The Impact of Knowledge Sources and Organizational Membership on Entrepreneurial Tendency

Yıl 2023, , 617 - 629, 30.12.2023

Özlem Özen

https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1124407

Öz

It has been argued that knowledge sources have an impact on identifying, exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities and creating a competitive advantage. However, research on whether various knowledge sources and voluntary organization membership affect entrepreneurial tendency is limited. The aim of the present research is to examine the relations between an individual’s interaction with environment and entrepreneurship tendency. In this regard in this study, the impacts of various knowledge sources and voluntary organizational membership on entrepreneurship are examined. This study is based on the individual level survey data collected from different countries by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development between the end of 2015 and the beginning of 2016. The number of observations for Turkey is 1500. The results of the empirical analysis demonstrate that knowledge sources have negative impact on entrepreneurship tendency and organizational membership has no impact on such tendency. However, social media, radio and television reports have favorable effects on entrepreneurship. This study contributes to the entrepreneurship literature by examining the impact of various knowledge sources, its dimensions and organizational membership in an emerging economy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurial Tendency, Knowledge Sources, Organizational Membership, Emerging Economies

Bilgi Kaynakları ve Örgüt Üyeliğinin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Çeşitli kaynaklardan elde edilen bilgi ve örgüt üyeliklerinin, girişimcilikte fırsatların belirlenmesi, bu fırsatlardan faydalanılması ve rekabetçi avantaj yaratılması sürecine katkı yaptığı ileri sürülmektedir. Yazında girişimcilik eğilimini etkileyen faktörler arasında farklı bilgi kaynaklarının ve gönüllü örgütlerde yer almanın incelendiği çalışmalar sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bireyin çevresi ile etkileşimi ve girişimcilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişkileri araştırmaktır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada, çeşitli bilgi kaynaklarının ve gönüllü örgütlere üyeliğin girişimcilik eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Çalışma, Avrupa İmar ve Kalkınma Bankası’nın 2015-2016 yılları arasında farklı ülkelerde bireyler üzerinde uyguladığı anket ile toplanan veriye dayanmaktadır. Türkiye için gözlem sayısının 1500 olduğu verinin analizi sonucunda, bilgi kaynaklarının girişimcilik eğilimi üzerinde olumsuz etki yarattığı ve örgüt üyeliğinin bu eğilim üzerinde etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, bilgi kaynakları alt boyutlarından sosyal medya ile radyo ve televizyonun girişimcilik eğiliminde olumlu etki yaptığı görülmüştür. Çalışma, gelişmekte olan bir ekonomide, bilgi kaynaklarını alt boyutları ile ele alması ve örgüt üyeliğinden kaynaklanan ağ ilişkilerini incelemesi bakımından girişimciliğin öncüllerini araştıran yazına katkı sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik Eğilimi, Bilgi Kaynakları, Örgüt Üyeliği, Gelişmekte Olan Ekonomiler

