Cryopreservation of Mouse Sperm

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 50 - 57, 23.12.2024

İbrahim Güvenç , Cengiz Yıldız

Öz

Mice are preferred in scientific studies due to their small size, easy availability, rapid reproduction, and ability to create new generations in a short time. Since mice and humans have the same structure in terms of protein and DNA similarity, they are frequently used as experimental animals (Spencer, 2002). In the studies conducted, specialized mouse breeds with various characteristics have been produced. These mice are mainly used as disease models in areas such as genetic diseases, cancer, immunology, and vaccine production in humans. The genetic resources of mutant mouse breeds produced by transgenic and mutation methods and many endangered animal species can be preserved by cryopreservation. For this purpose, sperm banks and related consortia are established for many species. Sperm cryopreservation plays a crucial role in safeguarding genetic diversity both now and in the future, ensuring the preservation and enhancement of valuable genetic traits in mice used for research and practical applications. (Yıldız et al., 2007; Yamashiro and Eimei, 2012). This review aims to provide information about the cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mouse, Cryopreservation, Spermatozoa

Fare Sperminin Kriyoprezervasyonu

Öz

Fareler küçük yapıya sahip olmaları, kolay temin edilmeleri, hızlı üreyebilmeleri ve kısa sürede yeni jenerasyon oluşturabilme özelliklerinden dolayı bilimsel çalışmalarda çok fazla tercih edilmektedir. Fareler ile insanlar protein ve DNA benzerliği yönünden aynı yapıya sahip olduklarından deney hayvanı olarak sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır (Spencer, 2002). Yapılan araştırmalarda çeşitli özellikler taşıyan özelleşmiş fare ırkları üretilmiştir. Bu fareler başlıca; insanlarda genetik hastalıklar, kanser, immünoloji, aşı yapımı gibi alanlarda hastalık modeli olarak kullanılmaktadırlar. Transgenik ve mutasyon metotları ile üretilen mutant fare ırklarının ve nesli tükenmekte olan birçok hayvan türünün genetik kaynakları kriyoprezervasyon ile korunabilmektedir. Bu amaçla birçok türler için sperm bankaları ve bununla ilgili konsorsiyumlar oluşturulmaktadır. Araştırma ve uygulamalar için değerli genetik özelliklere sahip farelerin genlerini korumak ve artırmak amacıyla sperm kriyoprezervasyonu günümüzde ve gelecekte önemli bir genetik yapıyı koruma kaynağı olacaktır (Yıldız ve ark., 2007; Yamashiro ve Eimei, 2012). Bu derlemede fare sperminin kriyoprezervasyonu hakkında bilgiler verilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fare, Kriyoprezervasyon, spermatozoa

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmanın yapılmasında Hayvan Deneyleri Yerel Etik Kurul (HADYEK) İzin Belgesi gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu çalışma herhangi bir finansman kuruluşundan/sektöründen hibe/destek almamıştır.

Teşekkür

Bu derleme ‘Fare ve Rat Spermasının Kriyoprezervasyonu’ isimli doktora seminerinden üretilmiştir.

