11 Eylül 2001 ve 13 Kasım 2015 Terör Saldırılarının Siyasete Etkileri: ABD ve Fransa’nın Terörle Savaş Yaklaşımı

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı ABD’de 11 Eylül 2001 yılında ve Fransa’da 13 Kasım 2015 yılında gerçekleşen terör saldırıları ardından uygulanan terörle savaş yaklaşımının karşılaştırmalı analizini yapmaktır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanarak içerik analizi tekniği kullanılmıştır. Terör saldırıları sonrasında George W. Bush ve François Hollande’in yaptıkları konuşma metinleri analiz edilerek terörle savaş, devletin ve ulusun gücü, düşmanın kapasitesi ve kötülüğü, uluslararası iş birliği, askeri ve idari düzenlemeler olarak 5 tema oluşturulmuş ve her bir tema için kategoriler belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, ABD ve Fransa’nın terörle mücadelede uyguladıkları terörle savaş yaklaşımı temelde dört ortak eğilim göstermektedir: terör saldırıları sonrasında yapılan düzenlemelerin güvenlik konusu haline getirme eğilimi, İslam’la değil cihatçı İslam’la mücadele etmeyi hedefledikleri, ulusal ve dış politikada kolluk ve askeri kuvvetlerin ön plana çıkması.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Terörle Savaş
• Terörün Siyasi Sonuçları
• ABD 11 Eylül Saldırıları
• Fransa 13 Kasım Saldırıları

Political Consequences of Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 and November 13, 2015: War on Terrorism

Öz

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effects of political consequences of terror by making a comparative analysis of September 11, 2001 in the USA and on the attacks of November 13, 2015 in France. In the study, content analysis technique was used by applying qualitative research method. After terrorist attacks, the speech texts of George W. Bush and François Hollande were analyzed and 5 themes were created as war on terrorism, power of the state and nation, capacity and evil of the enemy, international cooperation, military and administrative regulations, and categories were determined for each theme. According to the results, war on terrorism approach implemented by the USA and France in war on terrorism shows four common trends: the tendency to make the regulations made after terrorist attacks a security issue, aim to fight jihadist Islam, not Islam, the prominence of law enforcement and military forces in national and foreign policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• War on Terror
• Political Consequences of Terror
• 9/11 Attacks
• November 13 Attacks

Kaynakça

1. 9/11 Komisyon Raporu. (tarih yok). Tthe 9/11 Commission Report Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks.
2. Abdo, M. (2015, Erişim Tarihi: 29 Haziran 2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of George W. Bush's Speech An Appeal to Muslims: Address to the United Nations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327270369_A_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_of_George_W_Bush%27s_Speech_An_Appeal_to_Muslims_Address_to_the_United_Nations adresinden alındı
3. d'Abadie, D. S., (2003), from 11/9 to 9/11:Contunity or Change in International Politics,Outone-Inverno, pp.123-134
4. Ballesteros, A., 2018, Counter-Terrorism Efforts in Spain, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses , Vol. 10, No. 11, pp.9-13
5. BBC, (2016), https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35924701 Son Erişim Tarihi: 06.10.2020
6. Beauchamps, M. (2020, Haziran 21). Denaturalisation, ‘Terrorism’ and National Identity in France. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/45345526/explosivepolitics.com-Denaturalisation_Terrorism_and_National_Identity_in_France.pdf?1462367173=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DDenaturalisation_Terrorism_and_National.pdf&Expires=159276425 adresinden alındı
7. Berschinski, R. G. (2007). Afrıcom’s Dılemma: The “Global War on Terrorısm,” “Capacıty Buıldıng,” Humanıtarıanısm, and The Future ff U.S. Securıty Polıcy in Afrıca. https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/37121954X.pdf, : Title 17, United States Code, Section 101.
8. Beshara, R. K. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of George W. Bush’s ‘War on Terror’ speech: the rhetoric of (counter)terrorism and the logic of Islamophobia. Journal of Language and Discrimination, Vol.2, No.1, 85-122.

