An Assessment on the Risk of Terrorist Organizations’ Access to and Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Öz

After the 9/11 attacks, the phenomenon of terrorism has taken an important place on the agenda of the world public opinion. What terrorist organizations are willing to risk in order to achieve their goals has emerged as another topic of discussion. The world, which was introduced to weapons of mass destruction in the 20th century, has painfully experienced the destruction caused by these weapons. The acquisition and use of weapons of mass destruction, which are much more powerful than conventional weapons, by non-state actors such as terrorist organizations is a major problem. In this study, by examining the motivations of terrorist organizations to use weapons of mass destruction, the relationship between weapons of mass destruction and four terrorist organizations, namely Aum Shinrikyo, DAESH, Al-Qaeda and Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ilam, which use, attempt to use or have various attempts to produce these weapons, will be revealed and the risk of WMD terrorism for Türkiye will be tried to be revealed through these examples.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 9/11 Attacks
• Weapons of Mass Destruction
• Aum Shinrikyo
• ISIS
• Al-Qaeda
• Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ilam.

Terör Örgütlerinin Kitle İmha Silahlarına Erişim ve Kullanma Riski Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

11 Eylül Saldırıları sonrası terörizm olgusu dünya kamuoyunun gündeminde önemli bir yer tutmuştur. Terör örgütlerinin amaçlarını gerçekleştirmek için neleri göze alabileceği ise bir diğer tartışma konusu olarak karşımıza çıkmıştır. Kitle imha silahları ile 20. yüzyılda tanışan dünya, bu silahların yarattığı yıkımı acı bir şekilde tecrübe etmiştir. Konvansiyonel silahlardan çok daha güçlü olan kitle imha silahlarının özellikle terör örgütleri gibi devlet dışı aktörlerin eline geçmesi ve kullanılması büyük bir sorundur. Bu çalışmada terör örgütlerinin kitle imha silahları kullanma motivasyonları incelenerek bu silahları kullanan, kullanmaya teşebbüs eden veya bu silahları üretmek için muhtelif girişimleri olan Aum Shinrikyo, DEAŞ, El-Kaide ve Tamil İlam Kurtuluş Kaplanları adlı dört terör örgütünün kitle imha silahları ile arasındaki ilişki ortaya konularak bu örnekler üzerinden Türkiye bakımından kitle imha silahları terörizmine ilişkin risk ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 11 Eylül Saldırıları
• Kitle İmha Silahları
• Aum Shinrikyo
• DEAŞ
• El-Kaide
• Tamil İlam Kurtuluş Kaplanları.

Kaynakça

1. AA (2024). Rusya’daki konser salonu saldırganlarının ikamet süreleri bittiği için Türkiye'ye geldiği belirlendi. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/rusyadaki-konser-salonu-saldirganlarinin-ikamet-sureleri-bittigi-icin-turkiyeye-geldigi-belirlendi/3174751(Erişim Tarihi: 22.07.2024).
2. Abdurrahmanlı, E. (2018). Küreselleşme olgusuyla birlikte büyüyen terörizm. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 5(18), 586-609.
3. Ackerman, G. ve Tamsett, J. (Eds. ). (2009). Jihadists and weapons of mass destruction. CRC Press.
4. Albright, D. Ve Higgins, H. (2003). A Bomb for the Unmah. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 49-55.
5. Al-Istrabadi, F., Ganguly, S. (2018). Introduction: An End to ISIS? In F. al-Istrabadi & S. Ganguly (Eds. ), The Future of ISIS: Regional and International Implications(3-16). Brookings Institution Press.
6. Baker, D. (2006) Biological, nuclear, and Chemical Weapons. Vero Beach, FL: Rourke Pub.
7. Barnaby, F. (2004). How to build a nuclear bomb: and other weapons of mass destruction. Nation Books.
8. Başpınar, M. H. (2023). Terörizmin Finansmanı Suçu. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