Kaynakça

• Agca, Y., Gilmore, J., Byers, M., Woods, E. J., Liu, J., & Critser, J. K. (2002). Osmotic characteristics of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extenders and sugars. Biology of Reproduction, 67(5), 1493-1501. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.005579
• Akman, O. (2007). Swiss albino ırkı farelerde sperma kalitesinin belirlenmesi amacıyla hos testi sonuçları ve diğer spermatolojik parametreler arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Selçuk Üniv.Sağ.Bil.Enst. Doktora tezi. 2007
• Anderson, R. A., Oswald, C., Willis, B. R., & Zaneveld, L. J. D. (1983). Relationship between semen characteristics and fertility in electroejaculated mice. Reproduction, 68(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0680001
• At, P. (1996). Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos and oocytes: recent advances. Biotechnol. Adv., 14, 127-149.
• Bucak, M. N., & Tekin, N. (2007). Protective effect of taurine, glutathione and trehalose on the liquid storage of ram semen. Small Ruminant Research, 73(1-3), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.12.001
• Cardullo, R. A., & Baltz, J. M. (1991). Metabolic regulation in mammalian sperm: mitochondrial volume determines sperm length and flagellar beat frequency. Cell motility and the cytoskeleton, 19(3), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.970190306
• Chang, M. C. (1984). The meaning of sperm capacitation. A historical perspective. Journal of andrology, 5(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1984.tb00775.x
• Chulavatnatol, M. (1982). Motility initiation of quiescent spermatozoa from rat caudal epididymis: effects of pH, viscosity, osmolality and inhibitors. International Journal of Andrology, 5(4), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1982.tb00272.x
• Curry, M. R., & Watson, P. F. (1994). Osmotic effects on ram and human sperm membranes in relation to thawing injury. Cryobiology, 31(1),39-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1994.1005
• Darszon, A., Espinosa, F., Galindo, B., Sánchez, D., & Beltrán, C. (2002). Regulation of sperm ion currents. In Fertilization (pp. 225-264). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012311629-1/50009-7
• De Leeuw, F. E., De Leeuw, A. M., Den Daas, J. H. G., Colenbrander, B., & Verkleij, A. J. (1993). Effects of various cryoprotective agents and membrane-stabilizing compounds on bull sperm membrane integrity after cooling and freezing. Cryobiology, 30(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1993.1005
• Dewit, M., Marley, W. S., & Graham, J. K. (2000). Fertilizing potential of mouse spermatozoa cryopreserved in a medium containing whole eggs. Cryobiology, 40(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1999.2219
• Edashige, K., Yamaji, Y., Kleinhans, F. W., & Kasai, M. (2003). Artificial expression of aquaporin-3 improves the survival of mouse oocytes after cryopreservation. Biology of Reproduction, 68(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.101.002394
• Gao, D. Y., Ashworth, E., Watson, P. F., Kleinhans, F. W., Mazur, P., & Critser, J. K. (1993). Hyperosmotic tolerance of human spermatozoa: separate effects of glycerol, sodium chloride, and sucrose on spermolysis. Biology of reproduction, 49(1), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.1.112
• Hammerstedt RH, Graham JK, Nolan J.P.(1990). Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl, 11: 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1990.tb01583.x
• Kasai, M. (2002). Advances in the cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes and embryos: development of ultrarapid vitrification. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 1, 1-9.
• Katkov, I. I., Katkova, N., Critser, J. K., & Mazur, P. (1998). Mouse spermatozoa in high concentrations of glycerol: chemical toxicity vs osmotic shock at normal and reduced oxygen concentrations. Cryobiology, 37(4), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1998.2128
• Kawase, Y., Aoki, Y., Kamada, N., Jishage, K. I., & Suzuki, H. (2004). Comparison of fertility between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization with a partial zona pellucida incision by using a piezo-micromanipulator in cryopreserved inbred mouse spermatozoa. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 43(1), 21-25.
• Koçak, G., & Yildiz, C. (2024). The Effects of Ferulic Acid, Tryptophan, and L-Glutamine on the Cryopreservation of Mouse Spermatozoa. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 22(3), 286-293. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2023.0067
