EU Financial Assistance to Civil Society in Turkey: Shrinking the Political Space in the Post-Gezi Process?
Öz
This study investigates the EU’s stance on post-Gezi civic engagement, which is based on alternative alliances and against the anti-democratic extremes of state power. Using a Gramscian perspective, the paper underlines the fact that before the protests, Turkey’s civil society had been politically socialized by the help of EU financial assistance as a sign of an ideology of consent. That is, the EU has focused on liberal-democratic cooperation with civic organic intellectuals, based on the conviction that civil society is the engine for social and political transformation. However, even though civil society organizations have strengthened their catalysing role and become a new counter-hegemonic political space since the Gezi protests, it is argued that Turkey’s normative distance from the EU and the pragmatic links between the EU and Turkey over refugees have led the EU to reduce its financial relationships with Turkey’s rights-based civil society.
Anahtar Kelimeler
EU Funds, Civil Society, EU-Turkey Relations, Gezi Protests, Gramsci
Kaynakça
- Agustín, Óscar García, and Martin Bak Jørgensen (2016), “Introduction” Agustín, Óscar García, and Martin Bak Jørgensen (Ed.), Solidarity without Borders: Gramscian Perspectives on Migration: and Civil Society Alliances, (London: Pluto Press): 3-20.
- Akçalı, Emel (2018), “Do Popular Assemblies Contribute to Genuine Political Change? Lessons from the Park Forums in Istanbul”, South European Society and Politics, 23 (3): 323-340.
- Altınörs, Görkem and Ümit Akçay (2022), “Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Crisis, and Consolidation: The Political Economy of Regime Change in Turkey”, Globalizations, 19 (7): 1029-1053.
- Arslanalp, Mert and Deniz T. Erkmen (2020), “Repression without Exception: A Study of Protest Bans during Turkey’s State of Emergency (2016-2018)”, South European Society and Politics, 25 (1): 99-125.
- Atalay, Zeynep (2022), “The Mutual Constitution of Illiberal Civil Society and Neoauthoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey”, Current Sociology, 70 (3): 338–357.
- Axyonova, Vera and Fabienne Bossuyt (2016), “Mapping the Substance of the EU’s Civil Society Support in Central Asia: From Neo-liberal to State-led Civil Society”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49 (3): 207-217.
- Aydın-Düzgit, Senem and Alper Kaliber (2016), “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a de-Europeanising Candidate Country?”, South European Society and Politics, 21 (1): 1-14.
- Bagic, Aida (2004), “Talking about ‘Donors’: Women's Organizing in Post-Yugoslav Countries”, Gould, Jeremy and Henrik Secher Marcussen (Eds.), Ethnographies of Aid – Exploring Development Texts and Encounter, Occasional Paper 24 (Roskilde: International Development Studies, Roskilde University Centre): 199-226.
- Bal, Sinem (2019) “Clash of Norms: The Limits of EU’s Normative Power in Gender Equality”, Marmara Journal of European Studies, 27 (1): 123-144.
- Bee, Cristiano and Ayhan Kaya (2017), “Between practices and demands: ambiguities, controversies and constraints in the emergence of active citizenship in Turkey”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17 (3): 301-324.