The Controversies over the Term “Empowerment” in the Implementation of Sustainable Development and the Case of Turkey
Öz
Sustainable development, being at the centre of today’s global and local policies, has led to discussions about its broad content and applicability since the 1980s. In particular, the most emphasized issues have been prioritizing the economic dimension of sustainable development and understanding the environment as the optimal use of natural capital. However, as was underlined at the World Sustainable Development Summit held in 2002, a social dimension also needs to be taken into account. This study adopts a qualitative approach to explore definitions and dimensions of sustainable development and empowerment to understand how their enlarged content affects their application. The dynamic range of empowerment presented as a critical strategy for implementing the social dimension of sustainable development, the ambiguities related to the meaning of the concepts, and the discourses transmitted from the global to the local level are being investigated through the Turkish case. To explore different definitions of sustainable development and empowerment, the qualitative analysis software Atlas.ti was used. The research sample consists of ten documents on international cooperation initiatives and three Turkish documents on implementing these initiatives. The international and Turkish texts show the fluctuations of empowerment between raising human welfare and increasing production. Thus, the concept of empowerment seems to reflect the contradictions of sustainable development semantically and by the nature of the discourse used.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Sustainable Development, Social Dimension, Empowerment, Content Analysis, Global Environmental Management, Populist Discourse
Destekleyen Kurum
Scientific Research Projects Commission of Galatasaray University
Proje Numarası
19.101.001
Teşekkür
This work has been supported by the Scientific Research Projects Commission of Galatasaray University under grant number 19.101.001.
Kaynakça
- Adger, W. Neil, Tor A Benjaminsen, Katrina Brown and Hanne Svarstad (2001), “Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses”, Development and Change, 32 (4): 681-715.
- Agyeman, Julian, Robert D Bullard and Bob Evans (2003), Just Sustainabilities. Development in an Unequal World (London: Earthscan Publications Ltd).
- Akyüz Selin, Feyda Sayan-Cengiz, Aslı Çırakman ve Dilek Cindoğlu (2018), “Married to Anatolian Tigers: Business Masculinities, Relationalities, and Limits to Empowerment”, Turkish Studies, 20 (2): 297-321.
- Austin, John L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
- Bahçeci Başarmak, Hazal Ilgın and Kemal Görmez (2019), “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma vs. Ekolojik Düşünce”, OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10 (17): 2299-2323.
- Baillat, Alice (2014), “Pour une approche discursive des politiques publiques environnementales”, CERISCOPE Environnement, http://ceriscope.sciences-po.fr/environnement/content/part4/pour-une-approche-discursive-des-politiques-publiques-environnementales (18.07. 2022).
- Barry, Marguerite and Gavin Doherty (2016), “What We Talk About When We Talk About Interactivity: Empowerment in Public Discourse”, New Media & Society, 19 (7): 1052-1071.
- Bartunek, Jean M., Gretchen M. Spreitzer (2006), “The Interdisciplinary Career of a Popular Construct Used in Management: Empowerment in the Late 20th Century”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15 (3): 255-273.
- Çoban, Aykut (2020), Çevre Politikası: Ekolojik Sorunlar ve Kuram (Ankara, İmge Kitabevi).
- Dryzek, John S. (1997), The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (Oxford, Oxford University Press).