• Koshimoto, C., Gamliel, E., & Mazur, P. (2000). Effect of osmolality and oxygen tension on the survival of mouse sperm frozen to various temperatures in various concentrations of glycerol and raffinose. Cryobiology, 41(3), 204-231. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2000.2281
• Koshimoto, C., & Mazur, P. (2002). Effects of warming rate, temperature, and antifreeze proteins on the survival of mouse spermatozoa frozen at an optimal rate. Cryobiology, 45(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(02)00105-0
• Lessard, C., Parent, S., Leclerc, P., BAILEYs, J. L., & Sullivan, R. (2000). Cryopreservation alters the levels of the bull sperm surface protein P25b. Journal of andrology, 21(5), 700-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb02138.x
• Li, H., Hung, P. H., & Suarez, S. S. (2015). Ejaculated mouse sperm enter cumulus-oocyte complexes more efficiently in vitro than epididymal sperm. PLoS One, 10(5), e0127753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127753
• Li, M. W., Glass, O. C., Zarrabi, J., Baker, L. N., & Lloyd, K. K. (2016). Cryorecovery of mouse sperm by different IVF methods using MBCD and GSH. Journal of fertilization in vitro, 4(2). doi: 10.4172/2375-4508.1000175
• Mazur, P. (1990). Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell biophysics, 17, 53-92.
• Mochida, K., Hasegawa, A., Shikata, D., Itami, N., Hada, M., Watanabe, N., ... & Ogura, A. (2021). Easy and quick (EQ) sperm freezing method for urgent preservation of mouse strains. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 14149.
• Nakagata, N. (2000). Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Mammalian Genome, 11(7), 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003350010109
• Nakatsukasa, E., Kashiwazaki, N., Takizawa, A., Shino, M., Kitada, K., Serikawa, T., ... & Nakagata, N. (2003). Cryopreservation of spermatozoa from closed colonies, and inbred, spontaneous mutant, and transgenic strains of rats. Comparative medicine, 53(6), 639-641.
• Noiles, E. E., Thompson, K. A., & Storey, B. T. (1997). Water permeability, Lp, of the mouse sperm plasma membrane and its activation energy are strongly dependent on interaction of the plasma membrane with the sperm cytoskeleton. Cryobiology, 35(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1997.2033
• Parks, J. E., & Lynch, D. V. (1992). Lipid composition and thermotropic phase behavior of boar, bull, stallion, and rooster sperm membranes. Cryobiology, 29(2), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90024-V
• Pedro, P. B., Zhu, S. E., Makino, N., Sakurai, T., Edashige, K., & Kasai, M. (1997). Effects of hypotonic stress on the survival of mouse oocytes and embryos at various stages. Cryobiology, 35(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1997.2034
• Pickett, B. W., & Amann, R. P. (1993). Cryopreservation of semen. Equine reproduction, 775, 780.
• Raspa, M., Guan, M., Paoletti, R., Montoliu, L., Ayadi, A., Marschall, S., ... & EMMA/Infrafrontier Technical Working Group. (2017). Dry ice is a reliable substrate for the distribution of frozen mouse spermatozoa: A multi-centric study. Theriogenology, 96, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.003
• Rezaei, N., Mohammadi, M., Mohammadi, H., Khalatbari, A., & Zare, Z. (2020). Acrosome and chromatin integrity, oxidative stress, and expression of apoptosis-related genes in cryopreserved mouse epididymal spermatozoa treated with L-Carnitine. Cryobiology, 95, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.006
• Rudolph, A. S., & Crowe, J. H. (1985). Membrane stabilization during freezing: the role of two natural cryoprotectants, trehalose and proline. Cryobiology, 22(4), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(85)90184-1
• Sağırkaya, H. (2001). Değişik gelişim dönemlerinde bulunan hibrit fare embriyolarının vitrifikasyon yöntemiyle dondurulması (Doctoral dissertation, Bursa Uludag University (Turkey)).Uludağ Üniv.Sağ.Bil.Enst. Doktora tezi. 2001
• Samper, J. C., Hellander, J. C., & Crabo, B. G. (1991). Relationship between the fertility of fresh and frozen stallion semen and semen quality. Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement, 44, 107-114.
• Si, W., Benson, J. D., Men, H., & Critser, J. K. (2006). Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on the motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal integrity of rat sperm. Cryobiology, 53(3), 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2006.09.001
• Sirat, M. P., Sinha, A. K., Singh, B. K., & Prasad, R. L. (1996). Effect of cryoprotectants on release of various enzymes from buck spermatozoa during freezing. Theriogenology, 45(2), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00377-K
