New Conflicts, New Orientalists: How Military Theorists Reproduced Orientalism in Twenty-First Century

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 205 - 227, 30.06.2024

Hasan Deniz Pekşen

https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2024.08

Öz

Efforts to understand the twenty-first century conflicts have led to the appearance of many unconventional studies. While many analyze the new conflicts as the method of the “weak”, others analyzed twenty-first century conflicts as the method of specific “cultures.” In this study, it is argued that many military theorists, who use the cultural analysis of new conflicts, also reproduce new forms of orientalism. Based on this argument, the study questions whether the orientalist discourse used in these works maintains continuity with the classical orientalist discourse or creates a new one specific to the twenty-first century. To answer that, first, drawing on Edward Said's and Patrick Porter’s works, classical orientalism is outlined. Then, to make the comparison, neo-orientalist theses regarding the continuity of colonialist and Euro-Centric perspectives are examined. Finally, selected texts and expressions from Counterinsurgency and Fourth Generation Warfare literatures are analyzed. As a result, it is concluded that these studies reproduce Orientalism and there is a continuity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Orientalism, Military Orientalism, Neo-Orientalism, 21st Century Wars, New Conflicts

Yeni Çatışmalar, Yeni Oryantalistler: Askeri Teorisyenler Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Oryantalizmi Nasıl Yeniden Ürettiler?

Öz

Yirmi birinci yüzyılın çatışmalarını anlama çabaları, birçok geleneksel olmayan çalışmanın ortaya çıkmasını beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu çalışmaların birçoğu yeni çatışmaları “zayıfların” yöntemi olarak analiz ederken, diğerleri yirmi birinci yüzyıl çatışmalarını belirli “kültürlerin” yöntemi olarak analiz etmiştir. Bu çalışmada, yeni çatışmaların kültürel analizini kullanan birçok askeri teorisyenin aynı zamanda oryantalist söylemi yeniden ürettiği savunulmaktadır. Bu savdan hareketle, bu çalışma, söz konusu çalışmalarda kullanılan oryantalist söylemin klasik oryantalist söylemle süreklilik mi içerdiğini, yoksa yirmi birinci yüzyıla özgü yeni bir söylem mi oluşturduğunu sorgulamaktadır. Bunu yanıtlamak için öncelikle, Edward Said'in ve Patrick Porter’in eserlerinden yararlanılarak klasik oryantalizmin öncülleri ortaya konulmuştur. Ardından, karşılaştırma yapabilmek için, sömürgeci ve Avrupa merkezci bakış açılarının sürekliliği perspektifinden neo-oryantalizm tezleri incelmiştir. Son olarak, Ayaklanma Karşıtı Mücadele ve Dördüncü Nesil Savaş literatürlerinden seçilmiş metinler ve ifadeler analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmaların oryantalizmi yeniden ürettiği ve bir süreklilik olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Oryantalizm, Askeri Oryantalizm, Neo-Oryantalizm, 21. Yüzyıl Savaşları, Yeni Çatışmalar

