Dezenfektanların Yeni Jenerasyon Monofazik Ölçü Materyallerinin Boyutsal Stabilitesine Etkisi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 12 - 18, 15.01.2020

Mustafa Hayati Atala Hülya Çetin Elif Yeğin Kübra Değirmenci Abdülhamit Eş

Öz

Amaç: Bu
çalışmada farklı dezenfektanların dört farklı monofazik vinilpolisiloksan dental
ölçü materyalinin boyutsal stabilitesi üzerindeki etkilerini karşılaştırmak
amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve
Yöntemler: Söz konusu dört materyal ana model ölçüsünü elde
etmek için kullanıldı ve dört gruba ayrıldı: Grup E: Elite HD; Grup H: Hydrorise; Grup C: Compress mono; Grup V: Variotime. Her bir materyal için
üç alt çalışma grubu (kontrol, sprey dezenfeksiyonu ve solüsyon dezenfeksiyonu
grupları) planlandı (n=10). Örneklerin referans noktaları 7 gün boyunca her gün
ölçüldü. İstatiksel analiz için tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD testi kullanıldı.

Bulgular: Üçüncü
ve 7. gün sonunda materyallerin uzunlukları arasında istatistiksel olarak
anlamlı bir fark görülmemekle birlikte (p>0,05), tüm zaman aralıklarında
ve tüm alt gruplar dahilinde en yüksek boyutsal değişiklik Grup E’de, en düşük
boyutsal değişiklik Grup H’de gözlemlendi.

Tartışma ve Sonuç: Tüm gruplarda lineer boyutsal değişiklikler
gözlemlendi; ancak bunlar ADA
standartları dahilinde ve klinik olarak kabul edilebilir düzeyde idi. Ölçü materyalleri
arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamasına rağmen en yüksek
boyutsal stabilite Grup H’de gözlemlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

boyutsal stabilite, monofazik ölçü materyalleri, vinilpolisiloksan

Effects of Disinfectants on the Dimensional Stability of New-generation Monophasic Impression Materials

Öz

Aim: In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of different disinfectants on the dimensional stability of four different monophasic vinyl
polysiloxane (VPS) dental impression materials.

Materials
and Methods: The four materials
were used to simulate the master model impression and divided into four groups:
Group
E: Elite HD; Group H: Hydrorise; Group C: Compress mono; Group V: Variotime. Three study subgroups were planned
for each material: the control, spray disinfection, and solution disinfection groups
(n=10). Reference points of the specimens
were measured every day during 7 days. One-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the
Tukey HSD test were used for
statistical analysis.

Results: Although no statistically significant difference was found between the
length values of the materials after
both 3 and 7 days (p>0.05), the highest dimensional change was observed in Group E and
the lowest dimensional change in Group
H, for all subgroups and all time intervals.

Discussion and Conclusion: Linear
dimensional changes were seen in all groups, but the changes were clinically
acceptable and within the ADA specification standards. Although no statistically
significant difference was found between the impression materials, the highest
dimensional stability was observed in Group H.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dimensional stability, monophasic impression material, vinyl polysiloxane

