The End of the Supranational Dream of the European Union: Toward a More Nationalist and Intergovernmental Union

Yıl 2024, , 540 - 569, 19.10.2024

Dilara Sülün

https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2024.19

Öz

This article questions and analyses the supranational aspirations of the European Union (EU) over its intergovernmental policies. It addresses first nationalism followed by neo-functionalism, supranationalism, and intergovernmentalism; the dominant theories in European integration. The purpose of the study is to reflect the EU’s supranational limitations. Our main research question is to determine whether there is a new form of Europeanism across Europe. The study shows the rising nationalism across Europe, through the 2019 and 2024 European Parliament (EP) elections, and the growing Euroscepticism through public opinion surveys. Moreover, a “policy analysis” is conducted through the EP resolutions between 1999 and 2024 and in European laws through Eur-lex, to reflect the number of intergovernmental operations. The overall findings indicate that many EU countries have ambiguous positions and altered views on the EU, between “Europhoria” and “Europhobia”. The study suggests a new form of Europeanism is growing, between Pro-Europeanism and Anti-Europeanism: “Adapted-Europeanism”. This new typology is introduced to refer to countries asking for less but more adapted integrational policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Union, Nationalism, Neo-Functionalism, Supranationalism, Intergovernmentalism

Avrupa Birliği’nin Ulus Üstü Hayalinin Sonu: Daha Milliyetçi ve Hükümetlerarası Bir Birliğe Doğru

Öz

Bu makale, Avrupa Birliği'nin (AB) ulusüstü hedeflerini ve hükümetlerarası politikalarını sorgulamakta ve incelemektedir. Çalışmada öncelikle milliyetçilik ve kavramlarına yer verilmiş, ardından Avrupa bütünleşmesinde baskın teoriler olan neo-işlevselcilik, ulusüstücülük ve hükümetlerarasıcılık teorileri ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı AB’nin ulusüstü işleyişinin sınırlarını ortaya koymaktır. Başlıca araştırma sorumuz, Avrupa çapında yeni bir Avrupalılık biçiminin olup olmadığını tespit etmektir. Bu kapsamda, 2019 ve 2024 Avrupa Parlamentosu (AP) seçimleri aracılığıyla Avrupa çapında yükselen milliyetçilik ve kamuoyu araştırmaları ile artmakta olan Avrupa şüpheciliği gösterilmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca, 1999-2024 yılları arasındaki Avrupa Parlamentosu kararları ve Eur-lex Avrupa yasaları araştırılarak “politika analizi” yapılmış ve AB’nin hükümetler arası karar sayısı verileri ile ulusüstü işleyişinin sınırları ortaya konmuştur. Varılan bulgular, pek çok AB ülkesinin AB ile ilgili görüşlerinin, AB sevgisi ile AB nefreti arasında karmaşık ve belirsiz olduğunu göstermektedir. Makale, Avrupa yanlısı ve Avrupa karşıtlığı arasında yeni bir Avrupalılık şeklinin gelişmekte olduğunu öne sürmekte olup, “Uyarlanmış Avrupalılık” kategorisi olarak adlandırmaktadır. Bu yeni tipoloji, daha az ama daha iyi uyarlanmış AB bütünleşme politikaları isteyen ülkeleri temsil etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği, Milliyetçilik, Yeni-İşlevselcilik, Ulusüstücülük, Hükümetlerarasıcılık