Kaynakça

• Akad, Tanju (2015), Tarihten Bugüne Gayrı Nizami Savaş (Istanbul: Kastaş Yayınevi).
• Barkawi, Tarak and Keith Stanski (2012), Orientalism and War (London: Hurst & Co).
• Bousquet, George Henry and Joseph Schacht (1957), Selected Works of C. Snouck Hurgronje (Leiden: E.J.Brill).
• Camous, Thierry (2011), Doğular Batılar: Yirmi Beş Asırlık Savaş (Istanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat) (translated to Turkish by Hande Güreli).
• Cassidy, Robert (2006), Counterinsurgency and the Global War on Terror: Military Culture and Irregular War (Standford: Standford University Press).
• Echevarria II, Antulio Joseph (2005), Fourth Generation War and Other Myths (Michigan: University of Michigan Library).
• Filkins, Dexter (2003), “A Region Inflamed: Strategy Tough New Tactics by US Tighten Grip on Iraqi Towns”, https://nytimes.com/2003/12/07/world/a-region-inflamed-strategy-tough-new-tactics-by-us-tighten-grip-on-iraq-towns.html (15.06.2023).
• Friedman, George (2005), America’s Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between the United States and Its Enemies (New York: Broadway Books).
• Friedman, Lawrence (2017), Strateji (Istanbul: Alfa Yayınları) (translated to Turkish by Belkıs Çorapçı Dişbudak and Taciser Belge).
• Gann, Lewis Henry (1971), Guerillas in History (Standford: Hoover Institute Press).
• Gregory, Derek (2012), “Dis/Ordering the Orient: Scopic Regimes and Modern War”, Barkawi, Tarak and Stanski Keith (Eds.), Orientalism and War (London: Hurst & Co): 151-175.
• Hammes, Thomas (2006), The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century (Minneapolis: MBI).
• Hashim, Ahmed Salah (2019), “Military Orientalism: Middle East Ways of War”, Middle East Policy, 26 (2): 31-47.
• Havard, Strand et al. (2019), “Trends in Armed Conflict: 1946-2018”, https://www.prio.org/publications/11349 (21.06.2023).
• Hunt, David (2010), “Dirty Wars: Counterinsurgency in Vietnam and Today”, Politics & Society, 38 (1): 35-66.
• Huntington, Samuel (1993), “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs, 72 (3): 22-49.
• Huntington, Samuel (1994), “Demokrasinin Yönetilemezliği”, Avrasya Dosyası, 1 (2): 118-132.
• Huntington, Samuel (1997), “The Erosion of American National Interests”, Foreign Affairs, 76 (5): 28-49.
• Johnsen, Gregory (2007), “Securing Yemen's Cooperation in the Second Phase of the War on Al-Qa'ida”, CTC Sentinel, 1 (1): 14-15.
• Johnson, Thomas and Chris Mason (2007), “Understanding the Taliban and Insurgency in Afghanistan”, Orbis, 51 (1): 71-89.
• Kaldor, Mary (1999), New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (London: Polity).
• Kaplan, Robert (2000), The Coming of Anarchy (New York: Random House).
• Keegan, John (1993), A History of Warfare (New York: Vintage Books).
• Keegan, John (2001), “In This War of Civilizations the West Will Prevail”, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/4266179/In-this-war-of-civilisations-the-West-will-prevail.html (18.03.2023).
• Khalid, Maryam (2017), Gender, Orientalism and the ‘War on Terror’ (New York: Routledge).
• Kilcullen, David (2006), “Counter-insurgency Redux”, Survival, 48 (4): 111-130.
• Kilcullen, David (2010), Counterinsurgency (London: Hurst and Co).
• Kitzen, Martijn (2020), “Operations in Irregular Warfare”, Sookermany, Anders (Ed.), Handbook of Military Sciences (New York: Springer).
• Klein, Christina (2003), Cold War Orientalism: Asia in the Middlebrow Imagination, 1945–1961 (Berkeley: University of California Press).
• Krepinevic, Andrew (1994), “Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions”, The National Interest, 37: 30-42.
• Lind, William (1985), “A Doubtful Revolution”, Issues in Science and Technology, 1 (3): 108-112.
• Lind, William (1991), “Defending Western Culture” Foreign Policy, 84: 40-50.
• Lind, William (2001), Phantom Soldier: The Enemy’s Answer to US Firepower (Emerald Isle: Posterity Press).
• Lind, William (2004), “Understanding Fourth Generation War”, Military Review, 84 (5): 12-16.
• Lind, William (2014), On War: The Collected Columns of William S. Lind (Washington: Castalia House).
• Lind, William et al. (1989), “The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation”, Marine Corps Gazette, 73 (10): 22-26.
• Magdoff, Harry (1974), Colonialism (1763-1970) (Encylopedia Britannica).
• Marston, Daniel and Carter Malkasian (2008), Counterinsurgency in Modern Warfare (Oxford: Osprey).
• Mcfate, Montgomery (2005), “The Military Utility of Understanding Adversary Culture”, Joint Force Quarterly, 38: 42-48.
• Münkler, Herfried (2004), The New Wars (translated to English by Patrick Camiller) (London: Polity).
• NATO (2011), “Allied Joint Doctrine for Counterinsurgency (COIN)”, https://info.publicintelligence.net/NATO-Counterinsurgency.pdf (15.02.2023).
• Pedahzur, Ami (2008), Suicide Terrorism (London: Polity).
• Petai, Raphael (2007), The Arab Mind (the revisited edition) (Arizona: Hatherlei Press).
• Porch, Douglas (2011) “The dangerous myths and dubious promise of COIN”, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 22 (2): 239-257.
• Porter, Patrick (2013), Military Orientalism: Eastern War Through Western Eyes (New York: Oxford University Press).
• Said, Edward (1978), “The Idea of Palestine in the West”, MERIP Reports, 70: 3-11.
• Said, Edward (1985), “Orientalism Reconsidered”, Cultural Critique, 1: 89-107.
• Said, Edward (1994), Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage Books).
• Said, Edward (2013), Oryantalizm: Batının Şark Anlayışları (Istanbul: Metis Yayınları) (translated by Berna Ülner).
• Samiei, Mohammad (2010), “Neo-Orientalism? The Relationship Between the West and Islam in Our Globalized World”, Third World Quarterly, 31 (7): 1145-1160.
• Sheldon, Rose Mary (2020), “Introduction”, Small Wars and Insurgencies, 31 (5): 931-955.
• Southern, Richard (1962), Western Views of Islam in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
• Spencer, Robert (2013), “The War on Terror and the Backlash against Orientalism”, Elmarsafy, Ziad, Anna Bernard and David Attwell (Eds.), Debating Orientalism (London: Palgrave Macmillan): 155-175.
• The Wall Street Journal (2001), “Crusade’ Reference Reinforces Fears War on Terrorism is Against Muslims”, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1001020294332922160 (17.03.2023).
• Thompson, Robert (1966), Defeating Communist Insurgency: Experiences in Malaya and Vietnam (London: Chatto & Windus Publishing).
• Toft, Ivan Arreguin (2001), “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflicts” International Security, 26 (1): 93-128.
• Tuastad, Dag (2003), “Neo-Orientalism and the New Barbarism Thesis: Aspects of Symbolic Violence in the Middle East Conflict(s)”, Third World Quarterly, 24 (4): 591-599.
• US Army/Marine Corps (2006), FM 3–24 Counterinsurgency Field Manual, Chicago.
• Van Creveld, Martin (2015), A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind (Washington: Castalia House).
• Von Grunebaum, Gustave (1964), Modern Islam: The Search for Cultural Identity (New York: Vintage Books).
• Weaver, Ole (1995), “Securitization and Desecuritization”, Lipschutz, Ronnie (Ed.), On Security (New York: Columbia University Press): 46-86.