9. Blakeley, R. (2017). British torture in the ‘war on terror’. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 23, No. 2, DOI: 10.1177/1354066116653455, 243–266.
10. Blanchard, M. C. and Humud, E. C., 2018, The Islamic Satate and U.S Policy, Congressiona Research Service, rapor
11. Boutin, B. (2016). The Use and Abuse of Administrative Measures against FTFs in France. ICCT The Hague.
12. Bush, G. W. (2001, Eylül 20). Text: President Bush Addresses the Nation. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bushaddress_092001.html adresinden alındı
13. Brisard, J-C. 2015, The Paris Attacks and the Evolving Islamic State Threat to France, CTCSENTİNEL, Vol.8, No.11
14. Bymann, D.L., 2011, The History of Al-Qaeda https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-history-of-al-qaeda/ Erşim Tarihi: 12.09.2020
15. Calamur, K.,2017, How Did Spain Avoid Terrorism Before Barcelona?, "https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/08/barcelona-attack-spanish-counterterrorism/537336/" Son Erişim tarihi: 05.10.2020 Chalkiadaki, V. (2015). The French “War on Terror” in the post-Charlie Hebdo Era. EUCRİM The European Criminal Law Association's Forum, 26-32.
16. CIA, 2002, https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2002/DCI_18_June_testimony_new.pdf Son Erişim Tarihi: 06.10.2020
17. Colijn, K., Singleton, M., Ginkel, B. v., Chauzal, G., & Zavagli, S. (2015). Paris: 11/13/15 Analysis and Policy Options. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/Policy_Brief_Clingendael_ICCT-Paris111315Analysis_and_Policy_Options_November%202015_final.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 25 Haziran 2020: Clingendael ve Centre for Counter-Terrorism – The Hague (ICCT).
18. Cottey, A. (2003)," Afghanistan and the new dynamics of intervention: counter-terrorism and nation building" SIPRI Yearbook 2003: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security
19. Cox, M. (2002). Paradıgm Shıfts And 9/11: Internatıonal Relatıons After The Twın Towers. Security Dialogue,33(2), 247-251. Retrieved October 6, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26298072
20. Daniel,K. (2015). The Black Friday Paris Attack Waht Do We Know? What Should We Do?, Special Report, International Institute for Counter-Terrorism, https://www.ict.org.il/UserFiles/ICT-The-Black-Friday-Paris-Attacks-Nov15.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 12.09.2020
21. Dück, E., & Lucke, R. (2019). Same Old (Macro-) Securitization? A Comparison of Political Reactions to Major Terrorist Attacks in the United States and France. Croatian International Relations Review, Vol. 25, No. 84, DOI 10.2478/ cirr-2019-0001, 1-30.
22. Daalder, I. H., & Lindsay, J. M. (2001, Aralık 1). Nasty, Brutish and Long: America’s War on Terrorism. Erişim tarihi 25.06.2020: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/nasty-brutish-and-long-americas-war-on-terrorism/ adresinden alındı
23. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (2020, Haziran 25). War on terrorism. Encyclopaedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/print/article/1247283 adresinden alındı
24. Eriksson, J. (2013). The ‘Clash of Civilizations’ and Its Unexpected Liberalism. J. P. (ed.) içinde, The Clash of Civilization: Twenty Years On (s. 20-30). Bristol: e-International Relations.
25. France25, 2015, France Strikes Islamic State group in Syria, Iraq from Aircraft Carrier, https://www.france24.com/en/20151123-france-charles-de-gaulle-carrier-strikes-targets-iraq, Son Erişim Tarihi: 06.10.2020
26. Gershkoff, A., & Kushner, S. (2005). Shaping Public Opinion: The 9/11-Iraq Connection in the Bush Administration’s Rhetoric. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 3, No.3, 525-537.
27. Günbayı,İ., Nitel Araştırmada Veri Analizi: Tema Analizi, Betimsel Analiz, İçerik Analizi ve Analitik Genelleme, Nirvana Sosyal Bilimler Sitesi, http://www.nirvanasosyal.com/h-392-nitel-arastirmada-veri-analizi-tema-analizi-betimsel-analiz-icerik-analizi-ve-analitik-genelleme.html, Son Erişim tarihi: 06.10.2020
28. Gordon, P. H. (2007). Can the War on Terror Be Won? How to Fight the Right War. Foreign Affairs, Vol.86, No.6, 53-66.
29. Gomes, T. A., Mikhael, M.M, 2018, Terror or Terrorism? Al-Qaeda and Islamic State in Comparative Perspective, A Journal of the Brazilian Political Science Association, Vol.12, No.1
30. Gurski, P. (2018). An End to the War on Terrorism. ICCT, The Hague. Hecker, M., & Tenenbaum, E. (2017). France vs. Jihadism: The Republic in a New Age of Terror. Notes de I'FRİ, Security Studies Center.
31. Hollande, F. (2015, Kasım 16). Speech by the President of the Republic before a joint session of Parliament (Versailles, November 16, 2015). https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/french-foreign-policy/security-disarmament-and-non-proliferation/news/news-about-defence-and-security/article/speech-by-the-president-of-the-republic-before-a-joint-session-of-parliament adresinden alındı
32. Jackson, R. (2005). Security, Democracy, and the Rhetoric of Counter-Terrorism. Democracy and Security, 1, DOI: 10.1080/17419160500322517, 147-171.