• Songsasen, N., & Leibo, S. P. (1997). Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Cryobiology, 35(3), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1997.2048
• Songsasen, N., & Leibo, S. P. (1998). Live mice from cryopreserved embryos derived in vitro with cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa. Comparative Medicine, 48(3), 275-281.
• Spencer, G. International Team of Researchers Assembles Draft Sequence of Mouse Genome.https://www.genome.gov/10002983/2002-release-draft-sequence-of-mouse-genome, Erişim Tarihi: 03.01.2020. 2002.
• Steinmann, H. (1996). Use of trehalose as a cryoprotectant in the freezing of stallion semen. A laboratory study.
• Storey, B. T., Noiles, E. E., & Thompson, K. A. (1998). Comparison of glycerol, other polyols, trehalose, and raffinose to provide a defined cryoprotectant medium for mouse sperm cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 37(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1998.2097
• Sztein, J. M., Noble, K., Farley, J. S., & Mobraaten, L. E. (2001). Comparison of permeating and nonpermeating cryoprotectants for mouse sperm cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 42(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2001.2300
• Tada, N. (1993). Effect of pre-freezing equilibration and post-thawing centrifugation on the fertilizing capacity of frozen mouse epididymal spermatozoa. Cryo-Letters, 14, 195-206.
• Tada, N., Sato, M., Yamanoi, J., Mizorogi, T., Kasai, K., & Ogawa, S. (1990). Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of raffinose and glycerol. Reproduction, 89(2), 511-516. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0890511
• Takeo, T., & Nakagata, N. (2010). Combination medium of cryoprotective agents containing L-glutamine and methyl-β-cyclodextrin in a preincubation medium yields a high fertilization rate for cryopreserved C57BL/6J mouse sperm. Laboratory animals, 44(2), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2009.009074
• Tecirlioglu, R. T., Hayes, E. S., & Trounson, A. O. (2002). Semen collection from mice: electroejaculation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 14(6), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD02015
• Thornton, C. E., Brown, S. D., & Glenister, P. H. (1999). Large numbers of mice established by in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved spermatozoa: implications and applications for genetic resource banks, mutagenesis screens, and mouse backcrosses. Mammalian Genome, 10(10), 987-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359901145
• Varisli, O., Uguz, C., Agca, C., & Agca, Y. (2009). Motility and acrosomal integrity comparisons between electro-ejaculated and epididymal ram sperm after exposure to a range of anisosmotic solutions, cryoprotective agents and low temperatures. Animal Reproduction Science, 110(3-4), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.012
• Watson, P. F. (1995). Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 7(4), 871-891. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950871
• Watson, P. F. (2000). The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Animal reproduction science, 60, 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3
• Woelders, H. (1997). Fundamentals and recent development in cryopreservation of bull and boar semen. Veterinary Quarterly, 19(3), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3
• Wongtawan, T., Saravia, F., Wallgren, M., Caballero, I., & Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (2006). Fertility after deep intra-uterine artificial insemination of concentrated low-volume boar semendoses. Theriogenology,65(4)773-787. htps://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.07.033
• Wowk, B., Leitl, E., Rasch, C. M., Mesbah-Karimi, N., Harris, S. B., & Fahy, G. M. (2000). Vitrification enhancement by synthetic ice blocking agents. Cryobiology, 40(3), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2000.2243
• Yamashiro, H., & Eimei, S. (2012). Cryopreservation of rat sperm. Current Frontiers in Cryobiology, 165-178.
• Yıldız, C., Erol, İ. (2024). The Effects on Post-Thaw Sperm Quality and Nuclear DNA Integrity of Supplementation of Low-Density Lipoprotein to Freezing Extender in the Mouse. Van Veterinary Journal, 35(1), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1417880
• Yıldız, C., Ottaviani, P., Law, N., Ayearst, R., Liu, L., & McKerlie, C. (2007). Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse. Reproduction, 133(3), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0256