Uluslararası Hukukta Denizlerdeki Canlı Kaynakların Korunması ve Yönetimi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 1 - 19, 31.10.2016

Ali İbrahim Akkutay

Öz

Denizlerdeki canlı kaynakların korunması ve yönetimi uluslararası hukukun konusunu oluşturmaktadır. 1982 Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi başta olmak üzere evrensel ve bölgesel pek çok uluslararası antlaşma konuyla ilgili çeşitli hükümler içermektedir. Denizlerdeki canlı kaynaklara ilişkin oluşturulan hukuki rejim deniz alanlarının ve korunan canlı türlerinin niteliği bakımından farklı yaklaşımlarda bulunmaktadır. Bu yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde kaynakların sürdürülebilir kullanımının sağlanması, ekolojik dengenin ve biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması hedeflenmektedir. Bununla birlikte devletlerin ekonomik çıkarlarının korunması, bu hedeflerin gerçekleştirilmesine nazaran ön planda tutulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

1982 Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi, bölgesel bazlı yaklaşım, canlı türleri bazlı yaklaşım, kaynakların sürdürülebilir kullanımı

Conservation and Management of Marine Living Resources in International Law

Öz

Conservation and management of marine living resources are subjects of international law. 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other related treaties contain various provisions on this topic. Zonal management and species specific approaches are the two basic approaches of the legal regime of the marine living resources established by the international law. These approaches aim sustainable use of marine living resources and conservation of ecological balance and bio-diversity. However economic interests of the states remain prior to the accomplishment of these aims.

Anahtar Kelimeler

1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, zonal management approach, species specific approach

