Araştırma Makalesi

The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material

Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3 27 Eylül 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material

Öz

Aim: In this study we aimed to compare the recurrence, incontinence and treatment success rates in patients with perianal fistulas (PF) who were operated on using two different seton materials.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records (PF characteristics, length of hospital stay and follow-up, postoperative complications, and presence of recurrence and incontinence) of a total of 66 patients who were diagnosed with PF and operated on using the seton method in a medical faculty hospital between January 2016 and May 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the seton material used (Prolene or elastic band material obtained from surgical gloves). Incontinence assessments were made using the Jorge–Wexner incontinence scoring system.
Results: Of the patients, 48 (72.7%) were male and 18 (27.3%) were female. Prolene and elastic seton materials were used in the surgery of 26 (39.4%) and 40 (60.6%) patients, respectively. The general recovery rate was 93.9%, recurrence rate was 7.6%, and incontinence rate was 6.1%. Although the recurrence and incontinence rates were higher in the Prolene group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.074 and p=0.292, respectively).
Conclusion: Elastic material obtained from surgical gloves can be used as a seton in PF surgery, with low rates of recurrence and acceptable rates of incontinence similar to those with traditional cutting seton materials.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anal fistula, Elastic seton, Incontinence

Kaynakça

  1. Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(5):420–30.
  2. Cariati A. Fistulotomy or seton in anal fistula: a decisional algorithm. Updates Surg. 2013;65(3):201–5.
  3. Bleier JI, Moloo H. Current management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(28):3286–91.
  4. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63(1):1–12.
  5. Sileri P, Cadeddu F, D’Ugo S, Franceschilli L, Blanco GV, Luca E, et al. Surgery for fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit: a critical appraisal. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:120.
  6. Leventoğlu S, Menteş BB. Anal fistula plug for treatment of complex anorectal fistula. Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2007;17:211–4.
  7. Akici M, Ersen O. The effect of suture selection in complex anal fistulas on the success of cutting seton placement and patient comfort. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(4):816–20.
  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.
  9. Memon AA, Murtaza G, Azami R, Zafar H, Chawla T, Laghari AA. Treatment of complex fistula in ano with cable-tie seton: a prospective case series. ISRN Surg. 2011;2011:636952.
  10. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(3):581–6.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yıldırım, M., & Bakır, H. (2021). The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences, 26(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.903232
AMA
1.Yıldırım M, Bakır H. The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material. Anadolu Klin. 2021;26(3):287-295. doi:10.21673/anadoluklin.903232
Chicago
Yıldırım, Murat, ve Hüseyin Bakır. 2021. “The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material”. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences 26 (3): 287-95. https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.903232.
EndNote
Yıldırım M, Bakır H (01 Eylül 2021) The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences 26 3 287–295.
IEEE
[1]M. Yıldırım ve H. Bakır, “The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material”, Anadolu Klin, c. 26, sy 3, ss. 287–295, Eyl. 2021, doi: 10.21673/anadoluklin.903232.
ISNAD
Yıldırım, Murat - Bakır, Hüseyin. “The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material”. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences 26/3 (01 Eylül 2021): 287-295. https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.903232.
JAMA
1.Yıldırım M, Bakır H. The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material. Anadolu Klin. 2021;26:287–295.
MLA
Yıldırım, Murat, ve Hüseyin Bakır. “The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material”. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences, c. 26, sy 3, Eylül 2021, ss. 287-95, doi:10.21673/anadoluklin.903232.
Vancouver
1.Murat Yıldırım, Hüseyin Bakır. The Seton Technique in Perianal Fistula Surgery: Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Types of Seton Material. Anadolu Klin. 01 Eylül 2021;26(3):287-95. doi:10.21673/anadoluklin.903232