Canhasan Yerleşimlerinde Arkeolojik Kazılar: İlk Bulgular ve Mimari Ananlizler

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 51, 1 - 22, 01.12.2025

Adnan Baysal

https://doi.org/10.36891/anatolia.1742480

https://izlik.org/JA67ZP35MR

Öz

Bu çalışma, üç höyükten oluşan Canhasan höyüklerinde yapılan ikinci dönem arkeolojik kazı ve araştırma çalışmalarına bir pencere açmaktadır. Çalışmalar 2021 yılında başlatılmış olup, son üç sezon içinde üç höyükte de yürütülen çalışmalar hakkında genel bir değerlendirmedir. Şu an itibarı ile alınan sonuçlar her an değişebileceği de düşünülerek gelinmiş olan noktadaki elde edilen bilgileri değerlendirmek üzere hazırlanmıştır. Çalışmalar üç höyük üzerinde de çeşitli yöntem ve aşamalarda yürütülmektedir. Modern ve dijital yöntemler yanında çok sayıda uzmanında katılarak yürütüldüğü çalışmalar ilerleyen sezonlarda daha sağlıklı ve analizlerin sonuçlarıyla birlikte bilimsel tabanlara oturmuş sonuçlar olarak ve kazı çalışmaları tamamlanmış yapıların kazı sonrası değerlendirmelerinin verileceğini, buradaki bilgilerinde şimdilik kaydıyla olmak üzere değerlendirmeye alındığı bu çalışmada genel bir değerlendirme sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Uygulanan kazı ve araştırma yöntemlerinin erken aşamada olsa dahi detaylı bilgi veriyor olması kullanılan yöntemlerin pozitif sonuçlar almak konusunda da ne kadar etkili olduğuna dair bir kanıt olarak değerlendirilebilecek olan bu çalışma kapsamında kesin bir sonuç vermek şimdilik erken olacaktır. Bununla birlikte, Konya ovasında ve çevresinde kazı çalışmalarının yürütüldüğü diğer yerleşmelerle karşılaştırarak genel bir değerlendirme yapmak da mümkün olabilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Canhasan , Çanak Çönleksiz Neolitik , Neolitik , Kalkolitik

Archaeological Excavations at Canhasan Sites: Preliminary Findings and Architectural Analysis

https://izlik.org/JA67ZP35MR

Öz

This study provides an overview of the second phase of archaeological excavations and research conducted at the Canhasan mounds, a site comprising three distinct mounds. Initiated in 2021, the work encompasses a preliminary assessment of the findings from the last three excavation seasons across all three mounds. The current results, though subject to potential revisions, are presented as an interim evaluation of the data obtained thus far. The investigations employ a variety of methodologies and stages across the three mounds, integrating modern and digital techniques alongside multidisciplinary expertise. While future seasons are expected to yield more robust, analytically supported conclusions –particularly upon completion of post-excavation assessments of fully excavated structures– this study offers a provisional synthesis of the available data. Although the excavations and research methodologies are still in their early stages, their ability to generate detailed insights suggests their efficacy in producing reliable results. However, definitive conclusions remain premature at this juncture. Nevertheless, a comparative analysis with other excavated settlements in the Konya Plain and its surroundings allows for a broader contextual assessment. This work ultimately aims to contribute to the scholarly discourse by documenting preliminary findings while acknowledging the evolving nature of ongoing archaeological research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Canhasan Sites , Pre-Pottery Neolithic , Neolithic , Chalcolithic , Konya Plain

Etik Beyan

İt has not been published fully or or partially and there is no clashing interest whatsoever

Destekleyen Kurum

Ministry of Culture and Ankara University

Teşekkür

We consider it our duty to express our gratitude to the institutions and individuals who contributed to the realization and execution of this project. At this stage, we extend our deepest thanks to the Ministry of Culture and Tourism for granting permission and providing support throughout the development and implementation of this study, as well as to the personnel of its affiliated institutions who consistently assisted us. We are also profoundly grateful to the Rectorate and Dean’s Office of Ankara University for their invaluable assistance. Our sincere appreciation goes to each and every member of our team, whose dedication and support were indispensable at every stage of this endeavor. Furthermore, we would like to convey our endless gratitude, on behalf of the entire team, to Karaman Municipality, Sudurağı Mayoralty, the Provincial Directorate of Culture and Tourism, BİFA, and the management of Saray for always extending their helping hands. While it is not possible to acknowledge every individual who contributed to the project, we wish to emphasize our profound indebtedness to all