Kaynakça

• 1. Luthardt RG, Walter MH, Weber A, Koch R, Rudolph H. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1-and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prostho. 2008;21(4):322-27.
• 2. Johnson GH, Lepe X, Aw TC. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. J Prosthe Dent. 2003;90(4):354-64.
• 3. Donovan TE, Chee W. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dent Clin North Amer. 2004;48(2):433-44.
• 4. Corso M, Abanomy A, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Morgano SM. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials. J Prosthe Dent. 1998;79(6):626-31.
• 5. Pant R, Juszczyk AS, Clark RK, Radford DR. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials. J Dent. 2008;36(6):456-61.
• 6. Schoenrock GA. The laminar impression technique. J Prosthe Dent. 1989;62(4):392-5.
• 7. Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthe Dent. 2008;99(4):274-81.
• 8. Samaranayake LP, Hunjan M, Jennings KJ. Carriage of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthe Dent. 1991;65(2):244-9.
• 9. Amin WM, Al-Ali MH, Al Tarawneh SK, Taha ST, Saleh MW, Ereifij N. The effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of impression materials and gypsum casts. J Clin Med Res. 2009;1(2):81.
• 10. Kugel G, Perry RD, Ferrari M, Lalicata P. Disinfection and communication practices: a survey: of US dental laboratories. J Amer Dent Assoc. 2000;131(6):786-92.
• 11. Al-Jabrah O, Al-Shumailan Y, Al-Rashdan M. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Int J Prostho 2007;20(3): 299-307.
• 12. Naylor WP. Infection control in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Amer. 1992;36(3):809-31.
• 13. Rice CD, Dykstra MA, Gier RE, Cobb CM. Microbial contamination in four brands of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):419-23.
• 14. Beyerle MP, Hensley DM, Bradley Jr DV, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part I: Microbiology. Int J Prostho. 1994;7(3):234-38.
• 15. McNeill M, Coulter W, Hussey D. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions: a comparative study. Int J Prostho. 1992;5(6):563-67.
• 16. Drennon DG, Johnson GH, Powell GL. The accuracy and efficacy of disinfection by spray atomization on elastomeric impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):468-75.
• 17. Matyas J, Dao N, Caputo A, Lucatorto F. Effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64(1):25-31.
• 18. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul B, Yilmaz C, Semiz M. Effect of disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyether impression materials. J Prostho. 2007;16(6):473-9.
• 19. Flanagan DA, Palenik CJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Antimicrobial activities of dental impression materials1. Dent Mater. 1998;14(6):399-404.
• 20. Fan P. Disinfection of impressions. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1991;122(8):110.
• 21. Council on Dental Materials I, Equipment. Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1988;116(2):241-8.
• 22. Association AD. Infection control reccommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1996;127:672-80.
• 23. Al-Omari W, Jones J, Wood D. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts. Euro J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1998;6(3):103-10.
• 24. Lepe X, Johnson GH. Accuracy of polyether and addition silicone after long-term immersion disinfection. J Prosthe Dent. 1997;78(3):245-9.
• 25. Melilli D, Rallo A, Cassaro A, Pizzo G. The effect of immersion disinfection procedures on dimensional stability of two elastomeric impression materials. J Oral Sci. 2008;50(4):441-6.
• 26. Lin C-C, Ziebert GJ, Donegan SJ, Dhuru VB. Accuracy of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures. J Prosthe Dent. 1988;59(3):288-91.
• 27. Luebke RJ, Scandrett FR, Kerber PE. The effect of delayed and second pours on elastomeric impression material accuracy. J Prosthe Dent. 1979;41(5):517-21.
• 28. Saber FS, Abolfazli N, Kohsoltani M. The effect of disinfection by spray atomization on dimensional accuracy of condensation silicone impressions. J Dent Res, Dent Clin, Dent Prospects. 2010;4(4):124.
• 29. Carvalhal CIO. Dimensional Change of Elastomeric Materials afterImmersion in Disinfectant Solutions for Different Times. J Cont Dent Prac. 2011;12(4):252-8.
• 30. Adabo GL, Zanarotti E, Fonseca RG, dos Santos Cruz CA. Effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthe Dent. 1999;81(5):621-4.
• 31. Herrera SP, Merchant VA. Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1986;113(3):419-22.
• 32. Thouati A, Deveaux E, Iost A, Behin P. Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants. J Prosthe Dent. 1996;76(1):8-14.
• 33. Lucas MG, Arioli‐Filho JN, Nogueira SS, Batista AUD, Pereira RDP. Effect of incorporation of disinfectant solutions on setting time, linear dimensional stability, and detail reproduction in dental stone casts. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant Esthet Recons Dent. 2009;18(6):521-6.
• 34. Sinobad T, Obradović-Đuričić K, Nikolić Z, Dodić S, Lazić V, Sinobad V, et al. The effect of disinfectants on dimensional stability of addition and condensation silicone impressions. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2014;71(3):251-8.
• 35. Kronström MH, Johnson GH, Hompesch RW. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection. J Prosthe Dent. 2010;103(1):23-30.
• 36. Tullner JB, Commette JA, Moon PC. Linear dimensional changes in dental impressions after immersion in disinfectant solutions. J Prosthe Dent. 1988;60(6):725-8.
• 37. Kern M, Rathmer RM. Three-dimensional investigation of the accuracy of impression materials after disinfection. J Prosthe Dent. 1993;70(5):449-56.
• 38. Panichuttra R, Jones RM, Goodacre C, Munoz CA, Moore BK. Hydrophilic poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. Int J Prostho. 1991;4(3):240-48.
• 39. Materials CoD, Devices. Revised American Dental Association specification No. 19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental impression materials. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1977;94(4):733-41.