Comparative Advertisings from Marketing Perspective
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to explain basic concepts of comparative advertising through marketing perspective. After the near future removal of the formal barriers against direct comparative advertising in Turkey, it will begin to appear at different mediums. There are different types of comparative advertising, such as direct comparative advertising and, indirect comparative advertising. Comparative advertisements were firstly appeared in the 1900s and legal obstacles with regard to use of direct comparative advertising were removed in United States by 1971. Direct comparative advertising has both advantages and disadvantages. When compared to non-comparative advertising, positive aspects of direct comparative advertising are informing and persuading the consumer, helping the consumer to make better comparisons among competing brands, encouraging competition, improving product features, helping to reduce the market barriers for newcomers. Yet there are also negative aspects to it such as, it is more likely to cause consumer confusion and to reduce honesty and impartiality and also it is more likely to cause fierce competition against companies and increase the number of bad attitudes regarding advertisement, if it is used carelessly it can result in legal ramifications. There are need points to pay attention when using comparative ads to avoid adverse events.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Abramson, J. (1978). Comparative Advertising; Inoculation Theory; and the Prevention of Attitude Change among Brand Loyal Consumers: A Laboratory Experiment. Doktora Tezi. Louisiana State University.
- Ash, S. B., & Wee, C.-H. (1983). Comparative Advertising: a Review with Implications for Further Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 10(1), 370-376.
- Aybat, O. (2012). Comparative Ads and Their Affective Consequences: The Effect of Schadenfreude on Purchase Likelihood and Attitudes. Doktora Tezi. City University of New York.
- Barigozzi, F., & Peitz, M. (2004). Comparative Advertising and Competition Policy. International University in Germany Working Paper, No. 19/2004.
- Barooah, S. P., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). Comparative Advertisements: Balancing Consumer Interest Vis-À-Vis IPR Infringement. Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 7(2), 116-128.
- Barry, T. E. (1993). Comparative Advertising: What Have We Learned In Two Decades?. Journal Of Advertising Research, March/April, 33(2), 19-29.
- Barry, T.E., & Tremblay, R. L. (1975). Comparative Advertising: Perspectives and Issues. Journal of Advertising, 4(4), 15-20.
- Beard, F. (2010). Comparative Advertising Wars: An Historical Analysis of Their Causes and Consequences. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(3), 270-286.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
İbrahim Aydın
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Kasım 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
3 Kasım 2016
Kabul Tarihi
4 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2017 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3
Cited By
MİZAH ÇEKİCİLİĞİ OLAN REKLAMLARA YÖNELİK TUTUMUN SATINALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE MARKA SADAKATİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜNÜN ARAŞTIRILMASI
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.54831/vanyyuiibfd.1786993