Kaynakça

• Akkermans, P. M. M. G. – M. Verhoeven 1995. “An Image of Complexity: The Burnt Village at Late Neolithic Sabi Abyad, Syria.” AJA 99(1):5–32.
• Ataman, K. A. 1987. “A Group of Projectile Points from Can Hasan III.” Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı IV, 339–357.
• Ataman, K. 1988. The Chipped Stone Assemblage from Can Hasan III: A Study in Typology, Technology and Function. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University College of London.
• Baird, D. 2007. “The Boncuklu Project: The Origins of Sedentism, Cultivation and Herding in Central Anatolia.” Anatolian Archaeology 13:14–18.
• Baird, D. 2014. “The Boncuklu Project: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 4:22–24. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2015.092
• Baird, D. 2015. “Boncuklu: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 5:18–21. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2015.115
• Baird, D. 2016. “Boncuklu: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 6:15–18. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2016.027
• Baird, D. 2017. “Boncuklu: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 7:25–26. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2017.15
• Baird, D. 2018. “Boncuklu: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 8:32–34. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2018.16
• Baird, D. 2019. “Boncuklu: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 9:29–31. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2019.15
• Baird, D. 2020. “The Boncuklu Project 2020: Boncuklu through four objects.” Heritage Turkey 10:37–39. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2020.18
• Baird, D. – O. Bar-Yosef – A. Baysal – A. Fairbairn 2012. “The Boncuklu Project: The Spread of Farming and the Antecedents of Çatalhöyük.” Heritage Turkey 2:16–18. DOI: 10.18866/biaa2015.038
• Baird, D. – A. Baysal 2010. “The Boncuklu Project: Investigating the Beginnings of Agriculture, Sedentism and Herding in Central Anatolia.” Anatolian Archaeology 16:9–11.
• Baird, D. – A. Baysal 2012. “Boncuklu Höyük Projesi: Orta Anadolu’da Tarımın, Yerleşik Hayata Geçişin ve Hayvancılığın Başlangıcının Araştırılması.” Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 33(4), 263–270.
• Baird, D. – A. Fairbairn – L. Martin – C. Middleton 2012. “The Boncuklu Project: The Origins of Sedentism, Cultivation and Herding in Central Anatolia.” M. Özdoğan – N. Başgelen – P. Kuniholm (eds.), The Neolithic in Turkey. New Excavations New Research Volume 3 Central Turkey. İstanbul: Archaeology and Art Publications, 219–244.
• Baird, D. – G. Mustafaoğlu – A. Fairbairn 2017. “2016 Yılı Boncuklu Höyük Kazısı, Tarımın Yayılımı ve Çatalhöyük’ün Öncüleri̇.” Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 38(1), 87–96.
• Balcı, S. – Ç. Altınbilek Algül – D. Mouralis – O. Kaycı – A. Büyükkarakaya – F. Açıkgöz 2021. “A New Aceramic Neolithic Site Nearby the Obsidian Sources: Preliminary Insights from Sırçalıtepe.” Anadolu Araştırmaları 24:67–92. DOI: 10.26650/anar.2021.24.936778
• Başoğlu, O. – F. V. Güngördü – M. Karakoç 2018. “Nevşehir’de En Erken Yerleşim İzleri, Sofular Höyük.” Colloquium Anatolicum 17:14-20.
• Baysal, A. 2013. “Konya Ovası Neolitik Dönem Kültürel Gelişimi İçinde Boncuklu Höyük ve Önemi.” Colloquium Anatolicum XII:79–104.
• Blaylock, S. 1998. “Rescue Excavations by the BIAA at Tille Höyük, on the Euphrates, 1979-1990.” R. Matthews (ed.), Ancient Anatolia: Fifty Years’ Work by the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara. London: British Institute at Ankara, 111–126.
• Blaylock, S. R. – D. H. French – G. D. Summers 1990. “The Adıyaman Survey: An interim report.” AnatSt 40: 81–135. DOI: 10.2307/3642798
• Çakan, Y. G. 2013. Tepeci̇k–Çi̇ftli̇k Son Neoli̇ti̇k Dönem Mi̇mari̇si̇. Unpublished Thesis İstanbul Üniversitesi: İstanbul.
• Der, L. – J. Issavi 2017. “The Urban Quandary and the ‘Mega-Site’ from the Çatalhöyük Perspective.” Journal of World Prehistory, 30(3):189–206. DOI: 10.1007/s10963-017-9103-x
• Duru, G. – N. Kayacan 2018. “Volkanik Kapadokya’da Epipaleolitik Toplulukların İzinde: İlk Değerlendirmeler.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 45:91–104.
• Esin, U. 1991. “Aşıklı Höyük (Kızılkaya-Aksaray) Kurtarma Kazısı.” TürkArkDerg XXIX:1–34.
• French, D. H. 1962. “Excavations at Can Hasan: First Preliminary Report, 1961.” AnatSt 12:27–40. DOI: 10.2307/3642516
• French, D. H. 1963. “Excavations at Can Hasan, Second Preliminary Report, 1962.” AnatSt 13:29–42. DOI: 10.2307/3642489
• French, D. H. 1964a. “Can Hasan, Karaman 1962.” TürkArkDerg XII(1):21–22.
• French, D. H. 1964b. “Excavations at Can Hasan: Third Preliminary Report, 1963.” AnatSt 14:125–137. DOI: 10.2307/3642468
• French, D. H. 1965a. “Can Hasan 1965.” TürkArkDerg XIV(1–2):147–150.
• French, D. H. 1965b. “Excavations at Can Hasan: Fourth Preliminary Report, 1964.” AnatSt 15:87–94. DOI: 10.2307/3642503
• French, D. H. 1966a. “Can Hasan 1966.” TürkArkDerg XV(1):69–73.
• French, D. H. 1966b. “Excavations at Can Hasan, 1965, Fifth Preliminary Report.” AnatSt 16:113–123. DOI: 10.2307/3642480
• French, D. H. 1967a. “Can Hasan 1965.” Türk ArkDerg XIV(1–2):147–150.