9. Bellany, I. (2007). Terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 10.
10. Bidwell, C. A. ve Bhatt, K. (2016). The Threat of Biological Weapons. In Use of Attribution and Forensic Science in Addressing Biological Weapon Threats: A Multi-Faceted Study (pp. 8-10). Federation of American Scientists.
11. Bishara, A. (2017). Terror and Terrorism. In What defines Terrorism?: The Identity of the Victim or that of the Victimizer? (pp. 4-8). Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies.
12. Blum, A., Asal, V., ve Wilkenfeld, J. (2005). Nonstate actors, terrorism, and weapons of mass destruction. International Studies Review, 7(1), 133-137.
13. Britannica (2023a). Chemical weapons and terrorism. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/technology/chemical-weapon/Chemical-weapons-and-terrorism (Erişim Tarihi: 29.06.2023).
14. Britannica (2023b). Tamil Tigers. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tamil-Tigers (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2024).
15. Campbell, C. (1984). Nuclear Weapons Fact Book. Novato, Calif, Presidio Press.
16. Cole, B. (2017). Political Manipulation and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Terrorism, Influence and Persuasion. Bloomsbury Publishing.
17. Cooper, H. ve Schmitt, E. (2016). ISIS Detainee’s Information Led to 2 US Airstrikes, Officials Say. The New York Times, 9.
18. Cordesman, A. H. (1999). Terrorısm And Weapons Of Mass Destructıon. In Transnatıonal Threats From The Mıddle East: Cryıng Wolf Or Cryıng Havoc? 171-209. Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
19. Croddy, E. A., Wirtz, J. J., & Larsen, J. (2005). Weapons of mass destruction. An Encyclopediaof Worldwide Policy, Technology, and History, Volume2, Abcoclio, Santa Barbara, California.
20. Çelik, S. (2021). Avrupa Birliği’nin Self-Determinasyon Yaklaşımı. Bölgesel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 639-672.
21. Danzig, R., Sageman, M., Leighton, T., Hough, L., Yuki, H., Kotani, R. ve Hosford, Z. M. (2012). Aum Shınrıkyo: Insıghts Into How Terrorısts Develop Bıologıcal And Chemıcal Weapons. Center for a New American Security.
22. Davis, M. B. ve Purcell, A. H. (2006). Weapons of Mass Destruction. (Library in a Book).
23. Denk, E. (2011) “Bir Kitle İmha Silahı Olarak Nükleer Silahların Yasaklanmasına Yönelik Çabalar” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 3(66), 93-136.
24. Dissanayake, S. (2017). Women in the Tamil Tigers: Path to Liberation or Pawn in a Game? Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 9(8), 1-6.
25. Doğanalp, T. (2016). Uluslararası Hukukta Kitle İmha Silahları ve Silahsızlanmaya Yönelik Girişimler. Uluslararası Yönetim ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(3), 15-28.
26. Ergün, K. K. (2021). Dinî Kültlerde Terör Örgütüne Dönüşme Potansiyeli: Aum Shinrikyo Vakası. Türk Savaş Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 196-207.
27. Gerges, F. A. (2011). The rise and fall of Al-Qaeda. OUP USA.
28. Gerges, F. A. (2021). ISIS: A History. Princeton University Press. Glasstone, S. (Ed.). (1964). The effects of nuclear weapons. 2. Baskı, US Atomic Energy Commission.
29. Gunaratna, R. (2018). Aum Shinrikyo’s Rise, Fall and Revival. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 10(8), 1-6.
30. Heupel, M. (2007). Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1540: A Division of Labor Strategy.
31. Hoffman, B. (2009). The first non-state use of a chemical weapon in warfare: the Tamil Tigers' assault on East Kiran. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 20(3-4), 463-477.
32. Hummel, S. , ve Burpo, F. J. (2020). The Nexus of Emerging Technologies with WMD Terrorism. In Small Groups, Big Weapons: The Nexus of Emerging Technologies and Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism (pp. 14-24). Combatting Terrorism Center at West Point.
33. ICAN (2023). What happens if nuclear weapons are used?. https://www.icanw.org/catastrophic_harm#:~:text=In%20the%20long%2Dterm%2C%20nuclear,caused%20grave%20long%2Dterm%20consequences (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2024).
34. Jackson, B. A., Chalk, P., Cragin, R. K., Newsome, B., Parachini, J. V., Rosenau, W., Simpson, E. M., Sisson, M. ve Temple, D. (2007). Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. In Breaching the Fortress Wall: Understanding Terrorist Efforts to Overcome Defensive Technologies (1st ed., pp. 59-82). RAND Corporation.
35. Jones, S. G. ve Libicki, M. C. (2008). Policing and Japan’s Aum Shinrikyo. In How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering al Qa’ida (pp. 45-62). RAND Corporation.
36. Joyner, D. H. (2009). International law and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Oxford University Press.
37. Kazi, R. (2011). The Correlation Between Non-State Actors and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Connections, 10(4), 1-10.
38. Kiremitçi, O. (2021) .Terörizmin Finansmanı Suçu ve Önleyici Tedbirler. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü (Yüksek Lisans Tezi).
39. Lifton, R.J. (1999) Destroying the world to save it: Aum shinrikyō, apocalyptic violence, and the the new global terrorism. New York: Metropolitan Books.
40. Mattis, F. (2009). Banning weapons of mass destruction. ABC-CLIO.
41. Maxwell, A.F.B (2004) . What If? Europe Simulates Qaeda Nuclear Hit. CPC Outreach Journal, N: 338.