Kaynakça

• Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through Social Networks. In D.L. Sexton & R.W. Wilson (Ed.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (pp. 154–67). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
• Anderson, A., Park, J., & Jack, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial Social Capital: Conceptualizing Social Capital in New High-tech Firms. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 245-272.
• Arfi, W.B., & Hikkerova, L. (2021). Corporate entrepreneurship, product innovation,and knowledge conversion: the role of digital platforms. Small Business Economics, 56, 1191-1204.
• Audretsch, D.B., Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Lehmann, E.E. (2020). Knowledge management and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 373-385.
• Audretsch, D.B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44, 219-230.
• Audretsch, D.B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The Theory of Knowledge Spillover Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242-1254.
• Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2010). Social capital access and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76, 821-833.
• Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Lehmann, E.E. (2021). Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 56, 521-531.
• Chrisman, J.J., Neubaum, D.O., Welter, F., & Wennberg, K. (2022). Knowledge Accumulation in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 479-496.
• Block, J.H., Fisch, C.O., & Van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(10), 61-95.
• Bylund,P.L., & McCaffrey, M. (2017). A theory of entrepreneurship and institutional uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 461-475.
• Casson, M., & Della-Giusta, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and Social Capital: Analysing the Impact of Social Networks on Entrepreneurial Activity from a Rational Action Perspective. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 220-244.
• Chell, E., & Baines, S. (2000). Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(3), 195-215.
• Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
• Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7-25.
• Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107-128.
• Danis, W.M., De Clercq, D., & Petricevic, O. (2011). Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension. International Business Review, 20, 394-408.
• De Clercq, D., Danis, W.M., & Dakhli, M. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19, 85-101.
• De Villiers-Scheepers, M. J. (2012). Antecedents of strategic corporate entrepreneurship. European Business Review, 24(5), 400-424.
• Doh, S., & Zolnik, E.J. (2011). Social capital and entrepreneurship: An exploratory analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4961-4975.
• EBRD, Life in Transition Survey (LiTS). Erişim: https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/economic-research-and-data/data/lits.html
• Foo, M.D., Vissa, B., & Wu, B. (2020). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14, 289-301.
• Gartner, W.B., & Shane, S.A. (1995). Measuring Entrepreneurship over Time. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 283-301.
• Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G., Gatewood, E., & Katz, J.A. (1994). Finding the Entrepreneur in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 5-9.
• Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C.B., Payne, G.T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social Capital and Entrepreneurship: A Schema and Research Agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455-478.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
• Hang, M., & Van Weezel, A. (2007). Media and Entrepreneurship: What Do We Know and Where Should We Go? Journal of Media Business Studies, 4(1), 51-70.
• Hayter, C.S. (2013). Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature. Small Business Economics, 41, 899-911.
• Hoogendoorn, B., Van Der Zwan, P., & Thurik, T. (2019). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: The Role of Perceived Barriers and Risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 1133-1154.
• Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249-267.
• Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., & Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989.
• Jennings, P.D., Greenwood, R., Lounsbury, M.D., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: A special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 1-9.
• Johnson, S.L., Madole, J.W., & Freeman, M.A. (2018). Mania Risk and Entrepreneurship: Overlapping Personality Traits. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(2), 207-227.
• Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review, 75, 41-51.
• Kleinhempel, J., Beugelsdijk, S., & Klasing, M.J. (2022). The Changing Role of Social Capital During the Venture Creation Process: A Multilevel Study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 297-330.
• Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, M. (2016). Risk, Uncertainty, and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment. Management Science, 62(10), 2897-2915.
• Kraus, S., McDowell, W., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E., & Rodriguez-Garcia, M. (2021). The role of innovation and knowledge for entrepreneurship and regional development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 33(3-4), 175-184.
• Kreiser, P.M., & Davis, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Unique Impact of Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-taking. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 39-51.
• Lee, S.M., & Peterson, S.J. (2000). Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Global Competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401-416.
• Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
• Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54, 503-522.
• Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 403-419.
• Olanrewaju, A.S.T., Hossain, M.A., Whiteside, N., & Mercieca, P. (2020). Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 90-110.
• Pineiro-Chousa, J., Lopez-Cabarcos, M.A., Romeo-Castro, N.M., & Perez-Pico, A.M. (2020). Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front. Journal of Business Research, 115, 475.485.
• Raza, A., Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S., Shahid, M.U., & Muffatto, M. (2020). Institutional adversity, external knowledge sources, and new ventures' innovation: An institutional polycentrism theory perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 633-647.
• Sahasranamam, S., Nandakumar, M.K., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). Knowledge capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship: Investigating the role of informal institutions. Journal of International Management, 27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100833
• Saunoris, J.W., & Sajny, A. (2017). Entrepreneurship and economic freedom: crosscountry evidence from formal and informal sectors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(3-4), 292-316.
• Schendel, D. (1990). Introduction to the Special Issue on Corporate Entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 1-3.
• Secundo, G., Vecchio, P.D., & Mele, G. (2021). Social media for entrepreneurship: myth or reality? A structured literature review and a future research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(1), 149-177.
• Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
• StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
• Stewart, W.H., & Roth, P.L. (2001). Risk Propensity Differences Between Entrepreneurs and Managers: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145-153.
• Stewart, W.H., Watson, W.E., Carland, J.C., & Carland, J.W. (1998). A Proclivity for Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Entrepreneurs, Small Business Owners, and Corporate Managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 189-214.
• Tabares, A. (2021). Opportunity-related behaviors in international entrepreneurship research: a multilevel analysis of antecedents, processes, and outcomes. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 321-368.
• Tan, Y., & Li, X. (2022). The impact of internet on entrepreneurship. International Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 135-142.
• Thomas, A.S., & Mueller, S.L. (2000). A Case for Comparative Entrepreneurship: Assessing the Relevance of Culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
• Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53, 21-49.
• Von Bloh, J., Broekel, T., Ozgun, B., & Sternberg, R. (2020). New(s) data for entrepreneurship research? An innovative approach to use Big Data on media coverage. Small Business Economics, 55, 673-694.
• Webb, J.W., Ketchen, D.J., & Ireland, R.D. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 67-77.
• Xu, D., & Meyer, K.E. (2013). Linking Theory and Context: ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies’ after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1322-1346.
• Yan, Y., & Guan, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem, entrepreneurial rate and innovation: the moderating role of internet attention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 625-650.
• Zahra, S.A., Jennings, D.F., & Kuratko, D.F. (2009). The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), 45-65.