A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION

Yıl 2022, , 209 - 228, 30.09.2022

Yesim Ozen , Volkan Yavaş

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1117296

Cited By: 1

Öz

Purpose of this study is to conduct a literature review related to sustainable production and consumption under business and management science. By doing this, it is aimed to contribute to the literature by presenting the gaps in the knowledge and proposing future research ideas. A two-step qualitative approach has followed in this study for conducting a content analysis and bibliometric analysis. Studies that are published after 2015 and indexed in Web of Science Database are considered in this study. Firstly, an open source Carrot2 software is used for general clustering, secondly, Citespace software and Vosviewer software respectively are used for bibliometric analysis Results showed that circular economy, consumption and procurement, clean energy clean and green production, sustainable consumption are some of the areas and clusters that appeared frequently Although sustainable production and sustainable consumption are popular topics, studies that covers both concepts are limited.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sustainability, efficiency, production, consumption, consumer behaviour

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR ÜRETİM VE TÜKETİM ANLAYIŞINA YÖNELİK BİR BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı işletme yönetimi bilim dalı altında sürdürülebilir üretim ve tüketim kavramlarını birlikte inceleyen çalışmalar ile ilgili bir yazın taraması ve içerik analizi gerçekleştirmektir. Bu şekilde yazındaki boşlukları ortaya koymak ve sürdürülebilir üretim ve tüketim alanındaki gelecek çalışmalar için öneriler sunmak hedeflenmiştir. Araştırmada yöntem olarak nitel araştırma yöntemi tercih edilmiş ve sırasıyla içerik ve bibliyometrik analizler uygulanmıştır. Çalışma taraması Web of Science veri tabanında 2015 yılı sonrası yayınlanan çalışmalar ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Konu ile ilgili anahtar kelimeler ile sonuçlanan çıktıları ortaya koymak için açık kaynaklı bir arama sonuçları kümeleme motoru olan Carrot2 yazılımı, bibliyometrik analiz için Citespace yazılımı ile “referans” odaklı ağ analizi, Vosviewer programı ile ise eş-bulunma analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, döngüsel ekonomi, tüketim ve satın alma, temiz enerji, temiz ve yeşil üretim, sürdürülebilir tüketim gibi konular ve kümeler dikkat çekmektedir. Sürdürülebilir üretim ve tüketim kavramları yoğunlukla ayrı ayrı üzerinde durulan konular olsa da bütüncül olarak ele alındığı çalışmalar henüz sınırlıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sürdürülebilirlik, verimlilik, üretim, tüketim, tüketici davranışları

