İnanç, Devlete Bağlılık ve Ekonomik Yoksunluğun Kesişim Noktası: 19. Yüzyıl Batı Avrupa'sında Hıristiyan Demokrat Sendikalar

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 612 - 640, 09.10.2022

Başak Taraktaş

https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2022.21

Öz

İşçi ve çiftçi Hıristiyan demokrat sendikaları (HDS) neden bazı Batı Avrupa ülkelerinde diğerlerine göre daha fazla gelişme gösterdi? Marksist teoriler, sendikal faaliyetleri sanayileşme ile açıklar. Bununla birlikte, HDS’lerin en aktif oldukları devletler 19. yüzyılın sonlarında İtalya ve Almanya gibi hızla sanayileşen devletler değildi. Bu makale, sosyal kimlik teorisini ve Lipset & Rokkan'ın bölünme teorisine dayanarak, Alman, Fransız, İtalyan, Hollanda ve Belçika vakaları üzerinde süreç izleme yöntemi kullanarak aşağıdaki argümanı test eder: kilise karşıtı saldırıların bir merkez-çevre çatışmasına yol açtığı devletlerde HDS’lerin organizasyonel olarak aktif olabilmeleri daha olasıyken, kilise karşıtı saldırıların kilise-devlet çatışmasına yol açtığı devletlerde HDS’lerin önemli bir güç elde etmesi daha az olasıdır. Öte yandan, devlette Katolik bir azınlığın varlığı da bu ilişkiyi etkiler. Protestanların çoğunluğu oluşturduğu devletlerde, Katoliklik, bireyleri harekete geçirmeyi ve grup içi uyumu sürdürmeyi kolaylaştırdı. Buna ek olarak, Lutheran devletlerin Katolik aktivizmine yönelik düşmanlığı ve Katolik azınlığın belli bölgelerde yoğunlaşmaları, HDS gelişimini hızlandıran mezhepsel farklılığı vurguladı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hıristiyan Demokrasi, Hıristiyan Demokrat Sendikalar, Bölünmeler, Sanayileşme, Mezhepsel Farklılıklar

At the Intersection of Faith, Allegiances Toward the State, and Economic Deprivation: The Case of the Christian Democratic Unions in 19th Century Western Europe

Öz

Why were Christian democratic unions (CDUs) among workers and farmers more proactive in some Western European states than in others? Marxist theories explain union activity by industrialization. However, CDUs were not the most active in the late 19th century in rapidly industrializing states, e.g., Italy and Germany. Using social identity theory and Lipset’s & Rokkan’s cleavage theory, this paper conducts process tracing on the German, French, Italian, Dutch, and Belgian cases to test the following argument: CDUs were more likely to develop in states where anticlerical attacks unleashed a center-periphery conflict. CDUs are less likely to expand in states where anticlerical attacks precipitated a church-state conflict. The presence of a Catholic minority moderated this relationship. In the Protestant-dominant states, Catholicism allowed for mobilizing individuals and maintaining cohesion. The Lutheran states’ hostility toward Catholic activism and the regional concentration of the minority accentuated this denominational difference, which catalyzed CDU development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Christian Democracy, Christian Democratic Unions, Cleavages, Industrialization, Denominational Differences