42. Meselson, M. (1999). The Problem of Biological Weapons. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 52(5), 46-58.
43. Miller, S. (2018). Dual use science and technology, ethics and weapons of mass destruction, New York: Springer.
44. Moftah, L. (2015). ISIS Nuclear Weapon? Islamic State Claims It Can Buy Nukes From Pakistan Within A Year In Dabiq Propaganda Magazine. International Business Times, 23.
45. Nehorayoff, A. A., Ash, B., ve Smith, D. S. (2016). Aum Shinrikyo’s Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Development Efforts. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(1), 35-48.
46. Nwanna, G.I. (2004) Weapons of mass destruction, what you should know: A citizen’s guide to biological, chemical, and Nuclear Agents & Weapons.
47. Baltimore, MD: Frontline Publishers. Okoro, O. ve Oluka, N. L. (2019). Weapons of mass destruction and modern terrorism: implications for global security. Asian Social Science, 15(3), 1-13.
48. O’Neil, A. (2003). Terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction: how serious is the threat?. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 57(1), 99-112.
49. Ong, K. (2016). Nuclear Terrorism: Assessing the Threat from North Korea. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 8(2), 11-16.
50. Oosterveld, W. T., Bloem, W., Farnham, N., Kayaoğlu, B. ve Sweijs, T. (2017). The Rise and Fall of ISIS: From Evitability to Inevitability. Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.
51. Özgür, S. (2006). Geleceğe Yönelen Tehdit? Kitle İmha Silahları. 1. Baskı, IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
52. Parachini, J. V., Mosher, D. E., Baker, J., Crane, K., Chase, M. ve Daugherty, M. (2005). Diversion of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons Expertise from the Former Soviet Union: Understanding an Evolving Problem. Rand Corp Arlıngton Va Natıonal Securıty Research Dıv.
53. Polyak, M. G. (2004). The Threat of Agroterrorism: Economics of Bioterrorism. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 5(2), 31-38.
54. Prelas, M. A. ve Peck, M. S. (2005). Nonproliferation issues for weapons of mass destruction. CRC Press.
55. National Archives and Records Administration (2002). The President’s State of the Union Address The United States Capitol Washington, D.C.. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives. gov/news/releases/2002/01/print/20020129-11.html (Erişim Tarihi: 19.06.2023).
56. Rabasa, A., Chalk, P., Cragin, K., Daly, S. A., Gregg, H. S. , Karasik, T. W., O’Brien, K. A. Ve Rosenau, W. (2006). Al-Qaeda’s Ideology and Propaganda. In Beyond al-Qaeda: Part 1, The Global Jihadist Movement (pp. 7-22). RAND Corporation.
57. Reader, I. (2013). Religious violence in contemporary Japan: The case of Aum Shinrikyo. Routledge.
58. Richardt, A., Hülseweh, B., Niemeyer, B. ve Sabath, F. (Eds. ). (2013) “CBRN protection: Managing the threat of chemical, biological, radioactive and nuclear weapons” John Wiley & Sons.
59. Rosand, E. (2022). Global Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1540-An Enhanced UN Response is Needed. Global Center on Cooperative Security.
60. Saraçlı, M. (2007). Uluslararası hukukta terörizm. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 1049-1078.
61. Sarvananthan, M. (2018). ‘Terrorism’ or ‘Liberation’? Towards a distinction: A Case study of the Armed Struggle of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(2), 1-18.
62. Senate Government Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations October 31, 1995 Staff Statement (1995). IV. The Operation of the Aum. https://irp.fas. org/congress/1995_rpt/aum/part04.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2023).
63. Shoham, D. (2015). Does ISIS Pose a WMD Threat? Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies.
64. Stenersen, A. (2017). Al-Qaida in Afghanistan. Cambridge University Press.
65. The New York Times (2024). Islamic State Claims Responsibility for Deadly Bombings in Iran. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes. com/2024/01/04/world/middleeast/us-isis-iran-general-suleimani.html (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2024).
66. The Washington Post (2022). ISIS planned chemical attacks, in Europe, new details on weapons program reveal. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/07/11/isis-chemical-biological-weapons/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.06.2023).
67. The White House President Barack Obama (2009). Remarks By President Barack Obama In Prague As Delivered. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives. gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-barack-obama-prague-delivered (Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2023).
68. Tønnessen, T. H. (2017). Islamic State and Technology - A Literature Review. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11(6), 101-111.
69. Warf, J. (1989) “All Things Nuclear” Los Angeles, Southern California Association of Scientists.
70. Webel, C. (2016). Terror, Terrorism and the Human Condition. Springer.
71. Wheelis, M. (2006). Deadly cultures: biological weapons since 1945. Harvard University Press.
72. Younger, S. M. (2008). Endangered species: How we can avoid mass destruction and build a lasting peace. Harper Collins.