33. Jasko, K., Kruglanski, A.W., Bin Hassan, A.S.R.
34. Gunaratna, R., ISIS: Its History,Ideology,and Psychology, içideHandbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives, Springer,Cham
35. Jones, S.G. Dobbins, J., Bymann, D. Chivvis, C.S., Connable, B., Martini, J., Robinson, E. Chandler, N. Rolling Back the Islamic State, 2017, Rand Cooperation, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1912.html. Erişim tarihi: 04.10.2020
36. Maulny, J.-P. (2017). Democracy and Terrorism – Experience in Coping with Terror Attacks in France. A. M. (Ed.) içinde, Democracy and Terrorism – Experiences in Coping with Terror Attacks Case Studies from Belgium, France, Israel and Norway (s. 15-31). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, International Policy Analysis,.
37. Mignot-Mahdavi, R. (2020). Le Silence des Agneaux: France’s War Against ‘Jihadist Groups’ and Associated Legal Rationale. ICCT Research paper, DOI: 10.19165/2020.1.02 ISSN: 2468-0486.
38. Murphy, R. (2016). France’s war on terror: a domestic or foreign threat? Politics Review, Vol. 25, No. 4.
39. Montalvo, J. G. 2011. "Voting after the Bombings: A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Terrorist Attacks on Democratic Elections", Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (4),1146-1154.
40. Naidenov, B. (2020, Erişim Tarihi: 21 Haziran 2020). An Evaluative Study of Operation Sentinelle: The French Response to its Domestic Terrorism Threat. https://www.academia.edu/33024759/AN_EVALUATIVE_STUDY_OF_OPERATION_SENTINELLE adresinden alındı
41. Post 9/11 Major Military Operations. (2020, Haziran 28). https://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/post_9-11_major_military_operations.pdf adresinden alındı
42. Reese, S. (2007). The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited. Journal of Communication , DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x, 148-154.
43. Reese, S. D., & Lewis, S. C. (2009). Framing the War on Terror The internalization of Policy in the US Press. Journalism, Vol. 10, No. 6, DOI: 10.1177/1464884909344480, 777–797.
44. Reinares F.(2009) After the Madrid Bombings: Internal Security Reforms and Prevention of Global Terrorism in Spain, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 32:5, 367-388, DOI: 10.1080/10576100902836767
45. Revkin, M., The Legal Foundations of the Islamic State, The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World, Analyses paper, No.23. 2016
46. Rosenau, W. ve Powell,(2017) A. Al QaedaCore: A Case Study, CNA Analysis and Solutions
47. Oosterveld, W.T ve Bloem, W. 2016-2017, The Rise and Fall of ISIS: From Evitability to Inevitability rapor
48. Samaan, J.-L., & Jacobs, A. (2018). Countering Jihadist Terrorism: A Comparative Analysis of French and German Experiences. Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol.32, No.2, 401-415.
49. Scheffer, A. d., Michelot, M., & Quencez, M. (2016). After the Terror Attacks of 2015 A French Activist Foreign Policy Here to Stay? . Paris: The German Marshall Fund of the United States, GMF.
50. Schofield, H. (2015, Kasım 16). Paris attacks: 'France will destroy IS' - Hollande. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34836439 adresinden alındı
51. Sert, G., Kurtoğlu, M., Akıncı, A., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2012). Öğretmenlerin Teknoloji Kullanma Durumlarını İnceleyen Araştırmalara Bir Bakış: Bir İçerik Analizi Çalışması. Akademik Bilişim’12 - XIV. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri (s. 351-357). Uşak: Uşak Üniversitesi.
52. Templeton, E. (2019). The Role of Socialisation in the Deradicalisation Process: A Promising Long-Term Strategy? Charles University Faculty of Social Sciences: https://www.academia.edu/42203827/The_Role_of_Socialisation_in_the_Deradicalisation_Process_A_Promising_Long-Term_Strategy adresinden alındı
53. U.S. Department of State Archive. (2009). The Global War on Terrorism: The First 100 Days. Washington, London, Islamabad: U.S. Department of State.
54. Wayne, M. I. (2009). Inside China’s War on Terrorism. Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 18, No.59, 249-261.
55. Weill, S. (2018). Terror in Courts, French counter-terrorism: Administrative and Penal Avenues. Paris: Report for the official visit of the UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights, The Capstone Course on Counter-Terrorism and International Crimes, PSIA, Sciences-Po.
56. White House. (2003). National Strategy for Combating Terrorism. https://www.cia.gov/news-information/cia-the-war-on-terrorism/Counter_Terrorism_Strategy.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27 06.2020.
57. Wright, R., Berger, J.M., Braniff, W. Bunzel, C., Bymann, D., Cafarella, J., Gambhir, H., Garternstein-Ross, D.,Hassan, H., Lister, C., McCants, W., Nada, G., Olidort, J., Thurston, A., Watts, C., Wehrey, F., Whiteside, C., Wood, G., Zelin, A.Y., Zimmerman, K., The Jihadi Threat ISIS, al-Qaeda, and Beyond, United States Instititute of Peace, 2016-2017
58. Yıldırım, A., & Şimsek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.