.
• Chóliz, M. (2010). Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction, 105(2), 373-375.
• Chóliz, M. (2012). Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: the test of mobile phone dependence (TMD). Progress in Health Sciences, 2(1), 33-44.
• Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: the antecedents and consequences of snubbing. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18.
• Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic reivew. Computers in Education, 110, 51-63.
• Cummiskey, M. (2011). There’s an app for that smartphone use in health and physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(8), 24-30.
• Daher, W. (2010). Building mathematical knowledge in an authentic mobile phone environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 85-104.
• Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S., Singh, J., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: an impact evaluation study. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 25(1), 35-42.
• David, M. E. & Roberts, J. A. (2017). Phubbed and alone: phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155-163.
• De-Sola Gutiérrez, J., de Fonseca, F. R., & Rubio, G. (2016). Cell-phone addiction: a review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 1-15.
• Dol, K. S. (2016). Fatigue and pain related to internet usage among university students. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(4), 1233-1237.
• Dwyer, R. J., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233-239.
• Elder, A. D. (2013). College students’ cell phone use, beliefs, and effects on their learning. College Student Journal, 47(4), 585-592.
• Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use and phubbing behavior among Flemish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 1-18.
• Gi Seo, D., Park, Y., Kyung Kim, M., & Park, J. (2016). Mobile phone dependency and its impacts on adolescents’ social and academic behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 282-292.
• Guazzini, A., Duradoni, M., Capelli, A., & Meringolo, P. (2019). An explorative model to assess individuals’ phubbing risk. Future Internet, 11(1), 1-13.
• Gupta, N., Garg, S., & Arora, K. (2016). Pattern of mobile phone usage and its effects on psychological health, sleep, and academic performance in students of a medical university. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6(2), 132-139.
• Ha, J. H., Chin, B., Park, D. H., Ryu, S. H., & Yu, J. (2008). Characteristics of exccessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 783-784.
• Halpern, D. & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: a crossed-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386-394.
• Ishii, K. (2011). Examining the adverse effects of mobile phone use among Japanese adolescents. Keio Communication Review, 27(1), 599-604.
• Jackson, L. A., Von Eye, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Witt, E. A., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children’s body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 599-604.
• Jones, T. (2014). Students’ cell phone addiction and their opinions. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 5(1), 74-80.
• Kadylak, T., Makki, T. W., Francis, J., Cotten, S. R., Rikard, R. V, & Sah, Y. J. (2018). Disrupted copresence: older adults’ views on mobile phone use during face-to-face interactions. Mobile Media and Communication, 6, 331-349.
• Khan, M. M. (2008). Adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 21(4), 289-293.
• Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationships: understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “generation” Y users. The Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/109
• Lee, Y. H., Ko, C. H., & Chou, C. (2015). Re-visiting internet addiction among Taiwanese students: a cross-sectional comparison of students’ expectations, online gaming, and online social interaction. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 43, 589-599.
• Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Sanders, G. J., Rebold, M., & Gates, P. (2013). The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students. International Journal of Behavioral Butrition & Physical Activity, 10, 79-87.
• Leung, L. (2008). Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Children and Media, 2(2), 93-113.
• Lin, Y-H., Chiang, C-L., Lin, P-H., Chang, L-R., Ko, C-H., Lee, Y-H., & Lin, S-H. (2016). Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS ONE, 11(11), 1-11.
• Lin, T. T. C. & Chiang, Y. H. (2017). Invesitgating predictors of smartphone dependency symptpms and effects on academic performance, improper phone use and perceived sociability. International Journal of Mobile Communications , 15(6), 655.
• McDaniel, B. T. & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 85-98.
• Merma-Molina, G., Gavilán-Martín, D., & Álvarez-Herrero, J. F. (2021). Education for sustainable development: The impact of the values in mobile phone addiction. Sustainability, 13, 1479-1496.
• Miller, H. B. & Cuevas, J. A. (2017). Mobile learning and its effects on academic achievement and student motivation in middle grades students. International Journal for Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 91-110.
• Miller-Ott, A. E. & Kelly, L. (2015). The presence of cell phones in romantic partner face-to-face interactions: an expectancy violation theory approach. Southern Communication Journal, 80(4), 253-270.
• Miller-Ott, A. E. & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies , 68(2), 190-207.
• Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iphone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior , 48(2), 275-298.
• Oduor, E., Neustaedter, C., Odom, W., Tang, A., Moallem, N., Tory, M., & Irani, P. (2016). The frustrations and benefits of mobile device usage in the home when co-present with family members. ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901809
• Ofcom. (2015). The communication market report. [Online]: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/multi-sectorresearch/cmr/cmr15#Communications%20Market%20Report%202015 15.12.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Ong, S. H. & Tan, Y. R. (2014). Internet addiction in young people. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, 43(7), 378-382.
• Przybylski, A. K. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246.
• Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A. & Eagle, N. (2009). Smartphones an emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 426-454.
• Ranie, L. & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. [Online]: http://www. pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette 15.12.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Rashid, T. & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604-612.
• Revilla, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Legleye, S., & de Pedraza, P. (2016). What is the gain in a probability-based online panel of providing internet access to sampling units who previously had no access?. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 479-496.
• Roberts, J. A. & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141.
• Roberts, J. A. & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: how boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217.
• Samaha, M. & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior , 57, 321-325
• Sánchez-Martínez, M. & Otero, A. (2009). Factors associated with cell phone use in adolescents in the community of Madrid (Spain). CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 131-137.
• Stop Phubbing. (2019). Definition and disturbing phubbing stats. [Online]: http://stopphubbing.com adresinden 15.12.2020 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• T’ng, S. T., Ho, K. H. & Low, S. K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement invariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 159-190.
• Toker, B. & Tuncay, N. (2020). Statistical analysis of Turkish speaking students’ phubbing behaviors. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(16), 526-544.
• Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569.
• Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. & Postma-Nilsenova, M. (2018). More than just gaze: an experimental vignette study examining how phone-gazing and newspaper-gazing and phubbing-while-speaking and phubbing-while-listening compare in their effect on affiliation. Communication Research Reports, 35, 303-313.
• Vázquez-Cano, E. & Sevillano-García, M. L. (2018). Ubiquitous educational use of mobile digital devices. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 105-115.
• Verma, S., Kumar, R. & Yadav, S. K. (2019). The determinants of phubbing behaviour: a millenials perspective. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(12), 806-812.
• Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: the roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship lenght. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17.
• Yen, C-F., Tang, T-C., Yen, J-Y., Lin, H-C., Huang, C-F., Liu, S-C., & Ko, C-H. (2008). Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 863-873.
• Zhang, K. Z. K., Chen, C., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Understanding the role of motives in smartphone addiction. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2014/131