Kaynakça

• Adler, Franklin Hugh (1995), Italian Industrialists from Liberalism to Fascism: The Political Development of the Industrial Bourgeoisie, 1906–34 (1st Ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
• Agocs, Sandor (1988), The Troubled Origins of the Italian Catholic Labor Movement, 1878-1914 (1st Ed.) (Detroit: Wayne State Univ Press).
• Agulhon, Maurice (1993), The French Republic, 1879-1992 (Cambridge: B. Blackwell).
• Akan, Murat (2017), The Politics of Secularism: Religion, Diversity, and Institutional Change in France and Turkey (New York: Columbia University Press).
• Alexander, Robert (2004), Re-Writing the French Revolutionary Tradition: Liberal Opposition and the Fall of the Bourbon Monarchy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
• Almond, Gabriel A. (1948), “The Political Ideas of Christian Democracy”, The Journal of Politics, 10 (4): 734–763.
• Berger, Suzanne (1985), “Religious Transformation and the Future of Politics”, European Sociological Review, 1 (1): 23–45.
• Brady, Henry and David Collier (2004), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Rowman & Littlefield).
• Brady, Henry and David Collier (2010), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (2nd Ed.) (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
• Broadberry, Stephen, Giovanni Federico and Alexander Klein (2010), “Sectoral Developments, 1870-1914”, The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press): 60–83.
• Caruso, Amerigo (2019), “Joining Forces against ‘Strike Terrorism’: The Public-Private Interplay in Policing Strikes in Imperial Germany, 1890–1914”, European History Quarterly, 49 (4): 597–624.
• Cary, Noel (1996), The Path to Christian Democracy: German Catholics and the Party System from Windthorst to Adenauer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
• Coffey, Joan L. (1998), “The Aix Affair of 1891: A Turning Point in Church-State Relations before the Separation?”, French Historical Studies, 21 (4): 543.
• Cottereau, Alain (1986), “The Distinctiveness of Working-Class: 1848-1900”, Zolberg, Aristide R. and Ira Katznelson (Eds.), Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press): 111–154.
• Crouzet, François (1996), “France”, Teich, Mikulas and Roy Porter (Eds.), The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 36–64.
• Damberg, Wilhelm, Claudia Hiepel and Alfredo Canavero (2005), “The Formation of Christian Working-Class Organizations in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands (1840s-1920s)”, van Voss, Lex Heerma, Patrick Pasture and Jan de Maeyer (Eds.), Between Cross and Class: Comparative Histories of Christian Labour in Europe 1840-2000 (Bern: Peter Lang): 49–127.
• Daudin, Guillaume, Matthias Morys and Kevin H. O’Rourke (2010), “Globalization: 1870-1914”, Broadberry, Stephen and Kevin H. O'Rourke (Eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press): 5-29.
• Delbreil, Jean-Claude (1990), Centrisme et démocratie chrétienne en France: Le parti démocrate populaire, des origines au MRP (1919-1944) (Publications de la Sorbonne).
• Diedrickx, Guido (1994), “Christian Democracy and Its Ideological Rivals”, Hanley, David (Ed.), Christian Democracy in Europe: A Comparative Perspective (London: Pinter): 15–31.
• Dill, Marshall (1953), “The Christian Trades Union Movement in Germany Before World War I”, Review of Social Economy, 11 (1): 70–86.
• Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), “Corporatism (Ideology)”, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/138442/corporatism (19.03.2013).
• Erk, Jan (2005), “Sub-State Nationalism and the Left-Right Divide: Critical Junctures in the Formation of Nationalist Labour Movements in Belgium”, Nations and Nationalism, 11 (4): 551–570.
• Evans, Ellen Lovell (1999), The Cross and the Ballot: Catholic Political Parties in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands, 1785-1985 (Boston, MA: Humanities Press).
• Fanning, Bryan (2021), Three Roads to the Welfare State: Liberalism, Social Democracy and Christian Democracy (Bristol: Policy Press).
• Fioretos, Karl Orfeo, Tulia Gabriela Falleti and Adam D. Sheingate (Eds.) (2016), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (1st Ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
• Fogarty, Michael Patrick (1957), Christian Democracy in Western Europe, 1820-1953 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
• George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press).
• Gérard, Emmanuel and Paul Wynants (1994), Histoire du mouvement ouvrier chrétien en Belgique (Leuven: Leuven University Press).
• Gourevitch, Peter Alexis (1977), “International Trade, Domestic Coalitions, and Liberty: Comparative Responses to the Crisis of 1873-1896”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 8 (2): 281-313.
• Habisch, André (2017), “Practical Wisdom for Social Innovation. How Christian Entrepreneurs Triggered the Emergence of the Catholic Social Tradition in Europe”, Backhaus, Jürgen, Günther Chaloupek, and Hans A. Frambach (Eds.), On the Economic Significance of the Catholic Social Doctrine (Cham: Springer International Publishing): 167–190.
• Hastings, Adrian, Alistair Mason and Hugh Pyper (2000), The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought (Oxford University Press).
• Hechter, Michael (2004), “From Class to Culture”, American Journal of Sociology, 110 (2): 400–445.
• Heerma van Voss, Lex, Patrick Pasture and Jan de Maeyer (Eds.) (2005), Between Cross and Class: Comparative Histories of Christian Labour in Europe, 1840-2000 (Bern: Peter Lang).
• Howell, Chris (2009), “The Transformation of French Industrial Relations: Labor Representation and the State in a Post-Dirigiste Era”, Politics & Society, 37 (2): 229–256.
• Irving, Ronald Eckford Mill (1980), The Christian Democratic Parties of Western Europe (London: Routledge).
• Kaelble, Hartmut (1976), “Social Stratification in Germany in the 19th and 20th Centuries: A Survey of Research since 1945”, Journal of Social History, 10 (2): 144–165.
• Kaiser, Wolfram (2007), Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
• Kaiser, Wolfram and Helmut Wohnout (2004), Political Catholicism in Europe, 1918-1945 (London: Routledge).
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. (1996), The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. (1998), “From Pulpit to Party: Party Formation and the Christian Democratic Phenomenon”, Comparative Politics, 30 (3): 293.