Kaynakça

• AKKUTAY, Berat Lale, 1982 Birleşmiş Milletler Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları, Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi, 2012.
• BORG, Simone, “The Influence of International Case Law on Aspects of International Law Relating to the Conservation of Living Marine Resources beyond National Jurisdiction”, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 23 (1), 2012, s. 44 – 79.
• DEVINE, Dermott, “International Law Regulation of Marine Living Resources and Pollution: Contemporary Issues”, in Contemporary Regulation of Marine Living Resources and Pollution. Essays Written by and in Honour of the International Francqui Chairholder Professor Dermott Devine, Eds. Erik FRANCKX and Dermott DEVINE, Antwerp:Maklu Publishing, 2007, s. 3 – 20.
• EDESON, William, “Sustainable Use of Marine Living Resources”, Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht and Völkerrecht, Vol. 63, 2003, s. 355 – 375.
• GUNTRIP, Edward, “The Common Heritage of Mankind: An Adequate Regime for Managing the Deep Seabed?”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, 2003, s. 376 – 405.
• HARRISON, James, Making the Law of the Sea – A Study in the Development of International Law, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
• HAYASHI, Moritaka, “The Antarctica Question in the United Nations”, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 19(2), 1986, s. 275 – 290.
• KOJIMA, Chie, “Implementing Community Interests in the Law of the Sea: The Conservation and Management of Marine Living Resources”, The Chuo Law Review, Vol 116 (1-2), 2009, s. 1 – 30.
• KWIATKOWSKA, Barbara, “Conservation of Living Resources of the High Seas”, in Encyclopedia of Public International Law Vol 11 – Law of the Sea, Air and Space, Eds. Rudolf DOLZER, Robert E. HOLLWEG, Steven LESS and Peter MACALISTER-SMITH, Amsterdam/New York: El-sevier Science Publishing, 1989, s. 76 – 78.
• MATZ, Nele, “The Interaction between the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea”, in Marine Issues: From a Scientific, Political and Legal Perspective, Eds. Peter N. EHLERS, Elisabeth MANN-BORGESE and Rudiger WOLFRUM, TheHague/ London/New York:Kluwer Law International, 2002, s. 203 – 220.
• MATZ-LÜCK, Nele and FUCHS, Johannes, “Marine Living Resources”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea, Donald D. ROTHWELL, Alex G Oude ELFERINK, Karen N SCOTT and Tim STEPHENS (Eds.), Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, s. 491 – 515.
• MILLER, Denzil G. M., SABOURENKOV, Eugene N. and RAMM, David C., “Managing Antarctic Marine Living Resources: The CCAMLR Approach”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 19 (3), 2004, s. 317 – 363.
• MOLENAAR, Erik Jaap, “CCAMLR and Southern Ocean Fisheries”, International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 16 (3), 2001, s. 465 – 499.
• ODA, Shigeru, “Sharing of Ocean Resources – Unresolved Issues in the Law of the Sea”, Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 3(1), 1981, s. 1 – 14.
• ODA, Shigeru, “New Trends in the Regime of the Seas: A Consideration of the Problems of Conservation and Distribution of Marine Resources II”, Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht and Völkerrecht, Vol. 18, 1957 – 1958, s. 261 – 286.
• POSNER, Eric A. and SYKES, Alan O., “Economic Foundations of the Law of the Sea”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104 (4), 2010, s. 569 – 596.
• PROELB, Alexander, “Marine Mammals”, in R. Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2008 –, online edition, 2007. (Son erişim tarihi 04.05.2016)
• PULVENIS DE SELIGNY, Jean-François, “The Marine Living Resources and the Evolving Law of the Sea”, Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law, Vol 1(1), 2010, s. 61 – 94.
• RAYFUSE, Rosemary, “Some Reflections on the What’s Wrong with the Law of the Sea”, in What’s Wrong with International Law – Liber Amicorum A. H. A. SOONS (Nova et Vetera Iuris Gentium Vol. 27), Cedric RYNGAERT, Erik J. MOLENAAR and Sarah M.H. NOUWEN (Eds.), Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2015 s. 15 – 29.
• ROSE, Gregory and MILLIGAN, Ben, “Law for the Management of Antarctic Marine Living Resources: From Normative Conflicts towards Integrated Governance?”, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 20 (1), 2009, s. 41 – 87.
• SCOVAZZI, Tullio, The Evolution of International Law of the Sea: New Issues, New Challanges, Collected Courses of Hague Academy, Vol. 286, 2000.
• TANAKA, Yoshifumi, The International Law of the Sea, Second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• TANAKA, Yoshifumi, “Protection of Community Interests in International Law: The Case of the Law of the Sea”, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Vol. 15, 2011, s. 329 – 375.
• TANAKA, Yoshifumi, “The Changing Approaches to Conservation of Marine Living Resources in International Law”, Zeitschrift für auslandisches öffentliches Recht and Völkerrecht, Vol. 71, 2011, s. 291 – 330. (2011/a)
• TANAKA, Yoshifumi, A Dual Approach to Ocean Governance – The Cases of Zonal and Integrated Management in International Law of the Sea, Farnham/Burlington:Ashgate Publication, 2008.
• YANKOV, Alexander YANKOV, “Reflagging of Fishing Vessels: Critical Assessment of Its Impact on the Enforcement of Fishing Regulations and the Responses thereto”, in Marine Issues: From a Scientific, Political and Legal Perspective, Eds. Peter EHLERS, Rüdiger WOLFRUM and Elisabeth Mann BORGESE,The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002, s. 195– 202.
• European Union Commission, Commission Regulation (EU) Laying down Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Trade in Seal Products, No. 737/2010, 10 August 2010.
• International Whaling Commission, International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling – SCHDULE– As Amended by the Commission at the 65th Meeting, Portoroz/Slovenia, September 2014
• UN, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment – Stockholm 5-16 June 1972, A/CONF.48/14/Rev. 1.
• UN General Assembly, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 3 – 14 June 2012, A/CONF.151/26/Rev. 1.
• UN General Assembly, General Assembly Resolution 28/3067 [Reservation exclusively for peaceful purposes of the sea-bed and the ocean floor, and the subsoil thereof, underlying the high seas beyond the limits of present national jurisdiction and use of their resources in the interests of mankind, and convening of the 3rd United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction], 16 November 1973, A/RES/28/3067 (1973).
• UN General Assembly, General Assembly Resolution 25/2750 A – C [Reservation exclusively for peaceful purposes of the sea-bed and the ocean floor, and the subsoil thereof, underlying the high seas beyond the limits of present national jurisdiction and use of their resources in the interests of mankind, and convening of a conference on the law of the sea], 17 December 1970, A/RES/25/2750 (1970).
• Award between the United States and the United Kingdom Relating to the Rights of Jurisdiction of United States in the Bering’s Sea and the Preservation of Fur Seals, Decision of 15 August 1893, Report of International Arbitral Awards, Vol. 28, 2007, s. 263 – 276.
• Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Estai Case) (Spain v. Canada), Judgement, 4 December 1998, 1998 ICJ Rep.
• Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and North Ireland v. Iceland), Merits, 25 July 1974, 1974 ICJ Rep.
• Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Federal Republic of Germany v. Iceland), Merits, 25 July 1974, 1974 ICJ Rep.
• Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgement, 20 April 2010, 2010 ICJ Rep.
• Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan and Australia v. Japan), Provisional measures, 27 August 1999, 1999 ITLOS Rep.
• The “Camouco” Case (Panama v. France), Aplication for Prompt Release, Judgment, 7 February 2000, 2000 ITLOS Rep.
• The “Monte Confurco” Case (Seychelles v. France), Aplication for Prompt Release, Judgment, 18 December 2000, 2000 ITLOS Rep.
• The M/V “Saiga” Case (No:1) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Judgment, 4 December 1997,1997 ITLOS Rep.
• The “Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia), Prompt Release, Judgment, 23 December 2002, 2002 ITLOS Rep.
• Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan; New Zealand Intervening), Judgement, 31 March 2014, 2014 ICJ Rep.
• Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, 4 August 1995, 2167 UNTS 3, No. 37924.
• Agreement to Promote Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High Seas, 24.11.1993, 2221 UNTS 91, No. 39486.
• Convention for the Conservation of the Antarctic Seals, 01 June 1972, 1080 UNTS 175, No. 16529.
• Convention on Biological Diversity, 5 June 1992, 1760 UNTS 79, No. 30619.
• Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean, 14 November 2009, No. 50553.
• Convention on the Conservation of the Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 20 May 1985, 1329 UNTS 47, No. 22301.
• Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas, 29 April 1958, 559 UNTS 285, No. 8164.
• Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, 03 March 1973, 993 UNTS 243, No. 14537.
• International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, 02 December 1946, 161 UNTS 72, No. 2124.
• Southern Indian Ocean Fisheries Agreement, 7 July 2006, 2835 UNTS 1, No. 49647.
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 396, No. 31363.