Kaynakça

• Atrek, B., & Madran, C. (2017). Tüketici perspektifli sürdürülebilir tüketim çalışmaları: ulusal alanyazındaki çalışmalar üzerine sistematik derleme çalışması. Pazarlama ve pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(19), 1-31.
• Azapagic, A., Stamford, L., Youds, L., & Barteczko-Hibbert, C. (2016). Towards sustainable production and consumption: a novel decision-support framework integrating economic, environmental and social sustainability. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 91, 93-103.
• Bradley, P. (2021). An institutional economics framework to explore sustainable production and consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1317-1339.
• Carrot2. (2022). https://search.carrot2.org/#/search/web (Erişim Tarihi: 06.03.2022)
• Chen, C. (2014). The citespace manual. Philadelphia: College of Computing and Informatics.
• Dogaru, L. (2021). About sustainability between responsible production and consumption. Proceedings 63, 1-7.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831.
• Ezeudu, O. B., Agunwamba, J. C., Ezeasor, I. C., & Madu, C. N. (2019). Sustainable production and consumption of paper and paper products in Nigeria: A review. Resources, 8(1), 53.
• Fabiani, C., Longo, S., Pisello, A. L., & Cellura, M. (2021). Sustainable production and consumption in remote working conditions due to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: An environmental and user acceptance investigation. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1757-1771.
• Fidan, E. T. (2020). Türkiye’de sürdürülebilir sanayi politikalarının uygulanması ve kamu, sivil toplum kuruluşları ve özel sektörün sürdürülebilir sanayi politikalarına ilişkin yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Verimlilik Dergisi, (2), 73-100.
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
• Goyal, S., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2021). Sustainable production and consumption: Analysing barriers and solutions for maintaining green tomorrow by using fuzzy-AHP–fuzzy-TOPSIS hybrid framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16934-16980.
• Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Tilt, C. (2020). Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 1-12.
• Hoek, A. C., Malekpour, S., Raven, R., Court, E., & Byrne, E. (2021). Towards environmentally sustainable food systems: decision-making factors in sustainable food production and consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 610-626.
• Jiang, Q., Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., & Lin, P. (2021). Mitigation pathways to sustainable production and consumption: examining the impact of commercial policy on carbon dioxide emissions in Australia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 390-403.
• Jonkutė, G., & Staniškis, J. K. (2016). Realising sustainable consumption and production in companies: the SUstainable and RESponsible COMpany (SURESCOM) model. Journal of cleaner production, 138, 170-180.
• Khan, I. S., Ahmad, M. O., & Majava, J. (2021). Industry 4.0 and sustainable development: A systematic mapping of triple bottom line, Circular Economy and Sustainable Business Models perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126655.
• Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46.3
• Küresel amaçlar. (tarihsiz). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için küresel amaçlar. https://www.kureselamaclar.org/ adresinde erişildi.
• Mathai, M. V., Isenhour, C., Stevis, D., Vergragt, P., Bengtsson, M., Lorek, S., & Alfredsson, E. (2021). The political economy of (un) sustainable production and consumption: A multidisciplinary synthesis for research and action. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167, 105265.
• Moreno-Peñaranda, R., Gasparatos, A., Stromberg, P., Suwa, A., Pandyaswargo, A. H., % de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2015). Sustainable production and consumption of palm oil in Indonesia: What can stakeholder perceptions offer to the debate? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 4, 16-35.
• Osiński, S., & Weiss, D. (2005). Carrot 2: Design of a flexible and efficient web information retrieval framework. P. S. Szczepaniak, J. Kacprzyk, & A. Niewiadomski (Editörler); Advamces in web intelligence içinde (439-444). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
• Pallaro, E., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., & Liu, C. (2015). Sustainable production and consumption in the automotive sector: integrated review framework and research directions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 4, 47-61.
• Roy, V., & Singh, S. (2017). Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: Review and research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 224-236.
• Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment, 786, 147481.
• Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77-95.
• Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49(3), 1020-1045.
• Söylemez, E. Y., Şahin, M. D., & Koç, Y. D. (2017). “Sürdürülebilir Üretim ve Tüketimin Benimsenmesinde Karşılaşılan Engellerin Değerlendirilmesi”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Afro-Avrasya Özel Sayısı, 192-204.
• Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435-438.
• Umar, M., Zia-ul-haq, H. M., Ali, S., & Yusliza, M. Y. (2021). Post COVID-19 development of sustainable production and consumption systems. C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, & S. A. R. Khan (Editörler), Sustainable production and consumption systems (s. 59-86) içinde. Singapore: Springer.
• United Nations (UN). (2022). The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals (Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2022)
• UNPD Türkiye. (2022). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları. https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development-goals.html (Erişim Tarihi: 06.03.2022)
• Wojnarowska, M., Sołtysik, M., & Prusak, A. (2021). Impact of eco-labelling on the implementation of sustainable production and consumption. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 1-13.
• World Commission on Environmental and Development (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University.
• Yu, Z., Razzaq, A., Rehman, A., Shah, A., Jameel, K., ve Mor, R. S. (2021). Disruption in global supply chain and socio-economic shocks: a lesson from COVID-19 for sustainable production and consumption. Operations Management Research, 1-16.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-47