• French, D. H. 1967b. “Excavations at Can Hasan, 1966: Sixth Preliminary Report.” AnatSt 17:165–178. DOI: 10.2307/3642446
• French, D. H. 1968. “Excavations at Can Hasan, 1967, Seventh Preliminary Report.” AnatSt 18:45–53. DOI: 10.2307/3642641
• French, D. H. 1972a. “Can Hasan 1970.” Türk ArkDerg XIX(I):93–94.
• French, D. H. 1972b. “Excavations at Canhasan III 1969-1970.” E. S. Higgs (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 181–190.
• French, D. 1973. “Aşvan 1968–72: The Excavations.” AnatSt 23:73–91. DOI: 10.2307/3642530
• French, D. H. 1998. Canhasan Sites 1: Canhasan I: Stratigraphy and Structures. BIAA Monograph 23. London: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• French, D. 2005. Canhasan Sites 2: Canhasan I: The Pottery. BIAA Monograph 32 London: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• French, D. H. 2010. Canhasan Sites 3: Canhasan I: The Small Finds. BIAA Monograph 45. London: British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• Gülçur, S. 2004. “Güvercinkayası the Black / Dark Burnished Pottery: A General Overwiew.” TÜBA-AR 7:141–164.
• Güngördü, F. V. – O. Başoğlu 2019. “Kızılırmak Nehri Kenarında Bir Çanak Çömleksiz Neolitik Dönem Yerleşimi: Sofular Höyük.” OLBA XXVII:41–60.
• Goring-Morris, A. N. – N. D. Munro – M. Özbaşaran – N. Kayacan M. Ergun – M. Uzdurum – S. Yelözer – F. Kalkan – G. Duru 2024. “Variation in the development of Neolithic societies atop the Central Anatolian Plateau: Recent results from Balıklı.” Antiquity 98(401):1163–1180. DOI: 10.15184/aqy. 2024.100
• Hodder, I. 1999. “Renewed work at Çatalhöyük.” M. Özdoğan – N. Başgelen (eds.), Neolithic in Turkey, the Cradle of Civilization. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 157–164.
• Hodder, I. 2005a. Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995-1999 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 6. BIAA Monograph 40. Cambridge – London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research – British Institute at Ankara.
• Hodder, I. (ed.) 2005b. Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-99 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 5. BIAA Monograph 39. Cambridge – London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research – British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• Hodder, I. 2005c. Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-99 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 4. BIAA Monograph 38. Cambridge – London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research – British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• Hodder, I. 2007. Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area Reports from the 1995‐99 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 3. BIAA Monograph 37. Cambridge – London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research – British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
• Hodder, I. 2013a. Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-2008 seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 8. BIAA Monograph 47. London – Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara – Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
• Hodder, I. 2013b. Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000-2008 seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 9. BIAA Monograph 48. London – Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara – Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
• Hodder, I. 2014a. Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2000-2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project 7. BIAA Monograph 46. London – Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara – Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
• Hodder, I. 2014b. Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000-2008. Çatalhöyük Research Project 10. BIAA Monograph 32. London – Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara – Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.
• Hodder, I. (ed.) 2018. Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
• Mellaart, J. 1970. Excavations at Hacılar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Özbaşaran, M. 2000. “The Neolithic Site of Musular, Central Anatolia.” Anatolica XXVI:129–151.
• Özbaşaran, M. 2011. “Re-starting at Aşıklı.” Anatolia Antiqua 19(1):27–37.
• Özbaşaran, M. – G. Duru – M. C. Stiner 2018. The Early Settlement at Aşıklı Höyük: Essays in Honor of Ufuk Esin. İstanbul: Ege Yayınları.
• Twiss, K. C. – A. Bogaard – D. Bogdan – T. Carter – M. P. Charles – S. Farid – N. Russell – M. Stevanović – E. N. Yalman – L. Yeomans 2008. “Arson or Accident? The Burning of a Neolithic House at Çatalhöyük, Turkey.” Journal of Field Archaeology 33(1):41–57.
• Verhoeven, M. 2000. “Death, fire and abandonment: Ritual practice at later neolithic tell sabi abyad, syria.” Adial 7(1):46–83.
• Watkins, T. 1996. “Excavations at Pınarbaşı: The Early Stages.” I. Hodder (ed.), On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95. Çatalhöyük Research Project 1. BIAA Monograph 22. Cambridge – London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research – British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 47–58.