Araştırma Makalesi

Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 30 Ekim 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts

Öz

This article investigates how jus post bellum can be adapted to the realities of non-international armed conflicts (NIACs), which dominate contemporary conflict yet remain normatively underdeveloped. Existing debates—whether moral, legal, or interpretive—have largely focused on interstate wars, providing limited guidance for NIACs marked by fragmented authority, weak institutions, and recurrent violence. To address this gap, the article develops a context-sensitive normative framework that builds on, but moves beyond, existing models in the literature. It argues that post-conflict transitions in NIACs demand attention to the sequencing and interplay of three core dimensions—establishing order, pursuing justice, and fostering reconciliation—while remaining sensitive to specificities of each context. In this way, the article extends jus post bellum’s scope, advancing it as a principled yet adaptable normative compass for guiding post-conflict transitions in NIACs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Jus Post Bellum, Non-international Armed Conflicts (NIACs), Post-Conflict Transitions, Peacebuilding, Post-Conflict Justice

Kaynakça

  1. Accord (2018), “Post-conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Sri Lanka”, https://accord.org.za/conflict-trends/post-conflict-reconstruction-and-reconciliation-in-rwanda-and-sri-lanka/ (30.05.2025).
  2. Barma, Naazneen H. (2017), The peacebuilding puzzle: Political order in post-conflict states (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  3. Bartels, Rogier (2014), “From jus in bello to jus post bellum: When do non-international armed conflicts end?”, Stahn, Carsten, Easterday, Jennifer S., and Iverson, Jens (Eds.), Jus post bellum: Mapping the normative foundations (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 297-314.
  4. Bass, Gary J. (2004), “Jus post bellum”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32 (4): 384-412.
  5. Bassiouni, M. Cherif and Daniel Rothenberg (2007), “Facing atrocity: The importance of guiding principles on post-conflict justice”, The Chicago Principles on Post-Conflict Justice, https://concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/to/213.pdf (21.04.2025).
  6. Bell, Christine (2008), On the law of peace: Peace agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  7. Bloomfield, David, Teresa Barnes and Luc Huyse (2003), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), https://idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/reconciliation-after-violent-conflict-handbook.pdf (21.08.2025).
  8. Boon, Kristen E. (2014), “The application of jus post bellum in non-international armed conflicts”, Stahn, Carsten, Easterday, Jennifer S., and Iverson, Jens (Eds.), Jus post bellum: Mapping the normative foundation (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 259-268.
  9. Caplan, Richard (2000), “Assessing the Dayton Accord: The Structural Weaknesses of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Diplomacy & Statecraft 11 (2): 213–232.
  10. Chetail, Vincent (2009), “Introduction: Post-conflict peacebuilding - ambiguity and identity”, Chetail, Vincent (Ed.), Post-Conflict Peace-Building: A Lexicon (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 1-33.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Taştemel Kapucu, V., & Gözen Ercan, P. (2025). Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts. Alternatif Politika, 17(3), 814-839. https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2025.29
AMA
1.Taştemel Kapucu V, Gözen Ercan P. Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts. Altern. Polit. 2025;17(3):814-839. doi:10.53376/ap.2025.29
Chicago
Taştemel Kapucu, Vildan, ve Pınar Gözen Ercan. 2025. “Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts”. Alternatif Politika 17 (3): 814-39. https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2025.29.
EndNote
Taştemel Kapucu V, Gözen Ercan P (01 Ekim 2025) Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts. Alternatif Politika 17 3 814–839.
IEEE
[1]V. Taştemel Kapucu ve P. Gözen Ercan, “Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts”, Altern. Polit., c. 17, sy 3, ss. 814–839, Eki. 2025, doi: 10.53376/ap.2025.29.
ISNAD
Taştemel Kapucu, Vildan - Gözen Ercan, Pınar. “Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts”. Alternatif Politika 17/3 (01 Ekim 2025): 814-839. https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2025.29.
JAMA
1.Taştemel Kapucu V, Gözen Ercan P. Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts. Altern. Polit. 2025;17:814–839.
MLA
Taştemel Kapucu, Vildan, ve Pınar Gözen Ercan. “Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts”. Alternatif Politika, c. 17, sy 3, Ekim 2025, ss. 814-39, doi:10.53376/ap.2025.29.
Vancouver
1.Vildan Taştemel Kapucu, Pınar Gözen Ercan. Jus Post Bellum as a Normative Framework for Non-International Armed Conflicts. Altern. Polit. 01 Ekim 2025;17(3):814-39. doi:10.53376/ap.2025.29