Kaynakça

• Adams, Ian (1993), Political Ideology Today (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
• Anderson, Benedict (1983), Imagined Communities (London, UK: Verso).
• Anderson, Benedict (1991), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised Edition ed. London and New York: Verso).
• Billig, Michael (1995), Banal Nationalism (London, UK: Sage).
• Bora, Salih I. and Lucas Schramm (2024), “Intergovernmentalism in a Supranational Field: France, Germany, and EU Competition Policy Reform”, West European Politics, 1–29.
• Börzel, Tanja (2006), The Disparity of European Integration: Revisiting Neofunctionalism in Honour of Ernst B. Haas (London: Routledge).
• Bréchon, Pierre (2024), “The French Identify as Europeans – and Yet Are Also Notoriously Eurosceptic”, https://theconversation.com/the-french-identify-as-europeans-and-yet-are-also-notoriously-eurosceptic-228661 (25.08.2024).
• Cramer, Clara Sophie and Ulrike Franke (2021), “Ambiguous Alliance: Neutrality, Opt-outs, and European Defence”, https://ecfr.eu/publication/ambiguous-alliance-neutrality-opt-outs-and-european-defence/ (25.08.2024)
• Dehove, Mario (2000), "Les Europes de Joschka Fischer", Le Banquet, 15 : 169-182.
• Deutsch, Karl (1953), People, Nationalism and Social Communication: An Enquiry into the Foundation of Nationality (New York: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Jon Wiley and Sons Inc).
• Deutsch, Karl (1969), Nationalism and Its Alternatives: The Experience of Western Europe (New York: Harward University, Borzoiboku, A. Knops Inc.).
• Eurlex (2024), “European Union Law, Opting Out”, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/opting-out.html (29.08.2024).
• European Council (2024), “How Maastricht changed Europe”, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ro/maastricht-treaty/ (30.08.2024).
• European Union (2024), “Jean Monnet: the unifying force behind the birth of the European Union”, https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu/eu-pioneers/jean-monnet_en (30.08.2024).
• Freeden, Michael (1998), “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?”, Political Studies, 46 (4): 748-765.
• Gellner, Ernest (1983), Nations and Nationalism (New York, USA: Cornell University Press).
• Gellner, Ernest (2008), Nations and Nationalism (Second Edition) (New York, USA: Cornell University Press).
• Glaser, Charles L. (2010), Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation (NJ: Princeton University Press).
• Goutron, J.C. (1997), Droit Européen (8th Edition) (Paris: Mementos Dalloz).
• Haas, Ernst B. (1958), The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
• Habermas, Jürgen (2003), “Toward a Cosmopolitan Europe”, Journal of Democracy, 14 (4): 86-100.
• Hernández-Morales, Aitor and Hanne Cokelaere (2024), “5 Things to Know About the EU Election Results”, https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-election-results-2024-things-to-know/ (30.07.2024).
• Hobsbawm, Eric J. (2012), Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Second Edition) (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
• Hodson, Dermot and U. Puetter (2019), “The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism and Integration Theory in the Post-Maastricht Period”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8): 1153–1171.
• Hoffman, Stanley (1982), “Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 21 (1): 21–38.
• Hoffmann, Stanley (1966), “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of The Nation-State and The Case of Western Europe”, Daedalus, 95 (3): 862–915.
• Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks (2019), “Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-first Century”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8): 1113–1133.
• House of Commons Library (2019), “European Parliament elections 2019: results and analysis”, https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8600/ (25.08.2024).
• Jaffrelot, Christophe (2003), "For a Theory of Nationalism", Centre d'études et de recherches internationales (CERI-Sciences Po/CNRS), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2290897 (25.08.2024).
• Jones, Robert A. (1996), The Politics and Economics of the European Union (Cambridge: Sheffield University Press).
• Joshua, Fishman A. (1938), “Nationality- Nationalism and Nation-Nationism”, Language Problems of Developing Nations, 39-51.
• Kahler, Miles and David A. Lake (2006), “Economic Integration and Global Governance: Why So Little Supranationalism?”, University of California, San Diego, Paper prepared for the Workshop on Explaining Global Regulation, University College, University of Oxford, 20-21 October 2006.
• Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph Nye (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown).
• Keohane, Robert O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton University Press).
• Kırilen, Gürhan (2018), “Origin of the Term Barbarian”, Doğu Asya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (1): 18-29.
• Kuhn, Theresa (2019), “Grand Theories of European Integration Revisited: Does Identity Politics Shape the Course of European Integration?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (8): 1213–1230.
• Leruth, Benhamin and Christopher Lord (2015), “Differentiated Integration in the European Union: A Concept, A Process, A System or A Theory?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (6): 754–763.
• Leuffen, Dirk, Berthold Rittberger, Frank Schimmelfennig (2022), Integration and Differentiation in the European Union: Theory and Policies (Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Malang, Thomas and Dominik Schraff (2023), “How Differentiated Integration Shapes the Constraining Dissensus”, Journal of European Public Policy, 1–29.
• Mann, Michael (1993), “Nation-States in Europe and Other Continents: Diversifying, Developing, Not Dying”, Daedalus, 122 (3): 115–140.
• Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1973), Manifesto of the Communist Party, The Revolutions of 1848 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
• McCarthy, Niall (2016), “The Rise of Nationalism Across Europe”, https://statista.com/chart/4901/the-rise-of-nationalism-across-europe/ (27.08.2024).
• McGowan, Lee (2007), “Theorising European Integration: Revisiting Neofunctionalism and Testing Its Suitability for Explaining the Development of EC Competition Policy?”, European Integration Online Papers, EIOP: 1-17.
• Mitrany, David (1966), A Working Peace System (Chicago: Quadrangle Books).
• Moravcsik, Andrew and Frank Schimmelfennig (2019), “Liberal Intergovernmentalism”, Wiener/Börzel/Risse (Eds.), European Integration Theory (Third Edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
• Moravcsik, Andrew (1998), The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca (New York: Cornell University Press).
• Moussis, Nicholas (2001), Access to European Union: Law, Economics, Policies (European Study Service, 10th Edition).
• Niemann, Arne and Ioannou, Demosthenes (2015), “European Economic Integration in Times of Crisis: A Case of Neofunctionalism?”, Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (2): 196–218.
• Nikolov, Krassen (2024), “Bulgarians Support EU Membership but Express Growing Scepticism Towards EU Policies”, https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/bulgarians-support-eu-membership-but-express-growing-scepticism-towards-eu-policies/ (25.08.2024).
• Nugent, Neil (2003), Government and Politics of the European Union (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Nugent, Neil (2010), The Government and Politics of the European Union (7th edition) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Obydenkova, Anastasia (2011), “Comparative Regionalism: Eurasian Cooperation and European Integration: The Case for Neofunctionalism?”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2: 87–102.
• Olasupo, Olusola, Isaac Olayide Oladeji and E.O.C. Ijeoma (2017), “Nationalism and Nationalist Agitation in Africa: The Nigerian Trajectory”, Rev Black Polit Econ, 44: 261–283.
• Orwell, George (1945), “Notes on Nationalism”, https://orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/notes-on-nationalism/ (22.07.2024).
• Pew Research Center (2019), “The European Union”, https://pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/ (25.08.2024).
• Rieffer, Barbara Ann J. (2003), “Religion and Nationalism Understanding the Consequences of a Complex Relationship”, Ethnicities, 3 (2): 215–242.
• Risse, Thomas (2005), “Neofunctionalism, European Identity, and the Puzzles of European Integration”, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:2: 291-309.
• Rollo, W. M. (1937), “Nationalism and Internationalism in the Ancient World. Greece & Rome”, 6 (18): 130–143.
• Rosamond, Ben (2005), “The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas”, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (2): 237-254.
• Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1968), On the Social Contract (London: Penguin).
• Rozenkranz, Suzan (2013), “‘To Hold the World in Contempt’: The British Empire, War, and the Irish and Indian Nationalist Press, 1899-1914” (Florida International University, FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 895).
• Ruszkowski, Janusz (2010), “Supranationalism as a Challenge for the European Union in the Globalized World”, Reality of Politics, 1: 186-200.
• Sandholtz, Wayne and Alec Stone-Sweet (1998), European Integration and Supranational Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
• Schimmelfennig, Frank (2015), “Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy”, 22 (2): 177–195.
• Schmidt, Brian C. and Colin Wight (2023), “Rationalism and the ‘Rational Actor Assumption’ in Realist International Relations Theory”, Journal of International Political Theory, 19 (2): 158-182.
• Schmitter, Philippe C. (2004), “Neo-Neofunctionalism”, Wiener, Antje and Thomas Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
• Smith, Anthony D. (2009), Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach (London, UK, Routledge).
• Statista, (2024), “Share of Respondents Agreeing or Disagreeing That Their Country Could Face the Future Better Outside of The European Union in 2023”, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1360467/euroscepticism-europeans-future-leave-eu/ (25.08.2024).
• Sweet, Alec Stone and Wayne Sandholtz (1997), “European Integration and Supranational Governance”, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (3): 297–317.
• Szczerbiak, Aleks and Paul Taggart (2024), “Euroscepticism and Anti-establishment Parties in Europe”, Journal of European Integration: 1-21.
• Tok, Nafiz (2002), “Nationalism, State and Cultural Survival”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57 (2): 161-183.
• Tsebelis, George (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (US: Princeton University Press).
• Tsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett (2001), “The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union”, International Organization, 55 (2): 357-390.
• Verdun, Amy. C. (2020), “Intergovernmentalism: Old, Liberal, and New”, Laursen, F. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedias (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
• Waltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
• Zaharia, Virginia and Veronica Pozneacova (2020), “Intergovernmentalism in the Actual Organization of EU”, Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences and European Studies, 6 (2): 47-61.
• Zhelyazkova, Asya, Eva Thomann, Eva Ruffing and Sebastiaan Princen (2023), “Differentiated Policy Implementation in the European Union”, West European Politics, 47 (3): 439–465.