• Kalyvas, Stathis N. and Kees van Kersbergen (2010), “Christian Democracy”, Annual Review of Political Science, 13 (1): 183–209.
• Katznelson, Ira and Aristide R. Zolberg (1986), Working-Class Formation: Ninteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
• Leonardi, Andrea (2006), “Italian Credit Cooperatives between Expansion and Retrenchment: 1883–1945”, International Economic History Congress, Session, 2006, http://www.helsinki.fi/iehc2006/papers2/Leonardi.pdf (15.03.2013).
• Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (Free Press).
• Löffler, Klemens (1912), “Burghard Freiherr von Schorlemer-Alst”, The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company).
• Luebbert, Gregory M. (1991), Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe (Oxford University Press).
• Maddison, Angus (2006), The World Economy (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/book/9789264022621-en (14.03.2013).
• Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1906), Manifesto of the Communist Party (Chicago: C. H. Kerr & Company).
• Masiero, Eleonora (2020), “Accountability by the Accountable Self: The Case of Leone Wollemborg”, Accounting History, 25 (1): 109–133.
• Mergel, Thomas (1996), “Ultramontanism, Liberalism, Moderation: Political Mentalities and Political Behavior of the German Catholic Bürgertum, 1848-1914”, Central European History, 29 (2): 151–174.
• Mich, Marvin L. Krier (1998), Catholic Social Teaching and Movements (Mystic: Twenty Third Publications).
• Palamar, Jasmin (2018), Beyond Pillarization. A Political-Economic Perspective on the Protestant Worker’s Association Patrimonium, 1890-1911 (Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht).
• Patch, William L. (1985), Christian Trade Unions in the Weimar Republic, 1918-1933: The Failure of Corporate Pluralism (New Haven: Yale University Press).
• Paterson, John L. (2001), “Institutional Organization, Stewardship, and Religious Resistance to Modern Agricultural Trends: The Christian Farmers’ Movement in the Netherlands and in Canada”, Agricultural History, 75 (3): 308.
• Pauwels, Henri (1946), “The Christian Trade-Union Movement”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 247 (1): 56–61.
• Peeters, Ruben (2020), “Getting a Foot in the Door: Small-Firm Credit and Interest Group Politics in the Netherlands, 1900–1927”, Enterprise & Society, 23 (2): 1–37.
• PIUS IX (1864), “The Syllabus of Errors”, http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm (19.03.2013).
• Plater, Charles D. (Charles Dominic) (1914), The Priest and Social Action (London: Longmans, Green and co).
• Poggi, Gianfranco (1967), Catholic Action in Italy: The Sociology of a Sponsored Organization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
• Polanyi, Karl (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press).
• Poni, Carlo and Giorgio Mori (1996), “Italy in the Longue Duree”, Teich, Mikulas and Roy Porter (Eds.), The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA (Cambridge University Press): 149-183.
• Prinz, Michael (2002), “German Rural Cooperatives, Friedrich-Wilhelm Raiffeisen and the Organization of Trust”,.
• Richard, Henry (1877), “The Relations of the Temporal & Spiritual Power in the Different Nations of Europe”, (London). http://www.jstor.org/stable/60228692.
• Robinson, Alan David (Ed.) (1961), “Agricultural Organisations in the Netherlands”, Dutch Organised Agriculture in International Politics (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands): 53–69.
• Rosanvallon, Pierre (2007), The Demands of Liberty: Civil Society in France since the Revolution (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).
• Rosanvallon, Pierre (2011), La societe des egaux SEUIL edition. (Paris: Seuil).
• Sengers, Erik (2004), “‘Although We Are Catholic, We Are Dutch’—The Transition of the Dutch Catholic Church from Sect to Church as an Explanation for Its Growth and Decline”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43 (1): 129–139.
• Sewell, William H. (1986), “Artisans, Factory Workers, and the Formation of the French Working Class, 1789-1848”, Zolberg, Aristide R. and Ira Katznelson (Eds.), Working-Class Formation Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press): 45–71.
• Silver, Beverly J. (2003), Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870 (Cambridge University Press).
• Smith, Helmut Walser (2016), German Nationalism and Religious Conflict Culture, Ideology, Politics, 1870-1914. (Princeton; Ewing: Princeton University Press California Princeton Fulfillment Services [Distributor). http://ezproxy.canterbury.ac.nz/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7zv7xg (13.04.2022).
• Strikwerda, Carl (1997), A House Divided: Catholics, Socialists, and Flemish Nationalists in Nineteenth Century Belgium (Rowman & Littlefield).
• Tajfel, Henri and John C. Turner (2004), The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior Political psychology: Key readings) (New York, NY, US: Psychology Press).
• Thorpe, Wayne (2001), “The European Syndicalists and War, 1914-1918”, Contemporary European History, 10 (1): 1–24.
• Turmann, Max (1899), Au sortir de l’école: les patronages: avec une lettre-préface de S. Émile Cardinal Lecot (V. Lecoffre). http://archive.org/details/ausortirdelcole00turmgoog (15.03.2013).
• Van Der Wee, Herman (1996), “The Industrial Revolution in Belgium”, Teich, Mikulas and Roy Porter (Eds.), The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA (Cambridge University Press): 64-77.
• van Kersbergen, Kees (1995), Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State (London: Routledge).
• Wills, Lode (1998), “The Two Belgian Revolutions”, Deprez, Kas and Louis Vos (Eds.), Nationalism in Belgium: Shifting Identities, 1780-1995 (Palgrave Macmillan): 33–51.
• Wright, Erik Olin (1996), Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
• Yonke, Eric (2002), “The Problem of the Middle Class in German Catholic History: The Nineteenth-Century Rhineland Revisited”, The Catholic Historical Review, 88 (2): 263–280.
• Zimmerman, Andrew (2011), “Race and World Politics: Germany in the Age of Imperialism, 1878-1914”, Smith, W. Helmut (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History (Oxford University Press): 359–377.